United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-02-23 JU 6.8:536 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536.pdf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002 USREPORTS USREPORTS-536 536 2004 2001 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 2004 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:536 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 2004-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1015 digital object pages JU 6.8:536 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536 P0b002ee1dec5bd3a 000641007 DGPO 2026-02-23 2026-02-23 USREPORTS-536 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-536 536 2004 2001 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1dec70272 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-3 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1dec702b7 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-4 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1dec7028a United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Supreme Court of the United States FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-2 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter D09002ee1dec702a3 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-FrontMatter.pdf 536 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-1 536 U.S. 1 (2002) 536 U.S. 1 D09002ee1dec702a7 Appeals Settlement Standing Labor Employee Benefits Civil Procedure Class Representative Class Action Retirees Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Devlin v. Scardelletti et al., 536 U.S. 1 (2002);536 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-536-1 1 5 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 1 536 U.S. 1 (2002) Appeals Settlement Standing Labor Employee Benefits Civil Procedure Class Representative Class Action Retirees Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Including Supreme Court Rules, Application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and State Rules and Admiralty Rules Judicial Power 2001-057-01 Retired or former employee Employer-employee trust agreement, employee health and welfare fund, or multiemployer pension plan Cert Maryland U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-26 Statutory construction Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure, or relevant rules of a circuit court Judicial Code, and admiralty rules Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor William H. Rehnquist 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-1.pdf 536 U.S. 24 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-24 536 U.S. 24 (2002) 536 U.S. 24 D09002ee1dec702ac Prisoners' Rights Self-Incrimination Sexual Abuse Inmates and Prisoners Human Rights and Civil Liberties Forced Rehabilitation Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Detention Prisoner Crime and Law Enforcement Fifth Amendment Sex Offenses Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Rehabilitation Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;McKune, Warden, et al. v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002);536 U.S. 24 CASE USREPORTS-536-24 24 6 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 24 536 U.S. 24 (2002) Prisoners' Rights Self-Incrimination Sexual Abuse Inmates and Prisoners Human Rights and Civil Liberties Forced Rehabilitation Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Detention Prisoner Crime and Law Enforcement Fifth Amendment Sex Offenses Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Rehabilitation Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure 2001-058-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert Kansas U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2001-11-28 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination) Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-24 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-24.pdf 536 U.S. 73 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-73 536 U.S. 73 (2002) 536 U.S. 73 D09002ee1dec70287 Refuse to Hire Rulemaking Employee Hiring Labor and Employment Law Disability Employer Health Worker Safety and Health People with Disabilities Rehabilitation Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73 (2002);536 U.S. 73 CASE USREPORTS-536-73 73 7 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 73 536 U.S. 73 (2002) Refuse to Hire Rulemaking Employee Hiring Labor and Employment Law Disability Employer Health Worker Safety and Health People with Disabilities Rehabilitation Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights 2001-059-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Disabled person or disability benefit claimant Cert Equal Employment Opportunity Commission California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-02-27 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Federal Statute Americans with Disabilities Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-73 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-73.pdf 536 U.S. 88 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-88 536 U.S. 88 (2002) 536 U.S. 88 D09002ee1dec7028c Foreign State Alienage Diversity Jurisdiction Foreign Trade and International Finance Contracts Immigration Civil Procedure Citizenship and Nationality Corporations and Associations Foreign and International Banking Judicial Administration: Miscellaneous Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd., 536 U.S. 88 (2002);536 U.S. 88 CASE USREPORTS-536-88 88 8 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 88 536 U.S. 88 (2002) Foreign State Alienage Diversity Jurisdiction Foreign Trade and International Finance Contracts Immigration Civil Procedure Citizenship and Nationality Corporations and Associations Foreign and International Banking Judicial Administration: Miscellaneous Judicial Power 2001-060-01 Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity Cert New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-17 Diversity jurisdiction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-88 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-88.pdf 536 U.S. 101 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-101 536 U.S. 101 (2002) 536 U.S. 101 D09002ee1dec702b9 Racial and Ethnic Relations Statute of Limitations Hostile Work Environment Human Rights and Civil Liberties Discrimination Racial Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Damages Minority Employment Former Employee Back Pay Retaliation Labor and Employment Law Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (2002);536 U.S. 101 CASE USREPORTS-536-101 101 9 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 101 536 U.S. 101 (2002) Racial and Ethnic Relations Statute of Limitations Hostile Work Environment Human Rights and Civil Liberties Discrimination Racial Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Damages Minority Employment Former Employee Back Pay Retaliation Labor and Employment Law Employment Discrimination: On Basis of Race, Age, Religion, Illegitimacy, National Origin, or Working Conditions. Civil Rights 2001-061-01 National Railroad Passenger Corp. Racial or ethnic minority employee or job applicant Cert Equal Employment Opportunity Commission California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-01-09 Statutory construction Federal Statute Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Clarence Thomas John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-101 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-101.pdf 536 U.S. 129 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-129 536 U.S. 129 (2002) 536 U.S. 129 D09002ee1dec70286 Loan Statute of Limitations Mortgage Housing Contracts Law Breach Contracts Buildings and Property Rural Development Commerce Property Law Housing and Community Development Real Estate Repudiation Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Franconia Associates et al. v. United States, 536 U.S. 129 (2002);536 U.S. 129 CASE USREPORTS-536-129 129 10 1 2002-06-10 2001 536 U.S. 129 536 U.S. 129 (2002) Loan Statute of Limitations Mortgage Housing Contracts Law Breach Contracts Buildings and Property Rural Development Commerce Property Law Housing and Community Development Real Estate Repudiation Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power 2001-062-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Cert U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-15 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-129 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-129.pdf 536 U.S. 150 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-150 536 U.S. 150 (2002) 536 U.S. 150 D09002ee1dec702a6 First Amendment Jehovah's Witnesses Freedom of Religion Arts and Culture Solicitation Ordinance Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Religion Freedom of Speech Canvassers Constitutional Law Content-Neutral Licensing and Permits Church and State Relations Freedom of Press Free Exercise of Religion First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Watchtower Bible & (and) Tract Society of New York, Inc., et al. v. Village of Stratton et al., 536 U.S. 150 (2002);536 U.S. 150 CASE USREPORTS-536-150 150 11 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 150 536 U.S. 150 (2002) First Amendment Jehovah's Witnesses Freedom of Religion Arts and Culture Solicitation Ordinance Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Religion Freedom of Speech Canvassers Constitutional Law Content-Neutral Licensing and Permits Church and State Relations Freedom of Press Free Exercise of Religion First Amendment 2001-063-01 Religious organization, institution, or person City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2002-02-26 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) Municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-150 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-150.pdf 536 U.S. 181 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-181 536 U.S. 181 (2002) 536 U.S. 181 D09002ee1dec702a4 Spending Clause Americans with Disabilities Act of (A.D.A.) Police Powers Discrimination Government Disability Human Rights and Civil Liberties Compensatory and Punitive Damages Health Remedies Contracts Disability Accommodation Wheelchair Arrestee Punitive Damages People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Liability, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Barnes, in Her Official Capacity as Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City Missouri, et al. v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002);536 U.S. 181 CASE USREPORTS-536-181 181 12 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 181 536 U.S. 181 (2002) Spending Clause Americans with Disabilities Act of (A.D.A.) Police Powers Discrimination Government Disability Human Rights and Civil Liberties Compensatory and Punitive Damages Health Remedies Contracts Disability Accommodation Wheelchair Arrestee Punitive Damages People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Liability, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 2001-064-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Disabled person or disability benefit claimant Cert Missouri Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-23 Statutory construction Federal Statute Americans with Disabilities Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-181 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-181.pdf 536 U.S. 194 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-194 536 U.S. 194 (2002) 536 U.S. 194 D09002ee1dec7028d Police Powers Seizure Consent to Search Fundamental Rights Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Passengers Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement Officers Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Intent Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;United States v. Drayton et al., 536 U.S. 194 (2002);536 U.S. 194 CASE USREPORTS-536-194 194 13 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 194 536 U.S. 194 (2002) Police Powers Seizure Consent to Search Fundamental Rights Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Passengers Crime and Law Enforcement Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement Officers Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Intent Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure 2001-065-01 United States Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Cert Florida Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-16 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-194 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-194.pdf 536 U.S. 214 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-214 536 U.S. 214 (2002) 536 U.S. 214 D09002ee1dec70289 Habeas Corpus Collateral Review Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Prisoner Petition Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Carey, Warden v. Saffold, 536 U.S. 214 (2002);536 U.S. 214 CASE USREPORTS-536-214 214 14 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 214 536 U.S. 214 (2002) Habeas Corpus Collateral Review Statute of Limitations Criminal Law and Procedure Prisoner Petition Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2001-066-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert California Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-02-27 Statutory construction Federal Statute 28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-214 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-214.pdf 536 U.S. 238 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-238 536 U.S. 238 (2002) 536 U.S. 238 D09002ee1dec702b0 Tip Income Labor and Employment Law Internal Revenue Tax Law Income Tax Taxation Regulations Tax Liability Wages and Hours Tips Audit Employees Taxes Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc., 536 U.S. 238 (2002);536 U.S. 238 CASE USREPORTS-536-238 238 15 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 238 536 U.S. 238 (2002) Tip Income Labor and Employment Law Internal Revenue Tax Law Income Tax Taxation Regulations Tax Liability Wages and Hours Tips Audit Employees Taxes Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation 2001-067-01 United States Restaurant, food vendor Cert Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-22 Statutory construction Federal Statute Internal Revenue Code and pre-IRC revenue acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer William H. Rehnquist 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-238 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-238.pdf 536 U.S. 266 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-266 536 U.S. 266 (2002) 536 U.S. 266 D09002ee1dec702b3 Habeas Petition Homicide Mitigating Circumstances Retroactivity Death Penalty Inmates and Prisoners Jury Instructions Sentencing Teague Analysis Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. v. Banks, 536 U.S. 266 (2002);536 U.S. 266 CASE USREPORTS-536-266 266 16 1 2002-06-17 2001 536 U.S. 266 536 U.S. 266 (2002) Habeas Petition Homicide Mitigating Circumstances Retroactivity Death Penalty Inmates and Prisoners Jury Instructions Sentencing Teague Analysis Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure 2001-068-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist Federal common law Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-266 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-266.pdf 536 U.S. 273 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-273 536 U.S. 273 (2002) 536 U.S. 273 D09002ee1dec70285 Consent Education Right to Privacy School Administration Human Rights and Civil Liberties Private Schools Student Records Good Moral Character Constitutional Law Federal Funding Privacy (Cf. Libel, Comity: Privacy) Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Gonzaga University et al. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002);536 U.S. 273 CASE USREPORTS-536-273 273 17 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 273 536 U.S. 273 (2002) Consent Education Right to Privacy School Administration Human Rights and Civil Liberties Private Schools Student Records Good Moral Character Constitutional Law Federal Funding Privacy (Cf. Libel, Comity: Privacy) Privacy 2001-069-01 Private school, college, or university Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court Conflict between federal court and state court William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-24 Statutory construction Federal Statute Family Educational Rights and Privacy (Buckley Amendment) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William H. Rehnquist William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-273 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-273.pdf 536 U.S. 304 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-304 536 U.S. 304 (2002) 536 U.S. 304 D09002ee1dec702cc Mentally Retarded Execution of Mentally Retarded Criminal Mentally Disabled Homicide Criminals Constitution Eighth Amendment Health Cognitive Disabilities Cruel and Unusual Punishment Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002);536 U.S. 304 CASE USREPORTS-536-304 304 18 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 304 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Mentally Retarded Execution of Mentally Retarded Criminal Mentally Disabled Homicide Criminals Constitution Eighth Amendment Health Cognitive Disabilities Cruel and Unusual Punishment Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure 2001-070-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2002-02-20 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-304 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-304.pdf 536 U.S. 355 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-355 536 U.S. 355 (2002) 536 U.S. 355 D09002ee1dec702b8 Health Care Preemption Labor and Employment Law Standard of Review Remedies Employee Retirement Employee Benefits Health Insurance Insurance Law Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran et al., 536 U.S. 355 (2002);536 U.S. 355 CASE USREPORTS-536-355 355 19 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 355 536 U.S. 355 (2002) Health Care Preemption Labor and Employment Law Standard of Review Remedies Employee Retirement Employee Benefits Health Insurance Insurance Law Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2001-071-01 Insurance company, or surety Medical or Medicaid claimant Cert Illinois Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-01-16 Statutory construction Federal Statute Employee Retirement Income Security, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent David H. Souter John Paul Stevens 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-355 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-355.pdf 536 U.S. 403 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-403 536 U.S. 403 (2002) 536 U.S. 403 D09002ee1dec7028b Freedom to Petition Prisoners' Rights Imprisonment Government Officials Concealment Denial of Access Torts Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Standard of Review Access to Courts Claims Detention Crime and Law Enforcement Law Enforcement Officers Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Christopher, Former Secretary of State, et al. v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403 (2002);536 U.S. 403 CASE USREPORTS-536-403 403 20 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 403 536 U.S. 403 (2002) Freedom to Petition Prisoners' Rights Imprisonment Government Officials Concealment Denial of Access Torts Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Standard of Review Access to Courts Claims Detention Crime and Law Enforcement Law Enforcement Officers Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity 2001-072-01 Retired or former governmental employee Wife, or ex-wife Cert District Of Columbia U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) To resolve important or significant question William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-18 Federal common law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition David H. Souter William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-403 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-403.pdf 536 U.S. 424 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-424 536 U.S. 424 (2002) 536 U.S. 424 D09002ee1dec702b2 Motor Carriers Police Powers Motor Vehicles Preemption Ordinance Government State and Local Government Permanent Injunction Tow Trucks Safety Regulations Regulations Business and Corporate Law Transportation and Public Works Transportation Safety and Security State Powers Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;City of Columbus et al. v. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., et al., 536 U.S. 424 (2002);536 U.S. 424 CASE USREPORTS-536-424 424 21 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 424 536 U.S. 424 (2002) Motor Carriers Police Powers Motor Vehicles Preemption Ordinance Government State and Local Government Permanent Injunction Tow Trucks Safety Regulations Regulations Business and Corporate Law Transportation and Public Works Transportation Safety and Security State Powers Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 2001-073-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Trucking company, or motor carrier Cert Ohio Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-23 Statutory construction Federal Statute Interstate Commerce, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg William H. Rehnquist 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-424 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-424.pdf 536 U.S. 452 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-452 536 U.S. 452 (2002) 536 U.S. 452 D09002ee1dec702b5 Standing Census Census Data Apportionment Sampling Actual Enumeration Statistical Methods Constitutional Law Reapportionment: Other than Plans Governed by the Voting Rights Act Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Utah et al. v. Evans, Secretary of Commerce, et al., 536 U.S. 452 (2002);536 U.S. 452 CASE USREPORTS-536-452 452 22 1 2002-06-20 2001 536 U.S. 452 536 U.S. 452 (2002) Standing Census Census Data Apportionment Sampling Actual Enumeration Statistical Methods Constitutional Law Reapportionment: Other than Plans Governed by the Voting Rights Act Civil Rights 2001-074-01 State Department or Secretary of Commerce Appeal Department or Secretary of Commerce Utah U.S. District Court Utah U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-27 Judicial review (national level) Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Stephen G. Breyer William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-452 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-452.pdf 536 U.S. 516 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-516 536 U.S. 516 (2002) 536 U.S. 516 D09002ee1dec702cb Competition and Antitrust Labor-Management Relations Union Labor and Employment Law Employer Collective Bargaining Petition Protected Activity Employees Retaliation Concerted Activities Unfair Labor Practices Antitrust Law Labor-Management Disputes: Miscellaneous Dispute Unions United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 536 U.S. 516 (2002);536 U.S. 516 CASE USREPORTS-536-516 516 23 1 2002-06-24 2001 536 U.S. 516 536 U.S. 516 (2002) Competition and Antitrust Labor-Management Relations Union Labor and Employment Law Employer Collective Bargaining Petition Protected Activity Employees Retaliation Concerted Activities Unfair Labor Practices Antitrust Law Labor-Management Disputes: Miscellaneous Dispute Unions 2001-075-01 Construction industry National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer Cert National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-16 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-516 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-516.pdf 536 U.S. 545 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-545 536 U.S. 545 (2002) 536 U.S. 545 D09002ee1dec70288 Imprisonment Drug Trafficking Guilty Plea Weapons Drugs and Narcotics Detention Sentencing Jury Trial Crime and Law Enforcement Indictment Elements of Crime Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Trial (Right To, as Distinct from Extra-Legal Jury Influences) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002);536 U.S. 545 CASE USREPORTS-536-545 545 24 1 2002-06-24 2001 536 U.S. 545 536 U.S. 545 (2002) Imprisonment Drug Trafficking Guilty Plea Weapons Drugs and Narcotics Detention Sentencing Jury Trial Crime and Law Enforcement Indictment Elements of Crime Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Trial (Right To, as Distinct from Extra-Legal Jury Influences) Criminal Procedure 2001-076-01 Person convicted of crime United States Cert North Carolina Middle U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Anthony M. Kennedy William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-545 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-545.pdf 536 U.S. 584 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-584 536 U.S. 584 (2002) 536 U.S. 584 D09002ee1dec702b1 Armed Robbery Homicide Mitigating Circumstances First-Degree Murder Sentencing Jury Trial Aggravating Circumstances Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Robbery Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002);536 U.S. 584 CASE USREPORTS-536-584 584 25 1 2002-06-24 2001 536 U.S. 584 536 U.S. 584 (2002) Armed Robbery Homicide Mitigating Circumstances First-Degree Murder Sentencing Jury Trial Aggravating Circumstances Criminal Law and Procedure Crime and Law Enforcement Capital Punishment Robbery Aggravating Factors Sixth Amendment Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Procedure 2001-077-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court Federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-22 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to trial by jury) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Ruth Bader Ginsburg John Paul Stevens 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-584 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-584.pdf 536 U.S. 622 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-622 536 U.S. 622 (2002) 536 U.S. 622 D09002ee1dec702cf Disclosure Jurisdiction and Venue Impeachment Information Brady Evidence Evidence Guilty Plea Fast Track Plea Bargain Drugs and Narcotics Sentencing Guidelines Impeachment Crime and Law Enforcement Conviction Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Affirmative Defense Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002);536 U.S. 622 CASE USREPORTS-536-622 622 26 1 2002-06-24 2001 536 U.S. 622 536 U.S. 622 (2002) Disclosure Jurisdiction and Venue Impeachment Information Brady Evidence Evidence Guilty Plea Fast Track Plea Bargain Drugs and Narcotics Sentencing Guidelines Impeachment Crime and Law Enforcement Conviction Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Sixth Amendment Affirmative Defense Plea Bargaining: The Constitutionality of and/Or the Circumstances of Its Exercise Criminal Procedure 2001-078-01 United States Person convicted of crime Cert California Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-24 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Stephen G. Breyer William H. Rehnquist 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-622 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-622.pdf 536 U.S. 635 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-635 536 U.S. 635 (2002) 536 U.S. 635 D09002ee1dec702ce Drug Trafficking Police Powers Cocaine Probable Cause Warrantless Arrest Inmates and Prisoners Drug Offenses Drugs and Narcotics Possession Warrantless Entry Government Warrantless Search and Seizure Fourth Amendment Exigent Circumstances Intent to Distribute Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Arrest Warrant Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Kirk v. Louisiana, 536 U.S. 635 (2002);536 U.S. 635 CASE USREPORTS-536-635 635 27 1 2002-06-24 2001 536 U.S. 635 536 U.S. 635 (2002) Drug Trafficking Police Powers Cocaine Probable Cause Warrantless Arrest Inmates and Prisoners Drug Offenses Drugs and Narcotics Possession Warrantless Entry Government Warrantless Search and Seizure Fourth Amendment Exigent Circumstances Intent to Distribute Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Arrest Warrant Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure 2001-079-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given William H. Rehnquist Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-635 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-635.pdf 536 U.S. 639 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-639 536 U.S. 639 (2002) 536 U.S. 639 D09002ee1dec702d0 Education Funding Education Arts and Culture Religion Human Rights and Civil Liberties Private Schools Vouchers Tuition Aid Public Schools Establishment Clause Student Tuition Taxpayers Constitutional Law Parochiaid: Government Aid to Religious Schools, or Religious Requirements in Public Schools First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al. v. Simmons-Harris et al., 536 U.S. 639 (2002);536 U.S. 639 CASE USREPORTS-536-639 639 28 1 2002-06-27 2001 536 U.S. 639 536 U.S. 639 (2002) Education Funding Education Arts and Culture Religion Human Rights and Civil Liberties Private Schools Vouchers Tuition Aid Public Schools Establishment Clause Student Tuition Taxpayers Constitutional Law Parochiaid: Government Aid to Religious Schools, or Religious Requirements in Public Schools First Amendment 2001-080-01 Specified state board or department of education State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of Cert Ohio Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-02-20 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (establishment of religion) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William H. Rehnquist William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-639 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-639.pdf 536 U.S. 730 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-730 536 U.S. 730 (2002) 536 U.S. 730 D09002ee1dec702aa Law Enforcement Officers Prisoners' Rights Bathroom Breaks Inmates and Prisoners Human Rights and Civil Liberties Eighth Amendment Taunting Cruel and Unusual Punishment Hitching Post Exposure Chained to Hitching Post Hitching Post for Punitive Purpose Fourteenth Amendment Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Water Breaks Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Hope v. Pelzer et al., 536 U.S. 730 (2002);536 U.S. 730 CASE USREPORTS-536-730 730 29 1 2002-06-27 2001 536 U.S. 730 536 U.S. 730 (2002) Law Enforcement Officers Prisoners' Rights Bathroom Breaks Inmates and Prisoners Human Rights and Civil Liberties Eighth Amendment Taunting Cruel and Unusual Punishment Hitching Post Exposure Chained to Hitching Post Hitching Post for Punitive Purpose Fourteenth Amendment Qualified Immunity Constitutional Law Water Breaks Liability, Civil Rights Acts (Cf. Liability, Governmental and Liability, Nongovernmental, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty) Civil Rights 2001-081-01 Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Cert Alabama Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit To resolve question presented William H. Rehnquist 2002-04-17 Statutory construction Federal Statute Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts (42 U.S.C. �� 1983) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-730 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-730.pdf 536 U.S. 765 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-765 536 U.S. 765 (2002) 536 U.S. 765 D09002ee1dec70271 Impartiality First Amendment Election Elections and Politics Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Public Office Announce Clause Candidates Strict Scrutiny Freedom of Speech Political Parties and Affiliations Judicial Elections Campaigns Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Republican Party of Minnesota et al. v. White, Chairperson, Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards, et al., 536 U.S. 765 (2002);536 U.S. 765 CASE USREPORTS-536-765 765 30 1 2002-06-27 2001 536 U.S. 765 536 U.S. 765 (2002) Impartiality First Amendment Election Elections and Politics Government Human Rights and Civil Liberties Public Office Announce Clause Candidates Strict Scrutiny Freedom of Speech Political Parties and Affiliations Judicial Elections Campaigns Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment 2001-082-01 Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official State commission, board, committee, or authority Cert State Agency Minnesota U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-26 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Antonin Scalia William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-765 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-765.pdf 536 U.S. 822 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-822 536 U.S. 822 (2002) 536 U.S. 822 D09002ee1dec702b4 Law Enforcement Education Drug Testing Right to Privacy School Administration Privacy Human Rights and Civil Liberties Extracurricular Activities Board of Education Students Unreasonable Search and Seizure Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Drug Use Health Records Fourth Amendment Constitutional Law School Board Privacy (Cf. Libel, Comity: Privacy) Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County et al. v. Earls et al., 536 U.S. 822 (2002);536 U.S. 822 CASE USREPORTS-536-822 822 31 1 2002-06-27 2001 536 U.S. 822 536 U.S. 822 (2002) Law Enforcement Education Drug Testing Right to Privacy School Administration Privacy Human Rights and Civil Liberties Extracurricular Activities Board of Education Students Unreasonable Search and Seizure Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Drug Use Health Records Fourth Amendment Constitutional Law School Board Privacy (Cf. Libel, Comity: Privacy) Privacy 2001-083-01 Local school district or board of education Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution Cert Oklahoma Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist 2002-03-19 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Clarence Thomas William H. Rehnquist 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-822 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-822.pdf 536 U.S. 856 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-856 536 U.S. 856 (2002) 536 U.S. 856 D09002ee1dec702ab Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Conflict of Interest Habeas Corpus Sexual Assault Petition Kidnapping First-Degree Murder Sentencing Ineffective Assistance Crime and Law Enforcement Sex Offenses Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure No Merits: Adequate Non-Federal Grounds for Decision Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Smith, 536 U.S. 856 (2002);536 U.S. 856 CASE USREPORTS-536-856 856 32 1 2002-06-28 2001 536 U.S. 856 536 U.S. 856 (2002) Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Homicide Conflict of Interest Habeas Corpus Sexual Assault Petition Kidnapping First-Degree Murder Sentencing Ineffective Assistance Crime and Law Enforcement Sex Offenses Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure No Merits: Adequate Non-Federal Grounds for Decision Judicial Power 2001-084-01 State Prisoner, inmate of penal institution Cert Arizona U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-856 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-856.pdf 536 U.S. 862 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-862 536 U.S. 862 (2002) 536 U.S. 862 D09002ee1dec702a9 Discriminatory Intent Plea Bargain Indictment Discovery Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Similarly Situated Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;United States v. Bass, 536 U.S. 862 (2002);536 U.S. 862 CASE USREPORTS-536-862 862 33 1 2002-06-28 2001 536 U.S. 862 536 U.S. 862 (2002) Discriminatory Intent Plea Bargain Indictment Discovery Sentencing Crime and Law Enforcement Similarly Situated Capital Punishment Criminal Law and Procedure Discovery and Inspection (In the Context of Criminal Litigation Only, Otherwise Freedom of Information Act and Related Federal or State Statutes or Regulations) Criminal Procedure 2001-085-01 United States Defendant Cert Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit No reason given William H. Rehnquist Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Per curiam (no oral argument) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-862 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-862.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1dec702b6 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Reporters Note, 536 U.S. 864a (2001) BACKMATTER USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-3 34 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-3.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter D09002ee1dec702a5 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Orders BACKMATTER USREPORTS-536-BackMatter 35 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1dec702cd United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Statement BACKMATTER USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-2 36 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1dec702a8 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 2001, June 10 through October 3, 2002;Index to Volume 536 BACKMATTER USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-4 37 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-536/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-536/pdf/USREPORTS-536-BackMatter-4.pdf