Chicago

Calegon v. Guerrero, (S.D. Tex. 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967-0.

APA

United States District Court Southern District of Texas. (2026, October 6). 26-5967 - Calegon v. Guerrero. [Government]. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967-0

MLA

United States District Court Southern District of Texas. 26-5967 - Calegon v. Guerrero. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, (6 Oct 2026), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967-0

Bluebook

Calegon v. Guerrero, (S.D. Tex. 2026) (MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Calegon's petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Calegon is advised that upon a showing of good cause for failing to comply with the Court's orders of July 28 and August 24, relief from this Order may be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Any motion under Rule 60(b) must be accompanied by either payment of the applicable filing fee or a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis, including an inmate trust fund account statement for the last six months as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967/USCOURTS-txsd-4_26-cv-05967-0