Skip to main content
Start of main content

Content Details

26-5947 - Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al

Category
Judicial Publications
Collection
United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc Class Number
JU 4.15
Court Type
District
Court Name
United States District Court District of Arizona
Circuit
9th
Office Location
Phoenix Division
Case Type
civil
Nature of Suit
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Party Names
Michael Cimino, Defendant
David Gallardo, Defendant
Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester LLP, Defendant
Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, Defendant
Maricopa, County of, Defendant
Unknown Parties, Defendant
Unknown Party, Defendant
Kristin M Wrobel, Defendant
Mayank Prasad, Plaintiff
Opinion Filed Date
September 2, 2026
Docket Text
 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice (Doc. 8) is DENIED to the extent it requests the court take judicial notice but GRANTED to the extent the court clarifies the administrative classification will not impact the resolution of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than September 15, 2026, Prasad must file a statement of no more than ten pages explaining why his current allegations are plausible. Failure to file a statement will result in the dismissal of this case.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice if plaintiff does not file a statement by September 15, 2026. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Krissa M Lanham on 9/2/2026. (NSH)