ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice (Doc. 8) is DENIED to the extent it requests the court take judicial notice but GRANTED to the extent the court clarifies the administrative classification will not impact the resolution of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than September 15, 2026, Prasad must file a statement of no more than ten pages explaining why his current allegations are plausible. Failure to file a statement will result in the dismissal of this case.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice if plaintiff does not file a statement by September 15, 2026. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/2/2026. (NSH)
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice (Doc. 8) is DENIED to the extent it requests the court take judicial notice but GRANTED to the extent the court clarifies the administrative classification will not impact the resolution of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than September 15, 2026, Prasad must file a statement of no more than ten pages explaining why his current allegations are plausible. Failure to file a statement will result in the dismissal of this case.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice if plaintiff does not file a statement by September 15, 2026. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/2/2026. (NSH)
ORDER that the complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and close this case. The Renewed Emergency Motion 15 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 10/20/2026. (MAR)
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al, (D. Ariz. 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947-0.
APA
United States District Court District of Arizona. (2026, October 21). 26-5947 - Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947-0
MLA
United States District Court District of Arizona. 26-5947 - Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (21 Oct 2026), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947-0
Bluebook
Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al, (D. Ariz. 2026) (ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice (Doc. 8) is DENIED to the extent it requests the court take judicial notice but GRANTED to the extent the court clarifies the administrative classification will not impact the resolution of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than September 15, 2026, Prasad must file a statement of no more than ten pages explaining why his current allegations are plausible. Failure to file a statement will result in the dismissal of this case.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice if plaintiff does not file a statement by September 15, 2026. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/2/2026. (NSH)), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947/USCOURTS-azd-2_26-cv-05947-0
