ORDER granting 47 Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Compel as set forth in this Order; and, finding that if Kohler does not comply with this Order, Plaintiffs will be allowed to file a Motion to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/20/2009. (thd)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER finding that deft is entitled to summary judgment on the WARN Act claim; deft's 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and pltfs' 51 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/18/10. (vjt)
Loading...
Document Citations
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data
as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
Sanders et al v. Kohler Company, (E.D. Ark. 2010). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-00222.
APA
United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas. (2010, March 18). 08-222 - Sanders et al v. Kohler Company. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-00222
MLA
United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas. 08-222 - Sanders et al v. Kohler Company. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (18 Mar 2010), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-00222
Bluebook
Sanders et al v. Kohler Company, (E.D. Ark. 2010), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-00222
