[10178473] The court has addressed the thirty-one consolidated petitions for review in two separately authored opinions being issued together. With regard to the issues raised in the opinion authored by Chief Judge Briscoe, Judge Holmes joins and Judge Bacharach dissents in part but otherwise joins. With regard to the issues raised in the opinion authored by Judge Bacharach, Chief Judge Briscoe and Judge Holmes join. Mandate to issue. [11-9900, 11-9581, 11-9585, 11-9586, 11-9587, 11-9588, 11-9589, 11-9590, 11-9591, 11-9592, 11-9593, 11-9594, 11-9595, 11-9596, 11-9597, 12-9500, 12-9510, 12-9511, 12-9513, 12-9514, 12-9517, 12-9520, 12-9521, 12-9522, 12-9523, 12-9524, 12-9528, 12-9530, 12-9531, 12-9532, 12-9533, 12-9534, 12-9575]
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
U.S. TelePacific Corp. v. FCC, et al, (10th Cir. 2014). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca10-12-09528.
APA
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (2014, May 23). 12-9528 - U.S. TelePacific Corp. v. FCC, et al. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca10-12-09528
MLA
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. 12-9528 - U.S. TelePacific Corp. v. FCC, et al. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (23 May 2014), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca10-12-09528
Bluebook
U.S. TelePacific Corp. v. FCC, et al, (10th Cir. 2014), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca10-12-09528
