American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, Amicus Ginger Harter, Amicus Bureau of Land Management, Defendant U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Defendant United States Forest Service, Defendant Cloud Foundation, Movant Loren Stout, Plaintiff Piper Stout, Plaintiff
Opinion and Order. Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is GRANTED as to plaintiffs' Claim I, and DENIED AS MOOT as to plaintiffs' Claim II. The 2007 Wild Horse Plan is remanded to the Forest Service. The Forest Service shall initiate consultation on its horse management plan while the 2007 Wild Horse Plan remains in effect. The remand period shall be one year. ORDER Defendants' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment55 is DENIED as to plaintiffs' Claim I, and DENIED AS MOOT as to Plaintiffs' Claim II. Signed on 3/10/2011 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (sp)
Opinion and Order -Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 69 is DENIED and defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is GRANTED as to Claims IV and V and DENIED as to Claim III. Signed on 4/24/2012 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (See formal Opinion and Order, 15pages) (ecp)
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Stout et al v. United States Forest Service, (D. Or. 2012). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ord-2_09-cv-00152.
APA
United States District Court District of Oregon. (2012, April 24). 09-152 - Stout et al v. United States Forest Service. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ord-2_09-cv-00152
MLA
United States District Court District of Oregon. 09-152 - Stout et al v. United States Forest Service. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (24 Apr 2012), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ord-2_09-cv-00152
Bluebook
Stout et al v. United States Forest Service, (D. Or. 2012), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ord-2_09-cv-00152
