United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:562 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011 USREPORTS USREPORTS-562 562 2016 2010 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2016 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:562 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 2016-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1333 digital object pages JU 6.8:562 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562 P0b002ee1dec5ccbb 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-562 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-562 562 2016 2010 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec89e57 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Title Page, 562 U.S. (2011) FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec89e42 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-4 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec89e5e United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Allotment of Justices FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-3 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1dec89e40 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Appointment of Reporter of Decisions FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-5 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec89e46 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-2 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-FrontMatter-2.pdf 562 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-1 562 U.S. 1 (2011) 562 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec89e43 Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Nonstatutory Aggravating Factors Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Attack Errors of State Law Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Wilson v. Corcoran, 562 U.S. 1 (2011);562 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-562-1 1 6 1 2010-11-08 2010 562 U.S. 1 562 U.S. 1 (2011) Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Nonstatutory Aggravating Factors Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Attack Errors of State Law Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2010-001-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert Indiana Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-1.pdf 562 U.S. 8 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-8 562 U.S. 8 (2011) 562 U.S. 8 D09002ee1dec89e5d Drug Trafficking Weapons Criminal Procedure Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Controlled Substances Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Gun Control Criminal Law and Procedure Mandatory Sentencing Mandatory Minimum Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Narcotics Includes Regulation and Prohibition of Alcohol Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Abbott v. United States, 562 U.S. 8 (2011);562 U.S. 8 CASE USREPORTS-562-8 8 7 1 2010-11-15 2010 562 U.S. 8 562 U.S. 8 (2011) Drug Trafficking Weapons Criminal Procedure Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Controlled Substances Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Gun Control Criminal Law and Procedure Mandatory Sentencing Mandatory Minimum Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Narcotics Includes Regulation and Prohibition of Alcohol Criminal Procedure 2010-002-01 Defendant United States Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-04 Statutory construction Federal Statute Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets, National Firearms, Organized Crime Control, Comprehensive Crime Control, or Gun Control Acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-8.pdf 562 U.S. 29 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-29 562 U.S. 29 (2011) 562 U.S. 29 D09002ee1dec89e65 Crimes Against Children Declaratory Relief Deprivation of Rights Civil Actions Civil Rights Act of 1871 Due Process Municipal Liability Legal Remedies 14th Amendment Declaratory Judgment Civil Liability Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Policy or Custom Requirement Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2011);562 U.S. 29 CASE USREPORTS-562-29 29 8 1 2010-11-30 2010 562 U.S. 29 562 U.S. 29 (2011) Crimes Against Children Declaratory Relief Deprivation of Rights Civil Actions Civil Rights Act of 1871 Due Process Municipal Liability Legal Remedies 14th Amendment Declaratory Judgment Civil Liability Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Policy or Custom Requirement Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2010-003-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Parent or parents Cert California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts (42 U.S.C. �� 1983) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-29 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-29.pdf 562 U.S. 40 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-40 562 U.S. 40 (2011) 562 U.S. 40 D09002ee1dec89e50 Intellectual Property Law Patents and Copyrights: Copyright Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Costco v. Omega, 562 U.S. 40 (2011);562 U.S. 40 CASE USREPORTS-562-40 40 9 1 2010-12-13 2010 562 U.S. 40 562 U.S. 40 (2011) Intellectual Property Law Patents and Copyrights: Copyright Economic Activity 2010-004-01 Wholesale trade Shipper, including importer and exporter Cert U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-08 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Equally divided vote No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent 4 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-40 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-40.pdf 562 U.S. 42 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-42 562 U.S. 42 (2011) 562 U.S. 42 D09002ee1dec89e64 Property Tax Tax Lien Foreclosures Federal Indian and Tribal Law Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Tax Administration and Collection Native American Law Taxation Tribal Sovereign Immunity Native Peoples Sovereign Immunity Property Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation, 562 U.S. 42 (2011);562 U.S. 42 CASE USREPORTS-562-42 42 10 1 2011-01-10 2010 562 U.S. 42 562 U.S. 42 (2011) Property Tax Tax Lien Foreclosures Federal Indian and Tribal Law Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Tax Administration and Collection Native American Law Taxation Tribal Sovereign Immunity Native Peoples Sovereign Immunity Property Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 2010-005-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert New York Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-42 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-42.pdf 562 U.S. 44 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-44 562 U.S. 44 (2011) 562 U.S. 44 D09002ee1dec89e4d Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Income Tax Federal Insurance Contributions Act (F.I.C.A.) Chevron Deference Taxation Social Security U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Withholding Tax Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Mayo Foundation v. United States, 562 U.S. 44 (2011);562 U.S. 44 CASE USREPORTS-562-44 44 11 1 2011-01-11 2010 562 U.S. 44 562 U.S. 44 (2011) Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Income Tax Federal Insurance Contributions Act (F.I.C.A.) Chevron Deference Taxation Social Security U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.) Withholding Tax Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation 2010-006-01 Hospital, medical center United States Cert Department or Secretary of the Treasury Minnesota U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-08 Federal common law Statutory construction Federal Statute Social Security, as amended, including Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-44 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-44.pdf 562 U.S. 61 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-61 562 U.S. 61 (2011) 562 U.S. 61 D09002ee1dec89e55 Finance and Financial Sector Chapter 13 Disposable Income Bankruptcy United States Bankruptcy Code Means Testing Banks and Financial Institutions Means Test Ownership Costs Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Bankruptcy Law Operating Costs Vehicle Ownership Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Ransom v. FIA Card Services, 562 U.S. 61 (2011);562 U.S. 61 CASE USREPORTS-562-61 61 12 1 2011-01-11 2010 562 U.S. 61 562 U.S. 61 (2011) Finance and Financial Sector Chapter 13 Disposable Income Bankruptcy United States Bankruptcy Code Means Testing Banks and Financial Institutions Means Test Ownership Costs Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Bankruptcy Law Operating Costs Vehicle Ownership Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity 2010-007-01 Debtor Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Cert Nevada U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-04 Statutory construction Federal Statute Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Elena Kagan John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-61 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-61.pdf 562 U.S. 86 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-86 562 U.S. 86 (2011) 562 U.S. 86 D09002ee1dec89e10 Discovery and Evidence Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Strickland V. Washington Serology Habeas Corpus Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Criminal Procedure Blood Testing Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011);562 U.S. 86 CASE USREPORTS-562-86 86 13 1 2011-01-19 2010 562 U.S. 86 562 U.S. 86 (2011) Discovery and Evidence Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Strickland V. Washington Serology Habeas Corpus Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Criminal Procedure Blood Testing Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2010-008-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-12 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-86 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-86.pdf 562 U.S. 115 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-115 562 U.S. 115 (2011) 562 U.S. 115 D09002ee1dec89e44 Post Conviction Relief Discovery and Evidence Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Strickland V. Washington Habeas Corpus Plea Bargain Criminal Procedure Sentencing Suppression Motion Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 (2011);562 U.S. 115 CASE USREPORTS-562-115 115 14 1 2011-01-19 2010 562 U.S. 115 562 U.S. 115 (2011) Post Conviction Relief Discovery and Evidence Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Strickland V. Washington Habeas Corpus Plea Bargain Criminal Procedure Sentencing Suppression Motion Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2010-009-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert Oregon U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-12 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-115 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-115.pdf 562 U.S. 134 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-134 562 U.S. 134 (2011) 562 U.S. 134 D09002ee1dec89e5b Open Ended Questions Background Checks Employee Hiring Whalen V. Roe Nixon V. General Services Administration Privacy Act Privacy Act of 1974 Right of Privacy National Agency Check with Inquiries Constitutional Law National Aeronautics and Space Administration (N.A.S.A.) Right to Informational Privacy Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;NASA v. Nelson, 562 U.S. 134 (2011);562 U.S. 134 CASE USREPORTS-562-134 134 15 1 2011-01-19 2010 562 U.S. 134 562 U.S. 134 (2011) Open Ended Questions Background Checks Employee Hiring Whalen V. Roe Nixon V. General Services Administration Privacy Act Privacy Act of 1974 Right of Privacy National Agency Check with Inquiries Constitutional Law National Aeronautics and Space Administration (N.A.S.A.) Right to Informational Privacy Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy 2010-010-01 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Governmental employee or job applicant Cert National Aeronautics and Space Administration California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-05 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-134 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-134.pdf 562 U.S. 170 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-170 562 U.S. 170 (2011) 562 U.S. 170 D09002ee1dec89e60 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Gender Discrimination Retaliation Claim Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.) Discrimination Title VII Sex Discrimination Antiretaliation Labor Civil Liability Civil Actions Labor and Employment Law Unlawful Employment Practice Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, 562 U.S. 170 (2011);562 U.S. 170 CASE USREPORTS-562-170 170 16 1 2011-01-24 2010 562 U.S. 170 562 U.S. 170 (2011) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Gender Discrimination Retaliation Claim Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.) Discrimination Title VII Sex Discrimination Antiretaliation Labor Civil Liability Civil Actions Labor and Employment Law Unlawful Employment Practice Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights 2010-014-01 Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Cert Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Kentucky Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-12-07 Statutory construction Federal Statute Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-170 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-170.pdf 562 U.S. 180 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-180 562 U.S. 180 (2011) 562 U.S. 180 D09002ee1dec89e54 Prisoners' Rights Reasonable Protection from Violence While in Custody Sexual Assault Eighth Amendment Immediate Appeal Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment 8th Amendment Superintending Prison Officer Civil Procedure 14th Amendment Summary Judgment Retaliation Fourteenth Amendment Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011);562 U.S. 180 CASE USREPORTS-562-180 180 17 1 2011-01-24 2010 562 U.S. 180 562 U.S. 180 (2011) Prisoners' Rights Reasonable Protection from Violence While in Custody Sexual Assault Eighth Amendment Immediate Appeal Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment 8th Amendment Superintending Prison Officer Civil Procedure 14th Amendment Summary Judgment Retaliation Fourteenth Amendment Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2010-013-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-01 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts (42 U.S.C. �� 1983) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-180 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-180.pdf 562 U.S. 195 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-195 562 U.S. 195 (2011) 562 U.S. 195 D09002ee1dec89e5f Finance and Financial Sector Administrative Law Truth in Lending Act (T.I.L.A.) Disclosure Statement Consumer Credit Disclosure Requirement Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z Financial Services Federal or State Consumer Protection: Typically Under the Truth in Lending, Food, Drug and Cosmetic, and Consumer Protection Credit Acts Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Chase Bank v. McCoy, 562 U.S. 195 (2011);562 U.S. 195 CASE USREPORTS-562-195 195 18 1 2011-01-24 2010 562 U.S. 195 562 U.S. 195 (2011) Finance and Financial Sector Administrative Law Truth in Lending Act (T.I.L.A.) Disclosure Statement Consumer Credit Disclosure Requirement Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z Financial Services Federal or State Consumer Protection: Typically Under the Truth in Lending, Food, Drug and Cosmetic, and Consumer Protection Credit Acts Economic Activity 2010-012-01 Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Debtor Cert Federal Reserve Board of Governors California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-12-08 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Federal Statute Truth in Lending Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sonia Sotomayor John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-195 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-195.pdf 562 U.S. 216 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-216 562 U.S. 216 (2011) 562 U.S. 216 D09002ee1dec89e41 Prisoners' Rights Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Probation and Parole Denial of Parole Criminal Law and Procedure Errors of State Law Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216 (2011);562 U.S. 216 CASE USREPORTS-562-216 216 19 1 2011-01-24 2010 562 U.S. 216 562 U.S. 216 (2011) Prisoners' Rights Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Probation and Parole Denial of Parole Criminal Law and Procedure Errors of State Law Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2010-011-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert State Agency California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-216 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-216.pdf 562 U.S. 223 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-223 562 U.S. 223 (2011) 562 U.S. 223 D09002ee1dec89e58 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (N.V.I.C.P.) Federal Preemption Torts Law Preemption Torts Product Liability Negligent Design Vaccine Court Strict Liability Doctrine of Preemption Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis (D.T.P.) Vaccines Civil Liability Child Health Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 562 U.S. 223 (2011);562 U.S. 223 CASE USREPORTS-562-223 223 20 1 2011-02-22 2010 562 U.S. 223 562 U.S. 223 (2011) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (N.V.I.C.P.) Federal Preemption Torts Law Preemption Torts Product Liability Negligent Design Vaccine Court Strict Liability Doctrine of Preemption Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis (D.T.P.) Vaccines Civil Liability Child Health Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2010-015-01 Juvenile Drug manufacturer Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-12 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-223 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-223.pdf 562 U.S. 277 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-277 562 U.S. 277 (2011) 562 U.S. 277 D09002ee1dec89e12 Statutory Interpretation Railroads Transportation and Public Works Sales and Excise Tax Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law State and Local Taxation Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 Taxation State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;CSX Transportation v. Alabama Department of Revenue, 562 U.S. 277 (2011);562 U.S. 277 CASE USREPORTS-562-277 277 21 1 2011-02-22 2010 562 U.S. 277 562 U.S. 277 (2011) Statutory Interpretation Railroads Transportation and Public Works Sales and Excise Tax Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law State and Local Taxation Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 Taxation State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity 2010-016-01 Railroad Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Alabama Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-10 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Elena Kagan John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-277 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-277.pdf 562 U.S. 307 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-307 562 U.S. 307 (2011) 562 U.S. 307 D09002ee1dec89e59 Post Conviction Relief Homicide Habeas Corpus Timeliness Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property California Timeliness Requirement Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Walker v. Martin, 562 U.S. 307 (2011);562 U.S. 307 CASE USREPORTS-562-307 307 22 1 2011-02-23 2010 562 U.S. 307 562 U.S. 307 (2011) Post Conviction Relief Homicide Habeas Corpus Timeliness Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property California Timeliness Requirement Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2010-017-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-29 Federal common law Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-307 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-307.pdf 562 U.S. 323 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-323 562 U.S. 323 (2011) 562 U.S. 323 D09002ee1dec89e48 Motor Vehicles Defective Design Torts Law Preemption Torts Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (N.H.T.S.A.) Wrongful Death Civil Liability Geier V. Honda Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Williamson v. Mazda, 562 U.S. 323 (2011);562 U.S. 323 CASE USREPORTS-562-323 323 23 1 2011-02-23 2010 562 U.S. 323 562 U.S. 323 (2011) Motor Vehicles Defective Design Torts Law Preemption Torts Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (N.H.T.S.A.) Wrongful Death Civil Liability Geier V. Honda Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2010-018-01 Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Auto manufacturer Cert Department or Secretary of Transportation State Trial Court State Appellate Court Conflict between federal court and state court John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-03 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-323 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-323.pdf 562 U.S. 344 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-344 562 U.S. 344 (2011) 562 U.S. 344 D09002ee1dec89e13 Discovery and Evidence Homicide Witnesses Testimonial Evidence Criminal Procedure Ongoing Emergency 6th Amendment Crime and Law Enforcement Confrontation Clause Constitutional Law Nontestimonial Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Crawford V. Washington Sixth Amendment Davis V. Washington Confrontation (Right to Confront Accuser, Call and Cross-Examine Witnesses) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011);562 U.S. 344 CASE USREPORTS-562-344 344 24 1 2011-02-28 2010 562 U.S. 344 562 U.S. 344 (2011) Discovery and Evidence Homicide Witnesses Testimonial Evidence Criminal Procedure Ongoing Emergency 6th Amendment Crime and Law Enforcement Confrontation Clause Constitutional Law Nontestimonial Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Crawford V. Washington Sixth Amendment Davis V. Washington Confrontation (Right to Confront Accuser, Call and Cross-Examine Witnesses) Criminal Procedure 2010-019-01 State Defendant Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-05 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sonia Sotomayor John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-344 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-344.pdf 562 U.S. 397 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-397 562 U.S. 397 (2011) 562 U.S. 397 D09002ee1dec89e45 Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Personal Privacy Statutory Interpretation Right of Privacy Communications Federal Communication Commission (F.C.C.) Exemption 7(C) Business and Corporate Law Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;FCC v. AT&T, 562 U.S. 397 (2011);562 U.S. 397 CASE USREPORTS-562-397 397 25 1 2011-03-01 2010 562 U.S. 397 562 U.S. 397 (2011) Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Personal Privacy Statutory Interpretation Right of Privacy Communications Federal Communication Commission (F.C.C.) Exemption 7(C) Business and Corporate Law Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy 2010-020-01 Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Cert Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2011-01-19 Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Freedom of Information, Sunshine, or Privacy Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-397 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-397.pdf 562 U.S. 411 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-411 562 U.S. 411 (2011) 562 U.S. 411 D09002ee1dec89e0e Statutory Interpretation Employment Discrimination Torts Law Employee Hiring Torts Labor Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of (U.S.E.R.R.A.) Veterans Discrimination Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Staub v. Proctor Hospital, 562 U.S. 411 (2011);562 U.S. 411 CASE USREPORTS-562-411 411 26 1 2011-03-01 2010 562 U.S. 411 562 U.S. 411 (2011) Statutory Interpretation Employment Discrimination Torts Law Employee Hiring Torts Labor Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of (U.S.E.R.R.A.) Veterans Discrimination Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights 2010-021-01 Veteran Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Cert Illinois Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-02 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-411 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-411.pdf 562 U.S. 428 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-428 562 U.S. 428 (2011) 562 U.S. 428 D09002ee1dec89e14 Article I Tribunal Veterans' Benefits Veterans Military Law Civil Procedure Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Article I Courts People with Disabilities U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) Military: Veteran Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428 (2011);562 U.S. 428 CASE USREPORTS-562-428 428 27 1 2011-03-01 2010 562 U.S. 428 562 U.S. 428 (2011) Article I Tribunal Veterans' Benefits Veterans Military Law Civil Procedure Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Article I Courts People with Disabilities U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) Military: Veteran Civil Rights 2010-022-01 Veteran Veterans' Administration Cert Veterans' Administration or Board of Veterans' Appeals U.S. Court of Veterans Appeals U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-12-06 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-428 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-428.pdf 562 U.S. 443 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-443 562 U.S. 443 (2011) 562 U.S. 443 D09002ee1dec89e52 First Amendment Intrusion upon Seclusion Torts Westboro Baptist Church Picketing Constitutional Law Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedom of Speech Protest Demonstrations (Other than as Pertains to Sit-in Demonstrations): Demonstrations and Other Forms of Protest Based on First Amendment Guarantees First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011);562 U.S. 443 CASE USREPORTS-562-443 443 28 1 2011-03-02 2010 562 U.S. 443 562 U.S. 443 (2011) First Amendment Intrusion upon Seclusion Torts Westboro Baptist Church Picketing Constitutional Law Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedom of Speech Protest Demonstrations (Other than as Pertains to Sit-in Demonstrations): Demonstrations and Other Forms of Protest Based on First Amendment Guarantees First Amendment 2010-023-01 Father Religious organization, institution, or person Cert Maryland U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-06 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-443 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-443.pdf 562 U.S. 476 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-476 562 U.S. 476 (2011) 562 U.S. 476 D09002ee1dec89e11 United States V. Booker Post Sentencing Rehabilitation Resentencing Controlled Substances Sentencing Criminal Procedure Downward Variance Criminal Law and Procedure United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011);562 U.S. 476 CASE USREPORTS-562-476 476 29 1 2011-03-02 2010 562 U.S. 476 562 U.S. 476 (2011) United States V. Booker Post Sentencing Rehabilitation Resentencing Controlled Substances Sentencing Criminal Procedure Downward Variance Criminal Law and Procedure United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure 2010-024-01 Defendant United States Cert Iowa Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-12-06 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury) Opinion of the court (orally argued) Act of congress declared unconstitutional Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sonia Sotomayor John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-476 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-476.pdf 562 U.S. 521 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-521 562 U.S. 521 (2011) 562 U.S. 521 D09002ee1dec89e3f Section 1983 Discovery and Evidence Homicide D.N.A. Evidence Civil Actions Federal Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction Due Process Criminal Procedure Civil Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Fourteenth Amendment Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521 (2011);562 U.S. 521 CASE USREPORTS-562-521 521 30 1 2011-03-07 2010 562 U.S. 521 562 U.S. 521 (2011) Section 1983 Discovery and Evidence Homicide D.N.A. Evidence Civil Actions Federal Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction Due Process Criminal Procedure Civil Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Fourteenth Amendment Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2010-027-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Texas Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-10-13 Statutory construction Federal Statute Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts (42 U.S.C. �� 1983) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-521 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-521.pdf 562 U.S. 545 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-545 562 U.S. 545 (2011) 562 U.S. 545 D09002ee1dec89e5a Post Conviction Relief Tolling Habeas Corpus Collateral Review Statute of Limitation Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Sex Offenses Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Attack Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Wall v. Kholi, 562 U.S. 545 (2011);562 U.S. 545 CASE USREPORTS-562-545 545 31 1 2011-03-07 2010 562 U.S. 545 562 U.S. 545 (2011) Post Conviction Relief Tolling Habeas Corpus Collateral Review Statute of Limitation Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Criminal Procedure Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Sex Offenses Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Attack Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2010-025-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Person convicted of crime Cert Rhode Island U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-11-29 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-545 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-545.pdf 562 U.S. 562 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-562 562 U.S. 562 (2011) 562 U.S. 562 D09002ee1dec89e4f Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Exemption 2 F.O.I.A. Exemption Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Personnel Records Weapons Armed Forces Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Milner v. Department of the Navy, 562 U.S. 562 (2011);562 U.S. 562 CASE USREPORTS-562-562 562 32 1 2011-03-07 2010 562 U.S. 562 562 U.S. 562 (2011) Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Exemption 2 F.O.I.A. Exemption Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Personnel Records Weapons Armed Forces Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations Privacy 2010-026-01 Protester, demonstrator, picketer or pamphleteer (non-employment related), or nonindigent loiterer Secretary or administrative unit of the U.S. Navy Cert Washington Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2010-12-01 Statutory construction Federal Statute Freedom of Information, Sunshine, or Privacy Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Elena Kagan John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-562 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-562.pdf 562 U.S. 594 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-594 562 U.S. 594 (2011) 562 U.S. 594 D09002ee1dec89e0f Crime and Law Enforcement Jury Selection Criminal Procedure Habeas Corpus Sex Offenses Batson V. Kentucky Criminal Law and Procedure Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Felkner v. Jackson, 562 U.S. 594 (2011);562 U.S. 594 CASE USREPORTS-562-594 594 33 1 2011-03-21 2010 562 U.S. 594 562 U.S. 594 (2011) Crime and Law Enforcement Jury Selection Criminal Procedure Habeas Corpus Sex Offenses Batson V. Kentucky Criminal Law and Procedure Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights 2010-028-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Federal common law Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-594 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-594.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter D09002ee1dec89e66 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-562-BackMatter 34 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec89e53 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Orders for October 4, 2010, through March 21, 2011 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-2 35 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec89e5c United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2010, October 4, 2010 through March 21, 2011;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-3 36 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-562/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-562/pdf/USREPORTS-562-BackMatter-3.pdf