ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/26/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that said Defendant shall have through September 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint. (Deputy Clerk JN)
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/26/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that said Defendant shall have through September 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint. (Deputy Clerk JN)
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO SEQUENCE PRELIMINARY MOTION PRACTICE FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/11/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS the following: Defendant shall have through September 30, 2026, to file its motion to compel individual arbitration claims and stay the action pending the completion of arbitration. Should the Court deny this motion, Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Should Defendant first appeal such a denial, Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint following any remand back to this Court. (Deputy Clerk JN)
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO VACATE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/14/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that the November 10, 2026 initial scheduling conference is VACATED to be reset, if necessary, following the assigned District Judge's ruling on the motion to compel arbitration. (Deputy Clerk JN)
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0.
APA
United States District Court Eastern District of California. (2026, October 14). 26-5971 - Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0
MLA
United States District Court Eastern District of California. 26-5971 - Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (14 Oct 2026), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0
Bluebook
Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2026) (ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/26/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that said Defendant shall have through September 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint. (Deputy Clerk JN)), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0
