United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Supreme Court author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USREPORTS Judicial Publications judicial 2025-07-05 JU 6.8/1:250 United States Supreme Court author aut https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/text/USREPORTS-250.txt United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919 USREPORTS USREPORTS-250 250 1920 1918-1919 cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at United States Supreme Court. creator text law report or digest Digests. Periodicals. dcu Washington, D.C.] U.S. Supreme Court 1920 1883 9999 continuing Irregular eng 1 online resource (volumes) Print began with: [Vol. 108] (Oct. term 1882 ... Oct. term 1883). n-us--- United States. Supreme Court Periodicals Law reports, digests, etc United States Constitutional law United States Digests Judicial opinions United States United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law Judicial opinions Law reports, digests, etc United States ISSN RECORD 348 JU 6.8/1:250 United States. Supreme Court. 0891-6845 (DLC) 01026074 (OCoLC)4384322 United States. Supreme Court. (OCoLC)26859335 0741-A (online) 2150-2331 2009231052 https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS30185 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes.aspx https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54225 https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/USREP/browse/ https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo94050 https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-reports/ https://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/locate.jsp?ItemNumber=0741-A&SYS=000641007 Banks Law Publishing Co. 1920-01-01 continuing Completely irregular converted reformatted digital 814 digital object pages JU 6.8/1:250 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250 P0b002ee1d4bc2a36 000641007 DGPO 2025-07-05 2025-07-05 USREPORTS-250 machine generated eng fdlp USREPORTS USREPORTS-250 250 1920 1918-1919 Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-7 D09002ee1d4cabd68 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Title Page FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-7 1 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-7.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-3 D09002ee1d4cabddf United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Errata FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-3 2 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-3.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter D09002ee1d4cabde6 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Justices of the Supreme Court FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter 3 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-6 D09002ee1d4cabd9b United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Supreme Court of the United States FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-6 4 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-6.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-2 D09002ee1d4cabdeb United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Table of Cases Reported FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-2 5 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-2.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-5 D09002ee1d4cabd95 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Table of Cases Cited FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-5 6 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-5.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-8 D09002ee1d4cabd6e United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Table of Statutes Cited FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-8 7 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-8.pdf 250 U.S. 1 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-1 250 U.S. 1 (1919) 250 U.S. 1 D09002ee1d4cabd98 Property Forts and Fortifications Government Property Property Law Seized Land Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Portsmouth Harbor Land &(and) Hotel Company et al. v. United States, 250 U.S. 1 (1919);250 U.S. 1 CASE USREPORTS-250-1 1 8 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 1 250 U.S. 1 (1919) Property Forts and Fortifications Government Property Property Law Seized Land Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 1918-037-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-01 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Per curiam (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-1.pdf 250 U.S. 2 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-2 250 U.S. 2 (1919) 250 U.S. 2 D09002ee1d4cabdb9 Full Faith and Credit Contracts Agency Conflict of Laws Constitutional Law Insurance Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U.S. 2 (1919);250 U.S. 2 CASE USREPORTS-250-2 2 9 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 2 250 U.S. 2 (1919) Full Faith and Credit Contracts Agency Conflict of Laws Constitutional Law Insurance Due Process: Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Litigants) Due Process 1918-038-01 Insurance company, or surety Forest products, lumber, or logging company Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-22 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-2.pdf 250 U.S. 14 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-14 250 U.S. 14 (1919) 250 U.S. 14 D09002ee1d4cabd99 Lumber Public Lands Contracts Tie Slash Government Property Law Timber Rights Federal or State Regulation of Transportation Regulation: Railroad Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Caldwell v. United States, 250 U.S. 14 (1919);250 U.S. 14 CASE USREPORTS-250-14 14 10 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 14 250 U.S. 14 (1919) Lumber Public Lands Contracts Tie Slash Government Property Law Timber Rights Federal or State Regulation of Transportation Regulation: Railroad Economic Activity 1918-039-01 Timber company United States Appeal United States Forest Service U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-14 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-14.pdf 250 U.S. 22 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-22 250 U.S. 22 (1919) 250 U.S. 22 D09002ee1d4cabdbd Eminent Domain Southeast Asia Philippines Railroads Property Law Statutory Construction Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Tayabas Land Co. v. Manila R. R. Co., 250 U.S. 22 (1919);250 U.S. 22 CASE USREPORTS-250-22 22 11 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 22 250 U.S. 22 (1919) Eminent Domain Southeast Asia Philippines Railroads Property Law Statutory Construction Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1918-040-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Railroad Writ of error Territorial Trial Court Territorial Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-25 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-22 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-22.pdf 250 U.S. 28 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-28 250 U.S. 28 (1919) 250 U.S. 28 D09002ee1d4cab899 Intellectual Property Law Labels Intellectual Property Beer Trademarks Beer Bottles Unlawful Imitation Patents and Copyrights: Trademark Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Houston Ice Co., 250 U.S. 28 (1919);250 U.S. 28 CASE USREPORTS-250-28 28 12 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 28 250 U.S. 28 (1919) Intellectual Property Law Labels Intellectual Property Beer Trademarks Beer Bottles Unlawful Imitation Patents and Copyrights: Trademark Economic Activity 1918-041-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Brewery, distillery Cert Texas Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-28 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-28.pdf 250 U.S. 30 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-30 250 U.S. 30 (1919) 250 U.S. 30 D09002ee1d4cabe13 Erroneously Collected Refunds Taxation Tax Law Illegally Assessed Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims: Over Those of the States or Private Entities Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Coleman v. United States, 250 U.S. 30 (1919);250 U.S. 30 CASE USREPORTS-250-30 30 13 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 30 250 U.S. 30 (1919) Erroneously Collected Refunds Taxation Tax Law Illegally Assessed Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims: Over Those of the States or Private Entities Federal Taxation 1918-042-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor United States Appeal Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-29 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-30 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-30.pdf 250 U.S. 33 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-33 250 U.S. 33 (1919) 250 U.S. 33 D09002ee1d4cabd8b Erroneously Collected Refunds Taxation Tax Law Illegally Assessed Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims: Over Those of the States or Private Entities Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Sage v. United States, 250 U.S. 33 (1919);250 U.S. 33 CASE USREPORTS-250-33 33 14 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 33 250 U.S. 33 (1919) Erroneously Collected Refunds Taxation Tax Law Illegally Assessed Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims: Over Those of the States or Private Entities Federal Taxation 1918-043-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor United States Appeal Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-29 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-33 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-33.pdf 250 U.S. 39 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-39 250 U.S. 39 (1919) 250 U.S. 39 D09002ee1d4cabe08 Boundaries Boundary Fix Equity Borders State Boundaries Boundary Dispute Between States Interstate Relations United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Arkansas v. Mississippi, 250 U.S. 39 (1919);250 U.S. 39 CASE USREPORTS-250-39 39 15 1 1919-03-19 1918 250 U.S. 39 250 U.S. 39 (1919) Boundaries Boundary Fix Equity Borders State Boundaries Boundary Dispute Between States Interstate Relations 1918-044-01 State State Original Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-03 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Favorable disposition for petitioning party unclear William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-39 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-39.pdf 250 U.S. 46 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-46 250 U.S. 46 (1919) 250 U.S. 46 D09002ee1d4cab894 Contracts Law Conversion Contracts Dams and Canals Government Seizure of Property Public Contracts and Procurement Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Ball Engineering Co. v. White & Co., 250 U.S. 46 (1919);250 U.S. 46 CASE USREPORTS-250-46 46 16 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 46 250 U.S. 46 (1919) Contracts Law Conversion Contracts Dams and Canals Government Seizure of Property Public Contracts and Procurement Liability, Governmental: Tort or Contract Actions by or Against Government or Governmental Officials Other than Defense of Criminal Actions Brought Under a Civil Rights Action. Economic Activity 1918-045-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Government contractor Cert Secretary or administrative unit or personnel of the U.S. Army Connecticut U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit To resolve important or significant question Edward Douglass White 1919-03-13 Judicial review (national level) Constitutional Amendment Fifth Amendment (takings clause) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-46 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-46.pdf 250 U.S. 58 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-58 250 U.S. 58 (1919) 250 U.S. 58 D09002ee1d4cabdea American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Heirs Indigenous Peoples Partition Suit Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Estates Osage Tribe Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Kenny v. Miles, 250 U.S. 58 (1919);250 U.S. 58 CASE USREPORTS-250-58 58 17 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 58 250 U.S. 58 (1919) American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Heirs Indigenous Peoples Partition Suit Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Estates Osage Tribe Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights 1918-046-01 Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert Department or Secretary of the Interior State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve question presented Edward Douglass White 1919-01-24 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-58 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-58.pdf 250 U.S. 66 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-66 250 U.S. 66 (1919) 250 U.S. 66 D09002ee1d4cabd6c Oil and Gas American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Creek Tribe Indigenous Peoples Royalties Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Parker v. Riley, 250 U.S. 66 (1919);250 U.S. 66 CASE USREPORTS-250-66 66 18 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 66 250 U.S. 66 (1919) Oil and Gas American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Creek Tribe Indigenous Peoples Royalties Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights 1918-047-01 Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Appeal Department or Secretary of the Interior Oklahoma Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-66 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-66.pdf 250 U.S. 71 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-71 250 U.S. 71 (1919) 250 U.S. 71 D09002ee1d4cabda5 Boundaries Property Property Law Replevin Mississippi River Timber No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Rust Land Co. v. Jackson, 250 U.S. 71 (1919);250 U.S. 71 CASE USREPORTS-250-71 71 19 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 71 250 U.S. 71 (1919) Boundaries Property Property Law Replevin Mississippi River Timber No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power 1918-048-01 Forest products, lumber, or logging company Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-04 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-71 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-71.pdf 250 U.S. 76 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-76 250 U.S. 76 (1919) 250 U.S. 76 D09002ee1d4cabd7c Jury Instructions Jury Trials Negligence Torts Erroneous Rulings Contributory Negligence Torts Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co., 250 U.S. 76 (1919);250 U.S. 76 CASE USREPORTS-250-76 76 20 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 76 250 U.S. 76 (1919) Jury Instructions Jury Trials Negligence Torts Erroneous Rulings Contributory Negligence Torts Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-049-01 Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Cert Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Federal court conflict Edward Douglass White 1919-03-18 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-76 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-76.pdf 250 U.S. 85 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-85 250 U.S. 85 (1919) 250 U.S. 85 D09002ee1d4cabd8c Contracts Law Furs Transportation Interstate Commerce Shipped Goods Misdescription Carriers Goods and Services Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;New York Cent. R. R. Co. v. Goldberg, 250 U.S. 85 (1919);250 U.S. 85 CASE USREPORTS-250-85 85 21 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 85 250 U.S. 85 (1919) Contracts Law Furs Transportation Interstate Commerce Shipped Goods Misdescription Carriers Goods and Services Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-050-01 Shipper, including importer and exporter Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Cert State Appellate Court State Supreme Court No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-03-20 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-85 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-85.pdf 250 U.S. 88 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-88 250 U.S. 88 (1919) 250 U.S. 88 D09002ee1d4cabda6 Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Patent Infringements Assignments Panama Canal Patents Suspension Cables Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Brothers v. United States, 250 U.S. 88 (1919);250 U.S. 88 CASE USREPORTS-250-88 88 22 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 88 250 U.S. 88 (1919) Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Patent Infringements Assignments Panama Canal Patents Suspension Cables Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1918-051-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder United States Appeal U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-88 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-88.pdf 250 U.S. 94 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-94 250 U.S. 94 (1919) 250 U.S. 94 D09002ee1d4cabdde Discrimination Taxation Telegraph Pole Telegraphs Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Mackay Telegraph Co. v. Little Rock, 250 U.S. 94 (1919);250 U.S. 94 CASE USREPORTS-250-94 94 23 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 94 250 U.S. 94 (1919) Discrimination Taxation Telegraph Pole Telegraphs Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1918-052-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-94 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-94.pdf 250 U.S. 101 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-101 250 U.S. 101 (1919) 250 U.S. 101 D09002ee1d4cabdd7 Interstate Commerce Bridge Carpenters Labor and Employment Law Worker Safety and Health Railroads Labor Employment Bridge Repair Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Phila., B. & W. R. R. Co. v. Smith, 250 U.S. 101 (1919);250 U.S. 101 CASE USREPORTS-250-101 101 24 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 101 250 U.S. 101 (1919) Interstate Commerce Bridge Carpenters Labor and Employment Law Worker Safety and Health Railroads Labor Employment Bridge Repair Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-053-01 Railroad Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court To resolve important or significant question Edward Douglass White 1919-04-15 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-101 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-101.pdf 250 U.S. 104 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-104 250 U.S. 104 (1919) 250 U.S. 104 D09002ee1d4cabd8f American Indians Trust Federal Indian and Tribal Law Heirs Indigenous Peoples Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Shawnee Tribe Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;United States v. Reynolds, 250 U.S. 104 (1919);250 U.S. 104 CASE USREPORTS-250-104 104 25 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 104 250 U.S. 104 (1919) American Indians Trust Federal Indian and Tribal Law Heirs Indigenous Peoples Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Shawnee Tribe Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 1918-054-01 United States Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Cert Department or Secretary of the Interior Oklahoma Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-03-04 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-104 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-104.pdf 250 U.S. 111 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-111 250 U.S. 111 (1919) 250 U.S. 111 D09002ee1d4cabe07 Surety Bonds Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;U. S. Fidelity Co. v. Oklahoma, 250 U.S. 111 (1919);250 U.S. 111 CASE USREPORTS-250-111 111 26 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 111 250 U.S. 111 (1919) Surety Bonds Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1918-055-01 Insurance company, or surety State Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-17 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-111 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-111.pdf 250 U.S. 114 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-114 250 U.S. 114 (1919) 250 U.S. 114 D09002ee1d4cabd79 Criminal Procedure Unlawfully Withheld Taxation Fifth Amendment Compensation Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Due Process Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Berkman v. United States, 250 U.S. 114 (1919);250 U.S. 114 CASE USREPORTS-250-114 114 27 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 114 250 U.S. 114 (1919) Criminal Procedure Unlawfully Withheld Taxation Fifth Amendment Compensation Constitutional Law Criminal Law and Procedure Due Process Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys 1918-056-01 Person convicted of crime United States Writ of error New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-16 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-114 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-114.pdf 250 U.S. 118 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-118 250 U.S. 118 (1919) 250 U.S. 118 D09002ee1d4cabe09 State and Local Laws Hunting Season U.S. Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) Animals Migratory Birds Wild Game Birds Environmental Law Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Carey v. South Dakota, 250 U.S. 118 (1919);250 U.S. 118 CASE USREPORTS-250-118 118 28 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 118 250 U.S. 118 (1919) State and Local Laws Hunting Season U.S. Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) Animals Migratory Birds Wild Game Birds Environmental Law Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity 1918-057-01 Person convicted of crime State Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-118 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-118.pdf 250 U.S. 123 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-123 250 U.S. 123 (1919) 250 U.S. 123 D09002ee1d4cabd9f Stockholders Laches Dividends Business and Corporate Law Statute of Limitations Corporations and Associations Government Stockholder Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Ches. & Del. Canal Co. v. Unites States, 250 U.S. 123 (1919);250 U.S. 123 CASE USREPORTS-250-123 123 29 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 123 250 U.S. 123 (1919) Stockholders Laches Dividends Business and Corporate Law Statute of Limitations Corporations and Associations Government Stockholder Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 1918-058-01 Business, corporation United States Writ of error Department or Secretary of the Treasury U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-17 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-123 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-123.pdf 250 U.S. 130 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-130 250 U.S. 130 (1919) 250 U.S. 130 D09002ee1d4cabddd Dozer Negligence Railroads Torts Law Employer Liability Torts Interstate Commerce Bridges and Tunnels Construction Workers Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Kinzell v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 250 U.S. 130 (1919);250 U.S. 130 CASE USREPORTS-250-130 130 30 1 1919-05-19 1918 250 U.S. 130 250 U.S. 130 (1919) Dozer Negligence Railroads Torts Law Employer Liability Torts Interstate Commerce Bridges and Tunnels Construction Workers Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-059-01 Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Railroad Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-04-15 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-130 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-130.pdf 250 U.S. 135 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-135 250 U.S. 135 (1919) 250 U.S. 135 D09002ee1d4cab897 Executive Powers Fixed Rates Transportation Systems Railroads Intrastate Commerce Constitutional Law War Powers Presidential Powers Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. North Dakota, 250 U.S. 135 (1919);250 U.S. 135 CASE USREPORTS-250-135 135 31 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 135 250 U.S. 135 (1919) Executive Powers Fixed Rates Transportation Systems Railroads Intrastate Commerce Constitutional Law War Powers Presidential Powers Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-060-01 Railroad State Writ of error Federal Railroad Administration State Supreme Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-135 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-135.pdf 250 U.S. 153 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-153 250 U.S. 153 (1919) 250 U.S. 153 D09002ee1d4cabd9d Property Rights Ditch River Volume Property Law Drainage Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Public Service Co. v. Corboy, 250 U.S. 153 (1919);250 U.S. 153 CASE USREPORTS-250-153 153 32 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 153 250 U.S. 153 (1919) Property Rights Ditch River Volume Property Law Drainage Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-061-01 Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company County government or county governmental unit, except school district Appeal State Agency State Trial Court State Trial Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-20 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-153 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-153.pdf 250 U.S. 163 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-163 250 U.S. 163 (1919) 250 U.S. 163 D09002ee1d4cabd74 Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Public Utilities (Cf. Federal Public Utilities Regulation) Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Dakora Cent. Tel. Co. v. South Dakota, 250 U.S. 163 (1919);250 U.S. 163 CASE USREPORTS-250-163 163 33 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 163 250 U.S. 163 (1919) Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Public Utilities (Cf. Federal Public Utilities Regulation) Federalism 1918-062-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company State Writ of error Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-163 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-163.pdf 250 U.S. 188 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-188 250 U.S. 188 (1919) 250 U.S. 188 D09002ee1d4cabd76 Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Public Utilities (Cf. Federal Public Utilities Regulation) Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Kansas v. Burleson, 250 U.S. 188 (1919);250 U.S. 188 CASE USREPORTS-250-188 188 34 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 188 250 U.S. 188 (1919) Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law National Supremacy: Public Utilities (Cf. Federal Public Utilities Regulation) Federalism 1918-063-01 State Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster Original Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-188 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-188.pdf 250 U.S. 191 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-191 250 U.S. 191 (1919) 250 U.S. 191 D09002ee1d4cabd89 Postmaster General Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Telegraphs Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law Federal and Some Few State Regulations of Public Utilities Regulation: Telephone or Telegraph Company Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Burleson v. Dempcy, 250 U.S. 191 (1919);250 U.S. 191 CASE USREPORTS-250-191 191 35 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 191 250 U.S. 191 (1919) Postmaster General Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Telegraphs Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law Federal and Some Few State Regulations of Public Utilities Regulation: Telephone or Telegraph Company Economic Activity 1918-064-01 Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Appeal Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster Illinois Northern U.S. District Court Illinois Northern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-191 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-191.pdf 250 U.S. 195 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-195 250 U.S. 195 (1919) 250 U.S. 195 D09002ee1d4cabda0 Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law Federal and Some Few State Regulations of Public Utilities Regulation: Telephone or Telegraph Company Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Macleod v. New England Tel. Co., 250 U.S. 195 (1919);250 U.S. 195 CASE USREPORTS-250-195 195 36 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 195 250 U.S. 195 (1919) Postmaster General Telephone Telecommunications Public Utilities and Utility Rates Presidential Powers War Powers Intrastate Commerce Executive Powers Constitutional Law Federal and Some Few State Regulations of Public Utilities Regulation: Telephone or Telegraph Company Economic Activity 1918-065-01 State commission, board, committee, or authority Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Cert Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster State Supreme Court No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-05-05 Statutory construction Federal Statute No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-195 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-195.pdf 250 U.S. 199 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-199 250 U.S. 199 (1919) 250 U.S. 199 D09002ee1d4cabde4 Criminal Law and Procedure Bills of Lading Interstate Commerce Fraudulent Fabrication Counterfeiting Corruption, Governmental or Governmental Regulation of Other than as in Campaign Spending Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;United States v. Ferger, 250 U.S. 199 (1919);250 U.S. 199 CASE USREPORTS-250-199 199 37 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 199 250 U.S. 199 (1919) Criminal Law and Procedure Bills of Lading Interstate Commerce Fraudulent Fabrication Counterfeiting Corruption, Governmental or Governmental Regulation of Other than as in Campaign Spending Economic Activity 1918-066-01 United States Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Writ of error Ohio Southern U.S. District Court Ohio Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-29 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-199 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-199.pdf 250 U.S. 207 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-207 250 U.S. 207 (1919) 250 U.S. 207 D09002ee1d4cabdd9 Criminal Law and Procedure Bills of Lading Interstate Commerce Fraudulent Fabrication Conspiracy Counterfeiting Corruption, Governmental or Governmental Regulation of Other than as in Campaign Spending Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;United States v. Ferger (No. 2.), 250 U.S. 207 (1919);250 U.S. 207 CASE USREPORTS-250-207 207 38 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 207 250 U.S. 207 (1919) Criminal Law and Procedure Bills of Lading Interstate Commerce Fraudulent Fabrication Conspiracy Counterfeiting Corruption, Governmental or Governmental Regulation of Other than as in Campaign Spending Economic Activity 1918-067-01 United States Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Writ of error Ohio Southern U.S. District Court Ohio Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-29 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-207 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-207.pdf 250 U.S. 208 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-208 250 U.S. 208 (1919) 250 U.S. 208 D09002ee1d4cab895 Right to Counsel Fee Limitation Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Attorney's Fees Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Capital Trust Co. v. Calhoun, 250 U.S. 208 (1919);250 U.S. 208 CASE USREPORTS-250-208 208 39 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 208 250 U.S. 208 (1919) Right to Counsel Fee Limitation Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law Attorney's Fees Attorneys' and Governmental Employees' or Officials' Fees or Compensation or Licenses Attorneys 1918-068-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Attorney, or person acting as such, includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association Writ of error Department or Secretary of the Treasury State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-05-02 Judicial review (state level) Constitutional Amendment Fourteenth Amendment (due process) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-208 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-208.pdf 250 U.S. 220 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-220 250 U.S. 220 (1919) 250 U.S. 220 D09002ee1d4cabe0a Succession Tax Due Process Jurisdiction Fourteenth Amendment Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Dana v. Dana, 250 U.S. 220 (1919);250 U.S. 220 CASE USREPORTS-250-220 220 40 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 220 250 U.S. 220 (1919) Succession Tax Due Process Jurisdiction Fourteenth Amendment Civil Procedure Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal or Writ of Error, from Highest State Court Judicial Power 1918-069-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-24 Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-220 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-220.pdf 250 U.S. 223 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-223 250 U.S. 223 (1919) 250 U.S. 223 D09002ee1d4cabda3 Federal Jurisdiction Fraudulent Transfers Jurisdiction and Venue Consideration of Evidence Bankruptcy Act Bankruptcy Law Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Flanders v. Coleman, 250 U.S. 223 (1919);250 U.S. 223 CASE USREPORTS-250-223 223 41 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 223 250 U.S. 223 (1919) Federal Jurisdiction Fraudulent Transfers Jurisdiction and Venue Consideration of Evidence Bankruptcy Act Bankruptcy Law Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity 1918-070-01 Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Father Appeal Georgia Southern U.S. District Court Georgia Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-14 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction Federal Statute Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-223 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-223.pdf 250 U.S. 229 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-229 250 U.S. 229 (1919) 250 U.S. 229 D09002ee1d4cabdda Surety Bonds Jurisdiction Judicial Code Estates Civil Procedure Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Brainerd &c. Quarry Co. v. Brice, 250 U.S. 229 (1919);250 U.S. 229 CASE USREPORTS-250-229 229 42 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 229 250 U.S. 229 (1919) Surety Bonds Jurisdiction Judicial Code Estates Civil Procedure Miscellaneous Judicial Power, Especially Diversity Jurisdiction Judicial Power 1918-071-01 Business, corporation Insurance company, or surety Writ of error New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-229 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-229.pdf 250 U.S. 235 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-235 250 U.S. 235 (1919) 250 U.S. 235 D09002ee1d4cabe02 Oil and Gas American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Restricted Lands Creek Tribe Indigenous Peoples Royalties Allotments Native Americans North America Secretary of the Interior Restrictions on Alienation Native Peoples Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;parker v. richard, 250 U.S. 235 (1919);250 U.S. 235 CASE USREPORTS-250-235 235 43 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 235 250 U.S. 235 (1919) Oil and Gas American Indians Federal Indian and Tribal Law Restricted Lands Creek Tribe Indigenous Peoples Royalties Allotments Native Americans North America Secretary of the Interior Restrictions on Alienation Native Peoples Indians (Other than Pertains to State Jurisdiction Over) Civil Rights 1918-072-01 Department or Secretary of the Interior Indian, including Indian tribe or nation Appeal Department or Secretary of the Interior Oklahoma Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-24 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-235 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-235.pdf 250 U.S. 241 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-241 250 U.S. 241 (1919) 250 U.S. 241 D09002ee1d4cabda1 Property Rights Contract Clause Railroads Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Railroads Tracks Due Process Clause Commerce Clause State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. Denver, 250 U.S. 241 (1919);250 U.S. 241 CASE USREPORTS-250-241 241 44 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 241 250 U.S. 241 (1919) Property Rights Contract Clause Railroads Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Railroads Tracks Due Process Clause Commerce Clause State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1918-073-01 Railroad City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-241 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-241.pdf 250 U.S. 246 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-246 250 U.S. 246 (1919) 250 U.S. 246 D09002ee1d4cabe0b Ships and Boats Steamships Maritime and Admiralty Law Inland Shipping Merchant Vessels Search and Seizure Shipping Board Act of 1916 Judicial Administration: Extraordinary Relief (E.G., Mandamus, Injunction) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Lake Monroe, The, 250 U.S. 246 (1919);250 U.S. 246 CASE USREPORTS-250-246 246 45 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 246 250 U.S. 246 (1919) Ships and Boats Steamships Maritime and Admiralty Law Inland Shipping Merchant Vessels Search and Seizure Shipping Board Act of 1916 Judicial Administration: Extraordinary Relief (E.G., Mandamus, Injunction) Judicial Power 1918-074-01 United States Court or judicial district Mandamus Unidentifiable Massachusetts U.S. District Court Massachusetts U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-246 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-246.pdf 250 U.S. 256 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-256 250 U.S. 256 (1919) 250 U.S. 256 D09002ee1d4cabdbe Taxation Gas Equal Protection Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Occupation Tax Due Process State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Lincoln Gas Co. v. Lincoln, 250 U.S. 256 (1919);250 U.S. 256 CASE USREPORTS-250-256 256 46 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 256 250 U.S. 256 (1919) Taxation Gas Equal Protection Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Occupation Tax Due Process State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1918-075-01 Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Appeal State Agency Nebraska U.S. District Court Nebraska U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1917-10-05 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-256 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-256.pdf 250 U.S. 269 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-269 250 U.S. 269 (1919) 250 U.S. 269 D09002ee1d4cabd6f Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Dredging and Excavating Dumping Scows Libel in Rem Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Scow 6-S, The, 250 U.S. 269 (1919);250 U.S. 269 CASE USREPORTS-250-269 269 47 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 269 250 U.S. 269 (1919) Ships and Boats Maritime and Admiralty Law Dredging and Excavating Dumping Scows Libel in Rem Natural Resources - Environmental Protection (Cf. National Supremacy: Natural Resources, National Supremacy: Pollution) Economic Activity 1918-076-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels United States Appeal New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-24 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-269 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-269.pdf 250 U.S. 273 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-273 250 U.S. 273 (1919) 250 U.S. 273 D09002ee1d4cabd6b Criminal Law and Procedure Corrupt Practice Act Grand Jury Compulsion to Appear Contempt of Court Contempt of Court or Congress Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273 (1919);250 U.S. 273 CASE USREPORTS-250-273 273 48 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 273 250 U.S. 273 (1919) Criminal Law and Procedure Corrupt Practice Act Grand Jury Compulsion to Appear Contempt of Court Contempt of Court or Congress Criminal Procedure 1918-077-01 Person convicted of crime United States Writ of error New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-01-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-273 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-273.pdf 250 U.S. 283 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-283 250 U.S. 283 (1919) 250 U.S. 283 D09002ee1d4cabd69 Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Procedure Removal of Defendant Alien Property Washington Indictment Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Rumley v. McCarthy, 250 U.S. 283 (1919);250 U.S. 283 CASE USREPORTS-250-283 283 49 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 283 250 U.S. 283 (1919) Criminal Law and Procedure Criminal Procedure Removal of Defendant Alien Property Washington Indictment Self-Incrimination (Other than as Pertains to Miranda or Immunity from Prosecution) Criminal Procedure 1918-078-01 Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Appeal New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Joseph McKenna 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-283 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-283.pdf 250 U.S. 290 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-290 250 U.S. 290 (1919) 250 U.S. 290 D09002ee1d4cabdbc Defamation Torts Newspapers Slander Libel Torts Law Libel, Defamation: Defamation of Public Officials and Public and Private Persons First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Washington Post Co. v. Chaloner, 250 U.S. 290 (1919);250 U.S. 290 CASE USREPORTS-250-290 290 50 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 290 250 U.S. 290 (1919) Defamation Torts Newspapers Slander Libel Torts Law Libel, Defamation: Defamation of Public Officials and Public and Private Persons First Amendment 1918-079-01 Newspaper, newsletter, journal of opinion, news service Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Cert Supreme Court of the District of Columbia U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-04-22 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-290 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-290.pdf 250 U.S. 295 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-295 250 U.S. 295 (1919) 250 U.S. 295 D09002ee1d4cabe06 Securities Shareholders Business and Corporate Law Banks and Financial Institutions Corporations and Associations Assessment Stock Transfers Sex Discrimination (Excluding Sex Discrimination in Employment) Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Williams v. Vreeland, 250 U.S. 295 (1919);250 U.S. 295 CASE USREPORTS-250-295 295 51 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 295 250 U.S. 295 (1919) Securities Shareholders Business and Corporate Law Banks and Financial Institutions Corporations and Associations Assessment Stock Transfers Sex Discrimination (Excluding Sex Discrimination in Employment) Civil Rights 1918-080-01 Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Writ of error Comptroller of Currency New Jersey U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-295 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-295.pdf 250 U.S. 300 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-300 250 U.S. 300 (1919) 250 U.S. 300 D09002ee1d4cabd7b Indictments Competition and Antitrust Antitrust Law Monopolies Corporations and Associations Private Business Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919);250 U.S. 300 CASE USREPORTS-250-300 300 52 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 300 250 U.S. 300 (1919) Indictments Competition and Antitrust Antitrust Law Monopolies Corporations and Associations Private Business Antitrust (Except in the Context of Mergers and Union Antitrust) Economic Activity 1918-081-01 United States Business, corporation Writ of error Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-10 Statutory construction Federal Statute Sherman Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-300 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-300.pdf 250 U.S. 308 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-308 250 U.S. 308 (1919) 250 U.S. 308 D09002ee1d4cabe05 Diversity Residence Jurisdiction and Venue Diversity of Citizenship Personal Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Contracts Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Camp v. Gress, 250 U.S. 308 (1919);250 U.S. 308 CASE USREPORTS-250-308 308 53 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 308 250 U.S. 308 (1919) Diversity Residence Jurisdiction and Venue Diversity of Citizenship Personal Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Contracts Private Action 1918-082-01 Defendant Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Cert Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-03-24 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-308 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-308.pdf 250 U.S. 321 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-321 250 U.S. 321 (1919) 250 U.S. 321 D09002ee1d4cab896 Breach of Trust Wills, Trusts, and Estate Law Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Improvement Fund Trustees Express Trust Repudiation Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Benedict v. City of New York, 250 U.S. 321 (1919);250 U.S. 321 CASE USREPORTS-250-321 321 54 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 321 250 U.S. 321 (1919) Breach of Trust Wills, Trusts, and Estate Law Wills, Trusts, and Estates Law Improvement Fund Trustees Express Trust Repudiation Judicial Administration: Untimely Filing Judicial Power 1918-083-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Appeal State Agency New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-22 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-321 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-321.pdf 250 U.S. 328 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-328 250 U.S. 328 (1919) 250 U.S. 328 D09002ee1d4cabd96 Military Law Personal Effects Recovery Military Service Property of Officers Military: Active Duty Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;United States v. Babcock, 250 U.S. 328 (1919);250 U.S. 328 CASE USREPORTS-250-328 328 55 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 328 250 U.S. 328 (1919) Military Law Personal Effects Recovery Military Service Property of Officers Military: Active Duty Civil Rights 1918-084-01 United States Military personnel, or dependent of, including reservist Appeal Comptroller of Currency U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-15 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-328 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-328.pdf 250 U.S. 332 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-332 250 U.S. 332 (1919) 250 U.S. 332 D09002ee1d4cabd9a Railroad Construction Due Process Railroads Police Powers Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Interlocking Safety Device Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Northern Pac. Ry. V. Puget Sound Ry., 250 U.S. 332 (1919);250 U.S. 332 CASE USREPORTS-250-332 332 56 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 332 250 U.S. 332 (1919) Railroad Construction Due Process Railroads Police Powers Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Interlocking Safety Device Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 1918-085-01 Railroad Railroad Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-332 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-332.pdf 250 U.S. 336 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-336 250 U.S. 336 (1919) 250 U.S. 336 D09002ee1d4cabd73 Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Oil and Gas Petroleum Patent Infringements Patents Disclaimers Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Minerals Separation v. Butte &c. Min'g Co., 250 U.S. 336 (1919);250 U.S. 336 CASE USREPORTS-250-336 336 57 1 1919-06-02 1918 250 U.S. 336 250 U.S. 336 (1919) Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Oil and Gas Petroleum Patent Infringements Patents Disclaimers Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1918-086-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Mining company or miner, excluding coal, oil, or pipeline company Cert Montana U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-03-19 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-336 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-336.pdf 250 U.S. 355 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-355 250 U.S. 355 (1919) 250 U.S. 355 D09002ee1d4cabda2 Chestnuts Import and Export Liquidation and Reliquidation Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Garlic Customs Commercial Law Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Vitelli & Son v. United States, 250 U.S. 355 (1919);250 U.S. 355 CASE USREPORTS-250-355 355 58 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 355 250 U.S. 355 (1919) Chestnuts Import and Export Liquidation and Reliquidation Fraud and Financial Crimes Goods and Services Garlic Customs Commercial Law Federal Taxation of Gifts, Personal, Business, or Professional Expenses Federal Taxation 1918-087-01 Shipper, including importer and exporter United States Cert Board of General Appraisers U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-04-24 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-355 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-355.pdf 250 U.S. 360 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-360 250 U.S. 360 (1919) 250 U.S. 360 D09002ee1d4cabd8d Executive Powers Postmaster General Marine Cables Telephone Constitutional Law War Powers Telecommunications Presidential Powers Mootness (Cf. Standing to Sue: Live Dispute) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U.S. 360 (1919);250 U.S. 360 CASE USREPORTS-250-360 360 59 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 360 250 U.S. 360 (1919) Executive Powers Postmaster General Marine Cables Telephone Constitutional Law War Powers Telecommunications Presidential Powers Mootness (Cf. Standing to Sue: Live Dispute) Judicial Power 1918-088-01 Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster Appeal Postal Service and Post Office, or Postmaster General, or Postmaster New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-07 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-360 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-360.pdf 250 U.S. 363 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-363 250 U.S. 363 (1919) 250 U.S. 363 D09002ee1d4cabdba Condemnation Eminent Domain Government Railroads Telegraphs Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Louis. & Nash. R. R. v. Western Un. Tel. Co., 250 U.S. 363 (1919);250 U.S. 363 CASE USREPORTS-250-363 363 60 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 363 250 U.S. 363 (1919) Condemnation Eminent Domain Government Railroads Telegraphs Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Law Due Process: Takings Clause, or Other Non-Constitutional Governmental Taking of Property Due Process 1918-089-01 Railroad Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company Appeal Mississippi Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-01-22 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-363 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-363.pdf 250 U.S. 368 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-368 250 U.S. 368 (1919) 250 U.S. 368 D09002ee1d4cabde0 Car Distribution Discrimination Interstate Commerce Coal Reparations Commercial Law Federal or State Regulation of Transportation Regulation: Railroad Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Minds, 250 U.S. 368 (1919);250 U.S. 368 CASE USREPORTS-250-368 368 61 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 368 250 U.S. 368 (1919) Car Distribution Discrimination Interstate Commerce Coal Reparations Commercial Law Federal or State Regulation of Transportation Regulation: Railroad Economic Activity 1918-090-01 Railroad Coal company or coal mine operator Writ of error Interstate Commerce Commission Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-23 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-368 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-368.pdf 250 U.S. 376 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-376 250 U.S. 376 (1919) 250 U.S. 376 D09002ee1d4cabde7 Aliens Personal Property Bonds Tax Law Income Tax Taxation Property Distributions Stocks Mortgages Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;DeGanay v. Lederer, 250 U.S. 376 (1919);250 U.S. 376 CASE USREPORTS-250-376 376 62 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 376 250 U.S. 376 (1919) Aliens Personal Property Bonds Tax Law Income Tax Taxation Property Distributions Stocks Mortgages Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Federal Taxation 1918-091-01 Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of Certification Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-23 Statutory construction Infrequently litigated statutes Infrequently litigated statutes Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Certification to or from a lower court Favorable disposition for petitioning party unclear William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-376 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-376.pdf 250 U.S. 383 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-383 250 U.S. 383 (1919) 250 U.S. 383 D09002ee1d4cabdc0 Intellectual Property Railroad Cars Prior Invention Intellectual Property Law Draft Rigging Patent Infringements Housing and Community Development Pockets Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Symington Co. v. National Castings Co., 250 U.S. 383 (1919);250 U.S. 383 CASE USREPORTS-250-383 383 63 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 383 250 U.S. 383 (1919) Intellectual Property Railroad Cars Prior Invention Intellectual Property Law Draft Rigging Patent Infringements Housing and Community Development Pockets Patents Patents and Copyrights: Patent Economic Activity 1918-092-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Cert Maine U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Federal court conflict Edward Douglass White 1918-04-19 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-383 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-383.pdf 250 U.S. 387 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-387 250 U.S. 387 (1919) 250 U.S. 387 D09002ee1d4cabe11 Public Lands Swamp Lands Railroads Property Law Conflicting Grants Real Property Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. McComas, 250 U.S. 387 (1919);250 U.S. 387 CASE USREPORTS-250-387 387 64 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 387 250 U.S. 387 (1919) Public Lands Swamp Lands Railroads Property Law Conflicting Grants Real Property Private Action 1918-093-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Cert State Trial Court State Supreme Court No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-01-22 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-387 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-387.pdf 250 U.S. 394 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-394 250 U.S. 394 (1919) 250 U.S. 394 D09002ee1d4cabd7a Oil and Gas Government Constitutional Law Municipal Corporations Public Utilities and Utility Rates No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U.S. 394 (1919);250 U.S. 394 CASE USREPORTS-250-394 394 65 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 394 250 U.S. 394 (1919) Oil and Gas Government Constitutional Law Municipal Corporations Public Utilities and Utility Rates No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of Jurisdiction (Cf. Judicial Administration: Supreme Court Jurisdiction or Authority on Appeal from Federal District Courts or Courts of Appeals) Judicial Power 1918-094-01 City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Oil company, or natural gas producer Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-25 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Willis Van Devanter Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-394 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-394.pdf 250 U.S. 400 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-400 250 U.S. 400 (1919) 250 U.S. 400 D09002ee1d4cabd66 Dangers of the Occupation Labor and Employment Law Worker Safety and Health Validity Labor Employment Nonhazardous Industries Worker's Compensation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Arizona Employers' Liability Cases, 250 U.S. 400 (1919);250 U.S. 400 CASE USREPORTS-250-400 400 66 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 400 250 U.S. 400 (1919) Dangers of the Occupation Labor and Employment Law Worker Safety and Health Validity Labor Employment Nonhazardous Industries Worker's Compensation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-095-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1918-01-25 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Oliver Wendell Holmes 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-400 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-400.pdf 250 U.S. 454 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-454 250 U.S. 454 (1919) 250 U.S. 454 D09002ee1d4cabd9e Sewers Tax Power Government Constitutional Law Municipal Corporations Assessment Public Utilities and Utility Rates Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Hancock v. City of Muskogee, 250 U.S. 454 (1919);250 U.S. 454 CASE USREPORTS-250-454 454 67 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 454 250 U.S. 454 (1919) Sewers Tax Power Government Constitutional Law Municipal Corporations Assessment Public Utilities and Utility Rates Due Process: Hearing or Notice (Other than as Pertains to Government Employees or Prisoners' Rights) Due Process 1918-096-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-454 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-454.pdf 250 U.S. 459 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-459 250 U.S. 459 (1919) 250 U.S. 459 D09002ee1d4cabd8a Gross Receipts Tax Tax Power Ad Valorem Property Tax Constitutional Law State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;American Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 250 U.S. 459 (1919);250 U.S. 459 CASE USREPORTS-250-459 459 68 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 459 250 U.S. 459 (1919) Gross Receipts Tax Tax Power Ad Valorem Property Tax Constitutional Law State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity 1918-097-01 Manufacturer City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-30 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-459 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-459.pdf 250 U.S. 465 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-465 250 U.S. 465 (1919) 250 U.S. 465 D09002ee1d4cabd8e Horses Commerce Livestock Interstate Shipment Carriers Railroads Imposed Conditions Commercial Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Erir R. R. Co. v. Shuart, 250 U.S. 465 (1919);250 U.S. 465 CASE USREPORTS-250-465 465 69 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 465 250 U.S. 465 (1919) Horses Commerce Livestock Interstate Shipment Carriers Railroads Imposed Conditions Commercial Law Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-098-01 Railroad Shipper, including importer and exporter Cert State Trial Court State Trial Court No reason given Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-465 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-465.pdf 250 U.S. 473 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-473 250 U.S. 473 (1919) 250 U.S. 473 D09002ee1d4cabd94 Nonsuit Labor and Employment Law Railroads Federal Employers' Liability Act No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Barrett v. Virginian Ry. Co., 250 U.S. 473 (1919);250 U.S. 473 CASE USREPORTS-250-473 473 70 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 473 250 U.S. 473 (1919) Nonsuit Labor and Employment Law Railroads Federal Employers' Liability Act No Merits: Dismissed or Affirmed for Want of a Substantial or Properly Presented Federal Question, or a Nonsuit Judicial Power 1918-099-01 Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Railroad Cert Virginia Western U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-473 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-473.pdf 250 U.S. 478 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-478 250 U.S. 478 (1919) 250 U.S. 478 D09002ee1d4cabd67 Livestock Railroads Carriers Carmack Amendment Horses Limited Liability Commercial Law Commerce Interstate Shipment Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Leatherwood, 250 U.S. 478 (1919);250 U.S. 478 CASE USREPORTS-250-478 478 71 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 478 250 U.S. 478 (1919) Livestock Railroads Carriers Carmack Amendment Horses Limited Liability Commercial Law Commerce Interstate Shipment Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1918-100-01 Railroad Shipper, including importer and exporter Cert State Trial Court State Appellate Court No reason given Edward Douglass White Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Judgment of the Court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 6 3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-478 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-478.pdf 250 U.S. 483 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-483 250 U.S. 483 (1919) 250 U.S. 483 D09002ee1d4cabddb Securities Shareholders Stocks Reorganization Business and Corporate Law New Company Corporations and Associations Contribution Commercial Transactions Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Southern Pacific Co. v. Bogert, 250 U.S. 483 (1919);250 U.S. 483 CASE USREPORTS-250-483 483 72 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 483 250 U.S. 483 (1919) Securities Shareholders Stocks Reorganization Business and Corporate Law New Company Corporations and Associations Contribution Commercial Transactions Private Action 1918-101-01 Railroad Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder Cert New York Eastern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit No reason given Edward Douglass White 1919-04-17 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Vacated and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-483 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-483.pdf 250 U.S. 501 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-501 250 U.S. 501 (1919) 250 U.S. 501 D09002ee1d4cabd6d Intellectual Property Law Steam Traps Intellectual Property Contracts Assignments Royalties Patent Infringements Patents Contracts Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Odell v. Farnsworth Co., 250 U.S. 501 (1919);250 U.S. 501 CASE USREPORTS-250-501 501 73 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 501 250 U.S. 501 (1919) Intellectual Property Law Steam Traps Intellectual Property Contracts Assignments Royalties Patent Infringements Patents Contracts Private Action 1918-102-01 Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder Appeal New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-501 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-501.pdf 250 U.S. 504 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-504 250 U.S. 504 (1919) 250 U.S. 504 D09002ee1d4cabddc Directors Negligent Management Banking Laws Accounting Banks and Financial Institutions Corporations and Associations Loans Business and Corporate Law Commercial Transactions Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Bowerman v. Hamner, 250 U.S. 504 (1919);250 U.S. 504 CASE USREPORTS-250-504 504 74 1 1919-06-09 1918 250 U.S. 504 250 U.S. 504 (1919) Directors Negligent Management Banking Laws Accounting Banks and Financial Institutions Corporations and Associations Loans Business and Corporate Law Commercial Transactions Private Action 1918-103-01 Management, executive officer, or director, of business entity Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Appeal Idaho U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-04-28 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-504 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-504.pdf Front Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-4 D09002ee1d4cabd88 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States at October Term, 1919 FRONTMATTER USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-4 75 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-FrontMatter-4.pdf 250 U.S. 519 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-519 250 U.S. 519 (1919) 250 U.S. 519 D09002ee1d4cabda7 Net Income Tax Taxation as Lessee Taxation Railroads Tax Law State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Wright, 250 U.S. 519 (1919);250 U.S. 519 CASE USREPORTS-250-519 519 76 1 1919-10-27 1919 250 U.S. 519 250 U.S. 519 (1919) Net Income Tax Taxation as Lessee Taxation Railroads Tax Law State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity 1919-001-01 Railroad Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-01-21 1919-10-13 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-519 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-519.pdf 250 U.S. 525 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-525 250 U.S. 525 (1919) 250 U.S. 525 D09002ee1d4cabdd8 Transfer Tax Inheritance Tax Fourteenth Amendment Privileges and Immunities Nonresident Descendants Constitutional Law Assessment State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525 (1919);250 U.S. 525 CASE USREPORTS-250-525 525 77 1 1919-10-27 1919 250 U.S. 525 250 U.S. 525 (1919) Transfer Tax Inheritance Tax Fourteenth Amendment Privileges and Immunities Nonresident Descendants Constitutional Law Assessment State or Local Government Tax Economic Activity 1919-002-01 Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-03-18 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William Rufus Day Joseph McKenna 5 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-525 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-525.pdf 250 U.S. 545 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-545 250 U.S. 545 (1919) 250 U.S. 545 D09002ee1d4cabde5 Contracts Law War Vessels Contracts Boat Government Public Contracts and Procurement Gold Coin Navy Military: Active Duty Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Cartas v. United States, 250 U.S. 545 (1919);250 U.S. 545 CASE USREPORTS-250-545 545 78 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 545 250 U.S. 545 (1919) Contracts Law War Vessels Contracts Boat Government Public Contracts and Procurement Gold Coin Navy Military: Active Duty Civil Rights 1919-003-01 Government contractor United States Appeal Secretary or administrative unit or personnel of the U.S. Navy U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Edward Douglass White Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-545 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-545.pdf 250 U.S. 549 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-549 250 U.S. 549 (1919) 250 U.S. 549 D09002ee1d4cabde8 Public Lands Property Rights Government Property Law Coal Mineral Resources and Mines General Land Office Judicial Administration: Extraordinary Relief (E.G., Mandamus, Injunction) Judicial Power United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Alaska Smokeless Coal Co. v. lane, 250 U.S. 549 (1919);250 U.S. 549 CASE USREPORTS-250-549 549 79 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 549 250 U.S. 549 (1919) Public Lands Property Rights Government Property Law Coal Mineral Resources and Mines General Land Office Judicial Administration: Extraordinary Relief (E.G., Mandamus, Injunction) Judicial Power 1919-004-01 Coal company or coal mine operator Department or Secretary of the Interior Writ of error Department or Secretary of the Interior Supreme Court of the District of Columbia U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction) Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-14 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-549 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-549.pdf 250 U.S. 556 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-556 250 U.S. 556 (1919) 250 U.S. 556 D09002ee1d4cabdc1 Elkins Act of 1903 Railroads Carriers Anthracite Coal Commercial Law Commerce Fixed Rates Tariffs Interstate Carriers Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Financial (Other than in Fraud or Internal Revenue) Criminal Procedure United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. v. United States, 250 U.S. 556 (1919);250 U.S. 556 CASE USREPORTS-250-556 556 80 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 556 250 U.S. 556 (1919) Elkins Act of 1903 Railroads Carriers Anthracite Coal Commercial Law Commerce Fixed Rates Tariffs Interstate Carriers Statutory Construction of Criminal Laws: Financial (Other than in Fraud or Internal Revenue) Criminal Procedure 1919-005-01 Coal company or coal mine operator United States Certification Interstate Commerce Commission New Jersey U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-14 Statutory construction Federal Statute Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets, National Firearms, Organized Crime Control, Comprehensive Crime Control, or Gun Control Acts Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Certification to or from a lower court Favorable disposition for petitioning party unclear Joseph McKenna Edward Douglass White 8 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-556 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-556.pdf 250 U.S. 566 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-566 250 U.S. 566 (1919) 250 U.S. 566 D09002ee1d4cabded Post Office Department Railroads Mail Cars Carriers Interstate Commerce U.S. Postal Service (U.S.P.S.) Federal Pre-Emption Commercial Law Commerce Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Penna. R. R. Co. v. Pub. Service Comm, 250 U.S. 566 (1919);250 U.S. 566 CASE USREPORTS-250-566 566 81 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 566 250 U.S. 566 (1919) Post Office Department Railroads Mail Cars Carriers Interstate Commerce U.S. Postal Service (U.S.P.S.) Federal Pre-Emption Commercial Law Commerce Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless the Court Says It Does. Federalism 1919-006-01 Railroad State commission, board, committee, or authority Writ of error State Agency State Trial Court State Trial Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-24 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed Petitioning party received a favorable disposition Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-566 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-566.pdf 250 U.S. 573 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-573 250 U.S. 573 (1919) 250 U.S. 573 D09002ee1d4cabd77 Ancillary Jurisdiction Fraud and Financial Crimes Bankruptcy Law Discharge of Liability Partnership Transactions Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Pell v. McCabe, 250 U.S. 573 (1919);250 U.S. 573 CASE USREPORTS-250-573 573 82 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 573 250 U.S. 573 (1919) Ancillary Jurisdiction Fraud and Financial Crimes Bankruptcy Law Discharge of Liability Partnership Transactions Bankruptcy Bankruptcy (Except in the Context of Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims) Economic Activity 1919-007-01 Creditor, including institution appearing as such, e.g., a finance company Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization Appeal New York Southern U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-16 Statutory construction Federal Statute Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Petition denied or appeal dismissed No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Oliver Wendell Holmes Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-573 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-573.pdf 250 U.S. 577 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-577 250 U.S. 577 (1919) 250 U.S. 577 D09002ee1d4cab893 Railroads Freight Charges Lien for Charges Carriers Coins Interstate Commerce Shipments Commercial Law Tariffs Commerce Relics Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Pittsburgh &c. Ry. Co. v. Fink, 250 U.S. 577 (1919);250 U.S. 577 CASE USREPORTS-250-577 577 83 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 577 250 U.S. 577 (1919) Railroads Freight Charges Lien for Charges Carriers Coins Interstate Commerce Shipments Commercial Law Tariffs Commerce Relics Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1919-008-01 Railroad Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related Writ of error State Trial Court State Appellate Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-07 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Reversed and remanded Petitioning party received a favorable disposition William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-577 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-577.pdf 250 U.S. 583 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-583 250 U.S. 583 (1919) 250 U.S. 583 D09002ee1d4cabe04 Criminal Law and Procedure Impartial Jury Peremptory Challenges Newspapers Selective Service Act of 1917 Conspiracy Sixth Amendment Espionage Act of 1917 Federal or State Internal Security Legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and Related Federal Statutes First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Stilson v. United States, 250 U.S. 583 (1919);250 U.S. 583 CASE USREPORTS-250-583 583 84 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 583 250 U.S. 583 (1919) Criminal Law and Procedure Impartial Jury Peremptory Challenges Newspapers Selective Service Act of 1917 Conspiracy Sixth Amendment Espionage Act of 1917 Federal or State Internal Security Legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and Related Federal Statutes First Amendment 1919-009-01 Person subject to selective service, including conscientious objector United States Writ of error Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-20 Statutory construction Federal Statute Smith, Subversive Activities Control, Communist Control, or other similar federal legislation (also see 346) Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent William Rufus Day Edward Douglass White 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-583 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-583.pdf 250 U.S. 590 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-590 250 U.S. 590 (1919) 250 U.S. 590 D09002ee1d4cabdbf American Indians Choctaw Federal Indian and Tribal Law Indigenous Peoples Warranty Deeds Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Chickasaw Alienation of Lands Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Mullen v. Pickens, 250 U.S. 590 (1919);250 U.S. 590 CASE USREPORTS-250-590 590 85 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 590 250 U.S. 590 (1919) American Indians Choctaw Federal Indian and Tribal Law Indigenous Peoples Warranty Deeds Allotments Native Americans North America Native Peoples Chickasaw Alienation of Lands Indians, State Jurisdiction Over Civil Rights 1919-010-01 Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels Unidentifiable Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-590 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-590.pdf 250 U.S. 596 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-596 250 U.S. 596 (1919) 250 U.S. 596 D09002ee1d4cabdec Disfigurement Labor and Employment Law Due Process Disability Worker's Compensation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;New York Cent. R. R. Co. v. Bianc, 250 U.S. 596 (1919);250 U.S. 596 CASE USREPORTS-250-596 596 86 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 596 250 U.S. 596 (1919) Disfigurement Labor and Employment Law Due Process Disability Worker's Compensation Liability, Other than as in Sufficiency of Evidence, Election of Remedies, Punitive Damages Economic Activity 1919-011-01 Employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer. Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of Writ of error State Agency State Appellate Court State Appellate Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-22 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Mahlon Pitney Edward Douglass White 8 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-596 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-596.pdf 250 U.S. 603 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-603 250 U.S. 603 (1919) 250 U.S. 603 D09002ee1d4cabd97 Charter Rights Corporate Rights Constitutional Law Contacts Banks and Financial Institutions Commercial Transactions Private Action United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Bank of Oxford v. Love, 250 U.S. 603 (1919);250 U.S. 603 CASE USREPORTS-250-603 603 87 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 603 250 U.S. 603 (1919) Charter Rights Corporate Rights Constitutional Law Contacts Banks and Financial Institutions Commercial Transactions Private Action 1919-012-01 Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company Governmental employee or job applicant Writ of error State Trial Court State Supreme Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-10 Federal common law No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent James Clark McReynolds Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-603 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-603.pdf 250 U.S. 607 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-607 250 U.S. 607 (1919) 250 U.S. 607 D09002ee1d4cab898 Commerce Fixed Rates Carriers Railroads Passenger Trains Interstate Commerce Intrastate Commerce Commercial Law State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Groesbeck v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry. Co., 250 U.S. 607 (1919);250 U.S. 607 CASE USREPORTS-250-607 607 88 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 607 250 U.S. 607 (1919) Commerce Fixed Rates Carriers Railroads Passenger Trains Interstate Commerce Intrastate Commerce Commercial Law State or Local Government Regulation, Especially of Business (Cf. Federal Pre-Emption of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-Emption of State Legislation or Regulation) Economic Activity 1919-013-01 Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact Railroad Appeal Unidentifiable Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-15 Statutory construction State or local law or regulation State or Local Law Regulation Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent Louis Dembitz Brandeis Edward Douglass White 9 0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-607 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-607.pdf 250 U.S. 616 Case https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-616 250 U.S. 616 (1919) 250 U.S. 616 D09002ee1d4cabda4 First Amendment West Europe Printing and Disseminating Conspiracy Espionage Act of 1917 Freedom of Speech War Labor Activism Germany Anarchists Criminal Law and Procedure Socialist East Europe Pamphlets Russia Federal or State Internal Security Legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and Related Federal Statutes First Amendment United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919);250 U.S. 616 CASE USREPORTS-250-616 616 89 1 1919-11-10 1919 250 U.S. 616 250 U.S. 616 (1919) First Amendment West Europe Printing and Disseminating Conspiracy Espionage Act of 1917 Freedom of Speech War Labor Activism Germany Anarchists Criminal Law and Procedure Socialist East Europe Pamphlets Russia Federal or State Internal Security Legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and Related Federal Statutes First Amendment 1919-014-01 Person subject to selective service, including conscientious objector United States Writ of error New York Southern U.S. District Court New York Southern U.S. District Court Case did not arise on cert or cert not granted Edward Douglass White 1919-10-21 Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction No Legal Provision No Legal Provision Opinion of the court (orally argued) No declaration of unconstitutionality Affirmed (includes modified) No favorable disposition for petitioning party apparent John Hessin Clarke Edward Douglass White 7 2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-616 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-616.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-7 D09002ee1d4cabd90 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Decisions Per Curiam BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-7 90 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-7.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-5 D09002ee1d4cabd6a United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-5 91 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-5.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-6 D09002ee1d4cabdbb United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Cases Disposed of without Consideration BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-6 92 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-6.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-3 D09002ee1d4cabd91 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Decisions Per Curiam BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-3 93 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-3.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-4 D09002ee1d4cabd75 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Decisions on Petitions BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-4 94 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-4.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter D09002ee1d4cabe03 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Cases Disposed of without Consideration BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter 95 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-2 D09002ee1d4cabd9c United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Cases Disposed of In Vacation BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-2 96 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-2.pdf Back Matter https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-8 D09002ee1d4cabdc2 United States reports : cases adjudged in the Supreme Court at October term, 1918, and October term, 1919, from May 19, 1919, to November 17, 1919;Index BACKMATTER USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-8 97 1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-250/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-250/pdf/USREPORTS-250-BackMatter-8.pdf