United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2025-07-03 JU 6.8/1:61 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/text/USREPORTS-61.txt Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857 USREPORTS USREPORTS-61 61 1858 1857 United States Supreme Court. creator Cranch, William 1769-1855 Wheaton, Henry 1785-1848 Peters, Richard 1780-1848 Howard, Benjamin C. (Benjamin Chew) 1791-1872 Black, Jeremiah S. (Jeremiah Sullivan) 1810-1883 text legal case and case notes Periodicals. dcu Washington City Published for John Conrad and Co. 1858 1803 1862 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Vol. 1 (Aug. and Dec. terms 1801 and Feb. term 1803)-v. 9 (Feb. term 1815) ; vol. 1 (Feb. term 1816)-v. 12 (Jan. term 1827); vol. 1 (Jan. term 1828)-v. 17 (Jan. term 1843) ; vol. 1 (Jan. term 1843)-v. 24 (Dec. term 1860) ; vol. 1 (Dec. term, 1861)-v. 2 (Dec. term, 1862). Title from PDF title page (viewed July 10, 2007). Imprint varies. Reporters: 1801-1815, William Cranch (5-13 U.S.); 1816-1827, Henry Wheaton (14-25 U.S.); 1828-1842, Richard Peters, Jr. (26-41 U.S.); 1843-1860, Benjamin C. Howard (42-65 U.S.); 1861-1862, J.S. Black (66-67 U.S.). Vol. 17 (Jan. term 1843) of Peters contains the same cases as v. 1 of Howard and was not included in the retrospective numbering of United States reports. Numbering begins with v. 1 with each reporter. n-us--- Law reports, digests, etc United States Law reports, digests, etc United States KF101 JU 6.8/1:61 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 91643007 (OCoLC)7474395 Dallas, Alexander James, 1759-1817. (DLC) 2007228602 (OCoLC)52789526 United States. Supreme Court. (DLC) 2007227675 (OCoLC)52789834 2007228603 W.H. & O.H. Morrison 1858-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 660 digital object pages JU 6.8/1:61 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61 P0b002ee1d496e5ba 001176055 DGPO 2025-07-03 2025-07-03 USREPORTS-61 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-61 61 1858 1857 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter D09002ee1d4aecbc8 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1d4aecbd9 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Judges List FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-2 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1d4aecc00 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Rule Number Sixty-Four FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-5 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1d4aecbdb Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;List of Attorneys and Counsellors FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-4 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1d4aecc04 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;List of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-3 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-FrontMatter-3.pdf 61 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-1 61 U.S. (20 How.) 1 (1858) 61 U.S. 1 D09002ee1d4aecbd1 Questions of Law Mixed Jurisdictions State and Local Courts Differing Constructions Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Morgan v. Curtenius et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 1 (1858);61 U.S. 1;20 How. 1 CASE USREPORTS-61-1 1 6 1 1858-01-25 1857 61 U.S. 1 20 How. 1 61 U.S. (20 How.) 1 (1858) Questions of Law Mixed Jurisdictions State and Local Courts Differing Constructions Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Real Property Private Action 1857-011-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-1.pdf 61 U.S. 3 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-3 61 U.S. (20 How.) 3 (1857) 61 U.S. 3 D09002ee1d4aecbbd Jurisdiction and Venue Abandonment Property Law Land Titles Naked Possession Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Wynn v. Morris et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 3 (1857);61 U.S. 3;20 How. 3 CASE USREPORTS-61-3 3 7 1 1857-12-30 1857 61 U.S. 3 20 How. 3 61 U.S. (20 How.) 3 (1857) Jurisdiction and Venue Abandonment Property Law Land Titles Naked Possession Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1857-001-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-3.pdf 61 U.S. 6 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-6 61 U.S. (20 How.) 6 (1857) 61 U.S. 6 D09002ee1d4aecbfb Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Land Offices Land Titles Public Lands Perjury Property Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Register and Receiver of Public Lands Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Garland v. Wynn., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 6 (1857);61 U.S. 6;20 How. 6 CASE USREPORTS-61-6 6 8 1 1857-12-30 1857 61 U.S. 6 20 How. 6 61 U.S. (20 How.) 6 (1857) Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Land Offices Land Titles Public Lands Perjury Property Law Fraud and Financial Crimes Register and Receiver of Public Lands Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1857-002-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error General Land Office or Commissioners State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-6.pdf 61 U.S. 8 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-8 61 U.S. (20 How.) 8 (1858) 61 U.S. 8 D09002ee1d4aecbea Land Grants Foreign Judgments State and Local Government Land Titles Inheritance and Succession Voidance Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Foreign Land Grants State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Jones et al. v. McMasters., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 8 (1858);61 U.S. 8;20 How. 8 CASE USREPORTS-61-8 8 9 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 8 20 How. 8 61 U.S. (20 How.) 8 (1858) Land Grants Foreign Judgments State and Local Government Land Titles Inheritance and Succession Voidance Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Foreign Land Grants State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-005-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-16 Statutory construction Other Treaty Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-8.pdf 61 U.S. 22 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-22 61 U.S. (20 How.) 22 (1858) 61 U.S. 22 D09002ee1d4aecbf6 Foreign Law State and Local Courts Civil Procedure State and Local Government Statute of Limitations Legislative Powers Retrospective Laws Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Bacon et al. v. Howard., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 22 (1858);61 U.S. 22;20 How. 22 CASE USREPORTS-61-22 22 10 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 22 20 How. 22 61 U.S. (20 How.) 22 (1858) Foreign Law State and Local Courts Civil Procedure State and Local Government Statute of Limitations Legislative Powers Retrospective Laws Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 1857-006-01 Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Debtor Appeal Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-18 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-22 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-22.pdf 61 U.S. 26 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-26 61 U.S. (20 How.) 26 (1857) 61 U.S. 26 D09002ee1d4aecbcc Property Tax State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Legislative Powers Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Christ Church v. The County of Philadelphia., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 26 (1857);61 U.S. 26;20 How. 26 CASE USREPORTS-61-26 26 11 1 1857-12-30 1857 61 U.S. 26 20 How. 26 61 U.S. (20 How.) 26 (1857) Property Tax State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Legislative Powers Judicial Powers Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1857-003-01 Religious organization, institution, or person County government or county governmental unit, except school district Writ of error State Supreme Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-26 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-26.pdf 61 U.S. 29 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-29 61 U.S. (20 How.) 29 (1858) 61 U.S. 29 D09002ee1d4aecbba Boundaries Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Cancellation of Land Titles District of the Surveyor Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Doswell v. De Le Lanza et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 29 (1858);61 U.S. 29;20 How. 29 CASE USREPORTS-61-29 29 12 1 1858-01-25 1857 61 U.S. 29 20 How. 29 61 U.S. (20 How.) 29 (1858) Boundaries Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Cancellation of Land Titles District of the Surveyor Real Property Private Action 1857-012-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-21 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-29 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-29.pdf 61 U.S. 34 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-34 61 U.S. (20 How.) 34 (1858) 61 U.S. 34 D09002ee1d4aecbeb Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Burden of Evidence Personal Injury Inland Water Transportation Negligent Operation Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Wade v. Leroy et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 34 (1858);61 U.S. 34;20 How. 34 CASE USREPORTS-61-34 34 13 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 34 20 How. 34 61 U.S. (20 How.) 34 (1858) Ships and Boats Civil Liability Maritime and Admiralty Law Burden of Evidence Personal Injury Inland Water Transportation Negligent Operation Evidence Private Action 1857-007-01 Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Water transportation, stevedore Certification New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-22 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Certification to or from a lower court Favorable disposition for petitioning party unclear John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-34 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-34.pdf 61 U.S. 45 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-45 61 U.S. (20 How.) 45 (1858) 61 U.S. 45 D09002ee1d4aecbde Fraud and Financial Crimes Land Titles Master's Report Bankruptcy Act Landlords and Tenants Bankruptcy Law Bankruptcy Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Hudgins et al. v. Kemp., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 45 (1858);61 U.S. 45;20 How. 45 CASE USREPORTS-61-45 45 14 1 1858-02-10 1857 61 U.S. 45 20 How. 45 61 U.S. (20 How.) 45 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Land Titles Master's Report Bankruptcy Act Landlords and Tenants Bankruptcy Law Bankruptcy Evidence Private Action 1857-021-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Virginia U.S. District Court Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-29 Federal common law Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-45 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-45.pdf 61 U.S. 54 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-54 61 U.S. (20 How.) 54 (1858) 61 U.S. 54 D09002ee1d4aecbb9 Profits Civil Procedure Land Titles Master's Report Rent Landlords and Tenants Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Hudgins et al. v. Kemp., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 54 (1858);61 U.S. 54;20 How. 54 CASE USREPORTS-61-54 54 15 1 1858-02-10 1857 61 U.S. 54 20 How. 54 61 U.S. (20 How.) 54 (1858) Profits Civil Procedure Land Titles Master's Report Rent Landlords and Tenants Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity 1857-070-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Virginia U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Virginia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-29 Statutory construction Federal Statute Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-54 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-54.pdf 61 U.S. 55 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-55 61 U.S. (20 How.) 55 (1858) 61 U.S. 55 D09002ee1d4aecbc1 Appellate Jurisdiction Bill of Enforcement Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Judicial Powers Right to Exclusive Use Patents Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Brown v. Shannon et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 55 (1858);61 U.S. 55;20 How. 55 CASE USREPORTS-61-55 55 16 1 1858-01-25 1857 61 U.S. 55 20 How. 55 61 U.S. (20 How.) 55 (1858) Appellate Jurisdiction Bill of Enforcement Jurisdiction and Venue Contracts Law Judicial Powers Right to Exclusive Use Patents Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1857-013-01 Business, corporation Business, corporation Appeal Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-05 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-55 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-55.pdf 61 U.S. 59 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-59 61 U.S. (20 How.) 59 (1858) 61 U.S. 59 D09002ee1d4aecbe6 Evidence Privatization Land Titles Boundaries Public Lands Colonization Ownership Grounds of Suspicion Property Law Land Title Application State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;United States v. Cambuston., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 59 (1858);61 U.S. 59;20 How. 59 CASE USREPORTS-61-59 59 17 1 1858-01-25 1857 61 U.S. 59 20 How. 59 61 U.S. (20 How.) 59 (1858) Evidence Privatization Land Titles Boundaries Public Lands Colonization Ownership Grounds of Suspicion Property Law Land Title Application State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-014-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-06 Federal common law Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-59 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-59.pdf 61 U.S. 65 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-65 61 U.S. (20 How.) 65 (1858) 61 U.S. 65 D09002ee1d4aecbf3 Duty Martial Law Jurisdiction and Venue Military Rank and Promotion False Imprisonment Deserters Military Law Responsibility of Officers Constitutional Law Legislative Powers Military Personnel Military: Active Duty Civil Rights Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Dynes v. Hoover., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 65 (1858);61 U.S. 65;20 How. 65 CASE USREPORTS-61-65 65 18 1 1858-02-01 1857 61 U.S. 65 20 How. 65 61 U.S. (20 How.) 65 (1858) Duty Martial Law Jurisdiction and Venue Military Rank and Promotion False Imprisonment Deserters Military Law Responsibility of Officers Constitutional Law Legislative Powers Military Personnel Military: Active Duty Civil Rights 1857-017-01 Person convicted of crime Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-07 Federal common law Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-65 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-65.pdf 61 U.S. 84 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-84 61 U.S. (20 How.) 84 (1858) 61 U.S. 84 D09002ee1d4aecc03 Eminent Domain Alteration of a River's Path Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Property Law Constitutional Law Rivers and Waterways State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Withers v. Buckley et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 84 (1858);61 U.S. 84;20 How. 84 CASE USREPORTS-61-84 84 19 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 84 20 How. 84 61 U.S. (20 How.) 84 (1858) Eminent Domain Alteration of a River's Path Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Property Law Constitutional Law Rivers and Waterways State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1857-008-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels State commission, board, committee, or authority Writ of error State Trial Court State Appellate Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-22 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-84 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-84.pdf 61 U.S. 94 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-94 61 U.S. (20 How.) 94 (1858) 61 U.S. 94 D09002ee1d4aecbcf Property Land Titles Civil Procedure Interest Equity Court of Chancery Commercial Law Decree Authentication Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Secombe et al. v. Steele., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 94 (1858);61 U.S. 94;20 How. 94 CASE USREPORTS-61-94 94 20 1 1858-01-28 1857 61 U.S. 94 20 How. 94 61 U.S. (20 How.) 94 (1858) Property Land Titles Civil Procedure Interest Equity Court of Chancery Commercial Law Decree Authentication Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 1857-016-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-11 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-94 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-94.pdf 61 U.S. 108 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-108 61 U.S. (20 How.) 108 (1858) 61 U.S. 108 D09002ee1d4aecbd5 Fraud and Financial Crimes Debt Forgiveness Creditor and Debtor Jurisdiction and Venue Bankruptcy Debt Equity Fraudulent Bankruptcy District Courts Bankruptcy Law Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;The Commercial Bank of Manchester v. Buckner, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 108 (1858);61 U.S. 108;20 How. 108 CASE USREPORTS-61-108 108 21 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 108 20 How. 108 61 U.S. (20 How.) 108 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Debt Forgiveness Creditor and Debtor Jurisdiction and Venue Bankruptcy Debt Equity Fraudulent Bankruptcy District Courts Bankruptcy Law Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-024-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Appeal Louisiana U.S. District Court Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-13 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-108 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-108.pdf 61 U.S. 125 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-125 61 U.S. (20 How.) 125 (1858) 61 U.S. 125 D09002ee1d4aecbdc Contracts Law Depositions Jury Instructions Trials and Court Proceedings Admissibility Evidence Commercial Law Partnerships Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Teller et al. v. Patten et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 125 (1858);61 U.S. 125;20 How. 125 CASE USREPORTS-61-125 125 22 1 1858-01-25 1857 61 U.S. 125 20 How. 125 61 U.S. (20 How.) 125 (1858) Contracts Law Depositions Jury Instructions Trials and Court Proceedings Admissibility Evidence Commercial Law Partnerships Evidence Private Action 1857-015-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-15 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-125 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-125.pdf 61 U.S. 128 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-128 61 U.S. (20 How.) 128 (1858) 61 U.S. 128 D09002ee1d4aecbf8 Equity Absent Defendant Statute of Limitations Interest Garnishments Commercial Law Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Mattingly et al. v. Boyd., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 128 (1858);61 U.S. 128;20 How. 128 CASE USREPORTS-61-128 128 23 1 1858-02-01 1857 61 U.S. 128 20 How. 128 61 U.S. (20 How.) 128 (1858) Equity Absent Defendant Statute of Limitations Interest Garnishments Commercial Law Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process 1857-018-01 Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Appeal Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Tennessee U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Tennessee Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-15 Statutory construction Federal common law State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-128 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-128.pdf 61 U.S. 133 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-133 61 U.S. (20 How.) 133 (1858) 61 U.S. 133 D09002ee1d4aecbfe Property Attachments Conveyances Injunctions Civil Procedure Appeal Procedure Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;McMicken v. Perin., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 133 (1858);61 U.S. 133;20 How. 133 CASE USREPORTS-61-133 133 24 1 1858-02-10 1857 61 U.S. 133 20 How. 133 61 U.S. (20 How.) 133 (1858) Property Attachments Conveyances Injunctions Civil Procedure Appeal Procedure Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1857-022-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-05 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-133 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-133.pdf 61 U.S. 135 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-135 61 U.S. (20 How.) 135 (1858) 61 U.S. 135 D09002ee1d4aecbbf Eminent Domain Cities and Towns Legal Remedies Corporate Rights Business and Corporate Law Municipal Corporations Corporations and Associations Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Smith v. Corporation of Washington, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 135 (1858);61 U.S. 135;20 How. 135 CASE USREPORTS-61-135 135 25 1 1858-02-10 1857 61 U.S. 135 20 How. 135 61 U.S. (20 How.) 135 (1858) Eminent Domain Cities and Towns Legal Remedies Corporate Rights Business and Corporate Law Municipal Corporations Corporations and Associations Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity 1857-023-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Business, corporation Writ of error Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-18 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-135 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-135.pdf 61 U.S. 149 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-149 61 U.S. (20 How.) 149 (1858) 61 U.S. 149 D09002ee1d4aecbed Multi-Party Action Repudiation of Contract Contracts Branding Contracts Law Classification of Contracts Statute of Limitations Multi-Party Interests Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Lyon v. Bertram et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 149 (1858);61 U.S. 149;20 How. 149 CASE USREPORTS-61-149 149 26 1 1858-02-08 1857 61 U.S. 149 20 How. 149 61 U.S. (20 How.) 149 (1858) Multi-Party Action Repudiation of Contract Contracts Branding Contracts Law Classification of Contracts Statute of Limitations Multi-Party Interests Contracts Private Action 1857-019-01 Buyer, purchaser Seller or vendor Writ of error California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California California U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of California Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-19 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-149 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-149.pdf 61 U.S. 156 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-156 61 U.S. (20 How.) 156 (1858) 61 U.S. 156 D09002ee1d4aecbe4 Legal Remedies Necessity of Interference Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Equity Civil Procedure Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Hungerford v. Sigerson., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 156 (1858);61 U.S. 156;20 How. 156 CASE USREPORTS-61-156 156 27 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 156 20 How. 156 61 U.S. (20 How.) 156 (1858) Legal Remedies Necessity of Interference Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Equity Civil Procedure Private Action 1857-025-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Wisconsin U.S. District Court Wisconsin U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-20 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-156 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-156.pdf 61 U.S. 162 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-162 61 U.S. (20 How.) 162 (1858) 61 U.S. 162 D09002ee1d4aecbef Master of the Vessel Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Equity Court of Chancery Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Grant et al. v. Poillon et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 162 (1858);61 U.S. 162;20 How. 162 CASE USREPORTS-61-162 162 28 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 162 20 How. 162 61 U.S. (20 How.) 162 (1858) Master of the Vessel Maritime and Admiralty Law Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Equity Court of Chancery Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-026-01 Water transportation, stevedore Business, corporation Appeal New York U.S. District Court New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-26 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-162 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-162.pdf 61 U.S. 170 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-170 61 U.S. (20 How.) 170 (1858) 61 U.S. 170 D09002ee1d4aecbf1 Jury Instructions Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Federal Courts State Laws Judicial Powers Civil Procedure Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Hyde et al. v. Stone., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 170 (1858);61 U.S. 170;20 How. 170 CASE USREPORTS-61-170 170 29 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 170 20 How. 170 61 U.S. (20 How.) 170 (1858) Jury Instructions Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Federal Courts State Laws Judicial Powers Civil Procedure Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism 1857-027-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-170 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-170.pdf 61 U.S. 176 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-176 61 U.S. (20 How.) 176 (1858) 61 U.S. 176 D09002ee1d4aecbf9 Fraud and Financial Crimes Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Provisional Judicial System Provisional Government Changing Allegiances Conquering Territory Property Rights Fraudulent Conveyances Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Leitensdorfer et al. v. Webb., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 176 (1858);61 U.S. 176;20 How. 176 CASE USREPORTS-61-176 176 30 1 1858-02-24 1857 61 U.S. 176 20 How. 176 61 U.S. (20 How.) 176 (1858) Fraud and Financial Crimes Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Provisional Judicial System Provisional Government Changing Allegiances Conquering Territory Property Rights Fraudulent Conveyances Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Property State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-034-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Other International Law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-176 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-176.pdf 61 U.S. 186 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-186 61 U.S. (20 How.) 186 (1858) 61 U.S. 186 D09002ee1d4aecbbb Property Pre-Emption Rights State and Local Courts Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Settlement Insufficient Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Fisher v. Haldeman et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 186 (1858);61 U.S. 186;20 How. 186 CASE USREPORTS-61-186 186 31 1 1858-02-22 1857 61 U.S. 186 20 How. 186 61 U.S. (20 How.) 186 (1858) Property Pre-Emption Rights State and Local Courts Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Settlement Insufficient Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1857-030-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-08 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-186 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-186.pdf 61 U.S. 194 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-194 61 U.S. (20 How.) 194 (1858) 61 U.S. 194 D09002ee1d4aecbb8 Injunctions Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Books and Documents Evidence Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Thompson v. Selden et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 194 (1858);61 U.S. 194;20 How. 194 CASE USREPORTS-61-194 194 32 1 1858-02-25 1857 61 U.S. 194 20 How. 194 61 U.S. (20 How.) 194 (1858) Injunctions Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Books and Documents Evidence Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 1857-037-01 Debtor Business, corporation Writ of error Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-02 Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-194 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-194.pdf 61 U.S. 198 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-198 61 U.S. (20 How.) 198 (1858) 61 U.S. 198 D09002ee1d4aecbd7 Intellectual Property Law Judicial Discretion Legal Remedies Response to Pro Confesso Bill Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Interest Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Dean v. Mason et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 198 (1858);61 U.S. 198;20 How. 198 CASE USREPORTS-61-198 198 33 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 198 20 How. 198 61 U.S. (20 How.) 198 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Judicial Discretion Legal Remedies Response to Pro Confesso Bill Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Interest Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1857-028-01 Manufacturer Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-198 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-198.pdf 61 U.S. 204 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-204 61 U.S. (20 How.) 204 (1857) 61 U.S. 204 D09002ee1d4aecbc7 Fatal Error Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Erroneous Writ of Error Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Carroll et al. v. Dorsey et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 204 (1857);61 U.S. 204;20 How. 204 CASE USREPORTS-61-204 204 34 1 1857-12-30 1857 61 U.S. 204 20 How. 204 61 U.S. (20 How.) 204 (1857) Fatal Error Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Erroneous Writ of Error Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1857-004-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-11 Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-204 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-204.pdf 61 U.S. 208 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-208 61 U.S. (20 How.) 208 (1858) 61 U.S. 208 D09002ee1d4aecbc5 Erroneous Writ of Error Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Civil Procedure Patents Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Chaffee v. Hayward and Day v. Hayward, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 208 (1858);61 U.S. 208;20 How. 208 CASE USREPORTS-61-208 208 35 1 1858-02-08 1857 61 U.S. 208 20 How. 208 61 U.S. (20 How.) 208 (1858) Erroneous Writ of Error Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Civil Procedure Patents Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 1857-020-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Manufacturer Writ of error Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-27 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-208 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-208.pdf 61 U.S. 216 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-216 61 U.S. (20 How.) 216 (1858) 61 U.S. 216 D09002ee1d4aecbc3 Intellectual Property Law Civil Procedure License Transferal Patents Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Day v. Union India Rubber Company, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 216 (1858);61 U.S. 216;20 How. 216 CASE USREPORTS-61-216 216 36 1 1858-02-22 1857 61 U.S. 216 20 How. 216 61 U.S. (20 How.) 216 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Civil Procedure License Transferal Patents Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity 1857-031-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Manufacturer Appeal New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-04 Federal common law Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-216 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-216.pdf 61 U.S. 219 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-219 61 U.S. (20 How.) 219 (1858) 61 U.S. 219 D09002ee1d4aecbe5 Pleadings Inferior Court Rulings Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Petition for Intervention Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Payne et al. v. Niles et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 219 (1858);61 U.S. 219;20 How. 219 CASE USREPORTS-61-219 219 37 1 1858-02-24 1857 61 U.S. 219 20 How. 219 61 U.S. (20 How.) 219 (1858) Pleadings Inferior Court Rulings Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Petition for Intervention Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 1857-035-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-26 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-219 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-219.pdf 61 U.S. 221 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-221 61 U.S. (20 How.) 221 (1858) 61 U.S. 221 D09002ee1d4aecbca Nunc Pro Tunc Contracts Commissions Goods and Services Real Estate Commercial Law Brokers Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;McGavock v. Woodlief., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 221 (1858);61 U.S. 221;20 How. 221 CASE USREPORTS-61-221 221 38 1 1858-02-22 1857 61 U.S. 221 20 How. 221 61 U.S. (20 How.) 221 (1858) Nunc Pro Tunc Contracts Commissions Goods and Services Real Estate Commercial Law Brokers Contracts Private Action 1857-032-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-04 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-221 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-221.pdf 61 U.S. 227 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-227 61 U.S. (20 How.) 227 (1858) 61 U.S. 227 D09002ee1d4aecbfc Corporations as Citizens Citizenship and Nationality State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Corporate Rights Judicial Powers Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Covington Drawbridge Company v. Shepherd et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 227 (1858);61 U.S. 227;20 How. 227 CASE USREPORTS-61-227 227 39 1 1858-02-24 1857 61 U.S. 227 20 How. 227 61 U.S. (20 How.) 227 (1858) Corporations as Citizens Citizenship and Nationality State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Domicile Corporate Rights Judicial Powers Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 1857-036-01 Water transportation, stevedore Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Writ of error Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Indiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Indiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-227 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-227.pdf 61 U.S. 235 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-235 61 U.S. (20 How.) 235 (1858) 61 U.S. 235 D09002ee1d4aecbd8 Statute of Limitations Jury Instructions Land Titles Contracts Surveyors and Surveying Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Enemy Belligerents Voluntary and Final Abandonment Real Property Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;White et al. v. Burnley., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 235 (1858);61 U.S. 235;20 How. 235 CASE USREPORTS-61-235 235 40 1 1858-02-22 1857 61 U.S. 235 20 How. 235 61 U.S. (20 How.) 235 (1858) Statute of Limitations Jury Instructions Land Titles Contracts Surveyors and Surveying Property Law Citizenship and Nationality Enemy Belligerents Voluntary and Final Abandonment Real Property Private Action 1857-033-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-25 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-235 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-235.pdf 61 U.S. 252 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-252 61 U.S. (20 How.) 252 (1858) 61 U.S. 252 D09002ee1d4aecbd4 State and Local Courts Suspension of Rules Evidence Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Bill of Exceptions Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;United States v. Breitling., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 252 (1858);61 U.S. 252;20 How. 252 CASE USREPORTS-61-252 252 41 1 1858-02-25 1857 61 U.S. 252 20 How. 252 61 U.S. (20 How.) 252 (1858) State and Local Courts Suspension of Rules Evidence Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Bill of Exceptions Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism 1857-038-01 United States Person who guarantees another's obligations Writ of error Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-252 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-252.pdf 61 U.S. 255 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-255 61 U.S. (20 How.) 255 (1857) 61 U.S. 255 D09002ee1d4aecbee Civil Procedure Maritime and Admiralty Law Chancery Courts Interest Equity Divided Court Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Hemmenway v. Fisher., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 255 (1857);61 U.S. 255;20 How. 255 CASE USREPORTS-61-255 255 42 1 1858-12-24 1858 61 U.S. 255 20 How. 255 61 U.S. (20 How.) 255 (1857) Civil Procedure Maritime and Admiralty Law Chancery Courts Interest Equity Divided Court Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 1858-002-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-01-14 Statutory construction Court Rules Supreme Court Rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality No disposition Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-255 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-255.pdf 61 U.S. 261 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-261 61 U.S. (20 How.) 261 (1858) 61 U.S. 261 D09002ee1d4aecbe2 Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Period of Review Land Titles Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;U.S. v. Pacheco, U.S. v. Hensley, U.S. v. Bidwell, and U.S. v. Sunot et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 261 (1858);61 U.S. 261;20 How. 261 CASE USREPORTS-61-261 261 43 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 261 20 How. 261 61 U.S. (20 How.) 261 (1858) Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Period of Review Land Titles Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 1857-009-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-261 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-261.pdf 61 U.S. 264 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-264 61 U.S. (20 How.) 264 (1858) 61 U.S. 264 D09002ee1d4aecbcb Impresarios Colonial Grant Contracts Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Powers of Attorney Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Spencer v. Lapsley., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 264 (1858);61 U.S. 264;20 How. 264 CASE USREPORTS-61-264 264 44 1 1858-02-25 1857 61 U.S. 264 20 How. 264 61 U.S. (20 How.) 264 (1858) Impresarios Colonial Grant Contracts Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Powers of Attorney Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-039-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-29 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-264 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-264.pdf 61 U.S. 280 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-280 61 U.S. (20 How.) 280 (1858) 61 U.S. 280 D09002ee1d4aecbfa Mandamus Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Mussina et al. v. Cavazos et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 280 (1858);61 U.S. 280;20 How. 280 CASE USREPORTS-61-280 280 45 1 1858-02-15 1857 61 U.S. 280 20 How. 280 61 U.S. (20 How.) 280 (1858) Mandamus Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process 1857-029-01 Person convicted of crime Judge Mandamus Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-280 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-280.pdf 61 U.S. 290 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-290 61 U.S. (20 How.) 290 (1858) 61 U.S. 290 D09002ee1d4aecbc2 Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Supersedeas Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Silsby et al. v. Foote., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 290 (1858);61 U.S. 290;20 How. 290 CASE USREPORTS-61-290 290 46 1 1858-01-11 1857 61 U.S. 290 20 How. 290 61 U.S. (20 How.) 290 (1858) Trials and Court Proceedings State and Local Courts Statute of Limitations Civil Procedure Supersedeas Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 1857-010-01 Manufacturer Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-31 Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-290 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-290.pdf 61 U.S. 296 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-296 61 U.S. (20 How.) 296 (1858) 61 U.S. 296 D09002ee1d4aecbdf Maritime and Admiralty Law Jurisdiction and Venue Transportation Safety and Security Collisions Judicial Powers Inland Water Transportation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Jackson et al. v. Steamboat Magnolia, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 296 (1858);61 U.S. 296;20 How. 296 CASE USREPORTS-61-296 296 47 1 1858-04-13 1857 61 U.S. 296 20 How. 296 61 U.S. (20 How.) 296 (1858) Maritime and Admiralty Law Jurisdiction and Venue Transportation Safety and Security Collisions Judicial Powers Inland Water Transportation Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-040-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Alabama Middle U.S. District Court Alabama Middle U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-02-18 1857-12-16 Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-296 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-296.pdf 61 U.S. 343 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-343 61 U.S. (20 How.) 343 (1858) 61 U.S. 343 D09002ee1d4aecbe7 Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Jury Instructions Conveyances Commercial Law Valuation Collateral Security Negotiable Instruments Partnerships Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Jury Instructions (Not Necessarily in Criminal Cases) Criminal Procedure Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Goodman v. Simonds., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 343 (1858);61 U.S. 343;20 How. 343 CASE USREPORTS-61-343 343 48 1 1858-04-26 1857 61 U.S. 343 20 How. 343 61 U.S. (20 How.) 343 (1858) Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Jury Instructions Conveyances Commercial Law Valuation Collateral Security Negotiable Instruments Partnerships Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Jury Instructions (Not Necessarily in Criminal Cases) Criminal Procedure 1857-042-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Debtor Writ of error Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-02 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-343 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-343.pdf 61 U.S. 372 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-372 61 U.S. (20 How.) 372 (1858) 61 U.S. 372 D09002ee1d4aecc02 Property Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Equity Land Offices State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Gazzam v. Lessee of Elam Philips et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 372 (1858);61 U.S. 372;20 How. 372 CASE USREPORTS-61-372 372 49 1 1858-05-04 1857 61 U.S. 372 20 How. 372 61 U.S. (20 How.) 372 (1858) Property Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Surveyors and Surveying Equity Land Offices State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-045-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error General Land Office or Commissioners State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-07 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-372 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-372.pdf 61 U.S. 378 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-378 61 U.S. (20 How.) 378 (1858) 61 U.S. 378 D09002ee1d4aecbe8 Intellectual Property Law Recovery of Costs Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Disclaimer of the Surplus Civil Procedure Interest Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Silsby et al. v. Foote., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 378 (1858);61 U.S. 378;20 How. 378 CASE USREPORTS-61-378 378 50 1 1858-05-04 1857 61 U.S. 378 20 How. 378 61 U.S. (20 How.) 378 (1858) Intellectual Property Law Recovery of Costs Legal Remedies Patent Infringement Disclaimer of the Surplus Civil Procedure Interest Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1857-046-01 Manufacturer Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-01-27 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-378 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-378.pdf 61 U.S. 393 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-393 61 U.S. (20 How.) 393 (1858) 61 U.S. 393 D09002ee1d4aecbe3 Maritime and Admiralty Law State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Liens Conflicts of Law Shipbuilders Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;People's Ferry Company of Boston v. Beers et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 393 (1858);61 U.S. 393;20 How. 393 CASE USREPORTS-61-393 393 51 1 1858-05-04 1857 61 U.S. 393 20 How. 393 61 U.S. (20 How.) 393 (1858) Maritime and Admiralty Law State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Liens Conflicts of Law Shipbuilders Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-047-01 Water transportation, stevedore Business, corporation Appeal New York U.S. District Court New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-17 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Catron John McLean 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-393 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-393.pdf 61 U.S. 402 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-402 61 U.S. (20 How.) 402 (1858) 61 U.S. 402 D09002ee1d4aecbc4 Form and Combination Technical Innovation Intellectual Property Patent Infringement Patentability Intellectual Property Law Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;McCormick v. Talcott et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 402 (1858);61 U.S. 402;20 How. 402 CASE USREPORTS-61-402 402 52 1 1858-04-22 1857 61 U.S. 402 20 How. 402 61 U.S. (20 How.) 402 (1858) Form and Combination Technical Innovation Intellectual Property Patent Infringement Patentability Intellectual Property Law Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1857-041-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-10 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-402 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-402.pdf 61 U.S. 413 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-413 61 U.S. (20 How.) 413 (1858) 61 U.S. 413 D09002ee1d4aecbdd Private Land Claims Evidence Rival Claimants Land Titles Boundaries Description Surveyors and Surveying Natural Boundary Property Law State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;United States v. Fossat., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 413 (1858);61 U.S. 413;20 How. 413 CASE USREPORTS-61-413 413 53 1 1858-04-30 1857 61 U.S. 413 20 How. 413 61 U.S. (20 How.) 413 (1858) Private Land Claims Evidence Rival Claimants Land Titles Boundaries Description Surveyors and Surveying Natural Boundary Property Law State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-043-01 United States Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners California Northern U.S. District Court California Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-24 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Archibald Campbell John McLean 7 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-413 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-413.pdf 61 U.S. 427 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-427 61 U.S. (20 How.) 427 (1858) 61 U.S. 427 D09002ee1d4aecbc0 Writ of Error Judicial Powers Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Special Verdicts Bill of Exceptions Civil Procedure Demurrer to Evidence Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Miscellaneous Criminal Procedure Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Suydam v. Williamson et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 427 (1858);61 U.S. 427;20 How. 427 CASE USREPORTS-61-427 427 54 1 1858-05-11 1857 61 U.S. 427 20 How. 427 61 U.S. (20 How.) 427 (1858) Writ of Error Judicial Powers Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Special Verdicts Bill of Exceptions Civil Procedure Demurrer to Evidence Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Miscellaneous Criminal Procedure 1857-052-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-02-22 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-427 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-427.pdf 61 U.S. 442 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-442 61 U.S. (20 How.) 442 (1858) 61 U.S. 442 D09002ee1d4aecbce Contracts Bills of Exchange Evidence Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Parol Evidence Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Brown v. Wiley et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 442 (1858);61 U.S. 442;20 How. 442 CASE USREPORTS-61-442 442 55 1 1858-05-10 1857 61 U.S. 442 20 How. 442 61 U.S. (20 How.) 442 (1858) Contracts Bills of Exchange Evidence Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Parol Evidence Contracts Private Action 1857-048-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Texas U.S. District Court Texas U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-27 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-442 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-442.pdf 61 U.S. 448 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-448 61 U.S. (20 How.) 448 (1858) 61 U.S. 448 D09002ee1d4aecbff Secret Sales Jury Instructions Injunctions Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Motion for a New Trial Civil Procedure Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Warner v. Norton et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 448 (1858);61 U.S. 448;20 How. 448 CASE USREPORTS-61-448 448 56 1 1858-05-03 1857 61 U.S. 448 20 How. 448 61 U.S. (20 How.) 448 (1858) Secret Sales Jury Instructions Injunctions Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Motion for a New Trial Civil Procedure Contracts Private Action 1857-044-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-05 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-448 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-448.pdf 61 U.S. 461 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-461 61 U.S. (20 How.) 461 (1858) 61 U.S. 461 D09002ee1d4aecbbc Property Contracts Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Land Titles Violation of Contract Equity Rent Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Stinson v. Dousman., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 461 (1858);61 U.S. 461;20 How. 461 CASE USREPORTS-61-461 461 57 1 1858-05-10 1857 61 U.S. 461 20 How. 461 61 U.S. (20 How.) 461 (1858) Property Contracts Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Land Titles Violation of Contract Equity Rent Contracts Private Action 1857-049-01 Buyer, purchaser Seller or vendor Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-16 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-461 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-461.pdf 61 U.S. 467 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-467 61 U.S. (20 How.) 467 (1858) 61 U.S. 467 D09002ee1d4aecbec Proof of the Law Land Offices Land Titles Maintenance Civil Procedure Champerty Property Law Depositions Property Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Roberts v. Cooper., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 467 (1858);61 U.S. 467;20 How. 467 CASE USREPORTS-61-467 467 58 1 1858-05-10 1857 61 U.S. 467 20 How. 467 61 U.S. (20 How.) 467 (1858) Proof of the Law Land Offices Land Titles Maintenance Civil Procedure Champerty Property Law Depositions Property Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1857-050-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Michigan U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Michigan Michigan U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Michigan Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-06 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-467 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-467.pdf 61 U.S. 486 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-486 61 U.S. (20 How.) 486 (1858) 61 U.S. 486 D09002ee1d4aecbd6 State and Local Courts Irregularities in Proceedings Civil Procedure Equity Failed Bank Trusts and Estates Comity Primarily Removal Cases, Civil Procedure (Cf. Comity, Criminal and First Amendment), Deference to Foreign Judicial Tribunals Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Ingraham et al. v. Dawson et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 486 (1858);61 U.S. 486;20 How. 486 CASE USREPORTS-61-486 486 59 1 1858-05-14 1857 61 U.S. 486 20 How. 486 61 U.S. (20 How.) 486 (1858) State and Local Courts Irregularities in Proceedings Civil Procedure Equity Failed Bank Trusts and Estates Comity Primarily Removal Cases, Civil Procedure (Cf. Comity, Criminal and First Amendment), Deference to Foreign Judicial Tribunals Judicial Power 1857-053-01 Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Appeal Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-26 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-486 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-486.pdf 61 U.S. 496 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-496 61 U.S. (20 How.) 496 (1858) 61 U.S. 496 D09002ee1d4aecbbe Contracts Commercial Law Promissory Notes Interest Real Estate Trusts and Estates Security on Loan Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Sigerson v. Mathews., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 496 (1858);61 U.S. 496;20 How. 496 CASE USREPORTS-61-496 496 60 1 1858-05-14 1857 61 U.S. 496 20 How. 496 61 U.S. (20 How.) 496 (1858) Contracts Commercial Law Promissory Notes Interest Real Estate Trusts and Estates Security on Loan Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process 1857-054-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Writ of error Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-496 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-496.pdf 61 U.S. 501 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-501 61 U.S. (20 How.) 501 (1858) 61 U.S. 501 D09002ee1d4aecbf5 Public Lands Pre-Emption Rights Transferrable Certificates of Purchase Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Land Offices Homestead State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Marks v Dickson et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 501 (1858);61 U.S. 501;20 How. 501 CASE USREPORTS-61-501 501 61 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 501 20 How. 501 61 U.S. (20 How.) 501 (1858) Public Lands Pre-Emption Rights Transferrable Certificates of Purchase Property Rights Property Law Land Titles Land Offices Homestead State and Territorial Land Claims Economic Activity 1857-058-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error General Land Office or Commissioners State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-29 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Catron Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-501 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-501.pdf 61 U.S. 506 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-506 61 U.S. (20 How.) 506 (1858) 61 U.S. 506 D09002ee1d4aecbda Contracts Law Property Burden of Proof Contracts Property Rights Illiterate Contractee Promissory Notes Business Ethics Evidence Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Selden v. Myers et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 506 (1858);61 U.S. 506;20 How. 506 CASE USREPORTS-61-506 506 62 1 1858-05-10 1857 61 U.S. 506 20 How. 506 61 U.S. (20 How.) 506 (1858) Contracts Law Property Burden of Proof Contracts Property Rights Illiterate Contractee Promissory Notes Business Ethics Evidence Private Action 1857-051-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Appeal Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of the District of Columbia Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-09 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-506 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-506.pdf 61 U.S. 511 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-511 61 U.S. (20 How.) 511 (1858) 61 U.S. 511 D09002ee1d4aecbe1 Contracts Law Importance of Time Property Contracts Property Rights Relief Entitlement Land Titles Contracts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Ahl v. Johnson., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 511 (1858);61 U.S. 511;20 How. 511 CASE USREPORTS-61-511 511 63 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 511 20 How. 511 61 U.S. (20 How.) 511 (1858) Contracts Law Importance of Time Property Contracts Property Rights Relief Entitlement Land Titles Contracts Private Action 1857-059-01 Buyer, purchaser Seller or vendor Appeal Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-14 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Nathan Clifford Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-511 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-511.pdf 61 U.S. 522 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-522 61 U.S. (20 How.) 522 (1858) 61 U.S. 522 D09002ee1d4aecbc9 Property State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Land Grants Ownership Conflicting Grants Constitutional Law Land Titles Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Moreland v. Page., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 522 (1858);61 U.S. 522;20 How. 522 CASE USREPORTS-61-522 522 64 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 522 20 How. 522 61 U.S. (20 How.) 522 (1858) Property State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Land Grants Ownership Conflicting Grants Constitutional Law Land Titles Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1857-060-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-522 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-522.pdf 61 U.S. 523 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-523 61 U.S. (20 How.) 523 (1858) 61 U.S. 523 D09002ee1d4aecbd2 Pleadings State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Change of Venue Civil Procedure Fair and Natural Construction Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;McFaul v. Ramsey., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 523 (1858);61 U.S. 523;20 How. 523 CASE USREPORTS-61-523 523 65 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 523 20 How. 523 61 U.S. (20 How.) 523 (1858) Pleadings State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Change of Venue Civil Procedure Fair and Natural Construction Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 1857-061-01 Seller or vendor Buyer, purchaser Writ of error Iowa U.S. District Court Iowa U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-05 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Robert Cooper Grier Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-523 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-523.pdf 61 U.S. 527 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-527 61 U.S. (20 How.) 527 (1858) 61 U.S. 527 D09002ee1d4aecbf4 Securities State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Civil Procedure State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Beers v. State of Arkansas. Platenius v. State of Arkansas. Same v. Same., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 527 (1858);61 U.S. 527;20 How. 527 CASE USREPORTS-61-527 527 66 1 1858-05-14 1857 61 U.S. 527 20 How. 527 61 U.S. (20 How.) 527 (1858) Securities State and Local Courts Jurisdiction and Venue State and Local Government Civil Procedure State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1857-055-01 Unidentifiable State Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-20 Judicial review (state level) Constitution Article I, Section 10, Paragraph 1 (contract clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-527 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-527.pdf 61 U.S. 530 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-530 61 U.S. (20 How.) 530 (1858) 61 U.S. 530 D09002ee1d4aecbf2 Securities Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Equity Cross Bills Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Bank of Washington et al. v. State of Arkansas et al. Same v. Same., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 530 (1858);61 U.S. 530;20 How. 530 CASE USREPORTS-61-530 530 67 1 1858-05-14 1857 61 U.S. 530 20 How. 530 61 U.S. (20 How.) 530 (1858) Securities Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Powers Equity Cross Bills Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1857-056-01 Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company State Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-20 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-530 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-530.pdf 61 U.S. 532 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-532 61 U.S. (20 How.) 532 (1858) 61 U.S. 532 D09002ee1d4aecc01 Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Land Titles Real Party in Interest State and Local Courts Scope of Exceptions Civil Procedure Property Rights Property Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Barton v. Forsyth., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 532 (1858);61 U.S. 532;20 How. 532 CASE USREPORTS-61-532 532 68 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 532 20 How. 532 61 U.S. (20 How.) 532 (1858) Jurisdiction and Venue Trials and Court Proceedings Evidence Land Titles Real Party in Interest State and Local Courts Scope of Exceptions Civil Procedure Property Rights Property Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 1857-062-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Roger Brooke Taney Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-532 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-532.pdf 61 U.S. 535 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-535 61 U.S. (20 How.) 535 (1858) 61 U.S. 535 D09002ee1d4aecbd0 Trials and Court Proceedings Trusts and Estates Foreign Government Compensation for Inconvenience Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Duty to Defend Late Objections Wills and Trusts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Williams v. Gibbes et al. Gibbes et al. v. Williams., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 535 (1858);61 U.S. 535;20 How. 535 CASE USREPORTS-61-535 535 69 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 535 20 How. 535 61 U.S. (20 How.) 535 (1858) Trials and Court Proceedings Trusts and Estates Foreign Government Compensation for Inconvenience Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Duty to Defend Late Objections Wills and Trusts Private Action 1857-063-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-21 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-535 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-535.pdf 61 U.S. 541 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-541 61 U.S. (20 How.) 541 (1858) 61 U.S. 541 D09002ee1d4aecbb7 State and Local Courts Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Cross Appeals Delayed Challenge of Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Wills and Trusts Private Action Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Whyte v. Gibbes et al. Gibbes et al. v. Whyte, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 541 (1858);61 U.S. 541;20 How. 541 CASE USREPORTS-61-541 541 70 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 541 20 How. 541 61 U.S. (20 How.) 541 (1858) State and Local Courts Chancery Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Cross Appeals Delayed Challenge of Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Wills and Trusts Private Action 1857-071-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Appeal Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-21 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-541 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-541.pdf 61 U.S. 543 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-543 61 U.S. (20 How.) 543 (1858) 61 U.S. 543 D09002ee1d4aecbc6 Negligence Evidence Towage and Pilotage Ships and Boats Collisions Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Transportation Safety and Security Duty of Care Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Snow et al. v. Hill et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 543 (1858);61 U.S. 543;20 How. 543 CASE USREPORTS-61-543 543 71 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 543 20 How. 543 61 U.S. (20 How.) 543 (1858) Negligence Evidence Towage and Pilotage Ships and Boats Collisions Inland Water Transportation Maritime and Admiralty Law Transportation Safety and Security Duty of Care Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1857-064-01 Water transportation, stevedore Water transportation, stevedore Appeal Louisiana U.S. District Court Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-12-14 1858-04-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-543 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-543.pdf 61 U.S. 552 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-552 61 U.S. (20 How.) 552 (1858) 61 U.S. 552 D09002ee1d4aecbcd Legal Remedies Destruction of Personal Property Essential Allegations Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Pleadings Civil Procedure Trespassing Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Holcombe v. McKusick et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 552 (1858);61 U.S. 552;20 How. 552 CASE USREPORTS-61-552 552 72 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 552 20 How. 552 61 U.S. (20 How.) 552 (1858) Legal Remedies Destruction of Personal Property Essential Allegations Trials and Court Proceedings Jurisdiction and Venue Pleadings Civil Procedure Trespassing Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 1857-065-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-06 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-552 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-552.pdf 61 U.S. 555 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-555 61 U.S. (20 How.) 555 (1858) 61 U.S. 555 D09002ee1d4aecbe9 Property Trials and Court Proceedings Summary Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Quashing Procedure Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;McCargo v. Chapman., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 555 (1858);61 U.S. 555;20 How. 555 CASE USREPORTS-61-555 555 73 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 555 20 How. 555 61 U.S. (20 How.) 555 (1858) Property Trials and Court Proceedings Summary Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Quashing Procedure Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1857-066-01 Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Defendant Writ of error Mississippi U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Mississippi Mississippi U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Mississippi Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-05-06 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Statutory construction Federal Statute Judiciary Act of 1789 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John McLean Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-555 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-555.pdf 61 U.S. 558 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-558 61 U.S. (20 How.) 558 (1858) 61 U.S. 558 D09002ee1d4aecbfd Agency Public Lands Property Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Privatization Equity Court Decisions' Land Titles Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Irvine v. Marshall et al., 61 U.S. (20 How.) 558 (1858);61 U.S. 558;20 How. 558 CASE USREPORTS-61-558 558 74 1 1858-05-14 1857 61 U.S. 558 20 How. 558 61 U.S. (20 How.) 558 (1858) Agency Public Lands Property Contracts Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Privatization Equity Court Decisions' Land Titles Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1857-057-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Appeal General Land Office or Commissioners Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-15 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Peter Vivian Daniel Roger Brooke Taney 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-558 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-558.pdf 61 U.S. 571 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-571 61 U.S. (20 How.) 571 (1858) 61 U.S. 571 D09002ee1d4aecbe0 Classification Ships and Boats Import and Export Merchant Appraiser Division of Imports Commercial Law Additional Duties Valuation Customs Enforcement Goods and Services Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Sampson et al. v. Peaslee, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 571 (1858);61 U.S. 571;20 How. 571 CASE USREPORTS-61-571 571 75 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 571 20 How. 571 61 U.S. (20 How.) 571 (1858) Classification Ships and Boats Import and Export Merchant Appraiser Division of Imports Commercial Law Additional Duties Valuation Customs Enforcement Goods and Services Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation 1857-067-01 Shipper, including importer and exporter Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error Department or Secretary of the Treasury Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Massachusetts U.S. Circuit for the District of Massachusetts Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1858-04-19 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Moore Wayne Roger Brooke Taney 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-571 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-571.pdf 61 U.S. 581 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-581 61 U.S. (20 How.) 581 (1858) 61 U.S. 581 D09002ee1d4aecbf7 Mandamus Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Sentencing Review Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Ex parte Ransom et al. v. City of New York, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 581 (1858);61 U.S. 581;20 How. 581 CASE USREPORTS-61-581 581 76 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 581 20 How. 581 61 U.S. (20 How.) 581 (1858) Mandamus Trials and Court Proceedings Civil Procedure Judicial Powers Sentencing Review Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys 1857-068-01 Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Court or judicial district Mandamus New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel Nelson Roger Brooke Taney 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-581 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-581.pdf 61 U.S. 583 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-583 61 U.S. (20 How.) 583 (1857) 61 U.S. 583 D09002ee1d4aecbd3 Ships and Boats Property Maritime and Admiralty Law Injunctions Property Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Foreign Attachments Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Taylor et al. v. Carryl, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 583 (1857);61 U.S. 583;20 How. 583 CASE USREPORTS-61-583 583 77 1 1858-05-18 1857 61 U.S. 583 20 How. 583 61 U.S. (20 How.) 583 (1857) Ships and Boats Property Maritime and Admiralty Law Injunctions Property Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Property Law Foreign Attachments Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction Federalism 1857-069-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Roger Brooke Taney 1857-02-05 1858-04-12 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Archibald Campbell John McLean 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-583 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-583.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-BackMatter D09002ee1d4aecbf0 Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1857;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-61-BackMatter 78 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-61/USREPORTS-61-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-61/pdf/USREPORTS-61-BackMatter.pdf