United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:545 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005 USREPORTS USREPORTS-545 545 2008 2004 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2008 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:545 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 2008-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1148 digital object pages JU 6.8:545 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545 P0b002ee1dec5c1a5 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-545 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-545 545 2008 2004 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec7ba07 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-7 D09002ee1dec7b9bf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-7 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-7.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1dec7b9c1 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Notes FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-5 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7b9ff United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Supreme Court of the United States Allotment of Justices FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-4 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7ba01 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Appointment of Chief Justice Roberts FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-3 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1dec7b9c2 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Death of Chief Justice Rehnquist FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-6 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7ba0d United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-2 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-FrontMatter-2.pdf 545 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-1 545 U.S. 1 (2005) 545 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec7b9fd Compassionate Use Act of 1996 Commerce Clause Interstate Commerce Cannabis Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.) Controlled Substances California Medical Marijuana Controlled Substances Act (C.S.A.) Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Commodities Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005);545 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-545-1 1 8 1 2005-06-06 2004 545 U.S. 1 545 U.S. 1 (2005) Compassionate Use Act of 1996 Commerce Clause Interstate Commerce Cannabis Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.) Controlled Substances California Medical Marijuana Controlled Substances Act (C.S.A.) Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Commodities Federalism 2004-054-01 Attorney general of the United States, or his office Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee Cert California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2004-11-29 Judicial review (national level) Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-1.pdf 545 U.S. 75 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-75 545 U.S. 75 (2005) 545 U.S. 75 D09002ee1dec7b9ba Alexander Archipelago Equal Footing Doctrine Alaska Statehood Act (A.S.A.) Historic Waters Claim Water Law Historic Inland Waters Boundaries Water Resources Special Master Submerged Lands Act (S.L.A.) Submerged Lands Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Maps and Mapping Alaska Submerged Land Ownership Federal-State Relations Submerged Lands Act (Cf. Federal-State Ownership Dispute) Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Alaska v. United States, 545 U.S. 75 (2005);545 U.S. 75 CASE USREPORTS-545-75 75 9 1 2005-06-06 2004 545 U.S. 75 545 U.S. 75 (2005) Alexander Archipelago Equal Footing Doctrine Alaska Statehood Act (A.S.A.) Historic Waters Claim Water Law Historic Inland Waters Boundaries Water Resources Special Master Submerged Lands Act (S.L.A.) Submerged Lands Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Maps and Mapping Alaska Submerged Land Ownership Federal-State Relations Submerged Lands Act (Cf. Federal-State Ownership Dispute) Federalism 2004-055-01 State United States Original Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted William H. Rehnquist 2005-01-10 Statutory construction Federal common law Federal Statute Submerged Lands Acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-75 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-75.pdf 545 U.S. 119 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-119 545 U.S. 119 (2005) 545 U.S. 119 D09002ee1dec7ba09 Americans with Disabilities Act of (A.D.A.) Foreign Vessel Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships Ships and Boats Public Accommodation Accessibility International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (S.O.L.A.S.) Maritime Law Cruise Ship Specified Public Transportation People with Disabilities Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 545 U.S. 119 (2005);545 U.S. 119 CASE USREPORTS-545-119 119 10 1 2005-06-06 2004 545 U.S. 119 545 U.S. 119 (2005) Americans with Disabilities Act of (A.D.A.) Foreign Vessel Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships Ships and Boats Public Accommodation Accessibility International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (S.O.L.A.S.) Maritime Law Cruise Ship Specified Public Transportation People with Disabilities Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights 2004-056-01 Disabled person or disability benefit claimant Water transportation, stevedore Cert Texas Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-02-28 Statutory construction Federal common law Federal Statute Americans with Disabilities Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-119 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-119.pdf 545 U.S. 162 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-162 545 U.S. 162 (2005) 545 U.S. 162 D09002ee1dec7ba0b Racial and Ethnic Relations Juries Exclusion of Jurors Race Discrimination Homicide More Likely than Not Standard Discrimination Purposeful Discrimination Peremptory Strikes Jury Selection Constitutional Law Prima Facie Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005);545 U.S. 162 CASE USREPORTS-545-162 162 11 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 162 545 U.S. 162 (2005) Racial and Ethnic Relations Juries Exclusion of Jurors Race Discrimination Homicide More Likely than Not Standard Discrimination Purposeful Discrimination Peremptory Strikes Jury Selection Constitutional Law Prima Facie Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights 2004-057-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-18 Federal common law Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens William H. Rehnquist 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-162 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-162.pdf 545 U.S. 175 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-175 545 U.S. 175 (2005) 545 U.S. 175 D09002ee1dec7ba0c Discovery and Evidence Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Mitigation Prosecutorial Inconsistency Guilty Plea Plea Sentencing Aggravated Murder Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 545 U.S. 175 (2005);545 U.S. 175 CASE USREPORTS-545-175 175 12 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 175 545 U.S. 175 (2005) Discovery and Evidence Homicide Habeas Corpus Due Process Mitigation Prosecutorial Inconsistency Guilty Plea Plea Sentencing Aggravated Murder Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure 2004-058-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-19 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-175 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-175.pdf 545 U.S. 193 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-193 545 U.S. 193 (2005) 545 U.S. 193 D09002ee1dec7ba00 Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of (D.P.C.P.T.R.A.) Clinical Trials Prescription Drugs New Drug Application (N.D.A.) Intellectual Property Law Infringement Preclinical Study Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of (F.D.C.A.) Preclinical Research Investigational New Drug (I.N.D.) Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. , 545 U.S. 193 (2005);545 U.S. 193 CASE USREPORTS-545-193 193 13 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 193 545 U.S. 193 (2005) Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of (D.P.C.P.T.R.A.) Clinical Trials Prescription Drugs New Drug Application (N.D.A.) Intellectual Property Law Infringement Preclinical Study Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of (F.D.C.A.) Preclinical Research Investigational New Drug (I.N.D.) Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 2004-059-01 Drug manufacturer Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Cert California Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-20 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-193 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-193.pdf 545 U.S. 209 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-209 545 U.S. 209 (2005) 545 U.S. 209 D09002ee1dec7ba15 Cruel and Unusual Punishment Supermax Prison Due Process Eighth Amendment Maximum Security Prisons Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment 8th Amendment 14th Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Liberty Interest Due Process: Prisoners' Rights and Defendants' Rights Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209 (2005);545 U.S. 209 CASE USREPORTS-545-209 209 14 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 209 545 U.S. 209 (2005) Cruel and Unusual Punishment Supermax Prison Due Process Eighth Amendment Maximum Security Prisons Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment 8th Amendment 14th Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Liberty Interest Due Process: Prisoners' Rights and Defendants' Rights Due Process 2004-060-01 State department or agency Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert State Agency Ohio Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-30 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-209 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-209.pdf 545 U.S. 231 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-231 545 U.S. 231 (2005) 545 U.S. 231 D09002ee1dec7b9be Racial and Ethnic Relations Juries Habeas Corpus Discrimination Due Process Racial Discrimination Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Equal Protection Peremptory Strikes Jury Selection Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005);545 U.S. 231 CASE USREPORTS-545-231 231 15 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 231 545 U.S. 231 (2005) Racial and Ethnic Relations Juries Habeas Corpus Discrimination Due Process Racial Discrimination Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Equal Protection Peremptory Strikes Jury Selection Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2004-061-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert Texas Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2004-12-06 Federal common law Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-231 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-231.pdf 545 U.S. 308 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-308 545 U.S. 308 (2005) 545 U.S. 308 D09002ee1dec7b9fb Tax Litigation Jurisdiction and Venue Quiet Title Real Property Property Seizure Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Action to Quiet Title Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Property Dispute Real Estate Judicial Administration: Federal Question (Cf. No Merits: Dismissed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005);545 U.S. 308 CASE USREPORTS-545-308 308 16 1 2005-06-13 2004 545 U.S. 308 545 U.S. 308 (2005) Tax Litigation Jurisdiction and Venue Quiet Title Real Property Property Seizure Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Action to Quiet Title Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Property Dispute Real Estate Judicial Administration: Federal Question (Cf. No Merits: Dismissed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question) Judicial Power 2004-062-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Cert Michigan Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-18 Statutory construction Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Federal Statute Internal Revenue Code and pre-IRC revenue acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent David H. Souter William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-308 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-308.pdf 545 U.S. 323 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-323 545 U.S. 323 (2005) 545 U.S. 323 D09002ee1dec7ba16 Takings Clause 5th Amendment Due Process State-Litigation Requirement Takings Urban Planning Hotel Conversion Ordinance (H.C.O.) Housing Zoning Licensing and Permits Civil Procedure Property Rights Eminent Domain Full Faith and Credit Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Land Use Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City and County Of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005);545 U.S. 323 CASE USREPORTS-545-323 323 17 1 2005-06-20 2004 545 U.S. 323 545 U.S. 323 (2005) Takings Clause 5th Amendment Due Process State-Litigation Requirement Takings Urban Planning Hotel Conversion Ordinance (H.C.O.) Housing Zoning Licensing and Permits Civil Procedure Property Rights Eminent Domain Full Faith and Credit Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Land Use Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 2004-063-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cert California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-28 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (takings clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-323 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-323.pdf 545 U.S. 353 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-353 545 U.S. 353 (2005) 545 U.S. 353 D09002ee1dec7ba03 Juries Drug Trafficking Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Review Timeliness Sentencing Limitation Period Operative Date Equitable Tolling Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Dodd v. United States, 545 U.S. 353 (2005);545 U.S. 353 CASE USREPORTS-545-353 353 18 1 2005-06-20 2004 545 U.S. 353 545 U.S. 353 (2005) Juries Drug Trafficking Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Collateral Review Timeliness Sentencing Limitation Period Operative Date Equitable Tolling Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2004-064-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution United States Cert Florida Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-22 Federal common law Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Sandra Day O'Connor William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-353 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-353.pdf 545 U.S. 374 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-374 545 U.S. 374 (2005) 545 U.S. 374 D09002ee1dec7ba10 Strickland Claim Mitigating Evidence Homicide Mental Health Habeas Corpus Mitigation Postconviction Relief Torture 6th Amendment Sentencing Right to Counsel Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Defense Counsel Right to Counsel (Cf. Indigents Appointment of Counsel or Inadequate Representation) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005);545 U.S. 374 CASE USREPORTS-545-374 374 19 1 2005-06-20 2004 545 U.S. 374 545 U.S. 374 (2005) Strickland Claim Mitigating Evidence Homicide Mental Health Habeas Corpus Mitigation Postconviction Relief Torture 6th Amendment Sentencing Right to Counsel Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Defense Counsel Right to Counsel (Cf. Indigents Appointment of Counsel or Inadequate Representation) Criminal Procedure 2004-065-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-01-18 Judicial review (state level) Federal common law Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to counsel) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-374 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-374.pdf 545 U.S. 409 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-409 545 U.S. 409 (2005) 545 U.S. 409 D09002ee1dec7ba1d Statute of Limitations Labor and Employment Law Qui Tam Action State and Local Government Cause of Action False Claims Act (F.C.A.) Whistleblower Civil Procedure Relator Officials and Employees Retaliation Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 545 U.S. 409 (2005);545 U.S. 409 CASE USREPORTS-545-409 409 20 1 2005-06-20 2004 545 U.S. 409 545 U.S. 409 (2005) Statute of Limitations Labor and Employment Law Qui Tam Action State and Local Government Cause of Action False Claims Act (F.C.A.) Whistleblower Civil Procedure Relator Officials and Employees Retaliation Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 2004-066-01 Local governmental unit other than a county, city, town, township, village, or borough Female governmental employee or job applicant Cert North Carolina Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-20 Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal False Claims Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-409 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-409.pdf 545 U.S. 429 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-429 545 U.S. 429 (2005) 545 U.S. 429 D09002ee1dec7ba17 Motor Carriers Tax Administration and Collection Motor Vehicles Commerce Clause Intrastate Commercial Hauling Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Interstate Commerce Interstate Trucking State and Local Taxation Michigan Motor Carrier Act Licensing and Permits Trucks Trucking Constitutional Law Local Assessment State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Commission, 545 U.S. 429 (2005);545 U.S. 429 CASE USREPORTS-545-429 429 21 1 2005-06-20 2004 545 U.S. 429 545 U.S. 429 (2005) Motor Carriers Tax Administration and Collection Motor Vehicles Commerce Clause Intrastate Commercial Hauling Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedures Interstate Commerce Interstate Trucking State and Local Taxation Michigan Motor Carrier Act Licensing and Permits Trucks Trucking Constitutional Law Local Assessment State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 2004-067-01 Trucking company, or motor carrier State commission, board, committee, or authority Cert State Trial Court State Appellate Court No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-26 Judicial review (state level) Constitution Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Stephen G. Breyer William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-429 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-429.pdf 545 U.S. 469 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-469 545 U.S. 469 (2005) 545 U.S. 469 D09002ee1dec7ba1b Economic Development Public Use Clause 5th Amendment Takings Clause Urban Planning Blight Public Use 14th Amendment Urban Renewal Property Rights Eminent Domain Property Law Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Condemnation of Property Redevelopment Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Kelo v. New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005);545 U.S. 469 CASE USREPORTS-545-469 469 23 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 469 545 U.S. 469 (2005) Economic Development Public Use Clause 5th Amendment Takings Clause Urban Planning Blight Public Use 14th Amendment Urban Renewal Property Rights Eminent Domain Property Law Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Condemnation of Property Redevelopment Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 2004-069-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2005-02-22 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (takings clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-469 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-469.pdf 545 U.S. 524 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-524 545 U.S. 524 (2005) 545 U.S. 524 D09002ee1dec7b9c0 Postconviction Relief Weapons Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005);545 U.S. 524 CASE USREPORTS-545-524 524 24 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 524 545 U.S. 524 (2005) Postconviction Relief Weapons Certificate of Appealability (C.O.A.) Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Sentencing Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 2004-070-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution State Cert Florida Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-25 Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Antonin Scalia William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-524 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-524.pdf 545 U.S. 546 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-546 545 U.S. 546 (2005) 545 U.S. 546 D09002ee1dec7b9fa Federal-Question Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue Removal to Federal Court Civil Actions Class Action Diversity Action Judicial Administration: Ancillary or Pendent Jurisdiction Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., 545 U.S. 546 (2005);545 U.S. 546 CASE USREPORTS-545-546 546 25 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 546 545 U.S. 546 (2005) Federal-Question Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue Removal to Federal Court Civil Actions Class Action Diversity Action Judicial Administration: Ancillary or Pendent Jurisdiction Judicial Power 2004-071-01 Oil company, or natural gas producer Franchisee Cert Florida Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-01 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-546 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-546.pdf 545 U.S. 596 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-596 545 U.S. 596 (2005) 545 U.S. 596 D09002ee1dec7b9fc California Central Valley Project (C.V.P.) Bureau of Reclamation Water Law Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 Water Resources Immunity from Suit Water Purchase Breach of Contract Waiver of Immunity Agriculture and Food Sovereign Immunity Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Orff v. United States, 545 U.S. 596 (2005);545 U.S. 596 CASE USREPORTS-545-596 596 26 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 596 545 U.S. 596 (2005) California Central Valley Project (C.V.P.) Bureau of Reclamation Water Law Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 Water Resources Immunity from Suit Water Purchase Breach of Contract Waiver of Immunity Agriculture and Food Sovereign Immunity Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity 2004-072-01 Farmer, farm worker, or farm organization United States Cert Department or Secretary of the Interior California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-02-23 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Clarence Thomas William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-596 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-596.pdf 545 U.S. 605 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-605 545 U.S. 605 (2005) 545 U.S. 605 D09002ee1dec7b9bd Two-Tier Court Withdrawal of Plea Appointment of Appellate Counsel Indigent Due Process Appointment of Counsel Nolo Contendere Equal Protection Sex Offenses Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Appointment of Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605 (2005);545 U.S. 605 CASE USREPORTS-545-605 605 27 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 605 545 U.S. 605 (2005) Two-Tier Court Withdrawal of Plea Appointment of Appellate Counsel Indigent Due Process Appointment of Counsel Nolo Contendere Equal Protection Sex Offenses Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Indigents: Appointment of Counsel (Cf. Right to Counsel) Civil Rights 2004-073-01 Indigent defendant State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-25 Federal common law Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-605 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-605.pdf 545 U.S. 644 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-644 545 U.S. 644 (2005) 545 U.S. 644 D09002ee1dec7b9fe Self-Incrimination Discovery and Evidence Homicide 5th Amendment Habeas Corpus Limitations Period Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) 6th Amendment Sentencing Fifth Amendment Confrontation Clause Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644 (2005);545 U.S. 644 CASE USREPORTS-545-644 644 28 1 2005-06-23 2004 545 U.S. 644 545 U.S. 644 (2005) Self-Incrimination Discovery and Evidence Homicide 5th Amendment Habeas Corpus Limitations Period Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of (A.E.D.P.A.) 6th Amendment Sentencing Fifth Amendment Confrontation Clause Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2004-074-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-19 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-644 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-644.pdf 545 U.S. 677 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-677 545 U.S. 677 (2005) 545 U.S. 677 D09002ee1dec7ba32 First Amendment Freedom of Religion Statues and Monuments Ten Commandments 1st Amendment Establishment of Religion Establishment Clause Secularism Constitutional Law Secular Society Establishment of Religion (Other than as Pertains to Parochiaid:) First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005);545 U.S. 677 CASE USREPORTS-545-677 677 29 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 677 545 U.S. 677 (2005) First Amendment Freedom of Religion Statues and Monuments Ten Commandments 1st Amendment Establishment of Religion Establishment Clause Secularism Constitutional Law Secular Society Establishment of Religion (Other than as Pertains to Parochiaid:) First Amendment 2004-075-01 Private person Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Texas Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-02 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (establishment of religion) Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William H. Rehnquist William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-677 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-677.pdf 545 U.S. 748 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-748 545 U.S. 748 (2005) 545 U.S. 748 D09002ee1dec7ba31 Crimes Against Children Law Enforcement Officers Restraining Order Enforcement Crime Victims Protection Order Divorce Due Process Domestic Violence Inaction Restraining Order Property Interest 14th Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Due Process: Miscellaneous (Cf. Loyalty Oath), the Residual Code Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005);545 U.S. 748 CASE USREPORTS-545-748 748 30 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 748 545 U.S. 748 (2005) Crimes Against Children Law Enforcement Officers Restraining Order Enforcement Crime Victims Protection Order Divorce Due Process Domestic Violence Inaction Restraining Order Property Interest 14th Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Due Process: Miscellaneous (Cf. Loyalty Oath), the Residual Code Due Process 2004-076-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Wife, or ex-wife Cert Colorado U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-21 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-748 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-748.pdf 545 U.S. 794 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-794 545 U.S. 794 (2005) 545 U.S. 794 D09002ee1dec7ba0f Homicide Mental Health Habeas Corpus Postconviction Relief State and Local Courts Abuse of Discretion Sentencing Courts of Appeals Appellate Courts Stay of Mandate Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Bell v. Thompson, 545 U.S. 794 (2005);545 U.S. 794 CASE USREPORTS-545-794 794 31 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 794 545 U.S. 794 (2005) Homicide Mental Health Habeas Corpus Postconviction Relief State and Local Courts Abuse of Discretion Sentencing Courts of Appeals Appellate Courts Stay of Mandate Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Judicial Administration: Jurisdiction or Authority of Federal Courts of Appeals Judicial Power 2004-077-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert Tennessee Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-04-26 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-794 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-794.pdf 545 U.S. 844 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-844 545 U.S. 844 (2005) 545 U.S. 844 D09002ee1dec7ba0a First Amendment American Civil Liberties Union (A.C.L.U.) Christianity Secular Legislative Purpose Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Ten Commandments 1st Amendment Establishment of Religion Establishment Clause Secularism District Courts Religious Display Constitutional Law Secular Society Establishment of Religion (Other than as Pertains to Parochiaid:) First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005);545 U.S. 844 CASE USREPORTS-545-844 844 32 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 844 545 U.S. 844 (2005) First Amendment American Civil Liberties Union (A.C.L.U.) Christianity Secular Legislative Purpose Historic Sites and Heritage Areas Ten Commandments 1st Amendment Establishment of Religion Establishment Clause Secularism District Courts Religious Display Constitutional Law Secular Society Establishment of Religion (Other than as Pertains to Parochiaid:) First Amendment 2004-078-01 County government or county governmental unit, except school district Public interest organization Cert Kentucky Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-02 Judicial review (state level) Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (establishment of religion) Opinion of the court (orally argued) Municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent David H. Souter John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-844 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-844.pdf 545 U.S. 913 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-913 545 U.S. 913 (2005) 545 U.S. 913 D09002ee1dec7ba1a Fasttrack Distributor Decentralized Networks Copyright Copyrighted Works Music Internet Intellectual Property Law Infringement Copyright Act Television and Film Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Copyright Holders Distributor's Liability Gnutella File-Sharing Distribution Patents and Copyrights: Copyright Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005);545 U.S. 913 CASE USREPORTS-545-913 913 33 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 913 545 U.S. 913 (2005) Fasttrack Distributor Decentralized Networks Copyright Copyrighted Works Music Internet Intellectual Property Law Infringement Copyright Act Television and Film Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Copyright Holders Distributor's Liability Gnutella File-Sharing Distribution Patents and Copyrights: Copyright Economic Activity 2004-079-01 Movie, play, pictorial representation, theatrical production, actor, or exhibitor or distributor of Computer business or manufacturer, hardware or software Cert California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-29 Federal common law Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-913 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-913.pdf 545 U.S. 967 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-967 545 U.S. 967 (2005) 545 U.S. 967 D09002ee1dec7ba0e Administrative Law Telecommunications Act of 1996 Internet Service Providers (I.S.P.) Broadband Common-Carrier Regulation Telecommunications Service Internet Infrastructure Development Information Service Cable Companies Chevron U.S.A. Inc. V. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc Cable Communications Act of 1934 Communications Federal Communications Commission F.C.C.) Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005);545 U.S. 967 CASE USREPORTS-545-967 967 34 1 2005-06-27 2004 545 U.S. 967 545 U.S. 967 (2005) Administrative Law Telecommunications Act of 1996 Internet Service Providers (I.S.P.) Broadband Common-Carrier Regulation Telecommunications Service Internet Infrastructure Development Information Service Cable Companies Chevron U.S.A. Inc. V. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc Cable Communications Act of 1934 Communications Federal Communications Commission F.C.C.) Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 2004-080-01 Cable TV Computer business or manufacturer, hardware or software Cert Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2005-03-29 Statutory construction Federal common law Federal Statute Communication Act of 1934, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas William H. Rehnquist 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-967 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-967.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7b9bc United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Reporter's Note, 545 U.S. 1020a (2005) BACKMATTER USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-2 35 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec7ba30 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Orders for June 6 through September 29, 2005 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-3 36 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-3.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter D09002ee1dec7ba19 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Statement Showing the Number of Cases Filed, Disposed of and Remaining on Dockets at Conclusion of October Terms, 2002, 2003, and 2004 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-545-BackMatter 37 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1dec7ba18 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2004, June 6 through October 3, 2005;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-4 38 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-545/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-545/pdf/USREPORTS-545-BackMatter-4.pdf