United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:556 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers USREPORTS USREPORTS-556 556 2014 2008 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2014 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:556 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 2014-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1352 digital object pages JU 6.8:556 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556 P0b002ee1dec5c674 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-556 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-556 556 2014 2008 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7a22e United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Title Page, 556 U.S. (2009) FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-3 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-7 D09002ee1dec7a221 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-7 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-7.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1dec7a240 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Notes FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-6 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec7a239 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Allotment of Justices FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1dec7a23c United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Presentation of the Solicitor General FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-5 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7a235 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Presentation of the Attorney General FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-4 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7a223 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-2 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-FrontMatter-2.pdf 556 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-1 556 U.S. 1 (2009) 556 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec7a23e Vote Dilution Minority Rights Crossover District Legislative Bodies Elections and Politics Majority Minority District State and Local Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Whole County Provision Voting Rights Racial Minorities Redistricting Voting Rights Act of 1965 Government Election Law Coalition District Legislative Elections Constitutional Avoidance Voting Rights Act of 1965, Plus Amendments Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009);556 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-556-1 1 8 1 2009-03-09 2008 556 U.S. 1 556 U.S. 1 (2009) Vote Dilution Minority Rights Crossover District Legislative Bodies Elections and Politics Majority Minority District State and Local Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Whole County Provision Voting Rights Racial Minorities Redistricting Voting Rights Act of 1965 Government Election Law Coalition District Legislative Elections Constitutional Avoidance Voting Rights Act of 1965, Plus Amendments Civil Rights 2008-030-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact County government or county governmental unit, except school district Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-10-14 Statutory construction Federal Statute Voting Rights Act of 1965, plus amendments Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-1.pdf 556 U.S. 49 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-49 556 U.S. 49 (2009) 556 U.S. 49 D09002ee1dec7a21d Jurisdiction and Venue Arbitration Federal Arbitration Act (F.A.A.) Counterclaims Well Pleaded Complaint Rule Judiciary Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Federal Jurisdiction State Law Ouster District Courts Federal Question Jurisdiction Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009);556 U.S. 49 CASE USREPORTS-556-49 49 9 1 2009-03-09 2008 556 U.S. 49 556 U.S. 49 (2009) Jurisdiction and Venue Arbitration Federal Arbitration Act (F.A.A.) Counterclaims Well Pleaded Complaint Rule Judiciary Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Federal Jurisdiction State Law Ouster District Courts Federal Question Jurisdiction Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2008-031-01 Consumer, consumer organization Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Cert Maryland U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-10-06 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg Antonin Scalia 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-49 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf 556 U.S. 81 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-81 556 U.S. 81 (2009) 556 U.S. 81 D09002ee1dec7a26b Prisoners' Rights Trials and Court Proceedings Assigned Counsel Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Attributed to Defendant Public Defender State and Local Courts Right to Speedy Trial Judiciary State Delay Lawyers and Legal Services Color of State Law Trial Delay Crime and Law Enforcement State Actors Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Chargeable Against the State Speedy Trial Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Vermont v. Brillon, 556 U.S. 81 (2009);556 U.S. 81 CASE USREPORTS-556-81 81 10 1 2009-03-09 2008 556 U.S. 81 556 U.S. 81 (2009) Prisoners' Rights Trials and Court Proceedings Assigned Counsel Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Attributed to Defendant Public Defender State and Local Courts Right to Speedy Trial Judiciary State Delay Lawyers and Legal Services Color of State Law Trial Delay Crime and Law Enforcement State Actors Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Chargeable Against the State Speedy Trial Criminal Procedure 2008-032-01 State Defendant Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-13 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (speedy trial) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-81 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-81.pdf 556 U.S. 98 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-98 556 U.S. 98 (2009) 556 U.S. 98 D09002ee1dec7a236 Witness Fees Prevailing Party Court Costs Witnesses Judiciary Taxation of Costs Civil Procedure Award of Costs Expert Witnesses District Courts American Rule Non-Real Property Dispute Between States Interstate Relations United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Kansas v. Colorado, 556 U.S. 98 (2009);556 U.S. 98 CASE USREPORTS-556-98 98 11 1 2009-03-09 2008 556 U.S. 98 556 U.S. 98 (2009) Witness Fees Prevailing Party Court Costs Witnesses Judiciary Taxation of Costs Civil Procedure Award of Costs Expert Witnesses District Courts American Rule Non-Real Property Dispute Between States Interstate Relations 2008-033-01 State State Original Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-01 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-98 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-98.pdf 556 U.S. 111 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-111 556 U.S. 111 (2009) 556 U.S. 111 D09002ee1dec7a1c4 Deficient Performance Insanity Defense Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Nothing to Lose Standard Homicide Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Standard of Review Reasonable Probability of Prevailing Federal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Crime and Law Enforcement Deferential Review Prejudice Criminal Law and Procedure Nothing to Lose Rule Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Knowles v. Mirzayance, 556 U.S. 111 (2009);556 U.S. 111 CASE USREPORTS-556-111 111 12 1 2009-03-24 2008 556 U.S. 111 556 U.S. 111 (2009) Deficient Performance Insanity Defense Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Nothing to Lose Standard Homicide Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Standard of Review Reasonable Probability of Prevailing Federal Habeas Lawyers and Legal Services Crime and Law Enforcement Deferential Review Prejudice Criminal Law and Procedure Nothing to Lose Rule Indigents: Inadequate Representation by Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2008-034-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-13 Federal common law Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-111 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-111.pdf 556 U.S. 129 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-129 556 U.S. 129 (2009) 556 U.S. 129 D09002ee1dec7a220 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 51(B) Plea Agreement Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(B) Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Unpreserved Claims of Error Breach of Contract Criminal Procedure Judiciary Forfeited Claim Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Plain Error Breach of Plea Agreement Plain Error Review Criminal Law and Procedure Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129 (2009);556 U.S. 129 CASE USREPORTS-556-129 129 13 1 2009-03-25 2008 556 U.S. 129 556 U.S. 129 (2009) Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 51(B) Plea Agreement Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(B) Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Unpreserved Claims of Error Breach of Contract Criminal Procedure Judiciary Forfeited Claim Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Plain Error Breach of Plea Agreement Plain Error Review Criminal Law and Procedure Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure 2008-035-01 Person convicted of crime United States Cert Texas Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-14 Federal common law Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-129 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-129.pdf 556 U.S. 148 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-148 556 U.S. 148 (2009) 556 U.S. 148 D09002ee1dec7a22a Juries Harmless Error Due Process Clause Judges Peremptory Challenges Due Process Right to Impartial Jury Human Rights and Civil Liberties Structural Error Right to Fair Trial State and Local Courts Judiciary Harmless Error Standard Crime and Law Enforcement Impartial Jury Fourteenth Amendment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Rivera v. Illinois, 556 U.S. 148 (2009);556 U.S. 148 CASE USREPORTS-556-148 148 14 1 2009-03-31 2008 556 U.S. 148 556 U.S. 148 (2009) Juries Harmless Error Due Process Clause Judges Peremptory Challenges Due Process Right to Impartial Jury Human Rights and Civil Liberties Structural Error Right to Fair Trial State and Local Courts Judiciary Harmless Error Standard Crime and Law Enforcement Impartial Jury Fourteenth Amendment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure 2008-036-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court State court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-23 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-148 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-148.pdf 556 U.S. 163 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-163 556 U.S. 163 (2009) 556 U.S. 163 D09002ee1dec7a224 Jurisdiction and Venue Joint Resolution Clear and Manifest Intent Property Law Legislative Bodies Repeals Government State and Local Government Statutory Interpretation Territories and Protectorates Public Lands Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Congress Statehood Legal Remedies Repeal by Implication Sovereignty Federal Jurisdiction Apology Resolution Natural Resources Native Peoples Hawaii Federal Question Jurisdiction Legislative Powers Constitutional Avoidance Property Miscellaneous Miscellaneous United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163 (2009);556 U.S. 163 CASE USREPORTS-556-163 163 15 1 2009-03-31 2008 556 U.S. 163 556 U.S. 163 (2009) Jurisdiction and Venue Joint Resolution Clear and Manifest Intent Property Law Legislative Bodies Repeals Government State and Local Government Statutory Interpretation Territories and Protectorates Public Lands Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Congress Statehood Legal Remedies Repeal by Implication Sovereignty Federal Jurisdiction Apology Resolution Natural Resources Native Peoples Hawaii Federal Question Jurisdiction Legislative Powers Constitutional Avoidance Property Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 2008-037-01 State State commission, board, committee, or authority Cert State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-163 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-163.pdf 556 U.S. 178 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-178 556 U.S. 178 (2009) 556 U.S. 178 D09002ee1dec7a22b Jury Instructions Certiorari Dismissed as Improvidently Granted Civil Procedure No Merits: Writ Improvidently Granted Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams, Personal Representative of the Estate of Williams, Deceased, 556 U.S. 178 (2009);556 U.S. 178 CASE USREPORTS-556-178 178 16 1 2009-03-31 2008 556 U.S. 178 556 U.S. 178 (2009) Jury Instructions Certiorari Dismissed as Improvidently Granted Civil Procedure No Merits: Writ Improvidently Granted Judicial Power 2008-038-01 Drug manufacturer Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Per curiam (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-178 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-178.pdf 556 U.S. 180 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-180 556 U.S. 180 (2009) 556 U.S. 180 D09002ee1dec7a228 Prisoners' Rights Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Appointed Counsel Federally Funded Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Statutory Construction State Clemency Proceedings Lawyers and Legal Services Clemency Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Legislative Purpose Criminal Law and Procedure Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180 (2009);556 U.S. 180 CASE USREPORTS-556-180 180 17 1 2009-04-01 2008 556 U.S. 180 556 U.S. 180 (2009) Prisoners' Rights Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Appointed Counsel Federally Funded Counsel Human Rights and Civil Liberties Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Statutory Construction State Clemency Proceedings Lawyers and Legal Services Clemency Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Legislative Purpose Criminal Law and Procedure Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2008-039-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert Tennessee Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-12 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-180 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-180.pdf 556 U.S. 208 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-208 556 U.S. 208 (2009) 556 U.S. 208 D09002ee1dec7a227 Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) Marine Resources and Fisheries Environment Water Resources Statutory Construction Environmental Mitigation Environmental Law Cost Benefit Analysis Regulations Water Quality National Performance Standards Environmental Technology Wildlife Natural Resources Best Technology Available Variance Clean Water Act (C.W.A.) Federal and Some Few State Regulation of Public Utilities Regulation: Electric Power Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc., 556 U.S. 208 (2009);556 U.S. 208 CASE USREPORTS-556-208 208 18 1 2009-04-01 2008 556 U.S. 208 556 U.S. 208 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) Marine Resources and Fisheries Environment Water Resources Statutory Construction Environmental Mitigation Environmental Law Cost Benefit Analysis Regulations Water Quality National Performance Standards Environmental Technology Wildlife Natural Resources Best Technology Available Variance Clean Water Act (C.W.A.) Federal and Some Few State Regulation of Public Utilities Regulation: Electric Power Economic Activity 2008-040-01 Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company Environmental organization Cert Environmental Protection Agency or Administrator U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-02 Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal Water Pollution Control (Clean Water), plus amendments Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-208 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-208.pdf 556 U.S. 247 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-247 556 U.S. 247 (2009) 556 U.S. 247 D09002ee1dec7a25a Age Discrimination in Employment Act of (A.D.E.A.) Employment Discrimination Collective Bargaining Agreements Labor Arbitration Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.) Union Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Minority Employment Age Discrimination Human Rights and Civil Liberties Alternative Dispute Resolution Labor and Employment Law National Labor Relations Act (N.L.R.A.) Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (2009);556 U.S. 247 CASE USREPORTS-556-247 247 19 1 2009-04-01 2008 556 U.S. 247 556 U.S. 247 (2009) Age Discrimination in Employment Act of (A.D.E.A.) Employment Discrimination Collective Bargaining Agreements Labor Arbitration Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.) Union Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Minority Employment Age Discrimination Human Rights and Civil Liberties Alternative Dispute Resolution Labor and Employment Law National Labor Relations Act (N.L.R.A.) Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights 2008-041-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Union member Cert Equal Employment Opportunity Commission New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-01 Statutory construction Federal Statute Age Discrimination in Employment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-247 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-247.pdf 556 U.S. 287 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-287 556 U.S. 287 (2009) 556 U.S. 287 D09002ee1dec7a230 Bureau of Indian Affairs Executive Agencies Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 Federal Indian and Tribal Law Indian Tucker Act (I.T.A.) Government Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act of 1950 U.S. Department of the Interior (D.O.I.) Fiduciary Obligation Tucker Act Fiduciary Duty Secretary of the Interior Native Peoples Comprehensive Control Sovereign Immunity Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S. 287 (2009);556 U.S. 287 CASE USREPORTS-556-287 287 20 1 2009-04-06 2008 556 U.S. 287 556 U.S. 287 (2009) Bureau of Indian Affairs Executive Agencies Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 Federal Indian and Tribal Law Indian Tucker Act (I.T.A.) Government Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act of 1950 U.S. Department of the Interior (D.O.I.) Fiduciary Obligation Tucker Act Fiduciary Duty Secretary of the Interior Native Peoples Comprehensive Control Sovereign Immunity Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 2008-042-01 United States Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert Department or Secretary of the Interior U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-23 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-287 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-287.pdf 556 U.S. 303 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-303 556 U.S. 303 (2009) 556 U.S. 303 D09002ee1dec7a263 Prisoners' Rights Statutory Interpretation Mcnabb-Mallory Exclusionary Rule Due Process Voluntary Confession Human Rights and Civil Liberties Delay Statutory Construction Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(A) Criminal Procedure Detention Crime and Law Enforcement Motion to Suppress Exclusionary Rule Criminal Law and Procedure Presentment Subconstitutional Fair Procedure: Presentation, Admissibility, or Sufficiency of Evidence (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Corley v. United States, 556 U.S. 303 (2009);556 U.S. 303 CASE USREPORTS-556-303 303 21 1 2009-04-06 2008 556 U.S. 303 556 U.S. 303 (2009) Prisoners' Rights Statutory Interpretation Mcnabb-Mallory Exclusionary Rule Due Process Voluntary Confession Human Rights and Civil Liberties Delay Statutory Construction Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(A) Criminal Procedure Detention Crime and Law Enforcement Motion to Suppress Exclusionary Rule Criminal Law and Procedure Presentment Subconstitutional Fair Procedure: Presentation, Admissibility, or Sufficiency of Evidence (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure 2008-043-01 Defendant United States Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-21 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-303 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-303.pdf 556 U.S. 332 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-332 556 U.S. 332 (2009) 556 U.S. 332 D09002ee1dec7a21e Law Enforcement Officers Search Incident to Arrest Safety Exception Vehicle Search Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Warrantless Searches Stare Decisis Warrantless Search and Seizure Evidentiary Exception Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Right of Privacy Criminal Law and Procedure Search and Seizure, Vehicles Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009);556 U.S. 332 CASE USREPORTS-556-332 332 22 1 2009-04-21 2008 556 U.S. 332 556 U.S. 332 (2009) Law Enforcement Officers Search Incident to Arrest Safety Exception Vehicle Search Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Warrantless Searches Stare Decisis Warrantless Search and Seizure Evidentiary Exception Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Right of Privacy Criminal Law and Procedure Search and Seizure, Vehicles Criminal Procedure 2008-044-01 State Defendant Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court Federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-10-07 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-332 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-332.pdf 556 U.S. 366 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-366 556 U.S. 366 (2009) 556 U.S. 366 D09002ee1dec7a226 Statutory Interpretation Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal Legislative History International Affairs Torts Law Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of (T.R.I.A.) Torts International Court of Arbitration Statutory Construction Set-Off Attachment Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of (F.S.I.A.) Iran Plain Meaning Alternative Dispute Resolution Judgment Treaties and International Agreements Civil Actions Sovereign Immunity Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of (V.P.A.) Waiver Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Elahi, 556 U.S. 366 (2009);556 U.S. 366 CASE USREPORTS-556-366 366 23 1 2009-04-21 2008 556 U.S. 366 556 U.S. 366 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal Legislative History International Affairs Torts Law Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of (T.R.I.A.) Torts International Court of Arbitration Statutory Construction Set-Off Attachment Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of (F.S.I.A.) Iran Plain Meaning Alternative Dispute Resolution Judgment Treaties and International Agreements Civil Actions Sovereign Immunity Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of (V.P.A.) Waiver Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity 2008-045-01 Foreign nation or instrumentality Government contractor Cert California Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-12 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-366 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-366.pdf 556 U.S. 396 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-396 556 U.S. 396 (2009) 556 U.S. 396 D09002ee1dec7a23b Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 Social Welfare Administrative Law Prejudicial Error Harmless Error Specialized Courts Administrative Procedure Act (A.P.A.) Administrative Courts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Burden of Proof Veterans Notice Disability Benefits Judiciary Department of Veterans Affairs Military: Veteran Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009);556 U.S. 396 CASE USREPORTS-556-396 396 24 1 2009-04-21 2008 556 U.S. 396 556 U.S. 396 (2009) Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 Social Welfare Administrative Law Prejudicial Error Harmless Error Specialized Courts Administrative Procedure Act (A.P.A.) Administrative Courts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Burden of Proof Veterans Notice Disability Benefits Judiciary Department of Veterans Affairs Military: Veteran Civil Rights 2008-046-01 Veterans' Administration Veteran Cert Veterans' Administration or Board of Veterans' Appeals U.S. Court of Veterans Appeals U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-08 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Other Harmless Error Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-396 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-396.pdf 556 U.S. 418 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-418 556 U.S. 418 (2009) 556 U.S. 418 D09002ee1dec7a233 Statutory Interpretation Enjoin Equity Statutory Construction Injunctions Stay of Removal Proceedings Legal Remedies Immigration Immigration Law Stays Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of (I.I.R.I.R.A.) Removal Proceedings Stay of Deportation Deportation Proceedings Deportation (Cf. Immigration and Naturalization) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009);556 U.S. 418 CASE USREPORTS-556-418 418 25 1 2009-04-22 2008 556 U.S. 418 556 U.S. 418 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Enjoin Equity Statutory Construction Injunctions Stay of Removal Proceedings Legal Remedies Immigration Immigration Law Stays Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of (I.I.R.I.R.A.) Removal Proceedings Stay of Deportation Deportation Proceedings Deportation (Cf. Immigration and Naturalization) Civil Rights 2008-047-01 Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked Attorney general of the United States, or his office Cert Board of Immigration Appeals U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-21 Statutory construction Federal Statute Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-418 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-418.pdf 556 U.S. 449 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-449 556 U.S. 449 (2009) 556 U.S. 449 D09002ee1dec7a22d Procedural Default Adequate State Grounds Adequate and Independent Grounds Juries De Novo Review Brady Claim Habeas Corpus Due Process Adequate Independent Grounds Human Rights and Civil Liberties Suppression of Evidence Suppressed Evidence Right to Fair Trial Material Evidence Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Material Exculpatory Evidence Fourteenth Amendment Guilt Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Punishment Waiver Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009);556 U.S. 449 CASE USREPORTS-556-449 449 26 1 2009-04-28 2008 556 U.S. 449 556 U.S. 449 (2009) Procedural Default Adequate State Grounds Adequate and Independent Grounds Juries De Novo Review Brady Claim Habeas Corpus Due Process Adequate Independent Grounds Human Rights and Civil Liberties Suppression of Evidence Suppressed Evidence Right to Fair Trial Material Evidence Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Material Exculpatory Evidence Fourteenth Amendment Guilt Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Punishment Waiver Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure 2008-048-01 Defendant State Cert Tennessee Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-09 Federal common law Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-449 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-449.pdf 556 U.S. 502 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-502 556 U.S. 502 (2009) 556 U.S. 502 D09002ee1dec7a22f Indecent Speech Administrative Law Executive Agencies Federal Communication Commission (F.C.C.) Constitutional Avoidance Communications Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Government Standard of Review Administrative Procedure Act (A.P.A.) Judiciary Communications Broadcasting Capricious Arbitrary Expletives Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009);556 U.S. 502 CASE USREPORTS-556-502 502 27 1 2009-04-28 2008 556 U.S. 502 556 U.S. 502 (2009) Indecent Speech Administrative Law Executive Agencies Federal Communication Commission (F.C.C.) Constitutional Avoidance Communications Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Government Standard of Review Administrative Procedure Act (A.P.A.) Judiciary Communications Broadcasting Capricious Arbitrary Expletives Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 2008-049-01 Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) Television station Cert Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-11-04 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Federal Statute Administrative Procedure, or Administrative Orders Review Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-502 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-502.pdf 556 U.S. 568 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-568 556 U.S. 568 (2009) 556 U.S. 568 D09002ee1dec7a25e Statutory Interpretation Sentencing Enhancement Accidental Discharge Rule of Lenity Weapons Firearms Statutory Construction Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Sentencing Proof of Intent Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Dean v. United States, 556 U.S. 568 (2009);556 U.S. 568 CASE USREPORTS-556-568 568 28 1 2009-04-29 2008 556 U.S. 568 556 U.S. 568 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Sentencing Enhancement Accidental Discharge Rule of Lenity Weapons Firearms Statutory Construction Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Sentencing Proof of Intent Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure 2008-050-01 Defendant United States Cert Georgia Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-04 Statutory construction Federal common law Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-568 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-568.pdf 556 U.S. 586 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-586 556 U.S. 586 (2009) 556 U.S. 586 D09002ee1dec7a225 Confession Evidence Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Confessions Impeachment Tainted Evidence Right to Counsel Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property Exclusionary Rule Sixth Amendment Involuntary Confession Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Kansas v. Ventris, 556 U.S. 586 (2009);556 U.S. 586 CASE USREPORTS-556-586 586 29 1 2009-04-29 2008 556 U.S. 586 556 U.S. 586 (2009) Confession Evidence Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Confessions Impeachment Tainted Evidence Right to Counsel Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property Exclusionary Rule Sixth Amendment Involuntary Confession Criminal Procedure 2008-051-01 State Defendant Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-21 Federal common law Judicial review (state level) Other Exclusionary Rule (Right to Counsel) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-586 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-586.pdf 556 U.S. 599 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-599 556 U.S. 599 (2009) 556 U.S. 599 D09002ee1dec7a254 Cleanup Costs Pollution Liability Apportionment of Liability Apportionment Torts Statutory Interpretation Environment Statutory Construction Soil Pollution Environmental Law Joint and Several Liability Civil Liability Arranger Liability Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (C.E.R.C.L.A.) Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Burlington N. & S.F.R. Co. v. United States, 556 U.S. 599 (2009);556 U.S. 599 CASE USREPORTS-556-599 599 30 1 2009-05-04 2008 556 U.S. 599 556 U.S. 599 (2009) Cleanup Costs Pollution Liability Apportionment of Liability Apportionment Torts Statutory Interpretation Environment Statutory Construction Soil Pollution Environmental Law Joint and Several Liability Civil Liability Arranger Liability Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (C.E.R.C.L.A.) Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity 2008-052-01 Railroad United States Cert Environmental Protection Agency or Administrator California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-24 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John G. Roberts, Jr. 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-599 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-599.pdf 556 U.S. 624 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-624 556 U.S. 624 (2009) 556 U.S. 624 D09002ee1dec7a1c5 Jurisdiction and Venue Enforcement of Contracts by Nonparties Interlocutory Appeal Federal Arbitration Act (F.A.A.) Nonparties Contracts Law Equitable Estoppel Nonsignatory Contracts Judiciary Stay Pending Arbitration Stays Alternative Dispute Resolution Appellate Courts Contract Enforcement Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle, 556 U.S. 624 (2009);556 U.S. 624 CASE USREPORTS-556-624 624 31 1 2009-05-04 2008 556 U.S. 624 556 U.S. 624 (2009) Jurisdiction and Venue Enforcement of Contracts by Nonparties Interlocutory Appeal Federal Arbitration Act (F.A.A.) Nonparties Contracts Law Equitable Estoppel Nonsignatory Contracts Judiciary Stay Pending Arbitration Stays Alternative Dispute Resolution Appellate Courts Contract Enforcement Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 2008-053-01 Broker, stock exchange, investment or securities firm Consumer, consumer organization Cert Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of Kentucky Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-03 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-624 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf 556 U.S. 635 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-635 556 U.S. 635 (2009) 556 U.S. 635 D09002ee1dec7a260 Removals Jurisdiction and Venue Supplemental Jurisdiction Remand Removal Discretion Remands Remand to State Court Appellate Review of Remand Orders Civil Procedure Abuse of Discretion Subject Matter Jurisdiction Discretion to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Removal to Federal Court State Law Claims Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Carslbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF BIO, Inc., 556 U.S. 635 (2009);556 U.S. 635 CASE USREPORTS-556-635 635 32 1 2009-05-04 2008 556 U.S. 635 556 U.S. 635 (2009) Removals Jurisdiction and Venue Supplemental Jurisdiction Remand Removal Discretion Remands Remand to State Court Appellate Review of Remand Orders Civil Procedure Abuse of Discretion Subject Matter Jurisdiction Discretion to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Removal to Federal Court State Law Claims Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 2008-054-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Chemical company Cert California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-24 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-635 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-635.pdf 556 U.S. 646 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-646 556 U.S. 646 (2009) 556 U.S. 646 D09002ee1dec7a246 Fraud and Financial Crimes Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Ordinary Meaning Knowledge Identity Theft Criminal Statute Statutory Construction Mens REA Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Immigration and Naturalization: Miscellaneous Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009);556 U.S. 646 CASE USREPORTS-556-646 646 33 1 2009-05-04 2008 556 U.S. 646 556 U.S. 646 (2009) Fraud and Financial Crimes Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Ordinary Meaning Knowledge Identity Theft Criminal Statute Statutory Construction Mens REA Crime and Law Enforcement Criminal Law and Procedure Immigration and Naturalization: Miscellaneous Civil Rights 2008-055-01 Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked United States Cert Iowa Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-02-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-646 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-646.pdf 556 U.S. 662 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-662 556 U.S. 662 (2009) 556 U.S. 662 D09002ee1dec7a258 First Amendment Jurisdiction and Venue Fifth Amendment Unconstitutional Conduct Motion to Dismiss Human Rights and Civil Liberties Collateral Order Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(A)(2) Civil Procedure Flexible Plausibility Standard Subject Matter Jurisdiction Interlocutory Appeal Bivens Action Qualified Immunity Plausible Claim for Relief No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009);556 U.S. 662 CASE USREPORTS-556-662 662 34 1 2009-05-18 2008 556 U.S. 662 556 U.S. 662 (2009) First Amendment Jurisdiction and Venue Fifth Amendment Unconstitutional Conduct Motion to Dismiss Human Rights and Civil Liberties Collateral Order Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(A)(2) Civil Procedure Flexible Plausibility Standard Subject Matter Jurisdiction Interlocutory Appeal Bivens Action Qualified Immunity Plausible Claim for Relief No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 2008-056-01 Attorney general of the United States, or his office Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked Cert New York Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-10 Federal common law Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-662 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-662.pdf 556 U.S. 701 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-701 556 U.S. 701 (2009) 556 U.S. 701 D09002ee1dec7a264 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Pregnancy Labor Pregnancy Discrimination Act (P.D.A.) Bona Fide Seniority System Retroactivity Discrimination Sex-Based Discrimination Title VII Retirement Benefits Labor and Employment Law Pregnancy Discrimination Employee Benefits Human Rights and Civil Liberties Seniority System Pension Women's Rights Sex Discrimination in Employment (Cf. Sex Discrimination) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen, 556 U.S. 701 (2009);556 U.S. 701 CASE USREPORTS-556-701 701 35 1 2009-05-18 2008 556 U.S. 701 556 U.S. 701 (2009) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Pregnancy Labor Pregnancy Discrimination Act (P.D.A.) Bona Fide Seniority System Retroactivity Discrimination Sex-Based Discrimination Title VII Retirement Benefits Labor and Employment Law Pregnancy Discrimination Employee Benefits Human Rights and Civil Liberties Seniority System Pension Women's Rights Sex Discrimination in Employment (Cf. Sex Discrimination) Civil Rights 2008-057-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Female employee or job applicant Cert Equal Employment Opportunity Commission California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-10 Statutory construction Federal Statute Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-701 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-701.pdf 556 U.S. 729 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-729 556 U.S. 729 (2009) 556 U.S. 729 D09002ee1dec7a261 Correction Officer Prisoners' Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Neutral Jurisdictional Rule Section 1983 Judicial Administration Section 1983 Actions General Jurisdiction Human Rights and Civil Liberties New York Supremacy Clause State Court Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment State and Local Courts Judiciary Crime and Law Enforcement Divest of Jurisdiction Constitutional Law Concurrent Jurisdiction Correction Law Sec. 24 Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Haywood v. Drown, 556 U.S. 729 (2009);556 U.S. 729 CASE USREPORTS-556-729 729 36 1 2009-05-26 2008 556 U.S. 729 556 U.S. 729 (2009) Correction Officer Prisoners' Rights Jurisdiction and Venue Neutral Jurisdictional Rule Section 1983 Judicial Administration Section 1983 Actions General Jurisdiction Human Rights and Civil Liberties New York Supremacy Clause State Court Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment State and Local Courts Judiciary Crime and Law Enforcement Divest of Jurisdiction Constitutional Law Concurrent Jurisdiction Correction Law Sec. 24 Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2008-058-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental employee or job applicant Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve important or significant question John G. Roberts, Jr. 2008-12-03 Judicial review (state level) Statutory construction Constitution Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-729 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-729.pdf 556 U.S. 778 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-778 556 U.S. 778 (2009) 556 U.S. 778 D09002ee1dec7a242 Law Enforcement Officers Human Rights and Civil Liberties Waiver of Right to Counsel Stare Decisis Detention Judiciary Lawyers and Legal Services Stare Decisis Factors Crime and Law Enforcement Right to Counsel Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Waiver Right to Counsel (Cf. Indigents Appointment of Counsel or Inadequate Representation) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009);556 U.S. 778 CASE USREPORTS-556-778 778 37 1 2009-05-26 2008 556 U.S. 778 556 U.S. 778 (2009) Law Enforcement Officers Human Rights and Civil Liberties Waiver of Right to Counsel Stare Decisis Detention Judiciary Lawyers and Legal Services Stare Decisis Factors Crime and Law Enforcement Right to Counsel Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Waiver Right to Counsel (Cf. Indigents Appointment of Counsel or Inadequate Representation) Criminal Procedure 2008-059-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-13 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to counsel) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-778 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-778.pdf 556 U.S. 816 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-816 556 U.S. 816 (2009) 556 U.S. 816 D09002ee1dec7a237 Statutory Interpretation Common Usage Judicial Powers Facilitation of a Felony Statutory Construction Judiciary Controlled Substances Bilateral Transaction Crime and Law Enforcement Controlled Substances Act (C.S.A.) Criminal Law and Procedure Facilitate Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Narcotics Includes Regulation and Prohibition of Alcohol Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Abuelhawa v. United States, 556 U.S. 816 (2009);556 U.S. 816 CASE USREPORTS-556-816 816 38 1 2009-05-26 2008 556 U.S. 816 556 U.S. 816 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Common Usage Judicial Powers Facilitation of a Felony Statutory Construction Judiciary Controlled Substances Bilateral Transaction Crime and Law Enforcement Controlled Substances Act (C.S.A.) Criminal Law and Procedure Facilitate Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Narcotics Includes Regulation and Prohibition of Alcohol Criminal Procedure 2008-060-01 Defendant United States Cert Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-04 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-816 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-816.pdf 556 U.S. 825 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-825 556 U.S. 825 (2009) 556 U.S. 825 D09002ee1dec7a269 Double Jeopardy Double Jeopardy Clause Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Eighth Amendment Mentally Retarded Cruel and Unusual Punishment Sentencing Issue Preclusion Collateral Estoppel Crime and Law Enforcement Mental Capacity Fifth Amendment Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Bobby v. Bies, 556 U.S. 825 (2009);556 U.S. 825 CASE USREPORTS-556-825 825 39 1 2009-06-01 2008 556 U.S. 825 556 U.S. 825 (2009) Double Jeopardy Double Jeopardy Clause Due Process Human Rights and Civil Liberties Eighth Amendment Mentally Retarded Cruel and Unusual Punishment Sentencing Issue Preclusion Collateral Estoppel Crime and Law Enforcement Mental Capacity Fifth Amendment Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure 2008-061-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-04-27 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-825 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-825.pdf 556 U.S. 838 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-838 556 U.S. 838 (2009) 556 U.S. 838 D09002ee1dec7a26a Federal Employers' Liability Act (F.E.L.A.) Negligence Trials and Court Proceedings Fear of Cancer Torts Law Jury Instructions Torts Damages Genuine and Serious Pain and Suffering Sufficiency of Evidence: Typically in the Context of a Jury's Determination of Compensation for Injury or Death Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Hensley, 556 U.S. 838 (2009);556 U.S. 838 CASE USREPORTS-556-838 838 40 1 2009-06-01 2008 556 U.S. 838 556 U.S. 838 (2009) Federal Employers' Liability Act (F.E.L.A.) Negligence Trials and Court Proceedings Fear of Cancer Torts Law Jury Instructions Torts Damages Genuine and Serious Pain and Suffering Sufficiency of Evidence: Typically in the Context of a Jury's Determination of Compensation for Injury or Death Economic Activity 2008-062-01 Railroad Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal Employers' Liability, as amended Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-838 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-838.pdf 556 U.S. 848 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-848 556 U.S. 848 (2009) 556 U.S. 848 D09002ee1dec7a25c Statutory Interpretation International Affairs Torts Law Iraq Government Statutory Construction Presidential Authority Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of (F.S.I.A.) Terrorism Exception Sovereign Immunity Jurisdiction and Venue Sovereignty Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act (E.W.S.A.A.) Foreign Sovereign Immunity Executive Powers Exceptions Presidential Waiver Authority Waiver Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Republic of Iraq v. Beaty, 556 U.S. 848 (2009);556 U.S. 848 CASE USREPORTS-556-848 848 41 1 2009-06-08 2008 556 U.S. 848 556 U.S. 848 (2009) Statutory Interpretation International Affairs Torts Law Iraq Government Statutory Construction Presidential Authority Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of (F.S.I.A.) Terrorism Exception Sovereign Immunity Jurisdiction and Venue Sovereignty Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act (E.W.S.A.A.) Foreign Sovereign Immunity Executive Powers Exceptions Presidential Waiver Authority Waiver Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 2008-063-01 Foreign nation or instrumentality Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Cert District Of Columbia U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-04-20 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-848 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-848.pdf 556 U.S. 868 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-868 556 U.S. 868 (2009) 556 U.S. 868 D09002ee1dec7a265 Probability of Actual Bias Bias Judicial Ethics Due Process Clause Judges Due Process Judicial Disqualification Human Rights and Civil Liberties Serious Objective Risk of Bias Unconstitutional Probability of Bias Legal Ethics Recusal Judicial Bias Risk of Actual Bias or Prejudgment Judiciary Campaign Contribution Professional Responsibility Constitutional Law Due Process: Impartial Decision Maker Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009);556 U.S. 868 CASE USREPORTS-556-868 868 42 1 2009-06-08 2008 556 U.S. 868 556 U.S. 868 (2009) Probability of Actual Bias Bias Judicial Ethics Due Process Clause Judges Due Process Judicial Disqualification Human Rights and Civil Liberties Serious Objective Risk of Bias Unconstitutional Probability of Bias Legal Ethics Recusal Judicial Bias Risk of Actual Bias or Prejudgment Judiciary Campaign Contribution Professional Responsibility Constitutional Law Due Process: Impartial Decision Maker Due Process 2008-064-01 Coal company or coal mine operator Coal company or coal mine operator Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-03 Federal common law Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-868 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-868.pdf 556 U.S. 904 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-904 556 U.S. 904 (2009) 556 U.S. 904 D09002ee1dec7a23d Coram Nobis Jurisdiction and Venue Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Specialized Courts Human Rights and Civil Liberties Military Courts and Tribunals Military Law Military Court All Writs Act Judiciary United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (C.A.A.F.) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (N.M.C.C.A.) Sixth Amendment Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904 (2009);556 U.S. 904 CASE USREPORTS-556-904 904 43 1 2009-06-08 2008 556 U.S. 904 556 U.S. 904 (2009) Coram Nobis Jurisdiction and Venue Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Specialized Courts Human Rights and Civil Liberties Military Courts and Tribunals Military Law Military Court All Writs Act Judiciary United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (C.A.A.F.) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (N.M.C.C.A.) Sixth Amendment Judicial Administration: Review of Non-Final Order Judicial Power 2008-065-01 United States Military personnel, or dependent of, including reservist Cert U.S. Court of Military Review U.S. Court of Military Appeals, renamed as Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces No reason given John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-03-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-904 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-904.pdf 556 U.S. 928 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-928 556 U.S. 928 (2009) 556 U.S. 928 D09002ee1dec7a22c Intervene Statutory Interpretation Notice of Appeal Intervention Untimely Appellate Procedure Government Real Party in Interest Party United States as Party Government as Party Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 False Claims Act (F.C.A.) Civil Action Civil Procedure Qui Tam Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(A) Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York, 556 U.S. 928 (2009);556 U.S. 928 CASE USREPORTS-556-928 928 44 1 2009-06-08 2008 556 U.S. 928 556 U.S. 928 (2009) Intervene Statutory Interpretation Notice of Appeal Intervention Untimely Appellate Procedure Government Real Party in Interest Party United States as Party Government as Party Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 False Claims Act (F.C.A.) Civil Action Civil Procedure Qui Tam Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(A) Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 2008-066-01 Governmental employee or job applicant City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cert New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve question presented John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-04-21 Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Clarence Thomas John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-928 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-928.pdf 556 U.S. 938 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-938 556 U.S. 938 (2009) 556 U.S. 938 D09002ee1dec7a244 Statutory Interpretation Association-in-Fact Enterprise Juries Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Instructions Statutory Construction Racketeering Structure Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property Organized Crime and Gangs Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (R.I.C.O) Enterprise Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Bank Robbery Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Boyle v. United States, 556 U.S. 938 (2009);556 U.S. 938 CASE USREPORTS-556-938 938 45 1 2009-06-08 2008 556 U.S. 938 556 U.S. 938 (2009) Statutory Interpretation Association-in-Fact Enterprise Juries Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Instructions Statutory Construction Racketeering Structure Crime and Law Enforcement Crimes Against Property Organized Crime and Gangs Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (R.I.C.O) Enterprise Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Bank Robbery Criminal Procedure 2008-067-01 Defendant United States Cert New York Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Federal court conflict John G. Roberts, Jr. 2009-01-14 Statutory construction Federal Statute Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Samuel A. Alito, Jr. John G. Roberts, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-938 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-938.pdf 556 U.S. 960 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-960 556 U.S. 960 (2009) 556 U.S. 960 D09002ee1dec7a21f Finance and Financial Sector Vacate Bankruptcy Denial Denial of Stay Stay Civil Procedure Stays Temporary Stay Bankruptcy Law Financial Crises and Stabilization Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Indiana State Police Pension Trust et al. v. Chrysler LLC et al., 556 U.S. 960 (2009);556 U.S. 960 CASE USREPORTS-556-960 960 46 1 2009-06-09 2008 556 U.S. 960 556 U.S. 960 (2009) Finance and Financial Sector Vacate Bankruptcy Denial Denial of Stay Stay Civil Procedure Stays Temporary Stay Bankruptcy Law Financial Crises and Stabilization Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power 2008-068-01 Employer-employee trust agreement, employee health and welfare fund, or multiemployer pension plan Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Stay U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted John G. Roberts, Jr. Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John G. Roberts, Jr. 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-960 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-960.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7a222 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-3 47 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-3.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-9 D09002ee1dec7a234 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Orders for March 9 Through June 8, 2009 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-9 48 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-9 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-9.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-7 D09002ee1dec7a229 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Amendments to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-7 49 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-7.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-8 D09002ee1dec7a266 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Amendments to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-8 50 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-8.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-5 D09002ee1dec7a23f United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-5 51 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-5.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter D09002ee1dec7a25d United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Amendments to Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter 52 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-6 D09002ee1dec7a262 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-6 53 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-6.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7a238 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-4 54 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-4.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-10 D09002ee1dec7a23a United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Opinion of Individual Justice in Chambers BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-10 55 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-10 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-10.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7a256 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2008, March 9 through June 9, 2008, together with opinion of individual justice in chambers;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-2 56 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-556/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-BackMatter-2.pdf