CB Richard Ellis, Counter Claimant CB Richard Ellis Inc, Counter Claimant City Of Houston, Counter Claimant Harkrider Distributing Co, Counter Claimant Park Equipment Co Ltd, Counter Claimant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc, Counter Claimant Differential Development-1994 Ltd, Counter Defendant Dean Lee, Counter Defendant CB Richard Ellis, Cross Claimant Harkrider Distributing Co, Cross Claimant Park Equipment Co Ltd, Cross Claimant Euro General Construction Inc, Cross Defendant European Holdings Inc., Cross Defendant HP Ventures Ltd, Cross Defendant Harkrider Distributing Co, Cross Defendant Dean Lee, Cross Defendant Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc, Cross Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd, Cross Defendant RR Street & Company, Cross Defendant Safety-Kleen Services, Inc., Cross Defendant CB Commercial Real Estate Group Inc, Defendant CB Richard Ellis Inc, Defendant City Of Houston, Defendant Euro General Construction Inc, Defendant European Holdings Inc., Defendant Gulf States Laundry Machinery Co, Defendant HP Ventures Ltd, Defendant Harkrider Distributing Co, Defendant KSB Inc, Defendant Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc, Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd, Defendant RR Street & Company, Defendant Safety-Kleen Services, Inc., Defendant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc, Defendant Differential Management, Inc, Interested Party Harkrider Distribution Company, Interested Party KSB, Inc, Interested Party Differential Development-1994 Ltd, Plaintiff Dean Lee, Plaintiff Pro Cleaners, Plaintiff City Of Houston, Third Party Defendant Doans & Associates, Third Party Defendant Pilgrim Cleaners Inc, Third Party Defendant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc, Third Party Defendant Southwest Plumbing Co, Third Party Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd, ThirdParty Plaintiff
ORDER entered MOOTING 25 MOTION to Strike, MOOTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 62 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority, MOOTING 36 MOTION to Dismiss, DENYING 69 MOTION to Modify Hearing Date as to 63 Notice of Setting, MOOTING 28 MOTION for Leave to File to File Reply Brief.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, )
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 86 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, GRANTING Deft. Saftey Kleen's 89 MOTION to Dismiss and Original Answer and Counterclaims Subject to Rule 12 Motions, GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 54 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING Deft. Harkrider's 97 MOTION to Dismiss. Because this court declines to continue to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, those claims are dismissed, without prejudice. Order of dismissal entered by separateorder.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al, (S.D. Tex. 2007). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375.
APA
United States District Court Southern District of Texas. (2007, January 9). 05-3375 - Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375
MLA
United States District Court Southern District of Texas. 05-3375 - Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (9 Jan 2007), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375
Bluebook
Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al, (S.D. Tex. 2007), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375
