United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Northern District of Georgia
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2023-03-18
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2023-03-17
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464
P0b002ee1bca733f1
DGPO
2023-03-18
2023-03-18
USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464
District
gand
11th
Georgia
2122
1:10-cv-01464
Atlanta
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
47:0332 - FCA-Wire or Radio Communications
T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia
1:10-cv-01464
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464
JU 4.15
1:10-cv-01464;10-1464
United States District Court Northern District of Georgia
11th Circuit
Atlanta
U.S. Courts
author
aut
City of Roswell, Georgia
City of Roswell, Georgia
Defendant
Deutsche Telekom AG
Deutsche Telekom AG
Plaintiff
Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V.
Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V.
Plaintiff
SoftBank Group Corp.
SoftBank Group Corp.
Plaintiff
Masayoshi Son
Son
Masayoshi
Plaintiff
T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH
T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH
Plaintiff
T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH
T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH
Plaintiff
T-Mobile South, LLC
T-Mobile South, LLC
Plaintiff
T-Mobile US, Inc.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Plaintiff
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464
District
gand
11th
Georgia
2122
1:10-cv-01464
Atlanta
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
47:0332 - FCA-Wire or Radio Communications
Georgia
T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia
OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on the 209 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment and the 186 MOTION for Summary Judgment or setting a date for resuming the previously continued evidentiary hearing until the parties have determined whether to pursue an appeal. If any party decides to pursue an interlocutory appeal, Section 1292(b) requires that they file their application with the Eleventh Circuit within TEN days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. The Court therefore DIRECTS any party who files an application for interlocutory appeal with the Eleventh Circuit to FILE A NOTICE on the docket to notify this Court of their pursuit of the appeal WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FILING THEAPPLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. Alternatively, if all parties determine after consideration of the Opinion and Order that they wish to continue with the next stages of proceedings in this Court, the Court will resume its previously continued evidentiary hearing applying the legal standard articulated in the 2016 MSJ Order. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 3/17/23. (jpa)
0
2023-03-17
D09002ee1bca7d4a9
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464-0
gand-1_10-cv-01464_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464/pdf/USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464-0.pdf
USCOURTS 1:10-cv-01464; T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia;
United States District Court Northern District of Georgia
Georgia
USCOURTS-gand-1_10-cv-01464-0
0
2023-03-17
OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on the 209 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment and the 186 MOTION for Summary Judgment or setting a date for resuming the previously continued evidentiary hearing until the parties have determined whether to pursue an appeal. If any party decides to pursue an interlocutory appeal, Section 1292(b) requires that they file their application with the Eleventh Circuit within TEN days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. The Court therefore DIRECTS any party who files an application for interlocutory appeal with the Eleventh Circuit to FILE A NOTICE on the docket to notify this Court of their pursuit of the appeal WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FILING THEAPPLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS. Alternatively, if all parties determine after consideration of the Opinion and Order that they wish to continue with the next stages of proceedings in this Court, the Court will resume its previously continued evidentiary hearing applying the legal standard articulated in the 2016 MSJ Order. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 3/17/23. (jpa)