United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2025-07-03 JU 6.8/1:62 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/text/USREPORTS-62.txt Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858 USREPORTS USREPORTS-62 62 1859 1858 United States Supreme Court. creator Cranch, William 1769-1855 Wheaton, Henry 1785-1848 Peters, Richard 1780-1848 Howard, Benjamin C. (Benjamin Chew) 1791-1872 Black, Jeremiah S. (Jeremiah Sullivan) 1810-1883 text legal case and case notes Periodicals. dcu Washington City Published for John Conrad and Co. 1859 1803 1862 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Vol. 1 (Aug. and Dec. terms 1801 and Feb. term 1803)-v. 9 (Feb. term 1815) ; vol. 1 (Feb. term 1816)-v. 12 (Jan. term 1827); vol. 1 (Jan. term 1828)-v. 17 (Jan. term 1843) ; vol. 1 (Jan. term 1843)-v. 24 (Dec. term 1860) ; vol. 1 (Dec. term, 1861)-v. 2 (Dec. term, 1862). Title from PDF title page (viewed July 10, 2007). Imprint varies. Reporters: 1801-1815, William Cranch (5-13 U.S.); 1816-1827, Henry Wheaton (14-25 U.S.); 1828-1842, Richard Peters, Jr. (26-41 U.S.); 1843-1860, Benjamin C. Howard (42-65 U.S.); 1861-1862, J.S. Black (66-67 U.S.). Vol. 17 (Jan. term 1843) of Peters contains the same cases as v. 1 of Howard and was not included in the retrospective numbering of United States reports. Numbering begins with v. 1 with each reporter. n-us--- Law reports, digests, etc United States Law reports, digests, etc United States KF101 JU 6.8/1:62 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 91643007 (OCoLC)7474395 Dallas, Alexander James, 1759-1817. (DLC) 2007228602 (OCoLC)52789526 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 2007227675 (OCoLC)52789834 2007228603 W.H. & O.H. Morrison 1859-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 668 digital object pages JU 6.8/1:62 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62 P0b002ee1d49b624b 001176055 DGPO 2025-07-03 2025-07-03 USREPORTS-62 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-62 62 1859 1858 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1d4aed0ef Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-2 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1d4aed0dd Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Judges List FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-3 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1d4aed508 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Admiralty Rule FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-5 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1d4aed0cd Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Rules of the Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-6 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter D09002ee1d4aed500 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;List of Attorneys and Counsellors FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1d4aed0c5 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;List of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-4 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-FrontMatter-4.pdf 62 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-1 62 U.S. (21 How.) 1 (1858) 62 U.S. 1 D09002ee1d4aed0d3 Duty Bodies of Water Disasters Torts Collisions Equity Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Steamer Louisiana v. Isaac Fisher et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 1 (1858);62 U.S. 1;21 How. 1 CASE USREPORTS-62-1 1 7 1 1858-12-28 1858 62 U.S. 1 21 How. 1 62 U.S. (21 How.) 1 (1858) Duty Bodies of Water Disasters Torts Collisions Equity Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-003-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Maryland U.S. District Court Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-10 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-1.pdf 62 U.S. 7 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-7 62 U.S. (21 How.) 7 (1858) 62 U.S. 7 D09002ee1d4aed0e5 Ships and Boats Bodies of Water Import and Export Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Shipping Inland Water Transportation Civil Liability Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Propeller Niagara v. Cordes et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 7 (1858);62 U.S. 7;21 How. 7 CASE USREPORTS-62-7 7 8 1 1859-01-04 1858 62 U.S. 7 21 How. 7 62 U.S. (21 How.) 7 (1858) Ships and Boats Bodies of Water Import and Export Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Shipping Inland Water Transportation Civil Liability Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-008-01 Water transportation, stevedore Business, corporation Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-08 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-7.pdf 62 U.S. 35 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-35 62 U.S. (21 How.) 35 (1858) 62 U.S. 35 D09002ee1d4aed0fc Consumer Protection Contracts Insurance Law Fires Disasters Homeowners' Insurance State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Union Insurance v. Hoge, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 35 (1858);62 U.S. 35;21 How. 35 CASE USREPORTS-62-35 35 9 1 1859-01-10 1858 62 U.S. 35 21 How. 35 62 U.S. (21 How.) 35 (1858) Consumer Protection Contracts Insurance Law Fires Disasters Homeowners' Insurance State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1858-011-01 Insurance company, or surety Business, corporation Writ of error New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-35 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-35.pdf 62 U.S. 66 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-66 62 U.S. (21 How.) 66 (1858) 62 U.S. 66 D09002ee1d4aed0fa Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Law Enforcement Officers Equity Pleadings Contracts Valuation Liens Bankruptcy Law Real Estate Property Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Leggett et al. v. Humphreys, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 66 (1858);62 U.S. 66;21 How. 66 CASE USREPORTS-62-66 66 10 1 1859-01-04 1858 62 U.S. 66 21 How. 66 62 U.S. (21 How.) 66 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Law Enforcement Officers Equity Pleadings Contracts Valuation Liens Bankruptcy Law Real Estate Property Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-009-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Person who guarantees another's obligations Appeal Mississippi U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Mississippi Mississippi U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Mississippi Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-15 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-66 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-66.pdf 62 U.S. 80 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-80 62 U.S. (21 How.) 80 (1858) 62 U.S. 80 D09002ee1d4aed0cb Corporate Income Tax Taxation Jurisdiction and Venue Tax Law Corporations Law Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Richmond v. The City of Milwaukie, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 80 (1858);62 U.S. 80;21 How. 80 CASE USREPORTS-62-80 80 11 1 1859-01-10 1858 62 U.S. 80 21 How. 80 62 U.S. (21 How.) 80 (1858) Corporate Income Tax Taxation Jurisdiction and Venue Tax Law Corporations Law Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Private Action 1858-012-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-09 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-80 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-80.pdf 62 U.S. 82 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-82 62 U.S. (21 How.) 82 (1858) 62 U.S. 82 D09002ee1d4aed501 Maritime and Admiralty Law Mixed Jurisdictions Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Rice v. Minnesota and Northwestern Railroad Company, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 82 (1858);62 U.S. 82;21 How. 82 CASE USREPORTS-62-82 82 12 1 1858-12-28 1858 62 U.S. 82 21 How. 82 62 U.S. (21 How.) 82 (1858) Maritime and Admiralty Law Mixed Jurisdictions Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1858-004-01 Unidentifiable Railroad Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-82 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-82.pdf 62 U.S. 85 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-85 62 U.S. (21 How.) 85 (1858) 62 U.S. 85 D09002ee1d4aed0e3 Jury Instructions Trials and Court Proceedings Conflicts of Law Civil Procedure Equity Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Kelsey et al. v. Forsyth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 85 (1858);62 U.S. 85;21 How. 85 CASE USREPORTS-62-85 85 13 1 1858-12-28 1858 62 U.S. 85 21 How. 85 62 U.S. (21 How.) 85 (1858) Jury Instructions Trials and Court Proceedings Conflicts of Law Civil Procedure Equity Civil Procedure Private Action 1858-005-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-85 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-85.pdf 62 U.S. 88 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-88 62 U.S. (21 How.) 88 (1858) 62 U.S. 88 D09002ee1d4aed0d2 Intellectual Property Evidence Prior Art Jury Instructions Patent Infringement Witnesses Contracts Civil Procedure Patents Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Winans v. New York and Erie Railroad Company, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 88 (1858);62 U.S. 88;21 How. 88 CASE USREPORTS-62-88 88 14 1 1859-01-10 1858 62 U.S. 88 21 How. 88 62 U.S. (21 How.) 88 (1858) Intellectual Property Evidence Prior Art Jury Instructions Patent Infringement Witnesses Contracts Civil Procedure Patents Evidence Private Action 1858-013-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Railroad Writ of error New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-16 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-88 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-88.pdf 62 U.S. 103 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-103 62 U.S. (21 How.) 103 (1858) 62 U.S. 103 D09002ee1d4aed0f6 Jury Instructions Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Civil Procedure Widows and Widowers Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Pennsylvania v. Ravenel, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 103 (1858);62 U.S. 103;21 How. 103 CASE USREPORTS-62-103 103 15 1 1858-12-28 1858 62 U.S. 103 21 How. 103 62 U.S. (21 How.) 103 (1858) Jury Instructions Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Civil Procedure Widows and Widowers Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process 1858-006-01 State Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Writ of error Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-14 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-103 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-103.pdf 62 U.S. 112 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-112 62 U.S. (21 How.) 112 (1858) 62 U.S. 112 D09002ee1d4aed0f5 Property Conflicts of Law Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Civil Procedure Equity Valuation Bridges and Tunnels Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Covington Drawbridge Company et al. v. Shepherd et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 112 (1858);62 U.S. 112;21 How. 112 CASE USREPORTS-62-112 112 16 1 1858-12-29 1858 62 U.S. 112 21 How. 112 62 U.S. (21 How.) 112 (1858) Property Conflicts of Law Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Civil Procedure Equity Valuation Bridges and Tunnels Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 1858-001-01 Business, corporation Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Appeal Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-112 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-112.pdf 62 U.S. 126 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-126 62 U.S. (21 How.) 126 (1858) 62 U.S. 126 D09002ee1d4aed0c7 Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Principal New York Contracts Sureties Conflicts of Law Liens Bankruptcy Law Real Estate Debtors' Rights Civil Rights Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Livermore et al. v. Jenckes et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 126 (1858);62 U.S. 126;21 How. 126 CASE USREPORTS-62-126 126 17 1 1859-01-04 1858 62 U.S. 126 21 How. 126 62 U.S. (21 How.) 126 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Creditor and Debtor Principal New York Contracts Sureties Conflicts of Law Liens Bankruptcy Law Real Estate Debtors' Rights Civil Rights 1858-010-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-126 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-126.pdf 62 U.S. 146 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-146 62 U.S. (21 How.) 146 (1858) 62 U.S. 146 D09002ee1d4aed0fb Ships and Boats Agency Motives Contracts Admissibility Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Intent Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Barreda et al. v. Silsbee et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 146 (1858);62 U.S. 146;21 How. 146 CASE USREPORTS-62-146 146 18 1 1859-01-31 1858 62 U.S. 146 21 How. 146 62 U.S. (21 How.) 146 (1858) Ships and Boats Agency Motives Contracts Admissibility Fraud and Financial Crimes Evidence Intent Contracts Private Action 1858-018-01 Seller or vendor Water transportation, stevedore Writ of error Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-22 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-146 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-146.pdf 62 U.S. 170 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-170 62 U.S. (21 How.) 170 (1858) 62 U.S. 170 D09002ee1d4aed0ea Evidence Statues and Monuments Land Titles Boundaries Public Lands Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Land Grants Officials and Employees Cessations Treaties and International Agreements State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;United States v. Sutter, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 170 (1858);62 U.S. 170;21 How. 170 CASE USREPORTS-62-170 170 19 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 170 21 How. 170 62 U.S. (21 How.) 170 (1858) Evidence Statues and Monuments Land Titles Boundaries Public Lands Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Land Grants Officials and Employees Cessations Treaties and International Agreements State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-029-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-04 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-170 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-170.pdf 62 U.S. 184 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-184 62 U.S. (21 How.) 184 (1858) 62 U.S. 184 D09002ee1d4aed0dc Duty Evidence Disasters Ships and Boats Lights Torts Collisions Harbors Conflicts of Law Inland Water Transportation Towage and Pilotage Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law South Carolina Charleston Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Owners of the Brig James Gray v. The Owners of the Ship John Fraser et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 184 (1858);62 U.S. 184;21 How. 184 CASE USREPORTS-62-184 184 20 1 1859-02-03 1858 62 U.S. 184 21 How. 184 62 U.S. (21 How.) 184 (1858) Duty Evidence Disasters Ships and Boats Lights Torts Collisions Harbors Conflicts of Law Inland Water Transportation Towage and Pilotage Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law South Carolina Charleston Navigation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-023-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal South Carolina U.S. District Court South Carolina U.S. Circuit for the District of South Carolina Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-30 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-184 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-184.pdf 62 U.S. 195 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-195 62 U.S. (21 How.) 195 (1858) 62 U.S. 195 D09002ee1d4aed0ca Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Insurance Co. of the Valley of Virginia v. Mordecai, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 195 (1858);62 U.S. 195;21 How. 195 CASE USREPORTS-62-195 195 21 1 1859-01-31 1858 62 U.S. 195 21 How. 195 62 U.S. (21 How.) 195 (1858) Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Private Action 1858-019-01 Insurance company, or surety Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Writ of error Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-21 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-195 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-195.pdf 62 U.S. 202 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-202 62 U.S. (21 How.) 202 (1858) 62 U.S. 202 D09002ee1d4aed0ec Jury Instructions Torts Agency Damages Privileged Communications Intent Civil Procedure Libel and Slander Business and Corporate Law Corporations Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Philadelphia, Wilmington, and Baltimore Railroad Company v. Quigley, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 202 (1858);62 U.S. 202;21 How. 202 CASE USREPORTS-62-202 202 22 1 1859-01-17 1858 62 U.S. 202 21 How. 202 62 U.S. (21 How.) 202 (1858) Jury Instructions Torts Agency Damages Privileged Communications Intent Civil Procedure Libel and Slander Business and Corporate Law Corporations Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-014-01 Railroad Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Writ of error Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-202 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-202.pdf 62 U.S. 223 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-223 62 U.S. (21 How.) 223 (1858) 62 U.S. 223 D09002ee1d4aed0c9 Jurisdiction and Venue California Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Louisiana Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Campbell et al. v. Boyreau, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 223 (1858);62 U.S. 223;21 How. 223 CASE USREPORTS-62-223 223 23 1 1859-01-31 1858 62 U.S. 223 21 How. 223 62 U.S. (21 How.) 223 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue California Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Louisiana Civil Procedure Private Action 1858-020-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-21 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-223 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-223.pdf 62 U.S. 228 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-228 62 U.S. (21 How.) 228 (1858) 62 U.S. 228 D09002ee1d4aed0e9 North America Canada Heirs Land Titles Boundaries Equity Veterans Military Bounties Public Lands Inheritance and Succession American Revolution Estoppel Civil Procedure Property Law Citizenship and Nationality War of Independence Constitutional Law Real Estate Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Lessee of French and Wife v. Spencer et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 228 (1858);62 U.S. 228;21 How. 228 CASE USREPORTS-62-228 228 24 1 1859-01-31 1858 62 U.S. 228 21 How. 228 62 U.S. (21 How.) 228 (1858) North America Canada Heirs Land Titles Boundaries Equity Veterans Military Bounties Public Lands Inheritance and Succession American Revolution Estoppel Civil Procedure Property Law Citizenship and Nationality War of Independence Constitutional Law Real Estate Judicial Administration: Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata Judicial Power 1858-021-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-12 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-228 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-228.pdf 62 U.S. 241 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-241 62 U.S. (21 How.) 241 (1858) 62 U.S. 241 D09002ee1d4aed515 Property Law Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Mortgages Real Estate Equity Debt Vested Interest Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Smith v. Orton, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 241 (1858);62 U.S. 241;21 How. 241 CASE USREPORTS-62-241 241 25 1 1859-02-03 1858 62 U.S. 241 21 How. 241 62 U.S. (21 How.) 241 (1858) Property Law Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Mortgages Real Estate Equity Debt Vested Interest Real Property Private Action 1858-024-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-13 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-241 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-241.pdf 62 U.S. 244 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-244 62 U.S. (21 How.) 244 (1858) 62 U.S. 244 D09002ee1d4aed0f4 Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence North America Ships and Boats Torts Interstate Commerce Commerce Inland Water Transportation Great Lakes Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Allen et al. v. Newberry, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 244 (1858);62 U.S. 244;21 How. 244 CASE USREPORTS-62-244 244 26 1 1859-02-03 1858 62 U.S. 244 21 How. 244 62 U.S. (21 How.) 244 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence North America Ships and Boats Torts Interstate Commerce Commerce Inland Water Transportation Great Lakes Maritime and Admiralty Law Navigation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1858-025-01 Business, corporation Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-07 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-244 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-244.pdf 62 U.S. 248 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-248 62 U.S. (21 How.) 248 (1858) 62 U.S. 248 D09002ee1d4aed0d4 Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Ships and Boats Torts Contracts Inland Water Transportation Commerce Maritime and Admiralty Law Admiralty and Maritime Law Navigation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Maguire v. Card, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 248 (1858);62 U.S. 248;21 How. 248 CASE USREPORTS-62-248 248 27 1 1859-02-07 1858 62 U.S. 248 21 How. 248 62 U.S. (21 How.) 248 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Ships and Boats Torts Contracts Inland Water Transportation Commerce Maritime and Admiralty Law Admiralty and Maritime Law Navigation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1858-028-01 Buyer, purchaser Seller or vendor Appeal California U.S. District Court California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-11 Statutory construction Federal common law Court Rules Supreme Court Rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-248 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-248.pdf 62 U.S. 251 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-251 62 U.S. (21 How.) 251 (1858) 62 U.S. 251 D09002ee1d4aed0df Customs Enforcement Import and Export Manufacturing Contracts Penalties Fraud and Financial Crimes Commercial Law Valuation Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Belcher et al. v. Lawrason, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 251 (1858);62 U.S. 251;21 How. 251 CASE USREPORTS-62-251 251 28 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 251 21 How. 251 62 U.S. (21 How.) 251 (1858) Customs Enforcement Import and Export Manufacturing Contracts Penalties Fraud and Financial Crimes Commercial Law Valuation Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation 1858-030-01 Shipper, including importer and exporter Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error Customs Service or Commissioner or Collector of Customs Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-251 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-251.pdf 62 U.S. 257 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-257 62 U.S. (21 How.) 257 (1858) 62 U.S. 257 D09002ee1d4aed0d1 Board of Commissioners International Law Standing Contracts Law Contracts Civil Procedure Treaties and International Agreements Bankruptcy Law Claims Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Pemberton v. Lockett et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 257 (1858);62 U.S. 257;21 How. 257 CASE USREPORTS-62-257 257 29 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 257 21 How. 257 62 U.S. (21 How.) 257 (1858) Board of Commissioners International Law Standing Contracts Law Contracts Civil Procedure Treaties and International Agreements Bankruptcy Law Claims Contracts Private Action 1858-036-01 Insurance company, or surety Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Appeal Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-08 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-257 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-257.pdf 62 U.S. 266 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-266 62 U.S. (21 How.) 266 (1858) 62 U.S. 266 D09002ee1d4aed0c8 Currency Contractual Terms Debt Certificates of Deposit Contracts Law Promissory Notes Banks and Financial Institutions Contracts Bankruptcy Law Financial Services Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Poorman v. Woodward et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 266 (1858);62 U.S. 266;21 How. 266 CASE USREPORTS-62-266 266 30 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 266 21 How. 266 62 U.S. (21 How.) 266 (1858) Currency Contractual Terms Debt Certificates of Deposit Contracts Law Promissory Notes Banks and Financial Institutions Contracts Bankruptcy Law Financial Services Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-037-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Debtor Writ of error Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-25 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-266 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-266.pdf 62 U.S. 276 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-276 62 U.S. (21 How.) 276 (1858) 62 U.S. 276 D09002ee1d4aed0e2 Juries Evidence Privatization Education Land Offices Property Law Land Titles Urban Planning Public Lands Public-Private Cooperation U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Executive Powers Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Dickins's Leasee v. Mahana, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 276 (1858);62 U.S. 276;21 How. 276 CASE USREPORTS-62-276 276 31 1 1859-02-22 1858 62 U.S. 276 21 How. 276 62 U.S. (21 How.) 276 (1858) Juries Evidence Privatization Education Land Offices Property Law Land Titles Urban Planning Public Lands Public-Private Cooperation U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Executive Powers Real Property Private Action 1858-043-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Agency Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-21 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-276 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-276.pdf 62 U.S. 283 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-283 62 U.S. (21 How.) 283 (1858) 62 U.S. 283 D09002ee1d4aed0c6 Railroads Contracts Law Contracts Demurrers Civil Procedure Valuation Property Law Securities Real Estate Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Hillv. Caleb B. Smith et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 283 (1858);62 U.S. 283;21 How. 283 CASE USREPORTS-62-283 283 32 1 1859-02-03 1858 62 U.S. 283 21 How. 283 62 U.S. (21 How.) 283 (1858) Railroads Contracts Law Contracts Demurrers Civil Procedure Valuation Property Law Securities Real Estate Contracts Private Action 1858-026-01 Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Railroad Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-283 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-283.pdf 62 U.S. 287 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-287 62 U.S. (21 How.) 287 (1858) 62 U.S. 287 D09002ee1d4aed0f0 Agency Contracts Fraud and Financial Crimes Contracts Law Evidence Parol Evidence Principal Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Ford v. Williams, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 287 (1858);62 U.S. 287;21 How. 287 CASE USREPORTS-62-287 287 33 1 1858-12-28 1858 62 U.S. 287 21 How. 287 62 U.S. (21 How.) 287 (1858) Agency Contracts Fraud and Financial Crimes Contracts Law Evidence Parol Evidence Principal Contracts Private Action 1858-007-01 Seller or vendor Buyer, purchaser Writ of error Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-15 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-287 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-287.pdf 62 U.S. 290 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-290 62 U.S. (21 How.) 290 (1858) 62 U.S. 290 D09002ee1d4aed505 Public Lands Property Jurisdiction and Venue Oregon Land Titles Real Estate Property Law Homestead Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Lownsdale v. Parrish, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 290 (1858);62 U.S. 290;21 How. 290 CASE USREPORTS-62-290 290 34 1 1859-01-17 1858 62 U.S. 290 21 How. 290 62 U.S. (21 How.) 290 (1858) Public Lands Property Jurisdiction and Venue Oregon Land Titles Real Estate Property Law Homestead Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1858-015-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-12-20 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-290 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-290.pdf 62 U.S. 294 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-294 62 U.S. (21 How.) 294 (1858) 62 U.S. 294 D09002ee1d4aed0d9 Pre-Emption Rights Ejectments Agency Land Titles Public Lands Inheritance and Succession Assignment Limitation of Actions Sovereignty Spain Homestead Death and Dying Property Law Real Estate Property Partnerships Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Morehouse v. Phelps, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 294 (1858);62 U.S. 294;21 How. 294 CASE USREPORTS-62-294 294 35 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 294 21 How. 294 62 U.S. (21 How.) 294 (1858) Pre-Emption Rights Ejectments Agency Land Titles Public Lands Inheritance and Succession Assignment Limitation of Actions Sovereignty Spain Homestead Death and Dying Property Law Real Estate Property Partnerships Real Property Private Action 1858-047-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-09 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-294 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-294.pdf 62 U.S. 305 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-305 62 U.S. (21 How.) 305 (1858) 62 U.S. 305 D09002ee1d4aed0cc Juries Land Offices Land Titles Boundaries Possession Virginia Surveyors and Surveying Maps and Mapping Property Law Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Brown et al. v. Huger, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 305 (1858);62 U.S. 305;21 How. 305 CASE USREPORTS-62-305 305 36 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 305 21 How. 305 62 U.S. (21 How.) 305 (1858) Juries Land Offices Land Titles Boundaries Possession Virginia Surveyors and Surveying Maps and Mapping Property Law Real Property Private Action 1858-031-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-20 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-305 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-305.pdf 62 U.S. 322 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-322 62 U.S. (21 How.) 322 (1858) 62 U.S. 322 D09002ee1d4aed507 Intellectual Property Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Patent Pending Intellectual Property Juries Jury Instructions Diligence Patent Infringement Inventions Patent Misuse Public Domain Contracts Limitation of Actions Secrecy Research and Development Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Kendall et al. v. Winsor, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 322 (1858);62 U.S. 322;21 How. 322 CASE USREPORTS-62-322 322 37 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 322 21 How. 322 62 U.S. (21 How.) 322 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Patent Pending Intellectual Property Juries Jury Instructions Diligence Patent Infringement Inventions Patent Misuse Public Domain Contracts Limitation of Actions Secrecy Research and Development Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1858-048-01 Holder of a license or permit, or applicant therefor Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Writ of error Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-16 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-322 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-322.pdf 62 U.S. 331 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-331 62 U.S. (21 How.) 331 (1858) 62 U.S. 331 D09002ee1d4aed0de Fraud and Financial Crimes Chancery Courts Evidence Tax Avoidance Land Titles Arkansas Burden of Proof State and Local Taxation Civil Procedure Property Law Real Estate Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Thomas v. Lawson et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 331 (1858);62 U.S. 331;21 How. 331 CASE USREPORTS-62-331 331 38 1 1859-01-24 1858 62 U.S. 331 21 How. 331 62 U.S. (21 How.) 331 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Chancery Courts Evidence Tax Avoidance Land Titles Arkansas Burden of Proof State and Local Taxation Civil Procedure Property Law Real Estate Evidence Private Action 1858-017-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Arkansas U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Arkansas Arkansas U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Arkansas Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-331 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-331.pdf 62 U.S. 343 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-343 62 U.S. (21 How.) 343 (1858) 62 U.S. 343 D09002ee1d4aed0eb Negligence Evidence Weather Ships and Boats Soap Damages Pleadings Damaged Goods Civil Procedure Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Goods and Services Shipping Navigation Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;McKinlay et al. v. Morrish et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 343 (1858);62 U.S. 343;21 How. 343 CASE USREPORTS-62-343 343 39 1 1859-01-31 1858 62 U.S. 343 21 How. 343 62 U.S. (21 How.) 343 (1858) Negligence Evidence Weather Ships and Boats Soap Damages Pleadings Damaged Goods Civil Procedure Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Goods and Services Shipping Navigation Evidence Private Action 1858-022-01 Business, corporation Water transportation, stevedore Appeal California Northern U.S. District Court California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-07 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-343 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-343.pdf 62 U.S. 356 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-356 62 U.S. (21 How.) 356 (1858) 62 U.S. 356 D09002ee1d4aed0e7 Administrative Law Ordinary Duties Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions Contracts Civil Procedure Ordinary Business Cashiers Reimbursement U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Securities Financial Services Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;United States v. City Bank of Columbus, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 356 (1858);62 U.S. 356;21 How. 356 CASE USREPORTS-62-356 356 40 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 356 21 How. 356 62 U.S. (21 How.) 356 (1858) Administrative Law Ordinary Duties Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions Contracts Civil Procedure Ordinary Business Cashiers Reimbursement U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Securities Financial Services Contracts Private Action 1858-032-01 United States Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Writ of error Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-26 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-356 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-356.pdf 62 U.S. 366 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-366 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1858) 62 U.S. 366 D09002ee1d4aed0ff Tonawanda Reservation North America Jurisdiction and Venue American Indians Indian Reservations Indian Lands Divorce Native Rights Domicile Property Law Land Titles New York Indigenous Peoples Equity Conflicts of Law Native Americans Civil Procedure Seneca Indians Property Rights Native Peoples Family Law Property National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;State of New York v. Dibble, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1858);62 U.S. 366;21 How. 366 CASE USREPORTS-62-366 366 41 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 366 21 How. 366 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1858) Tonawanda Reservation North America Jurisdiction and Venue American Indians Indian Reservations Indian Lands Divorce Native Rights Domicile Property Law Land Titles New York Indigenous Peoples Equity Conflicts of Law Native Americans Civil Procedure Seneca Indians Property Rights Native Peoples Family Law Property National Supremacy: Natural Resources (Cf. Natural Resources - Environmental Protection) Federalism 1858-038-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Judge Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-03 Statutory construction Judicial review (state level) State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-366 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-366.pdf 62 U.S. 372 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-372 62 U.S. (21 How.) 372 (1858) 62 U.S. 372 D09002ee1d4aed087 Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Steamships Navigation Sailing Ships Damages Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;New York and Liverpool U.S. Mail Steamship Co. v. Rumball, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 372 (1858);62 U.S. 372;21 How. 372 CASE USREPORTS-62-372 372 42 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 372 21 How. 372 62 U.S. (21 How.) 372 (1858) Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Steamships Navigation Sailing Ships Damages Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-039-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal New York U.S. District Court New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-07 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-372 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-372.pdf 62 U.S. 386 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-386 62 U.S. (21 How.) 386 (1858) 62 U.S. 386 D09002ee1d4aed0e6 Maritime and Admiralty Law Damages Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Consent Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Montgomery et al. v. Anderson et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 386 (1858);62 U.S. 386;21 How. 386 CASE USREPORTS-62-386 386 43 1 1859-02-28 1858 62 U.S. 386 21 How. 386 62 U.S. (21 How.) 386 (1858) Maritime and Admiralty Law Damages Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Consent Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1858-044-01 Water transportation, stevedore Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Missouri U.S. District Court Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-386 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-386.pdf 62 U.S. 389 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-389 62 U.S. (21 How.) 389 (1858) 62 U.S. 389 D09002ee1d4aed0d0 Consent Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Ballance v. Forsyth et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 389 (1858);62 U.S. 389;21 How. 389 CASE USREPORTS-62-389 389 44 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 389 21 How. 389 62 U.S. (21 How.) 389 (1858) Consent Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1858-040-01 Unidentifiable Unidentifiable Appeal Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-389 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-389.pdf 62 U.S. 390 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-390 62 U.S. (21 How.) 390 (1858) 62 U.S. 390 D09002ee1d4aed0e1 Tax Refunds Taxation Jurisdiction and Venue Tax Law Civil Procedure Valuation Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Mason v. Gamble et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 390 (1858);62 U.S. 390;21 How. 390 CASE USREPORTS-62-390 390 45 1 1859-01-18 1858 62 U.S. 390 21 How. 390 62 U.S. (21 How.) 390 (1858) Tax Refunds Taxation Jurisdiction and Venue Tax Law Civil Procedure Valuation Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1858-016-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Shipper, including importer and exporter Writ of error Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-14 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-390 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-390.pdf 62 U.S. 391 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-391 62 U.S. (21 How.) 391 (1858) 62 U.S. 391 D09002ee1d4aed0db Evidence Jurisdiction and Venue Affidavit Civil Procedure Valuation Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Richmond v. City of Milwaukie, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 391 (1858);62 U.S. 391;21 How. 391 CASE USREPORTS-62-391 391 46 1 1859-02-28 1858 62 U.S. 391 21 How. 391 62 U.S. (21 How.) 391 (1858) Evidence Jurisdiction and Venue Affidavit Civil Procedure Valuation Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1858-045-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Rehearing or restored to calendar for reargument Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-391 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-391.pdf 62 U.S. 393 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-393 62 U.S. (21 How.) 393 (1858) 62 U.S. 393 D09002ee1d4aed0f7 Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Porter et al. v. Foley, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 393 (1858);62 U.S. 393;21 How. 393 CASE USREPORTS-62-393 393 47 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 393 21 How. 393 62 U.S. (21 How.) 393 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power 1858-041-01 Unidentifiable Unidentifiable Writ of error State Appellate Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-393 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-393.pdf 62 U.S. 394 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-394 62 U.S. (21 How.) 394 (1858) 62 U.S. 394 D09002ee1d4aed0ee Pennsylvania Legal Titles Equitable Titles Evidence Balance of Accounts Civil Procedure Louisiana Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Martin v. Imhsen, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 394 (1858);62 U.S. 394;21 How. 394 CASE USREPORTS-62-394 394 48 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 394 21 How. 394 62 U.S. (21 How.) 394 (1858) Pennsylvania Legal Titles Equitable Titles Evidence Balance of Accounts Civil Procedure Louisiana Civil Procedure Private Action 1858-033-01 Debtor Business, corporation Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-25 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-394 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-394.pdf 62 U.S. 397 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-397 62 U.S. (21 How.) 397 (1858) 62 U.S. 397 D09002ee1d4aed0d6 Evidence Agency Texas Contracts Civil Procedure Credit Markets Property Law Securities State and Local Finance Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Combs v. Hodge et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 397 (1858);62 U.S. 397;21 How. 397 CASE USREPORTS-62-397 397 49 1 1859-02-03 1858 62 U.S. 397 21 How. 397 62 U.S. (21 How.) 397 (1858) Evidence Agency Texas Contracts Civil Procedure Credit Markets Property Law Securities State and Local Finance Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-027-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-11 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-397 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-397.pdf 62 U.S. 408 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-408 62 U.S. (21 How.) 408 (1858) 62 U.S. 408 D09002ee1d4aed0f9 Mexico Evidence Abdication Land Titles Sovereignty Public Lands California Land Grants Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;United States v. Nye, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 408 (1858);62 U.S. 408;21 How. 408 CASE USREPORTS-62-408 408 50 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 408 21 How. 408 62 U.S. (21 How.) 408 (1858) Mexico Evidence Abdication Land Titles Sovereignty Public Lands California Land Grants Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-034-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-14 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-408 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-408.pdf 62 U.S. 412 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-412 62 U.S. (21 How.) 412 (1858) 62 U.S. 412 D09002ee1d4aed0d8 Mexico Evidence Abdication Land Titles Sovereignty Public Lands California Land Grants Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;United States v. Bassett, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 412 (1858);62 U.S. 412;21 How. 412 CASE USREPORTS-62-412 412 51 1 1859-02-14 1858 62 U.S. 412 21 How. 412 62 U.S. (21 How.) 412 (1858) Mexico Evidence Abdication Land Titles Sovereignty Public Lands California Land Grants Property Law Real Estate Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-035-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-17 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-412 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-412.pdf 62 U.S. 414 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-414 62 U.S. (21 How.) 414 (1858) 62 U.S. 414 D09002ee1d4aed517 Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Interest Contracts Civil Procedure Liens Bankruptcy Law Securities Corporations Law Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;White Water Valley Canal Company v. Vallette et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 414 (1858);62 U.S. 414;21 How. 414 CASE USREPORTS-62-414 414 52 1 1859-02-21 1858 62 U.S. 414 21 How. 414 62 U.S. (21 How.) 414 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Interest Contracts Civil Procedure Liens Bankruptcy Law Securities Corporations Law Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-042-01 Debtor Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-28 Statutory construction Federal common law State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell James Moore Wayne 6 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-414 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-414.pdf 62 U.S. 426 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-426 62 U.S. (21 How.) 426 (1858) 62 U.S. 426 D09002ee1d4aed504 North America Land Titles France Spain Sovereignty Louisiana Public Lands Contracts Estoppel Civil Procedure Property Law New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Easton v. Salisbury, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 426 (1858);62 U.S. 426;21 How. 426 CASE USREPORTS-62-426 426 53 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 426 21 How. 426 62 U.S. (21 How.) 426 (1858) North America Land Titles France Spain Sovereignty Louisiana Public Lands Contracts Estoppel Civil Procedure Property Law New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-049-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error General Land Office or Commissioners State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-18 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-426 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-426.pdf 62 U.S. 432 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-432 62 U.S. (21 How.) 432 (1858) 62 U.S. 432 D09002ee1d4aed509 Currency Trusts and Estates Debt Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions Collateral Contracts Valuation Securities Financial Services Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;McCarty et al. v. Roots et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 432 (1858);62 U.S. 432;21 How. 432 CASE USREPORTS-62-432 432 54 1 1859-03-04 1858 62 U.S. 432 21 How. 432 62 U.S. (21 How.) 432 (1858) Currency Trusts and Estates Debt Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions Collateral Contracts Valuation Securities Financial Services Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-046-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Debtor Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-19 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-432 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-432.pdf 62 U.S. 441 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-441 62 U.S. (21 How.) 441 (1858) 62 U.S. 441 D09002ee1d4aed0e4 Competition and Antitrust Public Transit Railroads Authority Ships and Boats Promissory Notes Inland Water Transportation Business and Corporate Law Commerce Corporations Law Navigation Antitrust Law Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Pearce v. Madison & Indianapolis R.R. Co. and Peru & Indianapolis R.R. Co., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 441 (1858);62 U.S. 441;21 How. 441 CASE USREPORTS-62-441 441 55 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 441 21 How. 441 62 U.S. (21 How.) 441 (1858) Competition and Antitrust Public Transit Railroads Authority Ships and Boats Promissory Notes Inland Water Transportation Business and Corporate Law Commerce Corporations Law Navigation Antitrust Law Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-053-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Railroad Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-441 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-441.pdf 62 U.S. 445 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-445 62 U.S. (21 How.) 445 (1858) 62 U.S. 445 D09002ee1d4aed50a Jurisdiction and Venue Controversy Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;United States v. Fossatt, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 445 (1858);62 U.S. 445;21 How. 445 CASE USREPORTS-62-445 445 56 1 1859-02-28 1858 62 U.S. 445 21 How. 445 62 U.S. (21 How.) 445 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Controversy Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1858-054-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-25 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-445 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-445.pdf 62 U.S. 451 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-451 62 U.S. (21 How.) 451 (1858) 62 U.S. 451 D09002ee1d4aed0d7 Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Towage and Pilotage Collisions Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Sturgis v. Clough et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 451 (1858);62 U.S. 451;21 How. 451 CASE USREPORTS-62-451 451 57 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 451 21 How. 451 62 U.S. (21 How.) 451 (1858) Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Towage and Pilotage Collisions Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-055-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal New York U.S. District Court New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-451 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-451.pdf 62 U.S. 456 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-456 62 U.S. (21 How.) 456 (1858) 62 U.S. 456 D09002ee1d4aed0f1 Intellectual Property Law Competition and Antitrust Contracts Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Contracts Law Telecommunications Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Western Telegraph Company v. Magnetic Telegraph Company, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 456 (1858);62 U.S. 456;21 How. 456 CASE USREPORTS-62-456 456 58 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 456 21 How. 456 62 U.S. (21 How.) 456 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Competition and Antitrust Contracts Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Contracts Law Telecommunications Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1858-056-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Appeal Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-456 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-456.pdf 62 U.S. 460 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-460 62 U.S. (21 How.) 460 (1858) 62 U.S. 460 D09002ee1d4aed0d5 Intellectual Property Law Competition and Antitrust Contracts Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Contracts Law Telecommunications Patents Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Western Telegraph Company v. Penniman et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 460 (1858);62 U.S. 460;21 How. 460 CASE USREPORTS-62-460 460 59 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 460 21 How. 460 62 U.S. (21 How.) 460 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Competition and Antitrust Contracts Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Contracts Law Telecommunications Patents Contracts Private Action 1858-057-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Appeal Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-04 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-460 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-460.pdf 62 U.S. 463 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-463 62 U.S. (21 How.) 463 (1858) 62 U.S. 463 D09002ee1d4aed506 Lighthouses Administrative Law Expenses Agency Public Contracts and Procurement Administrative Law and Procedure Duties Defense Spending Appropriations Officials and Employees U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Goods and Services Executive Powers Compensation Legislative Powers Military Personnel Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;James C. Converse, Administrator of Philip Greely, deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 463 (1858);62 U.S. 463;21 How. 463 CASE USREPORTS-62-463 463 60 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 463 21 How. 463 62 U.S. (21 How.) 463 (1858) Lighthouses Administrative Law Expenses Agency Public Contracts and Procurement Administrative Law and Procedure Duties Defense Spending Appropriations Officials and Employees U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Goods and Services Executive Powers Compensation Legislative Powers Military Personnel Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys 1858-058-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor United States Writ of error Department or Secretary of the Treasury Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-04 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-463 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-463.pdf 62 U.S. 481 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-481 62 U.S. (21 How.) 481 (1858) 62 U.S. 481 D09002ee1d4aed0f3 Jurisdiction and Venue Privatization Ejectments Land Titles Boundaries Equity Public Lands Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Appellate Courts New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Fenn v. Holme, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 481 (1858);62 U.S. 481;21 How. 481 CASE USREPORTS-62-481 481 61 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 481 21 How. 481 62 U.S. (21 How.) 481 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Privatization Ejectments Land Titles Boundaries Equity Public Lands Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Appellate Courts New Madrid Act State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-059-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error General Land Office or Commissioners Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-16 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-481 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-481.pdf 62 U.S. 489 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-489 62 U.S. (21 How.) 489 (1858) 62 U.S. 489 D09002ee1d4aed503 Jurisdiction and Venue Railroads Joinder of Parties Contracts Law Indiana Contracts Civil Procedure Valuation Property Law Securities Real Estate Ohio Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Hiram Clearwater, Plaintiff in Error, v. Solomon Meredith, Pleasant Johnson, and Thomas Tyner, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 489 (1858);62 U.S. 489;21 How. 489 CASE USREPORTS-62-489 489 62 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 489 21 How. 489 62 U.S. (21 How.) 489 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Railroads Joinder of Parties Contracts Law Indiana Contracts Civil Procedure Valuation Property Law Securities Real Estate Ohio Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power 1858-060-01 Seller or vendor Buyer, purchaser Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-03 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-489 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-489.pdf 62 U.S. 493 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-493 62 U.S. (21 How.) 493 (1858) 62 U.S. 493 D09002ee1d4aed0fd Adverse Possession Evidence Tennessee Statute of Limitations Land Titles Vendors Public Lands Validity Property Law Real Estate Bona Fide Purchasers Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Lea v. Polk County Copper Company, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 493 (1858);62 U.S. 493;21 How. 493 CASE USREPORTS-62-493 493 63 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 493 21 How. 493 62 U.S. (21 How.) 493 (1858) Adverse Possession Evidence Tennessee Statute of Limitations Land Titles Vendors Public Lands Validity Property Law Real Estate Bona Fide Purchasers Real Property Private Action 1858-061-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-01 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-493 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-493.pdf 62 U.S. 506 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-506 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1858) 62 U.S. 506 D09002ee1d4aed502 States' Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Habeas Corpus State and Local Government Fugitive Slave Law Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Slaves Law Enforcement Officials National Supremacy: Marital and Family Relationships and Property, Including Obligation of Child Support Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Ableman v. Booth and United States v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1858);62 U.S. 506;21 How. 506 CASE USREPORTS-62-506 506 64 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 506 21 How. 506 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1858) States' Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Habeas Corpus State and Local Government Fugitive Slave Law Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Slaves Law Enforcement Officials National Supremacy: Marital and Family Relationships and Property, Including Obligation of Child Support Federalism 1858-050-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Writ of error State Supreme Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-19 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-506 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-506.pdf 62 U.S. 526 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-526 62 U.S. (21 How.) 526 (1858) 62 U.S. 526 D09002ee1d4aed0cf Civil Procedure No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Rogers et al. v. Law, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 526 (1858);62 U.S. 526;21 How. 526 CASE USREPORTS-62-526 526 65 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 526 21 How. 526 62 U.S. (21 How.) 526 (1858) Civil Procedure No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power 1858-051-01 Unidentifiable Unidentifiable Appeal Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-18 1859-03-04 Statutory construction Court Rules Supreme Court Rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-526 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-526.pdf 62 U.S. 527 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-527 62 U.S. (21 How.) 527 (1858) 62 U.S. 527 D09002ee1d4aed0da Standards of Practice Commerce Liens Insurance Ships and Boats Import and Export Contracts Law Terms of Contract Payment on Delivery Pro Rata Freight Charges Contracts Damaged Goods Goods and Services Shipping Securities Payments Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Brittan v. Barnaby, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 527 (1858);62 U.S. 527;21 How. 527 CASE USREPORTS-62-527 527 66 1 1859-03-07 1858 62 U.S. 527 21 How. 527 62 U.S. (21 How.) 527 (1858) Standards of Practice Commerce Liens Insurance Ships and Boats Import and Export Contracts Law Terms of Contract Payment on Delivery Pro Rata Freight Charges Contracts Damaged Goods Goods and Services Shipping Securities Payments Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-052-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Water transportation, stevedore Appeal California U.S. District Court California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-27 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-527 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-527.pdf 62 U.S. 539 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-539 62 U.S. (21 How.) 539 (1858) 62 U.S. 539 D09002ee1d4aed0f2 Public Transit Railroads State and Local Government Contracts Law Municipal Corporations Contracts Election Law Business and Corporate Law Securities Corporations Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Commissioners of Knox County, Indiana v. Aspinwall et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 539 (1858);62 U.S. 539;21 How. 539 CASE USREPORTS-62-539 539 67 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 539 21 How. 539 62 U.S. (21 How.) 539 (1858) Public Transit Railroads State and Local Government Contracts Law Municipal Corporations Contracts Election Law Business and Corporate Law Securities Corporations Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1858-062-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Writ of error State Agency Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-23 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-539 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-539.pdf 62 U.S. 546 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-546 62 U.S. (21 How.) 546 (1858) 62 U.S. 546 D09002ee1d4aed0e8 Public Transit Railroads State and Local Government Contracts Law Municipal Corporations Contracts Election Law Business and Corporate Law Securities Corporations Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Commissioners of Knox County, Indiana v. Wallace, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 546 (1858);62 U.S. 546;21 How. 546 CASE USREPORTS-62-546 546 68 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 546 21 How. 546 62 U.S. (21 How.) 546 (1858) Public Transit Railroads State and Local Government Contracts Law Municipal Corporations Contracts Election Law Business and Corporate Law Securities Corporations Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1858-063-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Writ of error State Agency Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-25 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-546 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-546.pdf 62 U.S. 548 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-548 62 U.S. (21 How.) 548 (1858) 62 U.S. 548 D09002ee1d4aed0f8 Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Negligence Lights Collisions Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Chamberlain et al. v. Ward et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 548 (1858);62 U.S. 548;21 How. 548 CASE USREPORTS-62-548 548 69 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 548 21 How. 548 62 U.S. (21 How.) 548 (1858) Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Negligence Lights Collisions Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-064-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Ohio U.S. District Court Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-10 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-548 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-548.pdf 62 U.S. 572 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-572 62 U.S. (21 How.) 572 (1858) 62 U.S. 572 D09002ee1d4aed516 Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Negligence Collisions Civil Procedure Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Ward et al. v. Chamberlain et al., 62 U.S. (21 How.) 572 (1858);62 U.S. 572;21 How. 572 CASE USREPORTS-62-572 572 70 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 572 21 How. 572 62 U.S. (21 How.) 572 (1858) Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Negligence Collisions Civil Procedure Navigation Disasters Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1858-065-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Ohio U.S. District Court Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-10 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-572 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-572.pdf 62 U.S. 575 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-575 62 U.S. (21 How.) 575 (1858) 62 U.S. 575 D09002ee1d4aed0ce Standards of Practice Jurisdiction and Venue Currency Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions English Law Contracts Massachusetts Negotiable Instruments Securities New Hampshire Financial Services Civil Procedure Commercial Transactions Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;White v. Vermont and Massachusetts Railroad Company, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 575 (1858);62 U.S. 575;21 How. 575 CASE USREPORTS-62-575 575 71 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 575 21 How. 575 62 U.S. (21 How.) 575 (1858) Standards of Practice Jurisdiction and Venue Currency Contracts Law Banks and Financial Institutions English Law Contracts Massachusetts Negotiable Instruments Securities New Hampshire Financial Services Civil Procedure Commercial Transactions Private Action 1858-066-01 Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Railroad Writ of error Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-03-08 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-575 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-575.pdf 62 U.S. 579 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-579 62 U.S. (21 How.) 579 (1858) 62 U.S. 579 D09002ee1d4aed0fe Chancery Courts Land Grants Land Titles Injunctions Veterans Public Lands Legal Remedies Virginia U.S. Department of the Interior (D.O.I.) Wages and Hours Property Law Salary and Compensation Executive Powers Real Estate State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Walker v. Smith, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 579 (1858);62 U.S. 579;21 How. 579 CASE USREPORTS-62-579 579 72 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 579 21 How. 579 62 U.S. (21 How.) 579 (1858) Chancery Courts Land Grants Land Titles Injunctions Veterans Public Lands Legal Remedies Virginia U.S. Department of the Interior (D.O.I.) Wages and Hours Property Law Salary and Compensation Executive Powers Real Estate State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1858-067-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-02-28 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-579 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-579.pdf 62 U.S. 582 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-582 62 U.S. (21 How.) 582 (1858) 62 U.S. 582 D09002ee1d4aed0e0 Jurisdiction and Venue Next Friend Alimony Divorce Domicile New York Equity Coverture English Law Wisconsin Civil Procedure Property Law Family Law Women's Rights Sex Discrimination (Excluding Sex Discrimination in Employment) Civil Rights Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Barber v. Barber, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 582 (1858);62 U.S. 582;21 How. 582 CASE USREPORTS-62-582 582 73 1 1859-03-11 1858 62 U.S. 582 21 How. 582 62 U.S. (21 How.) 582 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Next Friend Alimony Divorce Domicile New York Equity Coverture English Law Wisconsin Civil Procedure Property Law Family Law Women's Rights Sex Discrimination (Excluding Sex Discrimination in Employment) Civil Rights 1858-068-01 Husband, or ex-husband Wife, or ex-wife Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1859-01-19 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitution Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne John McLean 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-582 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-582.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-BackMatter D09002ee1d4aed0ed Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1858;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-62-BackMatter 74 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-62/USREPORTS-62-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-62/pdf/USREPORTS-62-BackMatter.pdf