H. Res. 230 (IH) - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.
Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Flake, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Royce, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Thune, Mr. Paul, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Stump, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Otter, Mr. Weller, Mr. Souder, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Petri, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Issa, Mr. Latham, Mr. Leach, Mr. Ganske, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Crane, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. Rush, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Costello, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Traficant, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Mr. Kind, Mr. Obey, Mr. Kleczka, and Mr. Phelps) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history.
J. D. Hayworth
(AZ); Jeff Flake
(AZ); John B. Shadegg
(AZ); Jim Kolbe
(AZ); Edward R. Royce
(CA); Thomas G. Tancredo
(CO); Jeff Miller
(FL); Jim Nussle
(IA); Donald A. Manzullo
(IL); Henry J. Hyde
(IL); Timothy V. Johnson
(IL); Judy Biggert
(IL); John N. Hostettler
(IN); Gil Gutknecht
(MN); John Thune
(SD); Ron Paul
(TX); Henry Bonilla
(TX); Mark Green
(WI); Bob Stump
(AZ); George Radanovich
(CA); Michael K. Simpson
(ID); C. L. (Butch) Otter
(ID); Jerry Weller
(IL); Mark E. Souder
(IN); John A. Boehner
(OH); Thomas E. Petri
(WI); F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.
(WI); Paul D. Ryan
(WI); Mark R. Kennedy
(MN); John Abney Culberson
(TX); Darrell E. Issa
(CA); Tom Latham
(IA); James A. Leach
(IA); Greg Ganske
(IA); John Shimkus
(IL); Philip M. Crane
(IL); Joe Skeen
(NM); Dana Rohrabacher
(CA); Calvin M. Dooley
(CA); Bobby L. Rush
(IL); Danny K. Davis
(IL); Jerry F. Costello
(IL); Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.
(IL); Bart Stupak
(MI); James L. Oberstar
(MN); Martin Olav Sabo
(MN); James A. Traficant Jr.
(OH); Tammy Baldwin
(WI); Thomas M. Barrett
(WI); Ron Kind
(WI); David R. Obey
(WI); Gerald D. Kleczka
(WI); David D. Phelps
(IL)
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience and may not be complete or accurate.
Chicago
U.S. Congress. House. Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history. H. Res. 230. 107th
Cong., 1st
sess., Introduced in House August 2, 2001. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-107hres230ih.
APA
Congress, House of Representatives (2001, August 2). Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history. (H. Res. 230 (IH)). Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-107hres230ih.
MLA
United States, Congress, House of Representatives. Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history. U.S. Government Publishing Office, https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-107hres230ih. 107th Congress, H. Res. 230, Introduced in House 2 Aug. 2001.
Bluebook
H.Res.230 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation's early history., H.Res.230, 107th Cong. (2001), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-107hres230ih.
