United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2025-07-08 JU 6.8:476 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/text/USREPORTS-476.txt United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers USREPORTS USREPORTS-476 476 1989 1985 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 1989 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8:476 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 U.S. Government Printing Office 1989-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 1184 digital object pages JU 6.8:476 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476 P0b002ee1d4c25496 000641007 DGPO 2025-07-08 2025-07-08 USREPORTS-476 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-476 476 1989 1985 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1d4da93c6 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-6 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1d4da928b United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Reporter's Note FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-5 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1d4da933d United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Errata FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-3 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter D09002ee1d4da93ca United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1d4da93bd United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Supreme Court of the United States FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-2 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1d4da93b6 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-4 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-4.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-7 D09002ee1d4da937a United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Table of Cases Cited FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-7 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-FrontMatter-7.pdf 476 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-1 476 U.S. 1 (1986) 476 U.S. 1 D09002ee1d4da9397 Juries Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Homicide Life Imprisonment Witnesses Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Sentencing Good Behavior Sex Offenses Capital Punishment Testimony Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986);476 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-476-1 1 8 1 1986-04-29 1985 476 U.S. 1 476 U.S. 1 (1986) Juries Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Homicide Life Imprisonment Witnesses Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Sentencing Good Behavior Sex Offenses Capital Punishment Testimony Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Death Penalty (Cf. Extra Legal Jury Influence, Death Rights) Penalty) Criminal Procedure 1985-073-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-02-24 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-1.pdf 476 U.S. 16 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-16 476 U.S. 16 (1986) 476 U.S. 16 D09002ee1d4da9288 Criminal Law and Procedure Assault and Battery Dangerous Weapon Law Enforcement Officers Bank Robbery Banks and Financial Institutions Unloaded Weapons Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Bank Robbery Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16 (1986);476 U.S. 16 CASE USREPORTS-476-16 16 9 1 1986-04-29 1985 476 U.S. 16 476 U.S. 16 (1986) Criminal Law and Procedure Assault and Battery Dangerous Weapon Law Enforcement Officers Bank Robbery Banks and Financial Institutions Unloaded Weapons Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Bank Robbery Criminal Procedure 1985-074-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime United States Cert Maryland U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Putative conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-31 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-16 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-16.pdf 476 U.S. 19 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-19 476 U.S. 19 (1986) 476 U.S. 19 D09002ee1d4da93b8 Employment and Training Programs Administrative Law Negotiations Contracts Labor-Management Relations Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Labor Unions Federal Labor Relations Authority (F.L.R.A.) No Merits: Writ Improvidently Granted Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;EEOC v. FLRA, 476 U.S. 19 (1986);476 U.S. 19 CASE USREPORTS-476-19 19 10 1 1986-04-29 1985 476 U.S. 19 476 U.S. 19 (1986) Employment and Training Programs Administrative Law Negotiations Contracts Labor-Management Relations Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Labor Unions Federal Labor Relations Authority (F.L.R.A.) No Merits: Writ Improvidently Granted Judicial Power 1985-075-01 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Federal Labor Relations Authority Cert Federal Labor Relations Authority U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-22 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Per curiam (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Warren Earl Burger 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-19 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-19.pdf 476 U.S. 28 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-28 476 U.S. 28 (1986) 476 U.S. 28 D09002ee1d4da933c Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Homicide Discrimination Storekeeper Weapons Silent Alarm Jewelry Store Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Impartial Jury Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Robbery Racial Prejudice Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Turner v. Murray, 476 U.S. 28 (1986);476 U.S. 28 CASE USREPORTS-476-28 28 11 1 1986-04-30 1985 476 U.S. 28 476 U.S. 28 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Homicide Discrimination Storekeeper Weapons Silent Alarm Jewelry Store Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Impartial Jury Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Robbery Racial Prejudice Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Voir Dire (Not Necessarily a Criminal Case) Criminal Procedure 1985-076-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-12 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (other provisions) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-28 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-28.pdf 476 U.S. 54 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-54 476 U.S. 54 (1986) 476 U.S. 54 D09002ee1d4da938f Medical Personnel Jurisdiction and Venue Private Party Standing State and Local Government Injunctions Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Case or Controversy Health Facilities and Institutions Abortion Constitutional Law Pediatricians Standing to Sue: Personal Injury Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54 (1986);476 U.S. 54 CASE USREPORTS-476-54 54 12 1 1986-04-30 1985 476 U.S. 54 476 U.S. 54 (1986) Medical Personnel Jurisdiction and Venue Private Party Standing State and Local Government Injunctions Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Case or Controversy Health Facilities and Institutions Abortion Constitutional Law Pediatricians Standing to Sue: Personal Injury Judicial Power 1985-077-01 Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Appeal Illinois Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1985-11-05 Judicial review (national level) Constitution Article III, Section 2 (extent of judicial power) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Harry A. Blackmun Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-54 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-54.pdf 476 U.S. 79 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-79 476 U.S. 79 (1986) 476 U.S. 79 D09002ee1d4da9396 Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Exclusion Discrimination Equal Protection Burden of Proof Venire Scrutiny Burglary Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Selection Constitutional Law Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986);476 U.S. 79 CASE USREPORTS-476-79 79 13 1 1986-04-30 1985 476 U.S. 79 476 U.S. 79 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Exclusion Discrimination Equal Protection Burden of Proof Venire Scrutiny Burglary Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Selection Constitutional Law Desegregation (Other than as Pertains to School Desegregation, Employment Discrimination, and Affirmative Action) Civil Rights 1985-078-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-12 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Lewis F. Powell, Jr. William J. Brennan, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-79 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-79.pdf 476 U.S. 140 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-140 476 U.S. 140 (1986) 476 U.S. 140 D09002ee1d4da93c7 Trials and Court Proceedings Reckless Endangerment Homicide Catastrophe Double Jeopardy Clause Sentencing Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Acquittal Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Smalis v. Pennsylvania, 476 U.S. 140 (1986);476 U.S. 140 CASE USREPORTS-476-140 140 14 1 1986-05-05 1985 476 U.S. 140 476 U.S. 140 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Reckless Endangerment Homicide Catastrophe Double Jeopardy Clause Sentencing Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Acquittal Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure 1985-079-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-02 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-140 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-140.pdf 476 U.S. 147 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-147 476 U.S. 147 (1986) 476 U.S. 147 D09002ee1d4da928c Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Pecuniary Gain Homicide Acquittal Double Jeopardy Clause Sentencing Aggravating Circumstances Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Poland v. Arizona, 476 U.S. 147 (1986);476 U.S. 147 CASE USREPORTS-476-147 147 15 1 1986-05-05 1985 476 U.S. 147 476 U.S. 147 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Pecuniary Gain Homicide Acquittal Double Jeopardy Clause Sentencing Aggravating Circumstances Criminal Law and Procedure Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Double Jeopardy Criminal Procedure 1985-080-01 Person convicted of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-02-24 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-147 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-147.pdf 476 U.S. 162 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-162 476 U.S. 162 (1986) 476 U.S. 162 D09002ee1d4da92f2 Trials and Court Proceedings Felony Murder Juries Evidence Homicide Weapons Discrimination Witnesses Imbalanced Jury Sentencing Fair-Cross-Section Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Robbery Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Deliberation Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Jurors and Death Penalty (Cf. Cruel and Unusual Punishment) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986);476 U.S. 162 CASE USREPORTS-476-162 162 16 1 1986-05-05 1985 476 U.S. 162 476 U.S. 162 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Felony Murder Juries Evidence Homicide Weapons Discrimination Witnesses Imbalanced Jury Sentencing Fair-Cross-Section Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Capital Punishment Robbery Criminal Law and Procedure Jury Deliberation Extra-Legal Jury Influences: Jurors and Death Penalty (Cf. Cruel and Unusual Punishment) Criminal Procedure 1985-081-01 State Person convicted of crime Cert Arkansas Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Federal court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-13 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (other provisions) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William H. Rehnquist Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-162 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-162.pdf 476 U.S. 207 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-207 476 U.S. 207 (1986) 476 U.S. 207 D09002ee1d4da9379 Warrants Legislative History Evidence Surveillance Drugs and Narcotics Aircraft Criminal Law and Procedure Electronic Surveillance Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement Officers Right of Privacy Constitutional Law Property Navigation Aerial Observation Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986);476 U.S. 207 CASE USREPORTS-476-207 207 17 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 207 476 U.S. 207 (1986) Warrants Legislative History Evidence Surveillance Drugs and Narcotics Aircraft Criminal Law and Procedure Electronic Surveillance Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement Officers Right of Privacy Constitutional Law Property Navigation Aerial Observation Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure 1985-082-01 State Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Cert State Trial Court State Appellate Court To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-10 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Warren Earl Burger Warren Earl Burger 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-207 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-207.pdf 476 U.S. 227 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-227 476 U.S. 227 (1986) 476 U.S. 227 D09002ee1d4da93ba Warrants Evidence Aerial Photography Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) Trade Secrets Open Fields Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Manufacturing Electronic Surveillance Inspection Law Enforcement Officers Right of Privacy Constitutional Law Property Navigation Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986);476 U.S. 227 CASE USREPORTS-476-227 227 18 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 227 476 U.S. 227 (1986) Warrants Evidence Aerial Photography Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) Trade Secrets Open Fields Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Manufacturing Electronic Surveillance Inspection Law Enforcement Officers Right of Privacy Constitutional Law Property Navigation Search and Seizure (Other than as Pertains to Vehicles or Crime Control Act) Criminal Procedure 1985-083-01 Chemical company United States Cert Environmental Protection Agency or Administrator Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-10 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment Fourth Amendment Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Warren Earl Burger Warren Earl Burger 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-227 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-227.pdf 476 U.S. 253 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-253 476 U.S. 253 (1986) 476 U.S. 253 D09002ee1d4da928d Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Employee Hiring State and Local Government Labor-Management Relations Administrative Remedies Accounting and Auditing Secretary of Labor Employment and Training Programs Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Wages and Hours Federal Funds Prejudice Legislative Powers Legislative Intention Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Brock v. Pierce County, 476 U.S. 253 (1986);476 U.S. 253 CASE USREPORTS-476-253 253 19 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 253 476 U.S. 253 (1986) Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Legislative History Employee Hiring State and Local Government Labor-Management Relations Administrative Remedies Accounting and Auditing Secretary of Labor Employment and Training Programs Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Wages and Hours Federal Funds Prejudice Legislative Powers Legislative Intention Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1985-084-01 Department or Secretary of Labor County government or county governmental unit, except school district Cert Department or Secretary of Labor U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-01 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Thurgood Marshall Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-253 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-253.pdf 476 U.S. 267 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-267 476 U.S. 267 (1986) 476 U.S. 267 D09002ee1d4da9377 Narrowly Tailored School Administration Employee Hiring Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Layoff Provision Collective Bargaining Equal Protection Minority Employment Contracts Legal Remedies Affirmative Action Burden Constitutional Law Teachers Affirmative Action Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 (1986);476 U.S. 267 CASE USREPORTS-476-267 267 20 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 267 476 U.S. 267 (1986) Narrowly Tailored School Administration Employee Hiring Discrimination Labor-Management Relations Layoff Provision Collective Bargaining Equal Protection Minority Employment Contracts Legal Remedies Affirmative Action Burden Constitutional Law Teachers Affirmative Action Civil Rights 1985-085-01 Governmental employee or job applicant Local school district or board of education Cert State Agency Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit To resolve important or significant question Warren Earl Burger 1985-11-06 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Warren Earl Burger 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-267 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-267.pdf 476 U.S. 321 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-321 476 U.S. 321 (1986) 476 U.S. 321 D09002ee1d4da9376 Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Legislative History Evidence Pretrial Motions Delay Drugs and Narcotics Speedy Trial Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.) Controlled Substances Criminal Law and Procedure Reasonably Necessary Speedy Trial Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321 (1986);476 U.S. 321 CASE USREPORTS-476-321 321 21 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 321 476 U.S. 321 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Legislative History Evidence Pretrial Motions Delay Drugs and Narcotics Speedy Trial Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.) Controlled Substances Criminal Law and Procedure Reasonably Necessary Speedy Trial Criminal Procedure 1985-086-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime United States Cert California Northern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-01 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Warren Earl Burger 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-321 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-321.pdf 476 U.S. 340 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-340 476 U.S. 340 (1986) 476 U.S. 340 D09002ee1d4da92f4 Wage Earner Survivors' Benefits Beneficiaries Divorce Due Process Equal Protection Eligibility Requirements Civil Procedure Marriage and Family Status Widowed Spouse District Courts Constitutional Law Discrimination Poverty Law, Constitutional Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Bowen v. Owens, 476 U.S. 340 (1986);476 U.S. 340 CASE USREPORTS-476-340 340 22 1 1986-05-19 1985 476 U.S. 340 476 U.S. 340 (1986) Wage Earner Survivors' Benefits Beneficiaries Divorce Due Process Equal Protection Eligibility Requirements Civil Procedure Marriage and Family Status Widowed Spouse District Courts Constitutional Law Discrimination Poverty Law, Constitutional Civil Rights 1985-087-01 Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be Appeal Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services California Central U.S. District Court California Central U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-02-26 Judicial review (national level) Federal Statute Social Security, as amended, including Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-340 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-340.pdf 476 U.S. 355 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-355 476 U.S. 355 (1986) 476 U.S. 355 D09002ee1d4da937c Administrative Law Competition and Antitrust Jurisdiction and Venue Legislative History Reserves Intrastate Telecommunications Preemption Supremacy Clause Accounting and Auditing Conflicts of Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Telephone Companies Constitutional Law Depreciation Revenues Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Louisiana Public Service Comm'n v. FCC, 476 U.S. 355 (1986);476 U.S. 355 CASE USREPORTS-476-355 355 23 1 1986-05-27 1985 476 U.S. 355 476 U.S. 355 (1986) Administrative Law Competition and Antitrust Jurisdiction and Venue Legislative History Reserves Intrastate Telecommunications Preemption Supremacy Clause Accounting and Auditing Conflicts of Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Telephone Companies Constitutional Law Depreciation Revenues Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1985-088-01 State commission, board, committee, or authority Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) Cert Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission) U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-13 Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Communication Act of 1934, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William J. Brennan, Jr. William J. Brennan, Jr. 5 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-355 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-355.pdf 476 U.S. 380 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-380 476 U.S. 380 (1986) 476 U.S. 380 D09002ee1d4da9395 Jurisdiction and Venue Juries Evidence Labor Unions Ships and Boats Preemption Torts Longshoremen Labor-Management Relations National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) Labor and Employment Law Supervisors Civil Procedure Burden Wages and Hours Constitutional Law Discrimination No Merits: Adequate Non-Federal Grounds for Decision Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Longshoremen v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380 (1986);476 U.S. 380 CASE USREPORTS-476-380 380 24 1 1986-05-27 1985 476 U.S. 380 476 U.S. 380 (1986) Jurisdiction and Venue Juries Evidence Labor Unions Ships and Boats Preemption Torts Longshoremen Labor-Management Relations National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) Labor and Employment Law Supervisors Civil Procedure Burden Wages and Hours Constitutional Law Discrimination No Merits: Adequate Non-Federal Grounds for Decision Judicial Power 1985-089-01 Union, labor organization, or official of Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Appeal National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-02-25 Statutory construction Federal Statute National Labor Relations, as amended Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-380 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-380.pdf 476 U.S. 409 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-409 476 U.S. 409 (1986) 476 U.S. 409 D09002ee1d4da92f5 Competition and Antitrust Legislative History Conspiracy Motor Vehicles Discrimination Interstate Commerce Injunctions Treble Damages Sherman Act Motor Carriers Legal Remedies Nonprofit Corporations Shipping Judicial Interpretation Antitrust Law Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bur., 476 U.S. 409 (1986);476 U.S. 409 CASE USREPORTS-476-409 409 25 1 1986-05-27 1985 476 U.S. 409 476 U.S. 409 (1986) Competition and Antitrust Legislative History Conspiracy Motor Vehicles Discrimination Interstate Commerce Injunctions Treble Damages Sherman Act Motor Carriers Legal Remedies Nonprofit Corporations Shipping Judicial Interpretation Antitrust Law Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity 1985-090-01 Shipper, including importer and exporter Trucking company, or motor carrier Cert Interstate Commerce Commission U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-03 Federal common law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-409 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-409.pdf 476 U.S. 426 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-426 476 U.S. 426 (1986) 476 U.S. 426 D09002ee1d4da933a Interpretation Legislative History Evidence Deposit Insurance Deposits Banks and Financial Institutions Interest Promissory Note Business and Corporate Law Assets Goods and Services Financial Services Letters of Credit Miscellaneous Economic Regulation Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;FDIC v. Philadelphia Gear Corp., 476 U.S. 426 (1986);476 U.S. 426 CASE USREPORTS-476-426 426 26 1 1986-05-27 1985 476 U.S. 426 476 U.S. 426 (1986) Interpretation Legislative History Evidence Deposit Insurance Deposits Banks and Financial Institutions Interest Promissory Note Business and Corporate Law Assets Goods and Services Financial Services Letters of Credit Miscellaneous Economic Regulation Economic Activity 1985-091-01 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Seller or vendor Cert Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Oklahoma Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-04 Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-426 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-426.pdf 476 U.S. 445 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-445 476 U.S. 445 (1986) 476 U.S. 445 D09002ee1d4da9373 Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Public Service Comm'n v. C & P Tel. Co., 476 U.S. 445 (1986);476 U.S. 445 CASE USREPORTS-476-445 445 27 1 1986-05-27 1985 476 U.S. 445 476 U.S. 445 (1986) Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1985-092-01 State commission, board, committee, or authority Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Cert Maryland U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-13 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Per curiam (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Warren Earl Burger 7 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-445 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-445.pdf 476 U.S. 447 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-447 476 U.S. 447 (1986) 476 U.S. 447 D09002ee1d4da9398 Medical Personnel Administrative Law Competition and Antitrust Evidence Health Insurance Conspiracy Dentists Medical Treatment Dental Treatments Administrative Remedies Alternative Benefits X-Rays Sherman Act Restraint Restraints of Trade Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Policyholders Antitrust Law Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;FTC v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447 (1986);476 U.S. 447 CASE USREPORTS-476-447 447 28 1 1986-06-02 1985 476 U.S. 447 476 U.S. 447 (1986) Medical Personnel Administrative Law Competition and Antitrust Evidence Health Insurance Conspiracy Dentists Medical Treatment Dental Treatments Administrative Remedies Alternative Benefits X-Rays Sherman Act Restraint Restraints of Trade Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Policyholders Antitrust Law Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity 1985-093-01 Federal Trade Commission Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Cert Federal Trade Commission U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-25 Statutory construction Federal common law Federal Statute Federal Trade Commission Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Byron Raymond White Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-447 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-447.pdf 476 U.S. 467 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-467 476 U.S. 467 (1986) 476 U.S. 467 D09002ee1d4da93bb Administrative Law Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Statute of Limitations Mental Health Administrative Courts Social Security Administration Administrative Remedies Disability Benefits Eligibility Legal Remedies Civil Procedure People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Social Workers Equitable Tolling Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Bowen. v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467 (1986);476 U.S. 467 CASE USREPORTS-476-467 467 29 1 1986-06-02 1985 476 U.S. 467 476 U.S. 467 (1986) Administrative Law Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Statute of Limitations Mental Health Administrative Courts Social Security Administration Administrative Remedies Disability Benefits Eligibility Legal Remedies Civil Procedure People with Disabilities Constitutional Law Social Workers Equitable Tolling Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights 1985-094-01 Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cert Social Security Administration or Commissioner New York Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-02-26 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Federal Statute Social Security, as amended, including Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-467 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-467.pdf 476 U.S. 488 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-488 476 U.S. 488 (1986) 476 U.S. 488 D09002ee1d4da9375 Competition and Antitrust Sherman Act Telecommunications Discrimination Public Utilities and Utility Rates Freedom of Speech Equal Protection Utility Poles Franchises Television Companies Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, Inc., 476 U.S. 488 (1986);476 U.S. 488 CASE USREPORTS-476-488 488 30 1 1986-06-02 1985 476 U.S. 488 476 U.S. 488 (1986) Competition and Antitrust Sherman Act Telecommunications Discrimination Public Utilities and Utility Rates Freedom of Speech Equal Protection Utility Poles Franchises Television Companies Constitutional Law First Amendment, Miscellaneous (Cf. Comity: First Amendment) First Amendment 1985-095-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Cable TV Cert State Agency California Central U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-29 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William H. Rehnquist Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-488 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-488.pdf 476 U.S. 498 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-498 476 U.S. 498 (1986) 476 U.S. 498 D09002ee1d4da93b5 Termination Act American Indians Legislative History Statute of Limitations Federal Indian and Tribal Law Land Titles Boundaries Indigenous Peoples Legislative Intent Public Lands Tribal Immunity Native Americans Catawba Tribe North America Government Property Tribal Lands Property Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc., 476 U.S. 498 (1986);476 U.S. 498 CASE USREPORTS-476-498 498 31 1 1986-06-02 1985 476 U.S. 498 476 U.S. 498 (1986) Termination Act American Indians Legislative History Statute of Limitations Federal Indian and Tribal Law Land Titles Boundaries Indigenous Peoples Legislative Intent Public Lands Tribal Immunity Native Americans Catawba Tribe North America Government Property Tribal Lands Property Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights 1985-096-01 State Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert South Carolina U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit To resolve important or significant question Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-12 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-498 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-498.pdf 476 U.S. 530 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-530 476 U.S. 530 (1986) 476 U.S. 530 D09002ee1d4da9338 Cross Examination Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Confession Premeditation and Deliberation Evidence Miranda Rights Homicide Weapons Legal Counsel Self-Defense Witnesses Confrontation Clause Statement Questioning Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Interlocking Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Intent Confrontation (Right to Confront Accuser, Call and Cross-Examine Witnesses) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Lee v. Illinois, 476 U.S. 530 (1986);476 U.S. 530 CASE USREPORTS-476-530 530 32 1 1986-06-03 1985 476 U.S. 530 476 U.S. 530 (1986) Cross Examination Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Confession Premeditation and Deliberation Evidence Miranda Rights Homicide Weapons Legal Counsel Self-Defense Witnesses Confrontation Clause Statement Questioning Lawyers and Legal Services Sentencing Interlocking Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Intent Confrontation (Right to Confront Accuser, Call and Cross-Examine Witnesses) Criminal Procedure 1985-097-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Appellate Court No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1985-12-09 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William J. Brennan, Jr. William J. Brennan, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-530 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-530.pdf 476 U.S. 558 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-558 476 U.S. 558 (1986) 476 U.S. 558 D09002ee1d4da93b9 Tax Reform Death Tax Estate Taxes Tax Benefits Transitional Rule Due Process Tax Administration and Collection Heirs Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Legislative Purpose Gift Tax Taxation Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Double Taxation Treaties Constitutional Law Real Estate Property Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;United States v. Hemme, 476 U.S. 558 (1986);476 U.S. 558 CASE USREPORTS-476-558 558 33 1 1986-06-03 1985 476 U.S. 558 476 U.S. 558 (1986) Tax Reform Death Tax Estate Taxes Tax Benefits Transitional Rule Due Process Tax Administration and Collection Heirs Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Legislative Purpose Gift Tax Taxation Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Double Taxation Treaties Constitutional Law Real Estate Property Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation 1985-098-01 United States Taxpayer or executor of taxpayer's estate, federal only Appeal Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of Illinois Southern U.S. District Court Illinois Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute Internal Revenue Code and pre-IRC revenue acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Thurgood Marshall Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-558 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-558.pdf 476 U.S. 573 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-573 476 U.S. 573 (1986) 476 U.S. 573 D09002ee1d4da92f6 Competition and Antitrust State and Local Government Liquor Distiller Wholesalers Price Schedule Commerce Clause Discrimination Marketing and Advertising Boundaries Territories and Protectorates Alcoholic Beverages State Authority Licensing and Permits Price Affirmation Manufacturing Business and Corporate Law Goods and Services Constitutional Law State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Brown-Forman Distillers v. N. Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573 (1986);476 U.S. 573 CASE USREPORTS-476-573 573 34 1 1986-06-03 1985 476 U.S. 573 476 U.S. 573 (1986) Competition and Antitrust State and Local Government Liquor Distiller Wholesalers Price Schedule Commerce Clause Discrimination Marketing and Advertising Boundaries Territories and Protectorates Alcoholic Beverages State Authority Licensing and Permits Price Affirmation Manufacturing Business and Corporate Law Goods and Services Constitutional Law State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1985-099-01 Brewery, distillery State commission, board, committee, or authority Appeal State Agency State Appellate Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-03 Judicial review (state level) Constitution Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Thurgood Marshall Warren Earl Burger 5 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-573 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-573.pdf 476 U.S. 593 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-593 476 U.S. 593 (1986) 476 U.S. 593 D09002ee1d4da9378 Income Tax Casino Bankruptcy Tax Avoidance Progressive Machine Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Slot Machines Gambling Accounting and Auditing Jackpot Withholding Tax Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc., 476 U.S. 593 (1986);476 U.S. 593 CASE USREPORTS-476-593 593 35 1 1986-06-03 1985 476 U.S. 593 476 U.S. 593 (1986) Income Tax Casino Bankruptcy Tax Avoidance Progressive Machine Tax Administration and Collection Tax Law Slot Machines Gambling Accounting and Auditing Jackpot Withholding Tax Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation 1985-100-01 United States Taxpayer or executor of taxpayer's estate, federal only Cert Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit Federal court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-23 Statutory construction Federal Statute Internal Revenue Code and pre-IRC revenue acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Harry A. Blackmun William J. Brennan, Jr. 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-593 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-593.pdf 476 U.S. 610 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-610 476 U.S. 610 (1986) 476 U.S. 610 D09002ee1d4da92fa Medical Personnel Health Promotion and Preventative Care Administrative Law Legislative History Evidence Health Care Pre-Existing Conditions Mental Health Discrimination Due Process Investigations Birth Defects Administrative Remedies Child Protective Services Corrective Surgery Handicap Final Rules Restraining Order Regulations Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Medical Neglect Federal Funds Child Health Parental Consent Health Facilities and Institutions Health Care Funding People with Disabilities Legislative Powers Infants Federal Financial Assistance Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Bowen v. American Hospital Ass., 476 U.S. 610 (1986);476 U.S. 610 CASE USREPORTS-476-610 610 36 1 1986-06-09 1985 476 U.S. 610 476 U.S. 610 (1986) Medical Personnel Health Promotion and Preventative Care Administrative Law Legislative History Evidence Health Care Pre-Existing Conditions Mental Health Discrimination Due Process Investigations Birth Defects Administrative Remedies Child Protective Services Corrective Surgery Handicap Final Rules Restraining Order Regulations Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Medical Neglect Federal Funds Child Health Parental Consent Health Facilities and Institutions Health Care Funding People with Disabilities Legislative Powers Infants Federal Financial Assistance Handicapped, Rights Of: Under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Related Statutes Civil Rights 1985-101-01 Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services Hospital, medical center Cert Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-15 Statutory construction Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Federal Statute Rehabilitation Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 5 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-610 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-610.pdf 476 U.S. 667 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-667 476 U.S. 667 (1986) 476 U.S. 667 D09002ee1d4da9394 Medical Personnel Administrative Law Legislative History Evidence Health Insurance Health Benefits Health Care Funding Constitutional Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Administrative Remedies Administrative Agencies Medicare Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Bowen v. Mich. Academy of Family Physicians, 476 U.S. 667 (1986);476 U.S. 667 CASE USREPORTS-476-667 667 37 1 1986-06-09 1985 476 U.S. 667 476 U.S. 667 (1986) Medical Personnel Administrative Law Legislative History Evidence Health Insurance Health Benefits Health Care Funding Constitutional Law Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Administrative Remedies Administrative Agencies Medicare Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1985-102-01 Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Cert Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-22 Statutory construction Federal Statute Medicare provisions of the Social Security Act Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-667 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-667.pdf 476 U.S. 683 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-683 476 U.S. 683 (1986) 476 U.S. 683 D09002ee1d4da9374 Prisoners' Rights Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Confession Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Homicide Voluntariness Credibility Due Process Witnesses Legal Counsel Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Lawyers and Legal Services Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Robbery Testimony Involuntary Confession Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986);476 U.S. 683 CASE USREPORTS-476-683 683 38 1 1986-06-09 1985 476 U.S. 683 476 U.S. 683 (1986) Prisoners' Rights Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Confession Evidence Criminal Law and Procedure Homicide Voluntariness Credibility Due Process Witnesses Legal Counsel Correctional Facilities and Imprisonment Lawyers and Legal Services Law Enforcement Officers Constitutional Law Robbery Testimony Involuntary Confession Criminal Procedure 1985-103-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime State Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court State court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-23 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-683 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-683.pdf 476 U.S. 693 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-693 476 U.S. 693 (1986) 476 U.S. 693 D09002ee1d4da92f1 American Indians Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Religion Discrimination Religion Poverty and Welfare Assistance Spiritual Power Indigenous Peoples Administrative Remedies Injunctions Social Security Number Legal Remedies Native Americans Food Stamps Abenaki Tribe Religious Liberty North America Mootness Constitutional Law Free Exercise of Religion First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Bowen v. Roy, 476 U.S. 693 (1986);476 U.S. 693 CASE USREPORTS-476-693 693 39 1 1986-06-11 1985 476 U.S. 693 476 U.S. 693 (1986) American Indians Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Religion Discrimination Religion Poverty and Welfare Assistance Spiritual Power Indigenous Peoples Administrative Remedies Injunctions Social Security Number Legal Remedies Native Americans Food Stamps Abenaki Tribe Religious Liberty North America Mootness Constitutional Law Free Exercise of Religion First Amendment 1985-104-01 Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services Indigent, needy, welfare recipient Appeal State Agency Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-14 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment First Amendment (free exercise of religion) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Warren Earl Burger Warren Earl Burger 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-693 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-693.pdf 476 U.S. 734 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-734 476 U.S. 734 (1986) 476 U.S. 734 D09002ee1d4da928e Juries Legislative History Evidence Indigenous Peoples Freedom of Religion Federal Indian and Tribal Law Birds Exclusive Treaty Rights Yankton Sioux Tribe Religion Endangered Species American Indians Public Lands Hunting and Fishing Native Americans Eagle Protection Act Bald Eagles North America Indian Treaties Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;United States v. Dion, 476 U.S. 734 (1986);476 U.S. 734 CASE USREPORTS-476-734 734 40 1 1986-06-11 1985 476 U.S. 734 476 U.S. 734 (1986) Juries Legislative History Evidence Indigenous Peoples Freedom of Religion Federal Indian and Tribal Law Birds Exclusive Treaty Rights Yankton Sioux Tribe Religion Endangered Species American Indians Public Lands Hunting and Fishing Native Americans Eagle Protection Act Bald Eagles North America Indian Treaties Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 1985-105-01 United States Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert South Dakota U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-25 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Thurgood Marshall Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-734 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-734.pdf 476 U.S. 747 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-747 476 U.S. 747 (1986) 476 U.S. 747 D09002ee1d4da9392 Medical Personnel Appellate Jurisdiction Jurisdiction and Venue Family Planning and Birth Control Pregnancy State and Local Government Viability Injunctions Medical Risks Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Roe V. Wade Criminal Law and Procedure Freedom of Choice Health Facilities and Institutions Informed Consent Abortion District Courts Maternal Health Constitutional Law Emergency Medical Services Abortion: Including Contraceptives Privacy United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Thornburgh v. American Coll. Of Obst. & GYN, 476 U.S. 747 (1986);476 U.S. 747 CASE USREPORTS-476-747 747 41 1 1986-06-11 1985 476 U.S. 747 476 U.S. 747 (1986) Medical Personnel Appellate Jurisdiction Jurisdiction and Venue Family Planning and Birth Control Pregnancy State and Local Government Viability Injunctions Medical Risks Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Roe V. Wade Criminal Law and Procedure Freedom of Choice Health Facilities and Institutions Informed Consent Abortion District Courts Maternal Health Constitutional Law Emergency Medical Services Abortion: Including Contraceptives Privacy 1985-106-01 State Physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit No reason given Warren Earl Burger 1985-11-05 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Harry A. Blackmun William J. Brennan, Jr. 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-747 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-747.pdf 476 U.S. 834 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-834 476 U.S. 834 (1986) 476 U.S. 834 D09002ee1d4da93c9 Jurisdiction and Venue Reservations Quiet Title Trusts and Estates Statute of Limitations Due Process Land Titles Injunctions Public Lands Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Market Value Property Law Government Property Allotment Consent Forms Real Estate Property Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;United States v. Mottaz, 476 U.S. 834 (1986);476 U.S. 834 CASE USREPORTS-476-834 834 42 1 1986-06-11 1985 476 U.S. 834 476 U.S. 834 (1986) Jurisdiction and Venue Reservations Quiet Title Trusts and Estates Statute of Limitations Due Process Land Titles Injunctions Public Lands Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Legal Remedies Civil Procedure Market Value Property Law Government Property Allotment Consent Forms Real Estate Property Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 1985-107-01 United States Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert Minnesota U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit To resolve important or significant question Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-22 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Harry A. Blackmun Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-834 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-834.pdf 476 U.S. 852 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-852 476 U.S. 852 (1986) 476 U.S. 852 D09002ee1d4da93bc Trusts and Estates Wedlock Divorce Heirs Discrimination State Interest Inheritance and Succession Civil Procedure Marriage and Family Status Legitimation Family Law Constitutional Law Real Estate Property Illegitimates, Rights of (Cf. Juveniles): Typically Inheritance and Survivor's Benefits, and Paternity Suits Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Reed v. Campbell, 476 U.S. 852 (1986);476 U.S. 852 CASE USREPORTS-476-852 852 43 1 1986-06-11 1985 476 U.S. 852 476 U.S. 852 (1986) Trusts and Estates Wedlock Divorce Heirs Discrimination State Interest Inheritance and Succession Civil Procedure Marriage and Family Status Legitimation Family Law Constitutional Law Real Estate Property Illegitimates, Rights of (Cf. Juveniles): Typically Inheritance and Survivor's Benefits, and Paternity Suits Civil Rights 1985-108-01 Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be Father Appeal State Trial Court State Appellate Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-30 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Paul Stevens Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-852 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-852.pdf 476 U.S. 858 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-858 476 U.S. 858 (1986) 476 U.S. 858 D09002ee1d4da93b4 Warranty Negligence Jurisdiction and Venue Turbine Ships and Boats Torts Property Damage Product Liability Hazardous Equipment Contracts Legal Remedies Strict Liability Admiralty Jurisdiction Manufacturing Inland Water Transportation Charterers Maritime and Admiralty Law Property Inspection Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;East River S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, 476 U.S. 858 (1986);476 U.S. 858 CASE USREPORTS-476-858 858 44 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 858 476 U.S. 858 (1986) Warranty Negligence Jurisdiction and Venue Turbine Ships and Boats Torts Property Damage Product Liability Hazardous Equipment Contracts Legal Remedies Strict Liability Admiralty Jurisdiction Manufacturing Inland Water Transportation Charterers Maritime and Admiralty Law Property Inspection Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1985-109-01 Water transportation, stevedore Manufacturer Cert New Jersey U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Federal court conflict Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-21 Federal common law Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Harry A. Blackmun Warren Earl Burger 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-858 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-858.pdf 476 U.S. 877 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-877 476 U.S. 877 (1986) 476 U.S. 877 D09002ee1d4da93cb Negligence Jurisdiction and Venue Reservations American Indians Self-Governance Federal Indian and Tribal Law Due Process State and Local Government Boundaries Territories and Protectorates Indigenous Peoples Equal Protection Public Lands Contracts State and Local Courts Indian Country Native Americans North America Constitutional Law Sovereign Immunity Property Waiver Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Three Affiliated Tribes v. Wold Engineering, 476 U.S. 877 (1986);476 U.S. 877 CASE USREPORTS-476-877 877 45 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 877 476 U.S. 877 (1986) Negligence Jurisdiction and Venue Reservations American Indians Self-Governance Federal Indian and Tribal Law Due Process State and Local Government Boundaries Territories and Protectorates Indigenous Peoples Equal Protection Public Lands Contracts State and Local Courts Indian Country Native Americans North America Constitutional Law Sovereign Immunity Property Waiver Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights 1985-110-01 Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Construction industry Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-24 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-877 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-877.pdf 476 U.S. 898 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-898 476 U.S. 898 (1986) 476 U.S. 898 D09002ee1d4da933e Civil Service Employment Military Service Discrimination Poverty and Welfare Assistance Equal Protection Veterans Military Law Right to Travel Armed Forces Military Assistance Residential Requirement Constitutional Law Military Personnel Residency Requirements: Durational, Plus Discrimination Against Nonresidents Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Attorney General of N. Y. v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986);476 U.S. 898 CASE USREPORTS-476-898 898 46 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 898 476 U.S. 898 (1986) Civil Service Employment Military Service Discrimination Poverty and Welfare Assistance Equal Protection Veterans Military Law Right to Travel Armed Forces Military Assistance Residential Requirement Constitutional Law Military Personnel Residency Requirements: Durational, Plus Discrimination Against Nonresidents Civil Rights 1985-111-01 State Veteran Appeal State Agency New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-01-15 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) Judgment of the Court (orally argued) State or territorial law, reg, or const provision unconstitutional Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William J. Brennan, Jr. Warren Earl Burger 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-898 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-898.pdf 476 U.S. 926 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-926 476 U.S. 926 (1986) 476 U.S. 926 D09002ee1d4da93b7 Administrative Law Loan Program Disasters Disaster Relief Farmers Agricultural Subsidies Government Lending and Loan Guarantees Administrative Remedies Injunctions Equitable Estoppel Notice Contracts Legal Remedies Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Loan Application District Courts Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926 (1986);476 U.S. 926 CASE USREPORTS-476-926 926 47 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 926 476 U.S. 926 (1986) Administrative Law Loan Program Disasters Disaster Relief Farmers Agricultural Subsidies Government Lending and Loan Guarantees Administrative Remedies Injunctions Equitable Estoppel Notice Contracts Legal Remedies Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Loan Application District Courts Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 1985-112-01 Department or Secretary of Agriculture Farmer, farm worker, or farm organization Cert Farmers Home Administration Florida Middle U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit To resolve important or significant question Warren Earl Burger 1986-03-24 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (takings clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-926 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-926.pdf 476 U.S. 953 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-953 476 U.S. 953 (1986) 476 U.S. 953 D09002ee1d4da9289 Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Water Law Interstate Commerce Water Resources Hydroelectric Facilities Public Utilities and Utility Rates Wholesale Rates Entitlement Power Contracts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Power Generation and Transmission Purchased Power Retail Operations Energy Law Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Nantahala Power & Light v. Thornburg, 476 U.S. 953 (1986);476 U.S. 953 CASE USREPORTS-476-953 953 48 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 953 476 U.S. 953 (1986) Jurisdiction and Venue Evidence Water Law Interstate Commerce Water Resources Hydroelectric Facilities Public Utilities and Utility Rates Wholesale Rates Entitlement Power Contracts Administrative Law and Regulatory Procedure Power Generation and Transmission Purchased Power Retail Operations Energy Law Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1985-113-01 Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Appeal State Agency State Appellate Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-21 Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal Power Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 7 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-953 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-953.pdf 476 U.S. 974 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-974 476 U.S. 974 (1986) 476 U.S. 974 D09002ee1d4da93c8 Health Promotion and Preventative Care Food Industry Tolerance Level Legislative History Aflatoxin Poisonous Interstate Commerce Public Health Harmful Substances Corn Deleterious Substances Business and Corporate Law Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) Food Production Food Safety Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Young v. Community Nutrition Institute, 476 U.S. 974 (1986);476 U.S. 974 CASE USREPORTS-476-974 974 49 1 1986-06-16 1985 476 U.S. 974 476 U.S. 974 (1986) Health Promotion and Preventative Care Food Industry Tolerance Level Legislative History Aflatoxin Poisonous Interstate Commerce Public Health Harmful Substances Corn Deleterious Substances Business and Corporate Law Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) Food Production Food Safety Judicial Review of Administrative Agency's or Administrative Official's Actions and Procedures Judicial Power 1985-114-01 Food and Drug Administration Consumer, consumer organization Cert Food and Drug Administration District Of Columbia U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) To resolve question presented Warren Earl Burger 1986-04-30 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order Statutory construction Federal Statute Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic, and related statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Sandra Day O'Connor Warren Earl Burger 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-974 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-974.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1d4da937b United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Reporter's Note BACKMATTER USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-2 50 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter D09002ee1d4da92f7 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Orders BACKMATTER USREPORTS-476-BackMatter 51 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter.pdf 476 U.S. 1301 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-1301 476 U.S. 1301 (1986) 476 U.S. 1301 D09002ee1d4da92f3 Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Harmlessness Homicide Jury Instructions Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Intent United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;California v. Hamilton, 476 U.S. 1301 (1986);476 U.S. 1301 CASE USREPORTS-476-1301 1301 52 1 1986-01-01 476 U.S. 1301 476 U.S. 1301 (1986) Trials and Court Proceedings Juries Evidence Harmlessness Homicide Jury Instructions Sentencing Criminal Law and Procedure Prejudice Capital Punishment Criminal Intent https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-1301 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-1301.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1d4da928a United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1985, April 29 through June 17, 1986, together with opinions of individual justices in chambers;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-3 53 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-476/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-476/pdf/USREPORTS-476-BackMatter-3.pdf