Chicago

Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0.

APA

United States District Court Eastern District of California. (2026, October 14). 26-5971 - Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0

MLA

United States District Court Eastern District of California. 26-5971 - Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (14 Oct 2026), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0

Bluebook

Flores v. McLane/Suneast, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2026) (ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/26/2026. For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that said Defendant shall have through September 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint. (Deputy Clerk JN)), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971/USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-05971-0