<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1dec5b956">
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
        </role>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States</namePart>
         <namePart>United States Supreme Court</namePart>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
        </role>
         <description>Government Organization</description>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
    <language>
         <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <extension>
         <collectionCode>USREPORTS</collectionCode>
         <category>Judicial Publications</category>
         <branch>judicial</branch>
         <dateIngested>2026-02-23</dateIngested>
    </extension>
    <titleInfo>
         <title>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <classification authority="sudocs">JU 6.8:529</classification>
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States</namePart>
         <namePart>Supreme Court</namePart>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529</identifier>
    <location>
         <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529</url>
         <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529.pdf</url>
    </location>
    <extension>
         <searchtitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000</searchtitle>
         <docClass>USREPORTS</docClass>
         <accessId>USREPORTS-529</accessId>
         <volume>529</volume>
         <dateIssued notSpecified="day-month">2001</dateIssued>
         <reporter name="Frank D. Wagner"></reporter>
         <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
    </extension>
                            
    <titleInfo>
                                    
         <title>United States Reports, 529</title>
                                    
         <subTitle>cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at</subTitle>
                                
    </titleInfo>
                            
    <titleInfo type="alternative">
                                    
         <title>Cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at</title>
                                
    </titleInfo>
                            
    <titleInfo displayLabel="Also known as:" type="alternative">
                                    
         <title>U.S. reports</title>
                                
    </titleInfo>
                            
    <titleInfo type="uniform">
                                    
         <title>United States reports (Washington, D.C.)</title>
                                
    </titleInfo>
                            
    <name type="corporate">
                                    
         <namePart>United States</namePart>
                                    
         <namePart>Supreme Court.</namePart>
                                    
         <role>
                                            
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
                                        
        </role>
                                
    </name>
                            
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
                            
    <genre authority="marcgt">law report or digest</genre>
                            
    <genre authority="fast">Digests.</genre>
                            
    <genre authority="fast">Periodicals.</genre>
                            
    <originInfo>
                                    
         <place>
                                            
              <placeTerm authority="marccountry" type="code">dcu</placeTerm>
                                        
        </place>
                                    
         <place>
                                            
              <placeTerm type="text">Washington, D.C.]</placeTerm>
                                        
        </place>
                                    
         <publisher>U.S. Supreme Court</publisher>
                                    
         <dateIssued>2001</dateIssued>
                                    
         <dateCreated encoding="marc" point="start">1883</dateCreated>
                                    
         <dateCreated encoding="marc" point="end">9999</dateCreated>
                                    
         <issuance>continuing</issuance>
                                    
         <frequency>Irregular</frequency>
                                
    </originInfo>
                            
    <language>
                                    
         <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
                                
    </language>
                            
    <physicalDescription>
                                    
         <extent>1 online resource (volumes)</extent>
                                
    </physicalDescription>
                            
    <note type="date/sequential designation">Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883).</note>
                            
    <subject>
                                    
         <geographicCode authority="marcgac">n-us---</geographicCode>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="lcsh">
                                    
         <name type="corporate">
                                            
              <namePart>United States.</namePart>
                                            
              <namePart>Supreme Court</namePart>
                                        
        </name>
                                    
         <genre>Periodicals</genre>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="lcsh">
                                    
         <topic>Law reports, digests, etc</topic>
                                    
         <geographic>United States</geographic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="lcsh">
                                    
         <topic>Constitutional law</topic>
                                    
         <geographic>United States</geographic>
                                    
         <genre>Digests</genre>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="lcsh">
                                    
         <topic>Judicial opinions</topic>
                                    
         <geographic>United States</geographic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="fast">
                                    
         <name type="corporate">
                                            
              <namePart>United States.</namePart>
                                            
              <namePart>Supreme Court.</namePart>
                                        
        </name>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="fast">
                                    
         <topic>Constitutional law</topic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="fast">
                                    
         <topic>Judicial opinions</topic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="fast">
                                    
         <topic>Law reports, digests, etc</topic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <subject authority="fast">
                                    
         <geographic>United States</geographic>
                                
    </subject>
                            
    <classification authority="lcc">ISSN RECORD</classification>
                            
    <classification authority="ddc" edition="14">348</classification>
                            
    <classification authority="sudocs">JU 6.8:529</classification>
                            
    <relatedItem displayLabel="Print version:" type="otherFormat">
                                    
         <titleInfo>
                                            
              <title>United States reports</title>
                                        
        </titleInfo>
                                    
         <name>
                                            
              <namePart>United States. Supreme Court.</namePart>
                                        
        </name>
                                    
         <identifier type="issn">0891-6845</identifier>
                                    
         <identifier type="local">(DLC) 01026074</identifier>
                                    
         <identifier type="local">(OCoLC)4384322</identifier>
                                
    </relatedItem>
                            
    <relatedItem displayLabel="Microfiche version:" type="otherFormat">
                                    
         <titleInfo>
                                            
              <title>United States reports</title>
                                        
        </titleInfo>
                                    
         <name>
                                            
              <namePart>United States. Supreme Court.</namePart>
                                        
        </name>
                                    
         <identifier type="local">(OCoLC)26859335</identifier>
                                
    </relatedItem>
                            
    <identifier type="sudoc-item-number">0741-A (online)</identifier>
                            
    <identifier type="issn">2150-2331</identifier>
                            
    <identifier type="lccn">2009231052</identifier>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="Vol. 502, 1991 term-" usage="primary display">https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="Vol. 502, 1991 term-">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="Vol. 502, 1991 term-vol. 552, 2007 term (UNT Digital Library)">https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="Vol. 502, 1991 term-vol. 552, 2007 term (UNT Digital Library)">https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="[Vol.] 108, Oct. term 1882-vol. 542, 2003 term (Library of Congress Digital Collections by agreement with the William S. Hein &amp; Co., Inc.)">https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="[Vol.] 108, Oct. term 1882-vol. 542, 2003 term (Library of Congress Digital Collections by agreement with the William S. Hein &amp; Co., Inc.)">https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/</url>
                                
    </location>
                            
    <location>
                                    
         <url displayLabel="(online)">https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&amp;SYS=000641007</url>
                                
    </location>
                        
    <originInfo>
         <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
         <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-01-01</dateIssued>
         <issuance>continuing</issuance>
         <frequency authority="marcfrequency">Completely irregular</frequency>
    </originInfo>
    <physicalDescription>
         <note type="source content type">converted</note>
         <digitalOrigin>reformatted digital</digitalOrigin>
         <extent>1196 digital object pages</extent>
    </physicalDescription>
    <classification authority="sudocs">JU 6.8:529</classification>
    <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529</identifier>
    <identifier type="local">P0b002ee1dec5b956</identifier>
    <identifier type="ILS system id">000641007</identifier>
    <recordInfo>
         <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
         <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-02-23</recordCreationDate>
         <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-02-23</recordChangeDate>
         <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">USREPORTS-529</recordIdentifier>
         <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
         <languageOfCataloging>
              <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    <accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
    <extension>
         <docClass>USREPORTS</docClass>
         <accessId>USREPORTS-529</accessId>
         <volume>529</volume>
         <dateIssued notSpecified="day-month">2001</dateIssued>
         <reporter name="Frank D. Wagner"></reporter>
         <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
    </extension>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Title Page</title>
              <partName>Front Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a8a</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Title Page</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>FRONTMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>1</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Justices of the Supreme Court</title>
              <partName>Front Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74acd</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Justices of the Supreme Court</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>FRONTMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>2</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-4.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Supreme Court of the United States</title>
              <partName>Front Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa1</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Supreme Court of the United States</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>FRONTMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>3</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-3.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Table of Cases Reported</title>
              <partName>Front Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aeb</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Table of Cases Reported</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>FRONTMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>4</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-FrontMatter-2.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-1" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-1/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 1</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-1</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 1 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 1</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-1.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa6</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
              <topic>Nursing Homes</topic>
              <topic>Health Care Funding</topic>
              <topic>Health</topic>
              <topic>Determination</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Health Facilities and Institutions</topic>
              <topic>Compliance</topic>
              <topic>Appeals Hearing</topic>
              <topic>Judicial Administration: Federal Question (Cf. No Merits: Dismissed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question)</topic>
              <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1 (2000);529 U.S. 1</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-1</accessId>
              <reportNumber>1</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>5</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-02-29</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 1</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 1 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Nursing Homes</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health Care Funding</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Determination</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health Facilities and Institutions</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Compliance</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Appeals Hearing</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Judicial Administration: Federal Question (Cf. No Merits: Dismissed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-034-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services</petitioner>
              <respondent>Health organization or person, nursing home, medical clinic or laboratory, chiropractor</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Illinois Northern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-08</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Medicare provisions of the Social Security Act</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Stephen G. Breyer</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-1</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-1.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-53" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-53/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 53</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-53</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 53 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 53</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-53.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a95</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Time Served</topic>
              <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53 (2000);529 U.S. 53</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-53</accessId>
              <reportNumber>53</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>6</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-01</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 53</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 53 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Time Served</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-035-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>United States</petitioner>
              <respondent>Prisoner, inmate of penal institution</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-12-08</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-53</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-53.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-61" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-61/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Portuondo v. Agard, 529 U.S. 61 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 61</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-61</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 61 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 61</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-61.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a99</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
              <topic>Due Process</topic>
              <topic>Evidence</topic>
              <topic>Fourteenth Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution)</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Portuondo v. Agard, 529 U.S. 61 (2000);529 U.S. 61</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-61</accessId>
              <reportNumber>61</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>7</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-06</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 61</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 61 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Due Process</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Evidence</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fourteenth Amendment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-036-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="New York">State</petitioner>
              <respondent>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>New York Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-01</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Antonin Scalia</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-61</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-61.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-89" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-89/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 89</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-89</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 89 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 89</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-89.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74acf</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Environmental Law</topic>
              <topic>Maritime and Admiralty Law</topic>
              <topic>Federal Preemption</topic>
              <topic>Environment</topic>
              <topic>Environmental Mitigation</topic>
              <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does.</topic>
              <topic>Federalism</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000);529 U.S. 89</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-89</accessId>
              <reportNumber>89</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>8</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-06</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 89</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 89 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Environmental Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Maritime and Admiralty Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Preemption</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Environment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Environmental Mitigation</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does.</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federalism</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-037-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>United States</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Washington">Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Washington Western U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-12-07</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-89</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-89.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-120" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-120/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>FDA v. Brown &amp; Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 120</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-120</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 120 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 120</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-120.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa5</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Commerce</topic>
              <topic>Tobacco and Smoking</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
              <topic>Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.)</topic>
              <topic>Marketing and Advertising</topic>
              <topic>Health</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Federal or State Consumer Protection: Typically Under the Truth in Lending, Food, Drug and Cosmetic, and Consumer Protection Credit Acts</topic>
              <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;FDA v. Brown &amp; Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000);529 U.S. 120</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-120</accessId>
              <reportNumber>120</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>9</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-21</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 120</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 120 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Commerce</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Tobacco and Smoking</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Marketing and Advertising</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Federal or State Consumer Protection: Typically Under the Truth in Lending, Food, Drug and Cosmetic, and Consumer Protection Credit Acts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-038-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Food and Drug Administration</petitioner>
              <respondent>Manufacturer</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>North Carolina Middle U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-12-01</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic, and related statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Sandra Day O&apos;Connor</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-120</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-120.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-193" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-193/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. 193 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 193</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-193</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 193 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 193</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a9a</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Commerce</topic>
              <topic>Contracts</topic>
              <topic>Jurisdiction and Venue</topic>
              <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Building Construction</topic>
              <topic>District Courts</topic>
              <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Venue</topic>
              <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. 193 (2000);529 U.S. 193</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-193</accessId>
              <reportNumber>193</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>10</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-21</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 193</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 193 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Commerce</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Contracts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Jurisdiction and Venue</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Building Construction</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>District Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Venue</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-039-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Business, corporation</petitioner>
              <respondent>Business, corporation</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Alabama Northern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-01-10</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>David H. Souter</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-193</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-205" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-205/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 205</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-205</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 205 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 205</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-205.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a9f</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
              <topic>Infringement</topic>
              <topic>Contracts</topic>
              <topic>Commercial Law</topic>
              <topic>Trademarks</topic>
              <topic>Manufacturing</topic>
              <topic>Commerce</topic>
              <topic>Goods and Services</topic>
              <topic>Unregistered Trade Dress</topic>
              <topic>Patents and Copyrights: Trademark</topic>
              <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000);529 U.S. 205</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-205</accessId>
              <reportNumber>205</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>11</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 205</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 205 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Infringement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Contracts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Commercial Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Trademarks</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Manufacturing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Commerce</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Goods and Services</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Unregistered Trade Dress</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Patents and Copyrights: Trademark</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-040-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Retail business or outlet</petitioner>
              <respondent>Manufacturer</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>New York Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-01-19</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Antonin Scalia</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-205</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-205.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-217" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-217/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 217</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-217</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 217 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 217</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-217.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a85</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>First Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Viewpoint Neutrality</topic>
              <topic>Human Rights and Civil Liberties</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Education Funding</topic>
              <topic>Freedom of Speech</topic>
              <topic>First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment)</topic>
              <topic>First Amendment</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000);529 U.S. 217</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-217</accessId>
              <reportNumber>217</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>12</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 217</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 217 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Viewpoint Neutrality</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Human Rights and Civil Liberties</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Education Funding</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Freedom of Speech</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-041-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Wisconsin">State college or university</petitioner>
              <respondent>Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Wisconsin Western U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-09</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-217</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-217.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-244" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-244/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 244</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-244</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 244 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 244</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-244.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ac6</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Probation and Parole</topic>
              <topic>Confinement and Release</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Ex Post Facto</topic>
              <topic>Ex Post Facto (State)</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244 (2000);529 U.S. 244</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-244</accessId>
              <reportNumber>244</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>13</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-28</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 244</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 244 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Probation and Parole</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Confinement and Release</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Ex Post Facto</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Ex Post Facto (State)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-042-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Georgia">State</petitioner>
              <respondent>Person convicted of crime</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <adminAction state="Georgia">State Agency</adminAction>
              <caseOrigin>Georgia Northern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-01-11</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitution</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>6</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>3</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-244</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-244.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-266" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-266/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 266</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-266</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 266 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 266</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-266.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ace</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Fourth Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Weapons</topic>
              <topic>Stop and Frisk</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Search and Seizure</topic>
              <topic>Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act)</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000);529 U.S. 266</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-266</accessId>
              <reportNumber>266</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>14</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-28</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 266</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 266 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fourth Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Weapons</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Stop and Frisk</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Search and Seizure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-043-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Florida">State</petitioner>
              <respondent>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin state="Florida">State Trial Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource state="Florida">State Supreme Court</caseSource>
              <certReason>Conflict between federal court and state court</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-29</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Fourth Amendment</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-266</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-266.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-277" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-277/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Erie v. Pap&apos;s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 277</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-277</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 277 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 277</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-277.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a92</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Moot Case</topic>
              <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
              <topic>Human Rights and Civil Liberties</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Freedom of Speech</topic>
              <topic>Obscenity, State (Cf. Comity: Privacy): Including the Regulation of Sexually Explicit Material Under the 21st Amendment</topic>
              <topic>First Amendment</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Erie v. Pap&apos;s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000);529 U.S. 277</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-277</accessId>
              <reportNumber>277</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>15</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-03-29</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 277</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 277 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Moot Case</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Human Rights and Civil Liberties</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Freedom of Speech</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Obscenity, State (Cf. Comity: Privacy): Including the Regulation of Sexually Explicit Material Under the 21st Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-044-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Pennsylvania">City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit</petitioner>
              <respondent>Theater, studio</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin state="Pennsylvania">State Trial Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource state="Pennsylvania">State Supreme Court</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-10</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Sandra Day O&apos;Connor</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>6</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>3</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-277</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-277.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-333" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-333/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Free et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., et al., 529 U.S. 333 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 333</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-333</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 333 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 333</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-333.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74acb</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Free et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., et al., 529 U.S. 333 (2000);529 U.S. 333</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-333</accessId>
              <reportNumber>333</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>16</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-03</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 333</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 333 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center"></subject>
              <docketId>1999-045-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Unidentifiable</petitioner>
              <respondent>Drug manufacturer</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-27</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction</authorityDecision>
              <law></law>
              <decisionType>Equally divided vote</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion></majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>4</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-333</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-333.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-334" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-334/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 334</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-334</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 334 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 334</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-334.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ae9</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Drugs and Narcotics</topic>
              <topic>Border Security</topic>
              <topic>Fourth Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Drug Trafficking</topic>
              <topic>Immigration</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Search and Seizure</topic>
              <topic>Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act)</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000);529 U.S. 334</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-334</accessId>
              <reportNumber>334</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>17</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-17</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 334</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 334 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Drugs and Narcotics</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Border Security</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fourth Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Drug Trafficking</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Immigration</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Search and Seizure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-046-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Texas Western U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-29</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (national level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Fourth Amendment</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>William H. Rehnquist</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-334</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-334.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-344" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-344/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. Shanklin, 529 U.S. 344 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 344</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-344</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 344 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 344</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-344.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a84</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Wrongful Death</topic>
              <topic>Torts</topic>
              <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Torts Law</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction</topic>
              <topic>Federalism</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. Shanklin, 529 U.S. 344 (2000);529 U.S. 344</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-344</accessId>
              <reportNumber>344</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>18</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-17</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 344</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 344 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Wrongful Death</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Torts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Torts Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federalism</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-047-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Railroad</petitioner>
              <respondent>Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <adminAction>Department or Secretary of Transportation</adminAction>
              <caseOrigin>Tennessee Western U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-01</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Sandra Day O&apos;Connor</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-344</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-344.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-362" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-362/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Williams v. Taylor, Warden, 529 U.S. 362 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 362</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-362</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 362 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 362</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-362.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa0</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
              <topic>Capital Punishment</topic>
              <topic>Evidence</topic>
              <topic>Ineffective Assistance of Counsel</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Discovery</topic>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Williams v. Taylor, Warden, 529 U.S. 362 (2000);529 U.S. 362</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-362</accessId>
              <reportNumber>362</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>19</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-18</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 362</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 362 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Capital Punishment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Evidence</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Ineffective Assistance of Counsel</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Discovery</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-048-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person convicted of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Virginia">State</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-10-04</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>John Paul Stevens</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>John Paul Stevens</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>6</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>3</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-362</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-362.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-420" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-420/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Williams v. Taylor, Warden, 529 U.S. 420 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 420</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-420</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 420 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 420</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-420.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a96</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Williams v. Taylor, Warden, 529 U.S. 420 (2000);529 U.S. 420</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-420</accessId>
              <reportNumber>420</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>20</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-18</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 420</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 420 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center"></subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-050-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person convicted of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Virginia">State</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-28</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-420</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-420.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-446" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-446/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Edwards v. Carpenter, 529 U.S. 446 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 446</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-446</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 446 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 446</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-446.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a88</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Sufficiency of the Evidence Claim</topic>
              <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
              <topic>Evidence</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Ineffective Assistance of Counsel</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Capital Punishment</topic>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Edwards v. Carpenter, 529 U.S. 446 (2000);529 U.S. 446</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-446</accessId>
              <reportNumber>446</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>21</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-25</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 446</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 446 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sufficiency of the Evidence Claim</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Trials and Court Proceedings</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Evidence</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Ineffective Assistance of Counsel</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Capital Punishment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-051-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Ohio">State</petitioner>
              <respondent>Person convicted of crime</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Ohio Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-28</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Federal common law</authorityDecision>
              <law></law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Antonin Scalia</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-446</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-446.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-460" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-460/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Nelson v. Adams USA, 529 U.S. 460 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 460</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-460</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 460 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 460</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-460.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a91</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Pleadings</topic>
              <topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
              <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
              <topic>Infringement</topic>
              <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Trademarks</topic>
              <topic>Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners&apos; Rights)</topic>
              <topic>Due Process</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Nelson v. Adams USA, 529 U.S. 460 (2000);529 U.S. 460</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-460</accessId>
              <reportNumber>460</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>22</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-25</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 460</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 460 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Pleadings</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Infringement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Trademarks</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners&apos; Rights)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Due Process</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-052-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Business, corporation</petitioner>
              <respondent>Business, corporation</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Ohio Northern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-27</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (national level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitutional Amendment</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Fifth Amendment (due process)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-460</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-460.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-473" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-473/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Slack v. McDaniel, Warden, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 473</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-473</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 473 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 473</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-473.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa7</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Homicide</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>State and Local Courts</topic>
              <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Slack v. McDaniel, Warden, 529 U.S. 473 (2000);529 U.S. 473</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-473</accessId>
              <reportNumber>473</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>23</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-26</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 473</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 473 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Homicide</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>State and Local Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Appellate Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Habeas Corpus</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-053-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Prisoner, inmate of penal institution</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Nevada">State</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Nevada U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-10-04</dateArgument>
              <dateRearg>2000-03-29</dateRearg>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>28 U.S.C. �� 2241-2255 (habeas corpus)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-473</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-473.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-494" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-494/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Beck v. Prupis, 529 U.S. 494 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 494</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-494</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 494 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 494</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-494.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa3</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (R.I.C.O.)</topic>
              <topic>Labor</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Conspiracy</topic>
              <topic>White-Collar Crime</topic>
              <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Beck v. Prupis, 529 U.S. 494 (2000);529 U.S. 494</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-494</accessId>
              <reportNumber>494</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>24</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-04-26</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 494</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 494 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (R.I.C.O.)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Labor</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Conspiracy</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>White-Collar Crime</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-054-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Management, executive officer, or director, of business entity</petitioner>
              <respondent>Management, executive officer, or director, of business entity</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Florida Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-03</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Clarence Thomas</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-494</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-494.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-513" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-513/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 513 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 513</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-513</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 513 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 513</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-513.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a98</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crimes Against Children</topic>
              <topic>Sex Offenses</topic>
              <topic>Ex Post Facto Clause</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Miscellaneous Criminal Procedure (Cf. Due Process, Prisoners&apos; Rights, Comity: Criminal Procedure)</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 513 (2000);529 U.S. 513</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-513</accessId>
              <reportNumber>513</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>25</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-01</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 513</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 513 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crimes Against Children</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sex Offenses</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Ex Post Facto Clause</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Miscellaneous Criminal Procedure (Cf. Due Process, Prisoners&apos; Rights, Comity: Criminal Procedure)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-055-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Texas">State</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin state="Texas">State Trial Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource state="Texas">State Appellate Court</caseSource>
              <certReason>Conflict between federal court and state court</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-30</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (state level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitution</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>John Paul Stevens</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>John Paul Stevens</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-513</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-513.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-576" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-576/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 576</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-576</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 576 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 576</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-576.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aee</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Labor-Management Relations</topic>
              <topic>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</topic>
              <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
              <topic>Labor</topic>
              <topic>Labor and Employment Law</topic>
              <topic>Wages and Hours</topic>
              <topic>Fair Labor Standards Act</topic>
              <topic>Unions</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000);529 U.S. 576</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-576</accessId>
              <reportNumber>576</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>26</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-01</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 576</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 576 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Labor-Management Relations</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Labor</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Labor and Employment Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Wages and Hours</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Fair Labor Standards Act</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Unions</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-056-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Texas">Governmental employee or job applicant</petitioner>
              <respondent state="Texas">County government or county governmental unit, except school district</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <adminAction>Department or Secretary of Labor</adminAction>
              <caseOrigin>Texas Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-23</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Fair Labor Standards</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Clarence Thomas</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>6</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>3</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-576</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-576.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-598" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-598/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 598</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-598</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 598 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 598</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-598.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec749e5</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
              <topic>Fourteenth Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Commerce Clause</topic>
              <topic>National Supremacy: Miscellaneous</topic>
              <topic>Federalism</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000);529 U.S. 598</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-598</accessId>
              <reportNumber>598</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>27</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-15</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 598</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 598 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Legal Remedies</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fourteenth Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Commerce Clause</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>National Supremacy: Miscellaneous</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federalism</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-057-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>United States</petitioner>
              <respondent>Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Virginia Western U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Other reason</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-01-11</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (national level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>Act of congress declared unconstitutional</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>William H. Rehnquist</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-598</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-598.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-667" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-667/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Fischer v. United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 667</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-667</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 667 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 667</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-667.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a8d</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Medicare</topic>
              <topic>Health Care Funding</topic>
              <topic>Fraud and Financial Crimes</topic>
              <topic>Bribery</topic>
              <topic>Health</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>White-Collar Crime</topic>
              <topic>Poverty Law, Statutory: Welfare Benefits, Typically Under Some Social Security Act Provision.</topic>
              <topic>Civil Rights</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Fischer v. United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000);529 U.S. 667</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-667</accessId>
              <reportNumber>667</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>28</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-15</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 667</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 667 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Medicare</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health Care Funding</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Fraud and Financial Crimes</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Bribery</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Health</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>White-Collar Crime</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Poverty Law, Statutory: Welfare Benefits, Typically Under Some Social Security Act Provision.</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Rights</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-058-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Management, executive officer, or director, of business entity</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Florida Middle U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-22</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>7</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>2</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-667</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-667.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-694" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-694/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 694</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-694</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 694 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 694</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-694.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ac7</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Supervised Release</topic>
              <topic>Ex Post Facto Clause</topic>
              <topic>Probation and Parole</topic>
              <topic>Sentencing</topic>
              <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694 (2000);529 U.S. 694</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-694</accessId>
              <reportNumber>694</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>29</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-15</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 694</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 694 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Supervised Release</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Ex Post Facto Clause</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Probation and Parole</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Sentencing</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Sentencing Guidelines</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-059-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Probationer, or parolee</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Tennessee Eastern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-02-22</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>David H. Souter</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>8</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>1</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-694</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-694.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-728" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-728/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Public Lands Council et al. v. Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al., 529 U.S. 728 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 728</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-728</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 728 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 728</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-728.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ac9</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Public Lands</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
              <topic>Livestock</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Taylor Grazing Act</topic>
              <topic>Agriculture and Food</topic>
              <topic>Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution)</topic>
              <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Public Lands Council et al. v. Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al., 529 U.S. 728 (2000);529 U.S. 728</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-728</accessId>
              <reportNumber>728</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>30</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-15</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 728</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 728 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Public Lands</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Livestock</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Taylor Grazing Act</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Agriculture and Food</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Economic Activity</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-060-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Farmer, farm worker, or farm organization</petitioner>
              <respondent>Department or Secretary of the Interior</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <adminAction>Department or Secretary of the Interior</adminAction>
              <caseOrigin>Wyoming U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>To resolve question presented</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-01</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Stephen G. Breyer</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-728</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-728.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-753" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-753/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Ohler v. United States, 529 U.S. 753 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 753</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-753</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 753 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 753</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-753.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74ac8</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Drugs and Narcotics</topic>
              <topic>Federal Rules of Evidence (F.R.E.)</topic>
              <topic>Evidence</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Discovery</topic>
              <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Ohler v. United States, 529 U.S. 753 (2000);529 U.S. 753</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-753</accessId>
              <reportNumber>753</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>31</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 753</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 753 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Drugs and Narcotics</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Rules of Evidence (F.R.E.)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Evidence</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Discovery</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-061-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>California Southern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Putative conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-20</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Court Rules</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Federal Rules of Evidence</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>William H. Rehnquist</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-753</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-753.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-765" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-765/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 765</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-765</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 765 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 765</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-765.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa4</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Administrative Courts</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
              <topic>Whistleblower</topic>
              <topic>False Claims Act</topic>
              <topic>Injury in Fact</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Eleventh Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Standing to Sue: Direct Injury</topic>
              <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000);529 U.S. 765</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-765</accessId>
              <reportNumber>765</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>32</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 765</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 765 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Courts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Whistleblower</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>False Claims Act</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Injury in Fact</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Eleventh Amendment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Standing to Sue: Direct Injury</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judicial Power</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-062-01</docketId>
              <petitioner state="Vermont">State department or agency</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Vermont U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>No reason given</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-29</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (national level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Constitution</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Antonin Scalia</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-765</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-765.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-803" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-803/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>United States et al. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., 529 U.S. 803 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 803</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-803</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 803 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 803</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-803.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aed</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>First Amendment</topic>
              <topic>Broadcasting</topic>
              <topic>Communications</topic>
              <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
              <topic>Television and Film</topic>
              <topic>Telecommunications</topic>
              <topic>First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment)</topic>
              <topic>First Amendment</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;United States et al. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., 529 U.S. 803 (2000);529 U.S. 803</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-803</accessId>
              <reportNumber>803</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>33</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 803</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 803 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Broadcasting</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Communications</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Constitutional Law</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Television and Film</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Telecommunications</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment)</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>First Amendment</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-063-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>United States</petitioner>
              <respondent>Cable TV</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Appeal</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Delaware U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>Delaware U.S. District Court</caseSource>
              <certReason>Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-11-30</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Judicial review (national level)</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>Act of congress declared unconstitutional</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Anthony M. Kennedy</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>John Paul Stevens</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-803</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-803.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-848" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-848/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 848</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-848</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 848 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 848</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-848.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec749e6</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
              <topic>Crimes Against Property</topic>
              <topic>Arson</topic>
              <topic>Buildings and Property</topic>
              <topic>Judiciary</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
              <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
              <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000);529 U.S. 848</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-848</accessId>
              <reportNumber>848</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>34</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 848</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 848 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Crime and Law Enforcement</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Crimes Against Property</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Arson</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Buildings and Property</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Judiciary</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Law and Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Miscellaneous</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Criminal Procedure</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-064-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime</petitioner>
              <respondent>United States</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <caseOrigin>Indiana Northern U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit</caseSource>
              <certReason>Federal court conflict</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>2000-03-21</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Federal Statute</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets, National Firearms, Organized Crime Control, Comprehensive Crime Control, or Gun Control Acts</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Reversed and remanded</disposition>
              <partyWinning>Petitioning party received a favorable disposition</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>9</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>0</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-848</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-848.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-861" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-861/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000)</title>
              <partNumber>529 U.S. 861</partNumber>
              <partName>Case</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-861</identifier>
         <identifier type="preferred citation">529 U.S. 861 (2000)</identifier>
         <identifier type="United States Reports citation">529 U.S. 861</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-861.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a94</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <subject>
              <topic>Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard</topic>
              <topic>Commerce</topic>
              <topic>Civil Liability</topic>
              <topic>Manufacturing</topic>
              <topic>Torts</topic>
              <topic>Product Liability</topic>
              <topic>Preemption</topic>
              <topic>Torts Law</topic>
              <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does.</topic>
              <topic>Federalism</topic>
        </subject>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000);529 U.S. 861</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>CASE</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-861</accessId>
              <reportNumber>861</reportNumber>
              <sequenceNumber>35</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
              <decisionDate>2000-05-22</decisionDate>
              <courtTerm>1999</courtTerm>
              <usCitation>529 U.S. 861</usCitation>
              <fullCitation>529 U.S. 861 (2000)</fullCitation>
              <subject authority="llc" uri="https://www.loc.gov/research-centers/law-library-of-congress/about-this-research-center">
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Commerce</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Civil Liability</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Manufacturing</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Torts</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Product Liability</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Preemption</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Torts Law</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <subject authority="scdb" uri="http://scdb.wustl.edu/documentation.php?var=issue">
                                        
                   <topic>Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does.</topic>
                                        
                   <topic>Federalism</topic>
                                    
            </subject>
              <docketId>1999-065-01</docketId>
              <petitioner>Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee</petitioner>
              <respondent>Auto manufacturer</respondent>
              <jurisdiction>Cert</jurisdiction>
              <adminAction>Department or Secretary of Transportation</adminAction>
              <caseOrigin>District Of Columbia U.S. District Court</caseOrigin>
              <caseSource>U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction)</caseSource>
              <certReason>State court confusion or uncertainty</certReason>
              <chiefJustice>William H. Rehnquist</chiefJustice>
              <dateArgument>1999-12-07</dateArgument>
              <authorityDecision>Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order</authorityDecision>
              <authorityDecision>Statutory construction</authorityDecision>
              <law>
                                        
                   <type>Infrequently litigated statutes</type>
                                        
                   <legalProvisions>Infrequently litigated statutes</legalProvisions>
                                    
            </law>
              <decisionType>Opinion of the court (orally argued)</decisionType>
              <unconstitutionality>No declaration of unconstitutionality</unconstitutionality>
              <disposition>Affirmed (includes modified)</disposition>
              <partyWinning>No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent</partyWinning>
              <majorityOpinion>
                                        
                   <writer>Stephen G. Breyer</writer>
                                        
                   <assigner>William H. Rehnquist</assigner>
                                    
            </majorityOpinion>
              <votes>
                                        
                   <majority>5</majority>
                                        
                   <minority>4</minority>
                                    
            </votes>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-861</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-861.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Reporter&apos;s Note, 529 U.S. 913a (1999)</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a93</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Reporter&apos;s Note, 529 U.S. 913a (1999)</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>36</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-4.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Orders</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a86</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Orders</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>37</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-2.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Amendments to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a8b</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Amendments to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>38</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aec</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>39</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-8.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec749e7</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>40</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-6.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74a97</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>41</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-7.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Building Regulations of the Supreme Court of the United States</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa8</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Building Regulations of the Supreme Court of the United States</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>42</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-5.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>Index</title>
              <partName>Back Matter</partName>
        </titleInfo>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3</identifier>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1dec74aa2</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1999, February 29 through May 25, 2000;Index</searchTitle>
              <granuleClass>BACKMATTER</granuleClass>
              <accessId>USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>43</sequenceNumber>
              <pagePosition>1</pagePosition>
        </extension>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-529/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-BackMatter-3.pdf</url>
        </location>
    </relatedItem>
</mods>