Rio Grande Dam &c. Co. v. United States, 215 U.S. 266 (1909) - USREPORTS-215-266 | Document in Context | GovInfo

Skip to main content

Rio Grande Dam &c. Co. v. United States, 215 U.S. 266 (1909)

Category: Judicial Publications

Collection: United States Reports

Volume: 215

SuDoc Class Number: JU 6.8/1:215

Decision Date: December 13, 1909

Court Term: 1909

Reporter: Charles Henry Butler

United States Reports Citation: 215 U.S. 266 (1909)

Subjects (LLC): Judicial Powers; Dams and Canals; Public Contracts and Procurement; Rio Grande River; Injunctions; Rivers and Waterways; Remedies; Civil Procedure; New Mexico Territory

Subjects (SCDB): Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules; Judicial Power

Go to current document

View Entire Volume

Title Page

Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

In Memoriam

Supreme Court of the United States

Table of Cases Reported

Table of Cases

Table of Statutes

Fall v. Eastin, 215 U.S. 1 (1909)

November 1, 1909.

Reavis v. Fianza, 215 U.S. 16 (1909)

November 1, 1909.

United States v. Mescall, 215 U.S. 26 (1909)

November 8, 1909.

Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank Co., 215 U.S. 33 (1909)

November 8, 1909.

United States v. Union Supply Co., 215 U.S. 50 (1909)

November 8, 1909.

Fleming v. McCurtain, 215 U.S. 56 (1909)

November 8, 1909.

Marbles v. Creecy, 215 U.S. 63 (1909)

November 15, 1909.

McGilvra v. Ross, 215 U.S. 70 (1909)

November 15, 1909.

Sylvester v. Washington, 215 U.S. 80 (1909)

November 15, 1909.

El Paso & N. E. Ry. V. Gutierrez, 215 U.S. 87 (1909)

November 15, 1909.

Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Stickney, 215 U.S. 98 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Hanover National Bank v. Suddath, 215 U.S. 110 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Hanover National Bank v. Suddath (No. 2), 215 U.S. 122 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Kenney v. Craven, 215 U.S. 125 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

The Steamship Jefferson, 215 U.S. 130 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Scully v. Squier, 215 U.S. 144 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Rumford Chem. Wks. V. Hygienic Chem. Co., 215 U.S. 156 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Steward v. American Lava Co., 215 U.S. 161 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Hubert v. New Orleans, 215 U.S. 170 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper, 215 U.S. 182 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

United States v. Stevenson, 215 U.S. 190 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

United States v. Stevenson (No. 2), 215 U.S. 200 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

Everett v. Everett, 215 U.S. 203 (1909)

November 29, 1909.

B. & O. R. R. v. Interstate Comm. Comm., 215 U.S. 216 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Southern Pacific Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U.S. 226 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Yordi v. Nolte, 215 U.S. 227 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

United States v. Corbett, 215 U.S. 233 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Lathrop, Shea & Co. v. Interior Constr'n Co., 215 U.S. 246 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven, 215 U.S. 252 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Snyder v. Rosenbaum, 215 U.S. 261 (1909)

December 6, 1909.

Rio Grande Dam &c. Co. v. United States, 215 U.S. 266 (1909)

December 13, 1909.

United States v. Celestine, 215 U.S. 278 (1909)

December 13, 1909.

United States v. Sutton, 215 U.S. 291 (1909)

December 20, 1909.

Santa Fé County v. Coler, 215 U.S. 296 (1909)

December 20, 1909.

Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Sheegog, 215 U.S. 308 (1909)

December 20, 1909.

Graves v. Ashburn, 215 U.S. 331 (1909)

December 20, 1909.

Scott County Road Co. v. Hines, 215 U.S. 336 (1909)

December 20, 1909.

First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U.S. 341 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co., 215 U.S. 349 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Henley v. Myers, 215 U.S. 373 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Harris, 215 U.S. 386 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Komada v. United States, 215 U.S. 392 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Tiglao v. Insular Government, 215 U.S. 410 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Minneapolis v. Street Railway Co., 215 U.S. 417 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Mechanical Appliance Co. v. Castleman, 215 U.S. 437 (1910)

January 3, 1910.

Haffner v. Dobrinski, 215 U.S. 446 (1910)

January 10, 1910.

Interstate Comm. Comm. v. Ill. Cent. R. R., 215 U.S. 452 (1909)

January 10, 1910.

Interstate Comm. Comm. v. Chicago &c. R. R., 215 U.S. 479 (1910)

January 10, 1910.

Balt. & Ohio R. R. v. Pitcairn Coal Co., 215 U.S. 481 (1910)

January 10, 1910.

Macon Grocery Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line, 215 U.S. 501 (1910)

January 17, 1910.

Flaherty v. Hanson, 215 U.S. 515 (1910)

January 17, 1910.

Brill v. Washington Ry. & Electric Co., 215 U.S. 527 (1910)

January 17, 1910.

Mankin v. Ludowici-Celadon Co., 215 U.S. 533 (1910)

January 17, 1910.

Old Nick Williams Co. v. United States, 215 U.S. 541 (1910)

January 24, 1910.

Wagg v. Herbert, 215 U.S. 546 (1910)

January 24, 1910.

Lowrey v. Hawaii, 215 U.S. 554 (1910)

January 24, 1910.

Per Curiam Opinions

MacKenzie v. MacKenzie, 215 U.S. 582 (1909)

1909.

Rand, McNally, and Company v. Kentucky, 215 U.S. 582 (1909)

1909.

Strong v. Gassert, 215 U.S. 583 (1909)

1909.

Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Company, 215 U.S. 584 (1909)

1909.

Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Company, 215 U.S. 584 (1909)

1909.

Jerome H. Remick and Company v. Stern, 215 U.S. 585 (1909)

1909.

North Carolina Mining Company v. Westfeldt, 215 U.S. 586 (1909)

1909.

Guaranty Trust Company v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)

1909.

Helvetia-Swiss Fire Insurance Company v. Brandenstein, 215 U.S. 588 (1909)

1909.

Kansas City Star Company v. Julian, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

1909.

Mills v. Johnson, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

1909.

Thomas v. Iowa, 215 U.S. 591 (1909)

1909.

Ex parte United States Consolidated Seeded Raisin Company, 215 U.S. 591 (1910)

1910.

Huston, Judge v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Haskell, Governor, 215 U.S. 592 (1910)

1910.

Perth Amboy Dry Dock Company v. Monmouth Steamboat Company, 215 U.S. 592 (1910)

1910.

Kenyon v. Fowler, Receiver of American Exchange National Bank of Syracuse, 215 U.S. 593 (1910)

1910.

Dyer v. City of Melrose, 215 U.S. 594 (1910)

1910.

Berger v. Tracy, 215 U.S. 594 (1910)

1910.

United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, 215 U.S. 595 (1910)

1910.

Decisions on Petitions

Cases Disposed of without Consideration by the Court

Cases Disposed of in Vacation

Index