READING HOSPITAL, Defendant THE READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant SUSAN BELL, Plaintiff AMANDA NEIFERT, Plaintiff EVELYN SANTORO, Plaintiff
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S DECEMBER 15, 2014 LETTER MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 4/21/15. 4/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
MEMORANDUM/OPINION THAT DEFENDANT'S DECEMBER 15, 2014 LETTER MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 4/21/15. 4/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS INFORMAL LETTER MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTEDAND DEFENDANTS INFORMAL LETTER MOTION SEEKING A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THISORDER:1. DEFENDANT SHALL MAKE A FULL AND COMPLETE PRODUICTION OF ALL DOCUUMENTS ITUSED TO PROVIDE ORIENTATION OR TRAINING ON PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT TO WAGES FORMISSED MEAL BREAKS, AND ANY PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING SUCH WAGES.2. DEFENDANT SHALL MAKE A FULL AND COMPLETE PRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IT USEDTO PROVIDE ORIENTATION OR TRAINING ON PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT TO WAGES FORINTERRUPTED MEAL BREAKS, AND ANY PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING SUCH WAGES.3. DEFENDANT SHALL PRODUCE ITS FINAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT CONCERNING HOW FREQUENTLYITS HOURLY EMPLOYEES MISSED A MEAL BREAK, OR EXPERIENCED AN INTERRUPTED MEALBREAK PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITS ROLL-OUT OF THE KRONOS ATTESTATION.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THISORDER, DEFENDANT SHALL PRODUCE A DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE DEPARTMENT-LEVEL INFORMATION (AS OPPOSEDTO GENERAL HOSPITAL INFORMATION) ON THE FIFTEEN TOPICS IDENTIFIED IN PLAINTIFFS DESIGNEEDEPOSITION NOTICE.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 1/14/2016. 1/14/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
MEMORANDUM/OPINION THAT DEFENDANT READING HOSPITAL'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED COLLECTIVE ACTION FILED APRIL 25, 2016 IS GRANTED, AND THE TWENTY-ONE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/19/16. 7/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED. (ky, )
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE TWENTY-ONE OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS ARE REMOVED FROM THIS CASE, AND THEIR CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION, WHICH WILL PROCEED ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED PLAINTIFF SUSAN BELL ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/19/16. 7/19/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ky, ) (Main Document 123 replaced on 7/20/2016) (fb). Modified on 7/20/2016 (fb).
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
NEIFERT, ET AL v. READING HOSPITAL, (E.D. Pa. 2016). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-paed-5_13-cv-05927.
APA
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (2016, July 19). 13-5927 - NEIFERT, ET AL v. READING HOSPITAL. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-paed-5_13-cv-05927
MLA
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 13-5927 - NEIFERT, ET AL v. READING HOSPITAL. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (19 Jul 2016), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-paed-5_13-cv-05927
Bluebook
NEIFERT, ET AL v. READING HOSPITAL, (E.D. Pa. 2016), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-paed-5_13-cv-05927