United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2025-07-03 JU 6.8/1:63 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/text/USREPORTS-63.txt Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859 USREPORTS USREPORTS-63 63 1860 1859 United States Supreme Court. creator Cranch, William 1769-1855 Wheaton, Henry 1785-1848 Peters, Richard 1780-1848 Howard, Benjamin C. (Benjamin Chew) 1791-1872 Black, Jeremiah S. (Jeremiah Sullivan) 1810-1883 text legal case and case notes Periodicals. dcu Washington City Published for John Conrad and Co. 1860 1803 1862 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Vol. 1 (Aug. and Dec. terms 1801 and Feb. term 1803)-v. 9 (Feb. term 1815) ; vol. 1 (Feb. term 1816)-v. 12 (Jan. term 1827); vol. 1 (Jan. term 1828)-v. 17 (Jan. term 1843) ; vol. 1 (Jan. term 1843)-v. 24 (Dec. term 1860) ; vol. 1 (Dec. term, 1861)-v. 2 (Dec. term, 1862). Title from PDF title page (viewed July 10, 2007). Imprint varies. Reporters: 1801-1815, William Cranch (5-13 U.S.); 1816-1827, Henry Wheaton (14-25 U.S.); 1828-1842, Richard Peters, Jr. (26-41 U.S.); 1843-1860, Benjamin C. Howard (42-65 U.S.); 1861-1862, J.S. Black (66-67 U.S.). Vol. 17 (Jan. term 1843) of Peters contains the same cases as v. 1 of Howard and was not included in the retrospective numbering of United States reports. Numbering begins with v. 1 with each reporter. n-us--- Law reports, digests, etc United States Law reports, digests, etc United States KF101 JU 6.8/1:63 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 91643007 (OCoLC)7474395 Dallas, Alexander James, 1759-1817. (DLC) 2007228602 (OCoLC)52789526 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 2007227675 (OCoLC)52789834 2007228603 W.H. & O.H. Morrison 1860-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 550 digital object pages JU 6.8/1:63 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63 P0b002ee1d49b75ff 001176055 DGPO 2025-07-03 2025-07-03 USREPORTS-63 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-63 63 1860 1859 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1d4aed950 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-2 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1d4aed938 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Judges List FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-4 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1d4aed93d Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;List of Attorneys and Counsellors FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-3 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter D09002ee1d4aed955 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;List of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-FrontMatter.pdf 63 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-1 63 U.S. (22 How.) 1 (1860) 63 U.S. 1 D09002ee1d4aed94d Evidence Trusts and Estates Ejectments Heirs Land Titles Wisconsin Contracts Property Law Children's Rights Real Estate Property Bona Fide Purchasers Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Parker v. Kane, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 1 (1860);63 U.S. 1;22 How. 1 CASE USREPORTS-63-1 1 5 1 1860-01-30 1859 63 U.S. 1 22 How. 1 63 U.S. (22 How.) 1 (1860) Evidence Trusts and Estates Ejectments Heirs Land Titles Wisconsin Contracts Property Law Children's Rights Real Estate Property Bona Fide Purchasers Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power 1859-027-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-05 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-1.pdf 63 U.S. 19 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-19 63 U.S. (22 How.) 19 (1860) 63 U.S. 19 D09002ee1d4aed952 Jurisdiction and Venue Cotton Ships and Boats Mississippi Contracts Law Louisiana Civil Procedure Commerce Goods and Services Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;White et al. v. Wright et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 19 (1860);63 U.S. 19;22 How. 19 CASE USREPORTS-63-19 19 6 1 1860-01-23 1859 63 U.S. 19 22 How. 19 63 U.S. (22 How.) 19 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Cotton Ships and Boats Mississippi Contracts Law Louisiana Civil Procedure Commerce Goods and Services Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1859-022-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-20 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-19 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-19.pdf 63 U.S. 23 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-23 63 U.S. (22 How.) 23 (1859) 63 U.S. 23 D09002ee1d4aed8d2 Property Law Minnesota Mortgages Promissory Notes Real Estate Debt No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Lawler v. Claflin et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 23 (1859);63 U.S. 23;22 How. 23 CASE USREPORTS-63-23 23 7 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 23 22 How. 23 63 U.S. (22 How.) 23 (1859) Property Law Minnesota Mortgages Promissory Notes Real Estate Debt No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-004-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-08 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-23 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-23.pdf 63 U.S. 28 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-28 63 U.S. (22 How.) 28 (1860) 63 U.S. 28 D09002ee1d4aed94c Contracts Law Shareholders Trials and Court Proceedings Fraud and Financial Crimes Railroads Parol Evidence Consideration Corporations and Associations Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Emerson v. Slater, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 28 (1860);63 U.S. 28;22 How. 28 CASE USREPORTS-63-28 28 8 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 28 22 How. 28 63 U.S. (22 How.) 28 (1860) Contracts Law Shareholders Trials and Court Proceedings Fraud and Financial Crimes Railroads Parol Evidence Consideration Corporations and Associations Contracts Private Action 1859-050-01 Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Writ of error Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-21 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-28 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-28.pdf 63 U.S. 46 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-46 63 U.S. (22 How.) 46 (1860) 63 U.S. 46 D09002ee1d4aed95a Pleadings Seals and Stamps Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Trial Motions No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Overton et al. v. Cheek et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 46 (1860);63 U.S. 46;22 How. 46 CASE USREPORTS-63-46 46 9 1 1860-01-24 1859 63 U.S. 46 22 How. 46 63 U.S. (22 How.) 46 (1860) Pleadings Seals and Stamps Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Trial Motions No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-026-01 Unidentifiable Unidentifiable Writ of error Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-23 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-46 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-46.pdf 63 U.S. 48 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-48 63 U.S. (22 How.) 48 (1860) 63 U.S. 48 D09002ee1d4aed947 Jurisdiction and Venue Disasters Ships and Boats Collisions Vessels Lights Shared Fault Trial Motions Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Nelson et al. v. Leland et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 48 (1860);63 U.S. 48;22 How. 48 CASE USREPORTS-63-48 48 10 1 1860-01-16 1859 63 U.S. 48 22 How. 48 63 U.S. (22 How.) 48 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Disasters Ships and Boats Collisions Vessels Lights Shared Fault Trial Motions Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1859-019-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Louisiana Eastern U.S. District Court Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-04 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-48 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-48.pdf 63 U.S. 56 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-56 63 U.S. (22 How.) 56 (1860) 63 U.S. 56 D09002ee1d4aed963 Administrative Law Education Funding United States Congress Education Administrative Law and Procedure Statutory Construction State and Local Finance Legislative Rules and Procedure Bills and Resolutions Constitutional Law Legislative Powers State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Springfield Township v. Quick et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 56 (1860);63 U.S. 56;22 How. 56 CASE USREPORTS-63-56 56 11 1 1860-01-03 1859 63 U.S. 56 22 How. 56 63 U.S. (22 How.) 56 (1860) Administrative Law Education Funding United States Congress Education Administrative Law and Procedure Statutory Construction State and Local Finance Legislative Rules and Procedure Bills and Resolutions Constitutional Law Legislative Powers State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1859-012-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-56 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-56.pdf 63 U.S. 69 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-69 63 U.S. (22 How.) 69 (1860) 63 U.S. 69 D09002ee1d4aed95e Property Contracts Commissions Agency Contracts Law Plantations Real Estate Real Estate Brokers Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Kock v. Emmerling, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 69 (1860);63 U.S. 69;22 How. 69 CASE USREPORTS-63-69 69 12 1 1860-01-23 1859 63 U.S. 69 22 How. 69 63 U.S. (22 How.) 69 (1860) Property Contracts Commissions Agency Contracts Law Plantations Real Estate Real Estate Brokers Contracts Private Action 1859-023-01 Seller or vendor Broker, stock exchange, investment or securities firm Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-10 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-69 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-69.pdf 63 U.S. 75 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-75 63 U.S. (22 How.) 75 (1859) 63 U.S. 75 D09002ee1d4aed8d5 Evidence Ejectments Agency Deeds Land Titles Limitation of Actions Property Law Mortgages Real Estate Property Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Morrill v. Cone et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 75 (1859);63 U.S. 75;22 How. 75 CASE USREPORTS-63-75 75 13 1 1859-12-30 1859 63 U.S. 75 22 How. 75 63 U.S. (22 How.) 75 (1859) Evidence Ejectments Agency Deeds Land Titles Limitation of Actions Property Law Mortgages Real Estate Property Evidence Private Action 1859-011-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-75 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-75.pdf 63 U.S. 83 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-83 63 U.S. (22 How.) 83 (1860) 63 U.S. 83 D09002ee1d4aed944 Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Contracts Law Witnesses Louisiana Contracts Delivery Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Real Estate Property No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Cucullu v. Emmerling, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 83 (1860);63 U.S. 83;22 How. 83 CASE USREPORTS-63-83 83 14 1 1860-02-13 1859 63 U.S. 83 22 How. 83 63 U.S. (22 How.) 83 (1860) Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Contracts Law Witnesses Louisiana Contracts Delivery Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Real Estate Property No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-034-01 Seller or vendor Broker, stock exchange, investment or securities firm Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-23 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-83 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-83.pdf 63 U.S. 87 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-87 63 U.S. (22 How.) 87 (1859) 63 U.S. 87 D09002ee1d4aed967 Trial Motions Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Hodge et al. v. Williams, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 87 (1859);63 U.S. 87;22 How. 87 CASE USREPORTS-63-87 87 15 1 1859-12-19 1859 63 U.S. 87 22 How. 87 63 U.S. (22 How.) 87 (1859) Trial Motions Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-001-01 Unidentifiable Unidentifiable Writ of error Texas U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Texas Texas U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Texas Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-87 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-87.pdf 63 U.S. 89 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-89 63 U.S. (22 How.) 89 (1860) 63 U.S. 89 D09002ee1d4aed959 Alterations Evidence Land Grants Civil Procedure Real Estate Trusts and Estates Land Titles State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Galbraith et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 89 (1860);63 U.S. 89;22 How. 89 CASE USREPORTS-63-89 89 16 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 89 22 How. 89 63 U.S. (22 How.) 89 (1860) Alterations Evidence Land Grants Civil Procedure Real Estate Trusts and Estates Land Titles State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-051-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-10 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-89 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-89.pdf 63 U.S. 96 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-96 63 U.S. (22 How.) 96 (1860) 63 U.S. 96 D09002ee1d4aed949 Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Bills of Exchange Juries Contracts Law Promissory Notes Banks and Financial Institutions Pleadings Financial Services Bona Fide Purchasers Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Bank of Pittsburgh v. Neal et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 96 (1860);63 U.S. 96;22 How. 96 CASE USREPORTS-63-96 96 17 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 96 22 How. 96 63 U.S. (22 How.) 96 (1860) Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Bills of Exchange Juries Contracts Law Promissory Notes Banks and Financial Institutions Pleadings Financial Services Bona Fide Purchasers Commercial Transactions Private Action 1859-052-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Debtor Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-03-01 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-96 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-96.pdf 63 U.S. 111 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-111 63 U.S. (22 How.) 111 (1860) 63 U.S. 111 D09002ee1d4aed964 Freight Insurance Ships and Boats Condemnation Valuation Commerce Maritime and Admiralty Law Goods and Services Shipping Insurance Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Insurance Co. of the Valley of Virginia v. Mordecai, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 111 (1860);63 U.S. 111;22 How. 111 CASE USREPORTS-63-111 111 18 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 111 22 How. 111 63 U.S. (22 How.) 111 (1860) Freight Insurance Ships and Boats Condemnation Valuation Commerce Maritime and Admiralty Law Goods and Services Shipping Insurance Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1859-053-01 Insurance company, or surety Business, corporation Writ of error South Carolina U.S. Circuit for the District of South Carolina South Carolina U.S. Circuit for the District of South Carolina Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-23 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-111 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-111.pdf 63 U.S. 118 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-118 63 U.S. (22 How.) 118 (1860) 63 U.S. 118 D09002ee1d4aed956 Debt Minnesota Contracts Law Territories and Protectorates Promissory Notes Interest Property Law Liens Mortgages Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Brewster v. Wakefield, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 118 (1860);63 U.S. 118;22 How. 118 CASE USREPORTS-63-118 118 19 1 1860-02-20 1859 63 U.S. 118 22 How. 118 63 U.S. (22 How.) 118 (1860) Debt Minnesota Contracts Law Territories and Protectorates Promissory Notes Interest Property Law Liens Mortgages Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1859-037-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-08 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-118 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-118.pdf 63 U.S. 129 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-129 63 U.S. (22 How.) 129 (1860) 63 U.S. 129 D09002ee1d4aed933 Jurisdiction and Venue Kentucky Ships and Boats Engines Contracts Law Louisville Boat Construction Boilers Civil Procedure Manufacturing Liens Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Roach et al. v. Chapman et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 129 (1860);63 U.S. 129;22 How. 129 CASE USREPORTS-63-129 129 20 1 1860-01-30 1859 63 U.S. 129 22 How. 129 63 U.S. (22 How.) 129 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Kentucky Ships and Boats Engines Contracts Law Louisville Boat Construction Boilers Civil Procedure Manufacturing Liens Contracts Private Action 1859-028-01 Business, corporation Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Louisiana Eastern U.S. District Court Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-129 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-129.pdf 63 U.S. 132 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-132 63 U.S. (22 How.) 132 (1860) 63 U.S. 132 D09002ee1d4aed93f Intellectual Property Law Manufacturing Intellectual Property Patentability Lead Pipes Functionality Patents Machinery Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Le Roy et al. v. Tatham et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 132 (1860);63 U.S. 132;22 How. 132 CASE USREPORTS-63-132 132 21 1 1860-03-19 1859 63 U.S. 132 22 How. 132 63 U.S. (22 How.) 132 (1860) Intellectual Property Law Manufacturing Intellectual Property Patentability Lead Pipes Functionality Patents Machinery Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1859-075-01 Manufacturer Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-11 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-132 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-132.pdf 63 U.S. 141 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-141 63 U.S. (22 How.) 141 (1860) 63 U.S. 141 D09002ee1d4aed965 Trials and Court Proceedings New Orleans Damages Administrative Remedies Louisiana Condemnation Civil Procedure Ownership Property Law Real Estate Property No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;City of New Orleans v. Gaines, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 141 (1860);63 U.S. 141;22 How. 141 CASE USREPORTS-63-141 141 22 1 1860-01-30 1859 63 U.S. 141 22 How. 141 63 U.S. (22 How.) 141 (1860) Trials and Court Proceedings New Orleans Damages Administrative Remedies Louisiana Condemnation Civil Procedure Ownership Property Law Real Estate Property No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-029-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-10 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-141 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-141.pdf 63 U.S. 144 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-144 63 U.S. (22 How.) 144 (1860) 63 U.S. 144 D09002ee1d4aed939 Land Grants Pre-Emption Rights Land Titles Arkansas Hot Springs Surveyors and Surveying Indian Lands Property Law Real Estate New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Hale v. Gaines et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 144 (1860);63 U.S. 144;22 How. 144 CASE USREPORTS-63-144 144 23 1 1860-01-09 1859 63 U.S. 144 22 How. 144 63 U.S. (22 How.) 144 (1860) Land Grants Pre-Emption Rights Land Titles Arkansas Hot Springs Surveyors and Surveying Indian Lands Property Law Real Estate New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-018-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-15 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-144 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-144.pdf 63 U.S. 161 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-161 63 U.S. (22 How.) 161 (1860) 63 U.S. 161 D09002ee1d4aed93a Livestock Cattle Deeds Land Titles Boundaries Territories Public Lands California Property Law Maps and Mapping Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Gonzales v. United States, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 161 (1860);63 U.S. 161;22 How. 161 CASE USREPORTS-63-161 161 24 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 161 22 How. 161 63 U.S. (22 How.) 161 (1860) Livestock Cattle Deeds Land Titles Boundaries Territories Public Lands California Property Law Maps and Mapping Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-054-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-24 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-161 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-161.pdf 63 U.S. 174 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-174 63 U.S. (22 How.) 174 (1860) 63 U.S. 174 D09002ee1d4aed93c Insurance State and Local Government Mayors Georgetown Washington, D.C. Government Civil Procedure Wages and Hours Officials and Employees Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States ex relatione Crawford v. Addison, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 174 (1860);63 U.S. 174;22 How. 174 CASE USREPORTS-63-174 174 25 1 1860-02-20 1859 63 U.S. 174 22 How. 174 63 U.S. (22 How.) 174 (1860) Insurance State and Local Government Mayors Georgetown Washington, D.C. Government Civil Procedure Wages and Hours Officials and Employees Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1859-038-01 Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official Court or judicial district Mandamus Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-06 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Stay, petition, or motion granted Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-174 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-174.pdf 63 U.S. 185 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-185 63 U.S. (22 How.) 185 (1859) 63 U.S. 185 D09002ee1d4aed94e Administrative Law Ejectments Heirs Land Titles Arkansas Administrative Remedies Veterans Contracts Agricultural Practices Wages and Hours Voiding Clauses Property Law Agriculture and Food Real Estate Property Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Maxwell et al. v. Moore et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 185 (1859);63 U.S. 185;22 How. 185 CASE USREPORTS-63-185 185 26 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 185 22 How. 185 63 U.S. (22 How.) 185 (1859) Administrative Law Ejectments Heirs Land Titles Arkansas Administrative Remedies Veterans Contracts Agricultural Practices Wages and Hours Voiding Clauses Property Law Agriculture and Food Real Estate Property Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1859-005-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-185 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-185.pdf 63 U.S. 192 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-192 63 U.S. (22 How.) 192 (1860) 63 U.S. 192 D09002ee1d4aed954 Judicial Powers Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Land Titles State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Mortgages Real Estate Property Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Verden v. Coleman, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 192 (1860);63 U.S. 192;22 How. 192 CASE USREPORTS-63-192 192 27 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 192 22 How. 192 63 U.S. (22 How.) 192 (1860) Judicial Powers Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Land Titles State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Mortgages Real Estate Property Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1859-055-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-28 Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-192 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-192.pdf 63 U.S. 193 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-193 63 U.S. (22 How.) 193 (1860) 63 U.S. 193 D09002ee1d4aed948 Jurisdiction and Venue Chancery Courts Evidence Statute of Limitations Land Titles Cultivation Arkansas Statutory Construction Possession State and Local Courts Agricultural Practices Civil Procedure Leases Land Fraud and Financial Crimes Agriculture and Food Bona Fide Purchasers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Lytle et al. v. State of Arkansas et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 193 (1860);63 U.S. 193;22 How. 193 CASE USREPORTS-63-193 193 28 1 1860-02-20 1859 63 U.S. 193 22 How. 193 63 U.S. (22 How.) 193 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Chancery Courts Evidence Statute of Limitations Land Titles Cultivation Arkansas Statutory Construction Possession State and Local Courts Agricultural Practices Civil Procedure Leases Land Fraud and Financial Crimes Agriculture and Food Bona Fide Purchasers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1859-039-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels State Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-16 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-193 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-193.pdf 63 U.S. 214 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-214 63 U.S. (22 How.) 214 (1859) 63 U.S. 214 D09002ee1d4aed94b Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Goods and Services Civil Procedure Salvage Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Bondies v. Sherwood et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 214 (1859);63 U.S. 214;22 How. 214 CASE USREPORTS-63-214 214 29 1 1859-12-19 1859 63 U.S. 214 22 How. 214 63 U.S. (22 How.) 214 (1859) Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Goods and Services Civil Procedure Salvage Contracts Private Action 1859-002-01 Water transportation, stevedore Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Appeal Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-214 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-214.pdf 63 U.S. 217 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-217 63 U.S. (22 How.) 217 (1859) 63 U.S. 217 D09002ee1d4aed966 Patent Infringement Rubber Inventions Intellectual Property Law Term Extensions (Intellectual Property) Licensing and Permits Manufacturing Processes Machinery Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Chaffer v. Boston Belting Company, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 217 (1859);63 U.S. 217;22 How. 217 CASE USREPORTS-63-217 217 30 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 217 22 How. 217 63 U.S. (22 How.) 217 (1859) Patent Infringement Rubber Inventions Intellectual Property Law Term Extensions (Intellectual Property) Licensing and Permits Manufacturing Processes Machinery Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1859-006-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Manufacturer Writ of error Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-15 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-217 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-217.pdf 63 U.S. 225 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-225 63 U.S. (22 How.) 225 (1860) 63 U.S. 225 D09002ee1d4aed942 Heirs Land Titles Boundaries Equity Inheritance and Succession Surveyors and Surveying Maps and Mapping Sovereignty Property Law Real Estate State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Pacheco, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 225 (1860);63 U.S. 225;22 How. 225 CASE USREPORTS-63-225 225 31 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 225 22 How. 225 63 U.S. (22 How.) 225 (1860) Heirs Land Titles Boundaries Equity Inheritance and Succession Surveyors and Surveying Maps and Mapping Sovereignty Property Law Real Estate State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-056-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-28 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-225 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-225.pdf 63 U.S. 227 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-227 63 U.S. (22 How.) 227 (1859) 63 U.S. 227 D09002ee1d4aed8d4 Ships and Boats State and Local Government Statutory Construction Conflicts of Law Licensing and Permits Steamships Inland Water Transportation Constitutional Law Alabama Navigation National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Sinnot et al. v. Davenport et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 227 (1859);63 U.S. 227;22 How. 227 CASE USREPORTS-63-227 227 32 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 227 22 How. 227 63 U.S. (22 How.) 227 (1859) Ships and Boats State and Local Government Statutory Construction Conflicts of Law Licensing and Permits Steamships Inland Water Transportation Constitutional Law Alabama Navigation National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism 1859-007-01 Water transportation, stevedore Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-08 Judicial review (state level) Constitution Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-227 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-227.pdf 63 U.S. 244 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-244 63 U.S. (22 How.) 244 (1859) 63 U.S. 244 D09002ee1d4aed932 Towage and Pilotage Ships and Boats State and Local Government Statutory Construction Conflicts of Law Licensing and Permits Steamships Inland Water Transportation Constitutional Law Alabama Navigation National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Foster et al. v. Davenport et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 244 (1859);63 U.S. 244;22 How. 244 CASE USREPORTS-63-244 244 33 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 244 22 How. 244 63 U.S. (22 How.) 244 (1859) Towage and Pilotage Ships and Boats State and Local Government Statutory Construction Conflicts of Law Licensing and Permits Steamships Inland Water Transportation Constitutional Law Alabama Navigation National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism 1859-008-01 Water transportation, stevedore Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-08 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitution Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-244 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-244.pdf 63 U.S. 246 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-246 63 U.S. (22 How.) 246 (1860) 63 U.S. 246 D09002ee1d4aed960 Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Trusts and Estates Criminal Law and Procedure Agency Heirs Land Titles Pleadings Inheritance and Succession Civil Procedure Real Estate Property Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Collins v. Thompson et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 246 (1860);63 U.S. 246;22 How. 246 CASE USREPORTS-63-246 246 34 1 1860-01-23 1859 63 U.S. 246 22 How. 246 63 U.S. (22 How.) 246 (1860) Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Trusts and Estates Criminal Law and Procedure Agency Heirs Land Titles Pleadings Inheritance and Succession Civil Procedure Real Estate Property Civil Procedure Private Action 1859-024-01 Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Appeal Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-246 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-246.pdf 63 U.S. 256 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-256 63 U.S. (22 How.) 256 (1860) 63 U.S. 256 D09002ee1d4aed943 Standards of Practice Creditor and Debtor Bills of Exchange Mississippi Agency Contracts Law Contracts Agricultural Practices Business and Corporate Law Slavery Agriculture and Food Corporations Law Partnerships Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Kimbro v. Bullitt et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 256 (1860);63 U.S. 256;22 How. 256 CASE USREPORTS-63-256 256 35 1 1860-02-20 1859 63 U.S. 256 22 How. 256 63 U.S. (22 How.) 256 (1860) Standards of Practice Creditor and Debtor Bills of Exchange Mississippi Agency Contracts Law Contracts Agricultural Practices Business and Corporate Law Slavery Agriculture and Food Corporations Law Partnerships Commercial Transactions Private Action 1859-040-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-256 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-256.pdf 63 U.S. 270 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-270 63 U.S. (22 How.) 270 (1860) 63 U.S. 270 D09002ee1d4aed95f Creditor and Debtor Debt Agency Promissory Notes Business and Corporate Law Mortgages Corporations Law Repayment Partnerships Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Clark et al. v. Bowen et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 270 (1860);63 U.S. 270;22 How. 270 CASE USREPORTS-63-270 270 36 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 270 22 How. 270 63 U.S. (22 How.) 270 (1860) Creditor and Debtor Debt Agency Promissory Notes Business and Corporate Law Mortgages Corporations Law Repayment Partnerships Civil Procedure Private Action 1859-057-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-17 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-270 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-270.pdf 63 U.S. 274 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-274 63 U.S. (22 How.) 274 (1860) 63 U.S. 274 D09002ee1d4aed951 Land Titles Boundaries Equity Public Lands California Property Law Property Interests Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Garcia, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 274 (1860);63 U.S. 274;22 How. 274 CASE USREPORTS-63-274 274 37 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 274 22 How. 274 63 U.S. (22 How.) 274 (1860) Land Titles Boundaries Equity Public Lands California Property Law Property Interests Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-058-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-08 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-274 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-274.pdf 63 U.S. 282 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-282 63 U.S. (22 How.) 282 (1860) 63 U.S. 282 D09002ee1d4aed94a Fraud and Financial Crimes Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Concealment Trial Motions Sugar Pleadings Civil Procedure Plantations No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;McMicken's Executors v. Perin, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 282 (1860);63 U.S. 282;22 How. 282 CASE USREPORTS-63-282 282 38 1 1860-01-03 1859 63 U.S. 282 22 How. 282 63 U.S. (22 How.) 282 (1860) Fraud and Financial Crimes Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Concealment Trial Motions Sugar Pleadings Civil Procedure Plantations No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-013-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-282 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-282.pdf 63 U.S. 286 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-286 63 U.S. (22 How.) 286 (1860) 63 U.S. 286 D09002ee1d4aed946 Irrigation Livestock Mexico Land Grants Jurisdiction and Venue Land Titles Agricultural Practices California Property Law Agriculture and Food Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Hartnell's Executors, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 286 (1860);63 U.S. 286;22 How. 286 CASE USREPORTS-63-286 286 39 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 286 22 How. 286 63 U.S. (22 How.) 286 (1860) Irrigation Livestock Mexico Land Grants Jurisdiction and Venue Land Titles Agricultural Practices California Property Law Agriculture and Food Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-059-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-23 Statutory construction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-286 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-286.pdf 63 U.S. 290 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-290 63 U.S. (22 How.) 290 (1860) 63 U.S. 290 D09002ee1d4aed94f Mexico Trials and Court Proceedings Judicial Powers Trial Motions Notices Sovereignty War California Civil Procedure Treaties and International Agreements Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Yturbide's Executor's v. United States, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 290 (1860);63 U.S. 290;22 How. 290 CASE USREPORTS-63-290 290 40 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 290 22 How. 290 63 U.S. (22 How.) 290 (1860) Mexico Trials and Court Proceedings Judicial Powers Trial Motions Notices Sovereignty War California Civil Procedure Treaties and International Agreements Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-060-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-28 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-290 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-290.pdf 63 U.S. 293 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-293 63 U.S. (22 How.) 293 (1860) 63 U.S. 293 D09002ee1d4aed95d Land Grants Heirs Land Titles Possession Inheritance and Succession California Death and Dying Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. De Haro's Heirs, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 293 (1860);63 U.S. 293;22 How. 293 CASE USREPORTS-63-293 293 41 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 293 22 How. 293 63 U.S. (22 How.) 293 (1860) Land Grants Heirs Land Titles Possession Inheritance and Succession California Death and Dying Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-061-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-24 Statutory construction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-293 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-293.pdf 63 U.S. 299 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-299 63 U.S. (22 How.) 299 (1860) 63 U.S. 299 D09002ee1d4aed945 Administrative Law Collectors Expenses United States Congress Statutory Construction Harbors Finance Conflicts of Law Bills and Resolutions Wages and Hours Customs Enforcement Credit Markets U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Officials and Employees Securities Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Walker, United States v. Hopkins, United States v. Fearn, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 299 (1860);63 U.S. 299;22 How. 299 CASE USREPORTS-63-299 299 42 1 1860-04-16 1859 63 U.S. 299 22 How. 299 63 U.S. (22 How.) 299 (1860) Administrative Law Collectors Expenses United States Congress Statutory Construction Harbors Finance Conflicts of Law Bills and Resolutions Wages and Hours Customs Enforcement Credit Markets U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Officials and Employees Securities Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity 1859-089-01 United States Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-23 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-299 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-299.pdf 63 U.S. 315 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-315 63 U.S. (22 How.) 315 (1860) 63 U.S. 315 D09002ee1d4aed8d6 Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Land Titles Inheritance and Succession California Land Grants Property Law Land Rights Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. West's Heirs, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 315 (1860);63 U.S. 315;22 How. 315 CASE USREPORTS-63-315 315 43 1 1860-02-27 1859 63 U.S. 315 22 How. 315 63 U.S. (22 How.) 315 (1860) Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Land Titles Inheritance and Succession California Land Grants Property Law Land Rights Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-046-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-13 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-315 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-315.pdf 63 U.S. 318 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-318 63 U.S. (22 How.) 318 (1860) 63 U.S. 318 D09002ee1d4aed93b Chancery Courts Securities Debt Widows and Widowers Heirs Land Titles Equity Banks and Financial Institutions Inheritance and Succession Legal Remedies Death and Dying Property Law Mortgages State and Local Finance Real Estate Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Refeld et al. v. Woodfolk, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 318 (1860);63 U.S. 318;22 How. 318 CASE USREPORTS-63-318 318 44 1 1860-04-09 1859 63 U.S. 318 22 How. 318 63 U.S. (22 How.) 318 (1860) Chancery Courts Securities Debt Widows and Widowers Heirs Land Titles Equity Banks and Financial Institutions Inheritance and Succession Legal Remedies Death and Dying Property Law Mortgages State and Local Finance Real Estate Contracts Private Action 1859-082-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Arkansas U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Arkansas Arkansas U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Arkansas Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-318 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-318.pdf 63 U.S. 330 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-330 63 U.S. (22 How.) 330 (1859) 63 U.S. 330 D09002ee1d4aed95c Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Labor Civil Procedure Partnerships Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Ward v. Thompson, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 330 (1859);63 U.S. 330;22 How. 330 CASE USREPORTS-63-330 330 45 1 1859-12-27 1859 63 U.S. 330 22 How. 330 63 U.S. (22 How.) 330 (1859) Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Labor Civil Procedure Partnerships Contracts Private Action 1859-009-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Michigan U.S. District Court Michigan U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Michigan Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-330 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-330.pdf 63 U.S. 334 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-334 63 U.S. (22 How.) 334 (1860) 63 U.S. 334 D09002ee1d4aed935 Jurisdiction and Venue Juries Jury Instructions Heirs Land Titles Equity Surveyors and Surveying Civil Procedure Property Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Berthold et al. v. McDonald et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 334 (1860);63 U.S. 334;22 How. 334 CASE USREPORTS-63-334 334 46 1 1860-02-27 1859 63 U.S. 334 22 How. 334 63 U.S. (22 How.) 334 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Juries Jury Instructions Heirs Land Titles Equity Surveyors and Surveying Civil Procedure Property Evidence Private Action 1859-047-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-10 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-334 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-334.pdf 63 U.S. 341 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-341 63 U.S. (22 How.) 341 (1860) 63 U.S. 341 D09002ee1d4aed8d3 Evidence Minnesota Parol Evidence Promissory Notes Pleadings Endorsements Civil Procedure Mortgages Property Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Rey et al. v. Simpson, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 341 (1860);63 U.S. 341;22 How. 341 CASE USREPORTS-63-341 341 47 1 1860-01-03 1859 63 U.S. 341 22 How. 341 63 U.S. (22 How.) 341 (1860) Evidence Minnesota Parol Evidence Promissory Notes Pleadings Endorsements Civil Procedure Mortgages Property Commercial Transactions Private Action 1859-014-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-08 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-341 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-341.pdf 63 U.S. 352 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-352 63 U.S. (22 How.) 352 (1860) 63 U.S. 352 D09002ee1d4aed93e Jurisdiction and Venue Trusts and Estates Widows and Widowers Land Titles Banks and Financial Institutions Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Real Estate Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Jeter v. Hewitt et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 352 (1860);63 U.S. 352;22 How. 352 CASE USREPORTS-63-352 352 48 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 352 22 How. 352 63 U.S. (22 How.) 352 (1860) Jurisdiction and Venue Trusts and Estates Widows and Widowers Land Titles Banks and Financial Institutions Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Real Estate Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power 1859-062-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-27 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-352 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-352.pdf 63 U.S. 364 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-364 63 U.S. (22 How.) 364 (1860) 63 U.S. 364 D09002ee1d4aed95b Railroads Bonds Roads and Highways Interest Contracts Conflicts of Law Securities Corporations and Associations Constitutional Law Property State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Aspinwall et al. v. Commissioners of the County of Daviess, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 364 (1860);63 U.S. 364;22 How. 364 CASE USREPORTS-63-364 364 49 1 1860-02-06 1859 63 U.S. 364 22 How. 364 63 U.S. (22 How.) 364 (1860) Railroads Bonds Roads and Highways Interest Contracts Conflicts of Law Securities Corporations and Associations Constitutional Law Property State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1859-032-01 Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder County government or county governmental unit, except school district Certification Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-13 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Certification to or from a lower court Favorable disposition for petitioning party unclear Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-364 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-364.pdf 63 U.S. 380 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-380 63 U.S. (22 How.) 380 (1860) 63 U.S. 380 D09002ee1d4aed962 Agency Securities Creditor and Debtor Fraud and Financial Crimes Business Investment and Capital Corporations Law Debt Insurance Law Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Ogilvie et al. v. Knox Insurance Co. et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 380 (1860);63 U.S. 380;22 How. 380 CASE USREPORTS-63-380 380 50 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 380 22 How. 380 63 U.S. (22 How.) 380 (1860) Agency Securities Creditor and Debtor Fraud and Financial Crimes Business Investment and Capital Corporations Law Debt Insurance Law Commercial Transactions Private Action 1859-063-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Debtor Appeal Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-16 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-380 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-380.pdf 63 U.S. 392 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-392 63 U.S. (22 How.) 392 (1860) 63 U.S. 392 D09002ee1d4aed968 American Indians Evidence North America Indian Wars Property Law Land Titles Witnesses Open Range Indigenous Peoples Common Land Veterans War Possession Native Americans California Civil Procedure Native Peoples Fraud and Financial Crimes State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Teschmaker, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 392 (1860);63 U.S. 392;22 How. 392 CASE USREPORTS-63-392 392 51 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 392 22 How. 392 63 U.S. (22 How.) 392 (1860) American Indians Evidence North America Indian Wars Property Law Land Titles Witnesses Open Range Indigenous Peoples Common Land Veterans War Possession Native Americans California Civil Procedure Native Peoples Fraud and Financial Crimes State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-064-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-01-26 Statutory construction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-392 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-392.pdf 63 U.S. 406 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-406 63 U.S. (22 How.) 406 (1860) 63 U.S. 406 D09002ee1d4aed961 Public Lands Property Mexico Evidence Sovereignty California Civil Procedure Land Titles State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Pico, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 406 (1860);63 U.S. 406;22 How. 406 CASE USREPORTS-63-406 406 52 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 406 22 How. 406 63 U.S. (22 How.) 406 (1860) Public Lands Property Mexico Evidence Sovereignty California Civil Procedure Land Titles State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-065-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-08 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-406 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-406.pdf 63 U.S. 416 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-416 63 U.S. (22 How.) 416 (1860) 63 U.S. 416 D09002ee1d4aed941 Mexico Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Land Titles Sovereignty Possession Public Lands California Civil Procedure Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;United States v. Vallejo, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 416 (1860);63 U.S. 416;22 How. 416 CASE USREPORTS-63-416 416 53 1 1860-03-12 1859 63 U.S. 416 22 How. 416 63 U.S. (22 How.) 416 (1860) Mexico Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Land Titles Sovereignty Possession Public Lands California Civil Procedure Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-066-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-02-28 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-416 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-416.pdf 63 U.S. 422 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-422 63 U.S. (22 How.) 422 (1860) 63 U.S. 422 D09002ee1d4aed937 Property Tax State and Local Government Land Titles Tax Law Washington, D.C. Taxation Tax Title Civil Procedure Property Law Legislative Powers State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Thompson et al. v. Lessee of Carroll et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 422 (1860);63 U.S. 422;22 How. 422 CASE USREPORTS-63-422 422 54 1 1860-04-16 1859 63 U.S. 422 22 How. 422 63 U.S. (22 How.) 422 (1860) Property Tax State and Local Government Land Titles Tax Law Washington, D.C. Taxation Tax Title Civil Procedure Property Law Legislative Powers State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity 1859-090-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-03-29 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-422 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-422.pdf 63 U.S. 436 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-436 63 U.S. (22 How.) 436 (1860) 63 U.S. 436 D09002ee1d4aed958 Livestock Mexico Land Grants Cattle Land Titles Cultivation Agricultural Practices Property Rights Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Agriculture and Food Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Dalton v. United States, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 436 (1860);63 U.S. 436;22 How. 436 CASE USREPORTS-63-436 436 55 1 1860-04-23 1859 63 U.S. 436 22 How. 436 63 U.S. (22 How.) 436 (1860) Livestock Mexico Land Grants Cattle Land Titles Cultivation Agricultural Practices Property Rights Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Agriculture and Food Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-095-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Southern U.S. District Court California Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-06 Statutory construction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-436 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-436.pdf 63 U.S. 443 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-443 63 U.S. (22 How.) 443 (1860) 63 U.S. 443 D09002ee1d4aed953 Mexico Evidence Land Titles Witnesses Administrative Law and Procedure War Surveyors and Surveying California Land Grants Sovereignty Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Fuentes v. United States, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 443 (1860);63 U.S. 443;22 How. 443 CASE USREPORTS-63-443 443 56 1 1860-04-09 1859 63 U.S. 443 22 How. 443 63 U.S. (22 How.) 443 (1860) Mexico Evidence Land Titles Witnesses Administrative Law and Procedure War Surveyors and Surveying California Land Grants Sovereignty Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1859-083-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-19 Statutory construction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-443 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-443.pdf 63 U.S. 461 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-461 63 U.S. (22 How.) 461 (1860) 63 U.S. 461 D09002ee1d4aed957 Towage and Pilotage Delaware River Disasters Ships and Boats Collisions Propeller Boats Barges Steamships Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Paddle Steamers Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;New York and Balt. Trans. Co. v. Phil. And Savannah Steam Navigation Co., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 461 (1860);63 U.S. 461;22 How. 461 CASE USREPORTS-63-461 461 57 1 1860-04-23 1859 63 U.S. 461 22 How. 461 63 U.S. (22 How.) 461 (1860) Towage and Pilotage Delaware River Disasters Ships and Boats Collisions Propeller Boats Barges Steamships Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Paddle Steamers Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1859-096-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-03-23 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-461 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-461.pdf 63 U.S. 473 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-473 63 U.S. (22 How.) 473 (1860) 63 U.S. 473 D09002ee1d4aed8d7 Fraud and Financial Crimes Jurisdiction and Venue Bankruptcy New Orleans Louisiana Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Liens Mortgages Property Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Adams v. Preston, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 473 (1860);63 U.S. 473;22 How. 473 CASE USREPORTS-63-473 473 58 1 1860-01-16 1859 63 U.S. 473 22 How. 473 63 U.S. (22 How.) 473 (1860) Fraud and Financial Crimes Jurisdiction and Venue Bankruptcy New Orleans Louisiana Civil Procedure Plantations Slavery Liens Mortgages Property Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1859-020-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-12-29 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-473 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-473.pdf 63 U.S. 491 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-491 63 U.S. (22 How.) 491 (1860) 63 U.S. 491 D09002ee1d4aed936 Evidence Ships and Boats Import and Export Foreign Trade and International Finance New York Brazil Contracts Declarations Rio De Janeiro Valuation Furniture Customs Enforcement Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Shipping Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Howland et al. v. Greenway et al., 63 U.S. (22 How.) 491 (1860);63 U.S. 491;22 How. 491 CASE USREPORTS-63-491 491 59 1 1860-04-16 1859 63 U.S. 491 22 How. 491 63 U.S. (22 How.) 491 (1860) Evidence Ships and Boats Import and Export Foreign Trade and International Finance New York Brazil Contracts Declarations Rio De Janeiro Valuation Furniture Customs Enforcement Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Shipping Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1859-091-01 Water transportation, stevedore Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal New York Southern U.S. District Court New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1860-03-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-491 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-491.pdf 63 U.S. 503 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-503 63 U.S. (22 How.) 503 (1860) 63 U.S. 503 D09002ee1d4aed934 Trial Motions Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Interest Banks and Financial Institutions No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Kilbourne et al. v. State Savings Institution of St. Louis, 63 U.S. (22 How.) 503 (1860);63 U.S. 503;22 How. 503 CASE USREPORTS-63-503 503 60 1 1860-03-26 1859 63 U.S. 503 22 How. 503 63 U.S. (22 How.) 503 (1860) Trial Motions Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Interest Banks and Financial Institutions No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1859-077-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Iowa U.S. District Court Iowa U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-503 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-503.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-BackMatter D09002ee1d4aed940 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1859;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-63-BackMatter 61 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-63/USREPORTS-63-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-63/pdf/USREPORTS-63-BackMatter.pdf