United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States District Court Southern District of Texas author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2014-03-12 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2007-01-09 monographic deposited born digital JU 4.15 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375 P0b002ee187cc7aac DGPO 2014-03-12 2014-03-12 USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375 District txsd 5th Texas 2483 4:05-cv-03375 Houston civil 893 Environmental Matters 42:9613 CERCLA 4:05-cv-03375 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375 JU 4.15 4:05-cv-03375;05-3375 United States District Court Southern District of Texas 5th Circuit Houston U.S. Courts author aut CB Richard Ellis CB Richard Ellis Counter Claimant CB Richard Ellis CB Richard Ellis Cross Claimant CB Commercial Real Estate Group Inc CB Commercial Real Estate Group Inc Defendant CB Richard Ellis Inc CB Richard Ellis Inc Counter Claimant CB Richard Ellis Inc CB Richard Ellis Inc Defendant City Of Houston City Of Houston Counter Claimant City Of Houston City Of Houston Defendant City Of Houston City Of Houston Third Party Defendant Differential Development-1994 Ltd Differential Development-1994 Ltd Counter Defendant Differential Development-1994 Ltd Differential Development-1994 Ltd Plaintiff Differential Management, Inc Differential Management, Inc Interested Party Doans & Associates Doans & Associates Third Party Defendant Euro General Construction Inc Euro General Construction Inc Cross Defendant Euro General Construction Inc Euro General Construction Inc Defendant European Holdings Inc. European Holdings Inc. Cross Defendant European Holdings Inc. European Holdings Inc. Defendant Gulf States Laundry Machinery Co Gulf States Laundry Machinery Co Defendant HP Ventures Ltd HP Ventures Ltd Cross Defendant HP Ventures Ltd HP Ventures Ltd Defendant Harkrider Distributing Co Harkrider Distributing Co Counter Claimant Harkrider Distributing Co Harkrider Distributing Co Cross Claimant Harkrider Distributing Co Harkrider Distributing Co Cross Defendant Harkrider Distributing Co Harkrider Distributing Co Defendant Harkrider Distribution Company Harkrider Distribution Company Interested Party KSB Inc KSB Inc Defendant KSB, Inc KSB, Inc Interested Party Dean Lee Lee Dean Counter Defendant Dean Lee Lee Dean Cross Defendant Dean Lee Lee Dean Plaintiff Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc Cross Defendant Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc Mondial Drycleaning Products Inc Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd Park Equipment Co Ltd Counter Claimant Park Equipment Co Ltd Park Equipment Co Ltd Cross Claimant Park Equipment Co Ltd Park Equipment Co Ltd Cross Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd Park Equipment Co Ltd Defendant Park Equipment Co Ltd Park Equipment Co Ltd ThirdParty Plaintiff Pilgrim Cleaners Inc Pilgrim Cleaners Inc Third Party Defendant Pro Cleaners Pro Cleaners Plaintiff RR Street & Company RR Street & Company Cross Defendant RR Street & Company RR Street & Company Defendant Safety-Kleen Services, Inc. Safety-Kleen Services, Inc. Cross Defendant Safety-Kleen Services, Inc. Safety-Kleen Services, Inc. Defendant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Counter Claimant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Defendant Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Safety-Kleen Systems Inc Third Party Defendant Southwest Plumbing Co Southwest Plumbing Co Third Party Defendant USCOURTS USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375 District txsd 5th Texas 2483 4:05-cv-03375 Houston civil 893 Environmental Matters 42:9613 CERCLA Texas ORDER entered MOOTING 25 MOTION to Strike, MOOTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 62 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority, MOOTING 36 MOTION to Dismiss, DENYING 69 MOTION to Modify Hearing Date as to 63 Notice of Setting, MOOTING 28 MOTION for Leave to File to File Reply Brief.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, ) 0 2006-09-11 D09002ee187d5dc47 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-0 txsd-4_05-cv-03375_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/pdf/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-0.pdf USCOURTS 4:05-cv-03375; Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al; United States District Court Southern District of Texas Texas USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-0 0 2006-09-11 ORDER entered MOOTING 25 MOTION to Strike, MOOTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 62 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority, MOOTING 36 MOTION to Dismiss, DENYING 69 MOTION to Modify Hearing Date as to 63 Notice of Setting, MOOTING 28 MOTION for Leave to File to File Reply Brief.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, ) MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 86 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, GRANTING Deft. Saftey Kleen's 89 MOTION to Dismiss and Original Answer and Counterclaims Subject to Rule 12 Motions, GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 54 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING Deft. Harkrider's 97 MOTION to Dismiss. Because this court declines to continue to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, those claims are dismissed, without prejudice. Order of dismissal entered by separate order.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, ) 1 2007-01-09 D09002ee187d5dc48 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-1 txsd-4_05-cv-03375_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375/pdf/USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-1.pdf USCOURTS 4:05-cv-03375; Differential Development-1994 Ltd et al v. HP Ventures Ltd et al; United States District Court Southern District of Texas Texas USCOURTS-txsd-4_05-cv-03375-1 1 2007-01-09 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 86 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, GRANTING Deft. Saftey Kleen's 89 MOTION to Dismiss and Original Answer and Counterclaims Subject to Rule 12 Motions, GRANTING Deft. Ellis's 54 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING Deft. Harkrider's 97 MOTION to Dismiss. Because this court declines to continue to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, those claims are dismissed, without prejudice. Order of dismissal entered by separate order.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, )