United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:558 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010 USREPORTS USREPORTS-558 558 2015 2009 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2015 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:558 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 2015-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1094 digital object pages JU 6.8:558 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558 P0b002ee1dec5c9db 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-558 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-558 558 2015 2009 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7c439 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Title Page, 558 U.S. (2010) FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-3 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec7c413 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7c356 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Allotment of Justices FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-4 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7c425 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Death of Mr. O'Connor FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-2 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1dec7c436 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-5 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-FrontMatter-5.pdf 558 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-1 558 U.S. 1 (2010) 558 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec7c423 Crime and Law Enforcement 6th Amendment Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Sixth Amendment Capital Punishment Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Corcoran v. Levenhagen, 558 U.S. 1 (2010);558 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-558-1 1 6 1 2009-10-20 2009 558 U.S. 1 558 U.S. 1 (2010) Crime and Law Enforcement 6th Amendment Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Sixth Amendment Capital Punishment Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals (Cf. 753) Judicial Power 2009-009-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution State Cert Indiana Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-1.pdf 558 U.S. 4 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-4 558 U.S. 4 (2010) 558 U.S. 4 D09002ee1dec7c411 Professional Standards Restatement of Professional Standards Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Prevailing Professional Norms Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Habeas Relief Professional Associations Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys American Bar Association Guidelines Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Bobby v. Van Hook, 558 U.S. 4 (2010);558 U.S. 4 CASE USREPORTS-558-4 4 7 1 2009-11-09 2009 558 U.S. 4 558 U.S. 4 (2010) Professional Standards Restatement of Professional Standards Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Prevailing Professional Norms Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Habeas Relief Professional Associations Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys American Bar Association Guidelines Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2009-008-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Judicial review (state level) Constitution Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-4.pdf 558 U.S. 15 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-15 558 U.S. 15 (2010) 558 U.S. 15 D09002ee1dec7c437 Professional Standards Totality of Circumstances Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Rebuttal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Habeas Relief Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Wong v. Belmontes, 558 U.S. 15 (2010);558 U.S. 15 CASE USREPORTS-558-15 15 8 1 2009-11-16 2009 558 U.S. 15 558 U.S. 15 (2010) Professional Standards Totality of Circumstances Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Rebuttal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Habeas Relief Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2009-007-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to counsel) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-15 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-15.pdf 558 U.S. 30 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-30 558 U.S. 30 (2010) 558 U.S. 30 D09002ee1dec7c412 Professional Standards Totality of Circumstances Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Mitigating Circumstances Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Deficient Performance Sentencing Habeas Relief Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Porter v. McCollum, 558 U.S. 30 (2010);558 U.S. 30 CASE USREPORTS-558-30 30 9 1 2009-11-30 2009 558 U.S. 30 558 U.S. 30 (2010) Professional Standards Totality of Circumstances Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Mitigating Circumstances Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Deficient Performance Sentencing Habeas Relief Crime and Law Enforcement Attorneys Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2009-006-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Florida Middle U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-30 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-30.pdf 558 U.S. 45 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-45 558 U.S. 45 (2010) 558 U.S. 45 D09002ee1dec7c438 Law Enforcement Officers Criminal Law and Procedure Human Rights and Civil Liberties Warrantless Entry Warrantless Search and Seizure Search and Seizure Emergency Aid Exception Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Reasonableness Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Michigan v. Fisher, 558 U.S. 45 (2010);558 U.S. 45 CASE USREPORTS-558-45 45 10 1 2009-12-07 2009 558 U.S. 45 558 U.S. 45 (2010) Law Enforcement Officers Criminal Law and Procedure Human Rights and Civil Liberties Warrantless Entry Warrantless Search and Seizure Search and Seizure Emergency Aid Exception Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Reasonableness Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure 2009-005-01 State Defendant Cert State Trial Court State Appellate Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-45 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-45.pdf 558 U.S. 53 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-53 558 U.S. 53 (2010) 558 U.S. 53 D09002ee1dec7c428 Post Verdict Motions Adequate State Grounds Doctrine Habeas Corpus Habeas Fugitive Forfeiture Law Discretionary State Procedural Rule Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Fugitives Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2010);558 U.S. 53 CASE USREPORTS-558-53 53 11 1 2009-12-08 2009 558 U.S. 53 558 U.S. 53 (2010) Post Verdict Motions Adequate State Grounds Doctrine Habeas Corpus Habeas Fugitive Forfeiture Law Discretionary State Procedural Rule Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Fugitives Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2009-004-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-11-02 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-53 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-53.pdf 558 U.S. 67 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-67 558 U.S. 67 (2010) 558 U.S. 67 D09002ee1dec7c42b Procedural Rule Jurisdiction and Venue Railroads Labor Arbitration Forfeiture Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Labor and Employment Law Labor-Management Relations Transportation and Public Works Railway Labor Act Alternative Dispute Resolution Statutory Claim Constitutional Claims National Railroad Adjustment Board (N.R.A.B.) Claim Processing Rule Labor-Management Disputes: Employee Discharge Unions United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers, 558 U.S. 67 (2010);558 U.S. 67 CASE USREPORTS-558-67 67 12 1 2009-12-08 2009 558 U.S. 67 558 U.S. 67 (2010) Procedural Rule Jurisdiction and Venue Railroads Labor Arbitration Forfeiture Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Labor and Employment Law Labor-Management Relations Transportation and Public Works Railway Labor Act Alternative Dispute Resolution Statutory Claim Constitutional Claims National Railroad Adjustment Board (N.R.A.B.) Claim Processing Rule Labor-Management Disputes: Employee Discharge Unions 2009-003-01 Railroad Union, labor organization, or official of Cert National Railroad Adjustment Board Illinois Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-10-07 Statutory construction Federal Statute Railway Labor Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-67 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-67.pdf 558 U.S. 87 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-87 558 U.S. 87 (2010) 558 U.S. 87 D09002ee1dec7c429 Jurisdiction and Venue Vacated Judgment Settlements Happenstance Vacate Forfeiture Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Equity Moot Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Vacatur Case or Controversy Crime and Law Enforcement Property Rights Mootness Capable of Repetition Mootness (Cf. Standing to Sue: Live Dispute) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Alvarez v. Smith, 558 U.S. 87 (2010);558 U.S. 87 CASE USREPORTS-558-87 87 13 1 2009-12-08 2009 558 U.S. 87 558 U.S. 87 (2010) Jurisdiction and Venue Vacated Judgment Settlements Happenstance Vacate Forfeiture Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Equity Moot Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Vacatur Case or Controversy Crime and Law Enforcement Property Rights Mootness Capable of Repetition Mootness (Cf. Standing to Sue: Live Dispute) Judicial Power 2009-002-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Cert Illinois Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-10-14 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitution Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-87 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-87.pdf 558 U.S. 100 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-100 558 U.S. 100 (2010) 558 U.S. 100 D09002ee1dec7c358 Evidence Discovery and Evidence Attorney-Client Privilege Pretrial Orders Discovery Collateral Order Doctrine Judiciary Lawyers and Legal Services Interlocutory Appeal Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2010);558 U.S. 100 CASE USREPORTS-558-100 100 14 1 2009-12-08 2009 558 U.S. 100 558 U.S. 100 (2010) Evidence Discovery and Evidence Attorney-Client Privilege Pretrial Orders Discovery Collateral Order Doctrine Judiciary Lawyers and Legal Services Interlocutory Appeal Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 2009-001-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Cert Georgia Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-10-05 Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Sonia Sotomayor John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-100 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-100.pdf 558 U.S. 120 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-120 558 U.S. 120 (2010) 558 U.S. 120 D09002ee1dec7c422 Forfeit D.N.A. Evidence Habeas Corpus Prosecutor's Fallacy Jackson V. Virginia Habeas Sufficiency of the Evidence Federal Habeas Insufficiency of Evidence Claim Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120 (2010);558 U.S. 120 CASE USREPORTS-558-120 120 15 1 2010-01-11 2009 558 U.S. 120 558 U.S. 120 (2010) Forfeit D.N.A. Evidence Habeas Corpus Prosecutor's Fallacy Jackson V. Virginia Habeas Sufficiency of the Evidence Federal Habeas Insufficiency of Evidence Claim Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2009-021-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Nevada U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-120 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-120.pdf 558 U.S. 139 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-139 558 U.S. 139 (2010) 558 U.S. 139 D09002ee1dec7c42a Juries Deficient Performance Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Strickland V. Washington Mitigating Circumstances Jury Instructions Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Closing Arguments Mental Defective Habeas Federal Habeas Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Mental Illness Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Sentencing Instructions Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Smith v. Spisak, 558 U.S. 139 (2010);558 U.S. 139 CASE USREPORTS-558-139 139 16 1 2010-01-12 2009 558 U.S. 139 558 U.S. 139 (2010) Juries Deficient Performance Mitigating Evidence Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Strickland V. Washington Mitigating Circumstances Jury Instructions Habeas Corpus Effective Assistance of Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Closing Arguments Mental Defective Habeas Federal Habeas Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Mental Illness Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Sentencing Instructions Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure 2009-020-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Ohio Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-10-13 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitutional Amendment Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-139 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-139.pdf 558 U.S. 165 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-165 558 U.S. 165 (2010) 558 U.S. 165 D09002ee1dec7c40b Energy Prices Energy Just and Reasonable Rates Public Interest Standard Electricity Public Utilities and Utility Rates Contract Rates Mobile-Sierra Doctrine Mobile-Sierra Public Interest Standard Federal Power Act Noncontracting Parties Public Interest Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (F.E.R.C.) Energy Law Federal and Some Few State Regulation of Public Utilities Regulation: Electric Power Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Pub. Util. Comm'n, 558 U.S. 165 (2010);558 U.S. 165 CASE USREPORTS-558-165 165 17 1 2010-01-13 2009 558 U.S. 165 558 U.S. 165 (2010) Energy Prices Energy Just and Reasonable Rates Public Interest Standard Electricity Public Utilities and Utility Rates Contract Rates Mobile-Sierra Doctrine Mobile-Sierra Public Interest Standard Federal Power Act Noncontracting Parties Public Interest Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (F.E.R.C.) Energy Law Federal and Some Few State Regulation of Public Utilities Regulation: Electric Power Economic Activity 2009-019-01 Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company State commission, board, committee, or authority Cert Federal Energy Regulatory Commission U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) To resolve important or significant question John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-11-03 Statutory construction Federal common law Federal Statute Federal Power Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-165 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-165.pdf 558 U.S. 183 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-183 558 U.S. 183 (2010) 558 U.S. 183 D09002ee1dec7c40e Trials and Court Proceedings Broadcast of Court Proceedings Rulemaking Broadcasting Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus Immediate Need Exception Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Certiorari Judiciary Irreparable Harm Broadcast Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Stays Amendment of Local Rule Notice and Comment District Courts Local Rules Public Notice Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183 (2010);558 U.S. 183 CASE USREPORTS-558-183 183 18 1 2010-01-13 2009 558 U.S. 183 558 U.S. 183 (2010) Trials and Court Proceedings Broadcast of Court Proceedings Rulemaking Broadcasting Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus Immediate Need Exception Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Certiorari Judiciary Irreparable Harm Broadcast Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Stays Amendment of Local Rule Notice and Comment District Courts Local Rules Public Notice Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal District Courts or Territorial Courts Judicial Power 2009-018-01 Voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL) Voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL) Stay California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted John G. Roberts, Jr. Statutory construction Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Stay, petition, or motion granted Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-183 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-183.pdf 558 U.S. 209 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-209 558 U.S. 209 (2010) 558 U.S. 209 D09002ee1dec7c435 Juries Juror Selection Voir Dire Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Right to Public Trial Public Trial Crime and Law Enforcement Public Hearings Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209 (2010);558 U.S. 209 CASE USREPORTS-558-209 209 19 1 2010-01-19 2009 558 U.S. 209 558 U.S. 209 (2010) Juries Juror Selection Voir Dire Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Right to Public Trial Public Trial Crime and Law Enforcement Public Hearings Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure 2009-017-01 Defendant State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (other provisions) Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-209 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-209.pdf 558 U.S. 220 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-220 558 U.S. 220 (2010) 558 U.S. 220 D09002ee1dec7c40f Granted, Vacated, and Remanded (G.V.R.) Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Judiciary Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Wellons v. Hall, Warden, 558 U.S. 220 (2010);558 U.S. 220 CASE USREPORTS-558-220 220 20 1 2010-01-19 2009 558 U.S. 220 558 U.S. 220 (2010) Granted, Vacated, and Remanded (G.V.R.) Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Habeas Judiciary Crime and Law Enforcement Habeas Relief Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure 2009-016-01 Defendant State Cert Georgia Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-220 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-220.pdf 558 U.S. 233 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-233 558 U.S. 233 (2010) 558 U.S. 233 D09002ee1dec7c410 Jurisdiction and Venue Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) Board of Immigration Appeals (B.I.A.) Motion to Reopen Specialized Courts Administrative Courts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Statutory Construction No Judicial Review Category Immigration Judiciary Judicial Review Presumption in Favor of Judicial Review of Administrative Action Immigration Law Judicial Review of Administrative Action Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of (I.I.R.I.R.A.) Removal Proceedings Barred Judicial Review Deportation (Cf. Immigration and Naturalization) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010);558 U.S. 233 CASE USREPORTS-558-233 233 21 1 2010-01-20 2009 558 U.S. 233 558 U.S. 233 (2010) Jurisdiction and Venue Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) Board of Immigration Appeals (B.I.A.) Motion to Reopen Specialized Courts Administrative Courts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Statutory Construction No Judicial Review Category Immigration Judiciary Judicial Review Presumption in Favor of Judicial Review of Administrative Action Immigration Law Judicial Review of Administrative Action Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of (I.I.R.I.R.A.) Removal Proceedings Barred Judicial Review Deportation (Cf. Immigration and Naturalization) Civil Rights 2009-015-01 Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked Attorney general of the United States, or his office Cert Board of Immigration Appeals U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-11-10 Statutory construction Federal Statute Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-233 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-233.pdf 558 U.S. 256 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-256 558 U.S. 256 (2010) 558 U.S. 256 D09002ee1dec7c426 Jurisdiction and Venue Intervention Intervenors Government State and Local Government North Carolina Original Action Nonstate Intervention Jurisdiction over Nonstate Parties Judiciary South Carolina Original Jurisdiction Compelling Interest State Boundary Disputes Leave to Intervene State Disputes Civil Procedure Non-Real Property Dispute Between States Interstate Relations United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;South Carolina v. North Carolina, 558 U.S. 256 (2010);558 U.S. 256 CASE USREPORTS-558-256 256 22 1 2010-01-20 2009 558 U.S. 256 558 U.S. 256 (2010) Jurisdiction and Venue Intervention Intervenors Government State and Local Government North Carolina Original Action Nonstate Intervention Jurisdiction over Nonstate Parties Judiciary South Carolina Original Jurisdiction Compelling Interest State Boundary Disputes Leave to Intervene State Disputes Civil Procedure Non-Real Property Dispute Between States Interstate Relations 2009-014-01 State State Original State Agency Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-10-13 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-256 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-256.pdf 558 U.S. 290 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-290 558 U.S. 290 (2010) 558 U.S. 290 D09002ee1dec7c414 State Habeas Appellate Review Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Federal Courts Federal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Factual Determination Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010);558 U.S. 290 CASE USREPORTS-558-290 290 23 1 2010-01-20 2009 558 U.S. 290 558 U.S. 290 (2010) State Habeas Appellate Review Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Habeas Corpus Human Rights and Civil Liberties Federal Courts Federal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Factual Determination Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2009-013-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert Alabama Middle U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-11-04 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Sonia Sotomayor John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-290 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-290.pdf 558 U.S. 310 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-310 558 U.S. 310 (2010) 558 U.S. 310 D09002ee1dec7c427 First Amendment Political Speech Judicial Restraint Antidistortion Rationale Shareholder Protection Campaign Finance Federal Election Commission (F.E.C.) Disclosure Requirements Anticorruption Interest Electioneering Communication Mccain-Feingold Act Elections and Politics Facial Challenges Human Rights and Civil Liberties Unions Expenditure Limits Freedom of Speech Stare Decisis Corruption Strict Scrutiny Hillary: The Movie Shareholders Nonprofit Corporations Election Law Censorship Compelling Interest Corporate Political Spending Corporate Expenditure Ban Corporations and Associations Constitutional Law Political Advertising Political Action Committee (P.A.C.) Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of (B.C.R.A.) Speech Restriction As-Applied Challenges Campaign Spending (Cf. Governmental Corruption): First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010);558 U.S. 310 CASE USREPORTS-558-310 310 24 1 2010-01-21 2009 558 U.S. 310 558 U.S. 310 (2010) First Amendment Political Speech Judicial Restraint Antidistortion Rationale Shareholder Protection Campaign Finance Federal Election Commission (F.E.C.) Disclosure Requirements Anticorruption Interest Electioneering Communication Mccain-Feingold Act Elections and Politics Facial Challenges Human Rights and Civil Liberties Unions Expenditure Limits Freedom of Speech Stare Decisis Corruption Strict Scrutiny Hillary: The Movie Shareholders Nonprofit Corporations Election Law Censorship Compelling Interest Corporate Political Spending Corporate Expenditure Ban Corporations and Associations Constitutional Law Political Advertising Political Action Committee (P.A.C.) Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of (B.C.R.A.) Speech Restriction As-Applied Challenges Campaign Spending (Cf. Governmental Corruption): First Amendment 2009-012-01 Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official Federal Election Commission Appeal Federal Election Commission District Of Columbia U.S. District Court District Of Columbia U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-24 2009-09-09 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) Act of congress declared unconstitutional Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-310 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-310.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7c40d United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-3 25 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-3.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7c40c United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Orders For October 5, 2009, Through January 19, 2010 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-2 26 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter D09002ee1dec7c424 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States BACKMATTER USREPORTS-558-BackMatter 27 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7c357 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2009, October 5, 2009 through January 21, 2010;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-4 28 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-558/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-558/pdf/USREPORTS-558-BackMatter-4.pdf