United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:570 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013 USREPORTS USREPORTS-570 570 2018 2012 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2018 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:570 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Publishing Office 2018-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 905 digital object pages JU 6.8:570 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570 P0b002ee1dec5d68c 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-570 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-570 570 2018 2012 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1dec8b07e United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-6 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec8b072 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Erratum FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-3 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec8b081 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-2 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec8b05b United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Allotment of Justices FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-4 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec8b083 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Retirement of the Clerk of the Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1dec8b080 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-5 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-FrontMatter-5.pdf 570 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-1 570 U.S. 1 (2013) 570 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec8b089 National Voter Registration Act of (N.V.R.A.) Citizenship Requirement Election Clause Voting Rights Evidence-of-Citizenship Requirement State Authority Election Law Citizenship and Nationality Voting Qualifications Federal Elections Voting Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013);570 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-570-1 1 7 1 2013-06-17 2012 570 U.S. 1 570 U.S. 1 (2013) National Voter Registration Act of (N.V.R.A.) Citizenship Requirement Election Clause Voting Rights Evidence-of-Citizenship Requirement State Authority Election Law Citizenship and Nationality Voting Qualifications Federal Elections Voting Civil Rights 2012-064-01 State Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert Arizona U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-03-18 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-1.pdf 570 U.S. 48 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-48 570 U.S. 48 (2013) 570 U.S. 48 D09002ee1dec8b073 Disclosure of Personal Information Data Protection Attorney Solicitation Marketing and Advertising Driver's Privacy Protection Act (D.P.P.A.) Legal Ethics Litigation Exception Professional Responsibility Right of Privacy Commercial Speech, Attorneys (Cf. Commercial Speech) Attorneys United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Maracich v. Spears, 570 U.S. 48 (2013);570 U.S. 48 CASE USREPORTS-570-48 48 8 1 2013-06-17 2012 570 U.S. 48 570 U.S. 48 (2013) Disclosure of Personal Information Data Protection Attorney Solicitation Marketing and Advertising Driver's Privacy Protection Act (D.P.P.A.) Legal Ethics Litigation Exception Professional Responsibility Right of Privacy Commercial Speech, Attorneys (Cf. Commercial Speech) Attorneys 2012-063-01 Private person Attorney, or person acting as such, includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association Cert South Carolina U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Other reason John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-01-09 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-48 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-48.pdf 570 U.S. 99 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-99 570 U.S. 99 (2013) 570 U.S. 99 D09002ee1dec8b077 Due Process Harris V. United States Sentencing Range Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Element of a Crime Sentencing Jury Trial Brandishing Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013);570 U.S. 99 CASE USREPORTS-570-99 99 9 1 2013-06-17 2012 570 U.S. 99 570 U.S. 99 (2013) Due Process Harris V. United States Sentencing Range Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Element of a Crime Sentencing Jury Trial Brandishing Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure 2012-062-01 Person convicted of crime United States Cert Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Other reason John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-01-14 Judicial review (national level) Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (other provisions) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas Clarence Thomas 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-99 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-99.pdf 570 U.S. 136 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-136 570 U.S. 136 (2013) 570 U.S. 136 D09002ee1dec8b079 Reverse Payment Settlement Agreement Prescription Drugs Patent Law Anticompetitive Settlements Competition, Antitrust, and Monopolies Generic Drugs Patents Hatch-Waxman Act Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Financial (Other than in Fraud or Internal Revenue) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013);570 U.S. 136 CASE USREPORTS-570-136 136 10 1 2013-06-17 2012 570 U.S. 136 570 U.S. 136 (2013) Reverse Payment Settlement Agreement Prescription Drugs Patent Law Anticompetitive Settlements Competition, Antitrust, and Monopolies Generic Drugs Patents Hatch-Waxman Act Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Financial (Other than in Fraud or Internal Revenue) Criminal Procedure 2012-061-01 Federal Trade Commission Drug manufacturer Cert Georgia Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-03-25 Statutory construction Federal Statute Sherman Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer Anthony M. Kennedy 5 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-136 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-136.pdf 570 U.S. 178 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-178 570 U.S. 178 (2013) 570 U.S. 178 D09002ee1dec8b062 Silence as Evidence of Guilt Prearrest Silence Miranda Rights Human Rights and Civil Liberties Express Invocation Requirement Criminal Procedure Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Criminal Law and Procedure Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 178 (2013);570 U.S. 178 CASE USREPORTS-570-178 178 11 1 2013-06-17 2012 570 U.S. 178 570 U.S. 178 (2013) Silence as Evidence of Guilt Prearrest Silence Miranda Rights Human Rights and Civil Liberties Express Invocation Requirement Criminal Procedure Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Criminal Law and Procedure Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure 2012-060-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court State court confusion or uncertainty John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-17 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-178 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-178.pdf 570 U.S. 205 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-205 570 U.S. 205 (2013) 570 U.S. 205 D09002ee1dec8b076 First Amendment Prostitution Health Care Funding Freedom of Speech H.I.V./A.I.D.S. United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of (Leadership Act) Nongovernmental Organizations (N.G.O.) Funding Condition Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l, Inc., 570 U.S. 205 (2013);570 U.S. 205 CASE USREPORTS-570-205 205 12 1 2013-06-20 2012 570 U.S. 205 570 U.S. 205 (2013) First Amendment Prostitution Health Care Funding Freedom of Speech H.I.V./A.I.D.S. United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of (Leadership Act) Nongovernmental Organizations (N.G.O.) Funding Condition Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment 2012-065-01 Not listed among agencies in the first Administrative Action variable Health organization or person, nursing home, medical clinic or laboratory, chiropractor Cert Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-22 Judicial review (national level) Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) Act of congress declared unconstitutional Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-205 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-205.pdf 570 U.S. 228 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-228 570 U.S. 228 (2013) 570 U.S. 228 D09002ee1dec8b061 Arbitration Alternative Dispute Resolution Individual Arbitration Cost Contracts Law Invalidation of Class-Arbitration Waiver Class Arbitration Civil Procedure Arbitration (Other than as Pertains to Labor-Management or Employer-Employee Relations (Cf. Union Arbitration) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 570 U.S. 228 (2013);570 U.S. 228 CASE USREPORTS-570-228 228 13 1 2013-06-20 2012 570 U.S. 228 570 U.S. 228 (2013) Arbitration Alternative Dispute Resolution Individual Arbitration Cost Contracts Law Invalidation of Class-Arbitration Waiver Class Arbitration Civil Procedure Arbitration (Other than as Pertains to Labor-Management or Employer-Employee Relations (Cf. Union Arbitration) Economic Activity 2012-066-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Restaurant, food vendor Cert New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-02-27 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-228 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-228.pdf 570 U.S. 254 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-254 570 U.S. 254 (2013) 570 U.S. 254 D09002ee1dec8b063 Predicate Offenses Categorical Approach Armed Career Criminal Act (A.C.C.A.) Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Divisible Statute Sentence Enhancement Modified Categorical Approach Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254 (2013);570 U.S. 254 CASE USREPORTS-570-254 254 14 1 2013-06-20 2012 570 U.S. 254 570 U.S. 254 (2013) Predicate Offenses Categorical Approach Armed Career Criminal Act (A.C.C.A.) Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Divisible Statute Sentence Enhancement Modified Categorical Approach Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure 2012-067-01 Person convicted of crime United States Cert California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-01-07 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Elena Kagan John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-254 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-254.pdf 570 U.S. 297 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-297 570 U.S. 297 (2013) 570 U.S. 297 D09002ee1dec8b05e Racial and Ethnic Relations Higher Education Admissions Policy Minority Rights Universities Discrimination Equal Protection Clause Equal Protection Strict Scrutiny Diversity Affirmative Action Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Affirmative Action Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Fisher v. University of Tex. at Austin, 570 U.S. 297 (2013);570 U.S. 297 CASE USREPORTS-570-297 297 15 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 297 570 U.S. 297 (2013) Racial and Ethnic Relations Higher Education Admissions Policy Minority Rights Universities Discrimination Equal Protection Clause Equal Protection Strict Scrutiny Diversity Affirmative Action Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Affirmative Action Civil Rights 2012-068-01 Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution State college or university Cert Texas Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2012-10-10 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-297 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-297.pdf 570 U.S. 338 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-338 570 U.S. 338 (2013) 570 U.S. 338 D09002ee1dec8b060 Racial and Ethnic Relations Workplace Discrimination Constructive Discharge Minority Rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 Motivating-Factor Test Discrimination Title VII Minority Employment But-for Causation Retaliation Labor and Employment Law Status-Based Discrimination Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, 570 U.S. 338 (2013);570 U.S. 338 CASE USREPORTS-570-338 338 16 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 338 570 U.S. 338 (2013) Racial and Ethnic Relations Workplace Discrimination Constructive Discharge Minority Rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 Motivating-Factor Test Discrimination Title VII Minority Employment But-for Causation Retaliation Labor and Employment Law Status-Based Discrimination Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2012-072-01 Hospital, medical center Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Cert Texas Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-24 Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-338 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-338.pdf 570 U.S. 387 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-387 570 U.S. 387 (2013) 570 U.S. 387 D09002ee1dec8b07c Constitutional Law Sex Offender Registration Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (S.O.R.N.A.) Licensing and Registration Sex Offenses Congressional Authority Intrastate Movement Necessary and Proper Clause Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: War Crimes Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;United States v. Kebodeaux, 570 U.S. 387 (2013);570 U.S. 387 CASE USREPORTS-570-387 387 17 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 387 570 U.S. 387 (2013) Constitutional Law Sex Offender Registration Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (S.O.R.N.A.) Licensing and Registration Sex Offenses Congressional Authority Intrastate Movement Necessary and Proper Clause Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: War Crimes Criminal Procedure 2012-071-01 United States Defendant Cert Texas Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Other reason John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-17 Judicial review (national level) Constitution Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 18 (necessary and proper clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-387 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-387.pdf 570 U.S. 421 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-421 570 U.S. 421 (2013) 570 U.S. 421 D09002ee1dec8b07f Racial and Ethnic Relations Supervisor Minority Rights Tangible Employment Action Hostile Work Environment Civil Rights Act of 1964 Labor Labor and Employment Law Racial Discrimination Title VII Vicarious Liability Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Vance v. Ball State Univ., 570 U.S. 421 (2013);570 U.S. 421 CASE USREPORTS-570-421 421 18 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 421 570 U.S. 421 (2013) Racial and Ethnic Relations Supervisor Minority Rights Tangible Employment Action Hostile Work Environment Civil Rights Act of 1964 Labor Labor and Employment Law Racial Discrimination Title VII Vicarious Liability Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2012-070-01 Minority female governmental employee or job applicant State college or university Cert Indiana Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2012-11-26 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-421 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-421.pdf 570 U.S. 472 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-472 570 U.S. 472 (2013) 570 U.S. 472 D09002ee1dec8b075 Pre-Emption Design-Defect Claim Risk-Utility Health Law Prescription Drugs Supremacy Clause Pliva, Inc. V. Mensing Danger Magnitude Drug Labeling Without Effect State Law Drug Safety Generic Drugs Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, 570 U.S. 472 (2013);570 U.S. 472 CASE USREPORTS-570-472 472 19 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 472 570 U.S. 472 (2013) Pre-Emption Design-Defect Claim Risk-Utility Health Law Prescription Drugs Supremacy Clause Pliva, Inc. V. Mensing Danger Magnitude Drug Labeling Without Effect State Law Drug Safety Generic Drugs Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2012-069-01 Drug manufacturer Patient of a health professional Cert New Hampshire U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-03-19 Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic, and related statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-472 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-472.pdf 570 U.S. 521 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-521 570 U.S. 521 (2013) 570 U.S. 521 D09002ee1dec8b05c Mandates Abuse of Discretion Civil Procedure Appellate Courts Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Failure to Issue Mandate Capital Punishment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Ryan v. Schad, 570 U.S. 521 (2013);570 U.S. 521 CASE USREPORTS-570-521 521 20 1 2013-06-24 2012 570 U.S. 521 570 U.S. 521 (2013) Mandates Abuse of Discretion Civil Procedure Appellate Courts Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Failure to Issue Mandate Capital Punishment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2012-076-01 State commission, board, committee, or authority Person convicted of crime Cert Arizona U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-521 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-521.pdf 570 U.S. 529 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-529 570 U.S. 529 (2013) 570 U.S. 529 D09002ee1dec8b05f Racial and Ethnic Relations Preclearance Requirement Minority Rights Elections and Politics Discrimination State and Local Government Racism Equality Among States Voting Rights Voting Discrimination Voting Rights Act of 1965 Coverage Formula Constitutional Law Tenth Amendment Voting Rights Act of 1965, Plus Amendments Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013);570 U.S. 529 CASE USREPORTS-570-529 529 21 1 2013-06-25 2012 570 U.S. 529 570 U.S. 529 (2013) Racial and Ethnic Relations Preclearance Requirement Minority Rights Elections and Politics Discrimination State and Local Government Racism Equality Among States Voting Rights Voting Discrimination Voting Rights Act of 1965 Coverage Formula Constitutional Law Tenth Amendment Voting Rights Act of 1965, Plus Amendments Civil Rights 2012-073-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Department of Justice or Attorney General Cert District Of Columbia U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-02-27 Statutory construction Judicial review (state level) Federal Statute Voting Rights Act of 1965, plus amendments Opinion of the court (orally argued) Act of congress declared unconstitutional Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-529 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-529.pdf 570 U.S. 595 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-595 570 U.S. 595 (2013) 570 U.S. 595 D09002ee1dec8b064 Wetlands Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine Takings Clause Environmental Mitigation Land-Use Permits Environmental Law Land-Use Exactions Property Rights Eminent Domain Constitutional Law Dolan Requirements Nollan Requirements Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013);570 U.S. 595 CASE USREPORTS-570-595 595 22 1 2013-06-25 2012 570 U.S. 595 570 U.S. 595 (2013) Wetlands Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine Takings Clause Environmental Mitigation Land-Use Permits Environmental Law Land-Use Exactions Property Rights Eminent Domain Constitutional Law Dolan Requirements Nollan Requirements Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 2012-074-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Local governmental unit other than a county, city, town, township, village, or borough Cert State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-01-15 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (takings clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-595 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-595.pdf 570 U.S. 637 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-637 570 U.S. 637 (2013) 570 U.S. 637 D09002ee1dec8b084 Continued Custody Federal Indian and Tribal Law Tribal Family Law Indian Child Welfare Act of (I.C.W.A.) Non-Custodial Parents Adoption and Foster Care Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Indigenous Peoples Child Custody Native Peoples Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637 (2013);570 U.S. 637 CASE USREPORTS-570-637 637 23 1 2013-06-25 2012 570 U.S. 637 570 U.S. 637 (2013) Continued Custody Federal Indian and Tribal Law Tribal Family Law Indian Child Welfare Act of (I.C.W.A.) Non-Custodial Parents Adoption and Foster Care Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Indigenous Peoples Child Custody Native Peoples Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 2012-075-01 Parent or parents Child, children, including adopted or illegitimate Cert State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-16 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-637 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-637.pdf 570 U.S. 693 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-693 570 U.S. 693 (2013) 570 U.S. 693 D09002ee1dec8b082 Standing L.G.B.T. Rights California Proposition 8 Constitutional Law Same-Sex Marriage Civil Procedure Personal Stake State Constitutional Amendment Standing to Sue: Personal Injury Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693 (2013);570 U.S. 693 CASE USREPORTS-570-693 693 24 1 2013-06-26 2012 570 U.S. 693 570 U.S. 693 (2013) Standing L.G.B.T. Rights California Proposition 8 Constitutional Law Same-Sex Marriage Civil Procedure Personal Stake State Constitutional Amendment Standing to Sue: Personal Injury Judicial Power 2012-077-01 Voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transexual person or organization Cert California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-03-26 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Constitution Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-693 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-693.pdf 570 U.S. 729 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-729 570 U.S. 729 (2013) 570 U.S. 729 D09002ee1dec8af48 White-Collar Crime Property Transferable Property Criminal Law and Procedure Extortion Hobbs Act Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Hobbs Act, I.E., 18 Usc 1951 Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Sekhar v. United States, 570 U.S. 729 (2013);570 U.S. 729 CASE USREPORTS-570-729 729 25 1 2013-06-26 2012 570 U.S. 729 570 U.S. 729 (2013) White-Collar Crime Property Transferable Property Criminal Law and Procedure Extortion Hobbs Act Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Hobbs Act, I.E., 18 Usc 1951 Criminal Procedure 2012-078-01 Person convicted of crime United States Cert New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-04-23 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-729 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-729.pdf 570 U.S. 744 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-744 570 U.S. 744 (2013) 570 U.S. 744 D09002ee1dec8b07d Defense of Marriage Act (D.O.M.A.) L.G.B.T. Rights Article III Jurisdiction Equal Protection Marriage Equality Marriage and Family Status Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Prudential Considerations Same-Sex Marriage Due Process: Miscellaneous (Cf. Loyalty Oath), the Residual Code Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013);570 U.S. 744 CASE USREPORTS-570-744 744 26 1 2013-06-26 2012 570 U.S. 744 570 U.S. 744 (2013) Defense of Marriage Act (D.O.M.A.) L.G.B.T. Rights Article III Jurisdiction Equal Protection Marriage Equality Marriage and Family Status Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Prudential Considerations Same-Sex Marriage Due Process: Miscellaneous (Cf. Loyalty Oath), the Residual Code Due Process 2012-079-01 U.S. House of Representatives Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transexual person or organization Cert Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2013-03-27 Judicial review (national level) Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) Act of congress declared unconstitutional Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy Anthony M. Kennedy 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-744 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-744.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter D09002ee1dec8b085 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-570-BackMatter 27 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec8b05d United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Orders for June 17 through October 1, 2013 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-2 28 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1dec8b078 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Statement Showing the Number of Cases Filed, Disposed of, and Remaining on Dockets at Conclusion of October Terms 2010, 2011, and 2012 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-4 29 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-4.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec8b070 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2012, June 17 through October 13, 2013;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-3 30 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-570/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-570/pdf/USREPORTS-570-BackMatter-3.pdf