Managed Healthcare Utilization Review; Health Insurance; Ordinary Care; Managed Care; Medicine and Ethics; Patients' Rights; Health Care Funding; Health Maintenance Organization (h.m.o.); Human Rights and Civil Liberties; Patient Care; Health; Treatment; Texas Health Care Liability Act; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Care; Insurance Law; Nongovernmental Organizations; Corporations and Associations; Employee Retirement Income Security Act of (e.r.i.s.a.); Diagnosis
Federal Pre-emption of State Legislation Or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does.; Federalism
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Aetna Health Inc., aka Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200 (2004).
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-542/USREPORTS-542-200.
APA
Aetna Health Inc., aka Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200 (2004).
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-542/USREPORTS-542-200.
MLA
United States, Supreme Court. Aetna Health Inc., aka Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Davila. United States Reports, vol. 542, 21 June 2004, p. 200. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-542/USREPORTS-542-200.
Bluebook
Aetna Health Inc., aka Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200 (2004).