Juries; Deficient Performance; Mitigating Evidence; Penalty Phase; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Strickland V. Washington; Mitigating Circumstances; Jury Instructions; Habeas Corpus; Effective Assistance of Counsel; Human Rights and Civil Liberties; Closing Arguments; Mental Defective; Habeas; Federal Habeas; Sentencing; Crime and Law Enforcement; Habeas Relief; Mental Illness; Capital Punishment; Criminal Law and Procedure; Aggravating Factors; Sixth Amendment; Sentencing Instructions
Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty); Criminal Procedure
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Smith v. Spisak, 558 U.S. 139 (2010). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-139.
APA
Smith v. Spisak, 558 U.S. 139 (2010). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-139.
MLA
United States, Supreme Court. Smith v. Spisak. United States Reports, vol. 558, 12 January 2010, p. 139. U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-139.
