So. Pacific Co. v. Interstate Comm. Comm., 219 U.S. 433 (1911) - USREPORTS-219-433 | Document in Context | GovInfo

Skip to main content

Start of main content

So. Pacific Co. v. Interstate Comm. Comm., 219 U.S. 433 (1911)

Category: Judicial Publications

Collection: United States Reports

Volume: 219

SuDoc Class Number: JU 6.8/1:219

Decision Date: February 20, 1911

Court Term: 1910

Reporter: Charles Henry Butler

United States Reports Citation: 219 U.S. 433 (1911)

Subjects (LLC): Motor Carriers; Interstate Commerce; Equitable Estoppel; Railroads; Liability; Commercial Law; Forests and Timber; Transportation Costs; Commerce; Mootness

Subjects (SCDB): Federal Or State Regulation of Transportation Regulation: Railroad; Economic Activity

Go to current document

View Entire Volume

Title Page

Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

Tribute

Contents

Table of Cases

Table of Statutes

United States v. Press Publishing Co., 219 U.S. 1 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Atlantic, Gulf &c. Co. v. Philippine Islands, 219 U.S. 17 (1910)

December 19, 1910.

Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Crane Co., 219 U.S. 24 (1910)

December 19, 1910.

Mobile, J. & K. C. R. R. v. Turnipseed, 219 U.S. 35 (1910)

December 19, 1910.

Herencia v. Guzman, 219 U.S. 44 (1910)

December 19, 1910.

American Land Co. v. Zeiss, 219 U.S. 47 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

United States v. Barber, 219 U.S. 72 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Hendrix v. United States, 219 U.S. 79 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

West Side R. R. Co. v. Pittsburgh Con. Co., 219 U.S. 92 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U.S. 104 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Shallenberger v. First State Bank, 219 U.S. 114 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Assaria State Bank v. Dolley, 219 U.S. 121 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U.S. 140 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Spokane &c. RY. V. Wash. & GT. Nor. RY., 219 U.S. 166 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. Hagg, 219 U.S. 175 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

United States v. Grizzard, 219 U.S. 180 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U.S. 186 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Matter of Gregory, 219 U.S. 210 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

Bailey v. State of Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

United States v. Chamberlin, 219 U.S. 250 (1911)

January 3, 1911.

House v. Mayes, 219 U.S. 270 (1911)

January 9, 1911.

Brodnax v. Missouri, 219 U.S. 285 (1911)

January 9, 1911.

Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296 (1911)

January 9, 1911.

German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Hale, 219 U.S. 307 (1911)

January 16, 1911.

William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Waterhouse, 219 U.S. 320 (1911)

January 16, 1911.

Sexton v. Dreyfus, 219 U.S. 339 (1911)

January 23, 1911.

Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 (1911)

January 23, 1911.

Ex Parte Harding, 219 U.S. 363 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Weyerhaeuser v. Hoyt, 219 U.S. 380 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Campbell v. Weyerhaeuser, 219 U.S. 424 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Northern Pacific RY. Co. v. Wass, 219 U.S. 426 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

So. Pacific Co. v. Interstate Comm. Comm., 219 U.S. 433 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Chicago, R. I. & Pac. RY. Co. v. Arkansas, 219 U.S. 453 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Lousiville and Nashville R. R. v. Mottley, 219 U.S. 467 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Chicago, Ind. & L. RY. Co. v. United States, 219 U.S. 486 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

So. Pac, Terminal Co. v. Int. Comm. Comm., 219 U.S. 498 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Merrimack River Sav. Bk. v. Clay Center, 219 U.S. 527 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Roughton v. Knight, 219 U.S. 537 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Chicago, B. and Quincy R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U.S. 549 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U.S. 575 (1911)

February 20, 1911.

Buck's Stove &c. Co. v. Am. Fed. of Labor, 219 U.S. 581 (1911)

January 27, 1911.

Opinions Per Curiam

Decisions on Petitions

Cases Disposed of without Consideration by the Court

Index