Ex Parte Oklahoma, 220 U.S. 191 (1911) - USREPORTS-220-191 | Document in Context | GovInfo

Skip to main content

Ex Parte Oklahoma, 220 U.S. 191 (1911)

Category: Judicial Publications

Collection: United States Reports

Volume: 220

SuDoc Class Number: JU 6.8/1:220

Decision Date: April 3, 1911

Court Term: 1910

Reporter: Charles Henry Butler

United States Reports Citation: 220 U.S. 191 (1911)

Subjects (LLC): Jurisdiction and Venue; Oklahoma; Interstate Commerce; Alcoholic Beverages; Billups Bill; Prohibition; Intoxicating Liquors; Civil Procedure; Manufacturing; Search and Seizure; Goods and Services

Subjects (SCDB): Judicial Administration: Extraordinary Relief (e.g., Mandamus, Injunction); Judicial Power

Go to current document

View Entire Volume

Title Page

Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

Table of Contents

Table of Cases Cited in Opinions

Table of Statutes

Virginia v. West Virginia, 220 U.S. 1 (1911)

March 6, 1911.

United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. Co., 220 U.S. 37 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 45 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Matter of Eastern Cherokees, 220 U.S. 83 (1911)

March 20, 1911.

Taylor v. Leesnitzer, 220 U.S. 90 (1911)

March 20, 1911.

B. & O. Southwest'n R. R. v. United States, 220 U.S. 94 (1911)

March 20, 1911.

Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Eliot v. Freeman, 220 U.S. 178 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Zonne v. Minneapolis Syndicate, 220 U.S. 187 (1911)

March 13, 1911.

Ex Parte Oklahoma, 220 U.S. 191 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Ex Parte Oklahoma (No. 2), 220 U.S. 210 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Martinez v. Inter. Banking Corporation, 220 U.S. 214 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Perez v. Fernandez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Blanco v. Hubbard, 220 U.S. 233 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Int. Comm. Comm. V. Del., L. & W. R. R., 220 U.S. 235 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

United States v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 220 U.S. 257 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

United States v. Erie R. R. Co., 220 U.S. 275 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Oklahoma v. A., T. & Santa Fe RY, 220 U.S. 277 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Oklahoma v. Gulf, Col. & Santa Fe RY, 220 U.S. 290 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Oklahoma v. Chi., R. I. & Pac. RY, 220 U.S. 302 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Enriquez v. Go-Tiongco, 220 U.S. 307 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Arnett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

United States v. O'Brien, 220 U.S. 321 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Hills & Co. v. Hoover, 220 U.S. 329 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Gavieres v. United States, 220 U.S. 338 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Vilas v. Manila, 220 U.S. 345 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

West. Un. Tel. Co. v. Crovo, 220 U.S. 364 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911)

April 3, 1911.

Chi., B. & Q. RY. Co. v. Willard, 220 U.S. 413 (1911)

April 10, 1911.

Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consol. Tire Co., 220 U.S. 428 (1911)

April 10, 1911.

Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asph. Co., 220 U.S. 446 (1911)

April 10, 1911.

Shawnee Sewerage & Dr. Co. v. Stearns, 220 U.S. 462 (1911)

April 10, 1911.

J. W. Perry Co. v. Norfolk, 220 U.S. 472 (1911)

April 17, 1911.

The Sac and Fox Indians, 220 U.S. 481 (1911)

April 24, 1911.

Ripley v. United States, 220 U.S. 491 (1911)

April 24, 1911.

Sena v. American Turquoise Co., 220 U.S. 497 (1911)

May 1, 1911.

Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. Rhodes, 220 U.S. 502 (1911)

May 1, 1911.

United States v. Grimaud, 220 U.S. 506 (1911)

May 3, 1911.

Light v. United States, 220 U.S. 523 (1911)

May 1, 1911.

Ex Parte Metropolitan Water Co., 220 U.S. 539 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

United States v. Rimer, 220 U.S. 547 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

Wise v. Mills, 220 U.S. 549 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

Wise v. Henkel, 220 U.S. 556 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

C., B. & Q. RY v. United States, 220 U.S. 559 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

Delk v. St. Louis and San Francisco R. R., 220 U.S. 580 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

Schlemmer v. Buffalo &c. RY. Co., 220 U.S. 590 (1911)

May 15, 1911.

Opinions Per Curiam

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari

Cases Disposed of without Consideration by the Court

Index