United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Court of International Trade author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2023-05-21 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2023-05-18 monographic deposited born digital JU 9.5: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100 P0b002ee1be437103 DGPO 2023-05-21 2023-05-21 USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100 National cit Federal 4004 1:17-cv-00100 New York civil 1581c 28USC1581(c) Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Determination(s) 1:17-cv-00100 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100 JU 9.5: 1:17-cv-00100;1:17-cv-00100 United States Court of International Trade Federal Circuit New York U.S. Courts author aut Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd. Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co., Ltd. Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff Titan International, Inc. Titan International, Inc. Defendant-Intervenor Titan Tire Corporation Titan Tire Corporation Consolidated Plaintiff Titan Tire Corporation Titan Tire Corporation Defendant-Intervenor Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co., Ltd. Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff United States United States Defendant United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC Defendant-Intervenor United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC Consolidated Plaintiff Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd. Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd. Consolidated Plaintiff USCOURTS USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100 National cit Federal 4004 1:17-cv-00100 New York civil 1581c 28USC1581(c) Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Determination(s) Order entered on 5/24/2019, Slip opinion: 19-64. ORDERED that Commerce shall submit a new determination upon remand (Remand Redetermination) in which it reconsiders its decisions not to assign separate rates to GTC and Aeolus and redetermines the dumping margins for those respondents as required by its reconsideration of those decisions; it is further ORDERED that Commerce, in the Remand Redetermination, shall recalculate export price and constructed export price for Xugong without making deductions for Chinese value added tax; it is further ORDERED that Commerce will redetermine the weighted average dumping margin for Xugong and also the rates to be assigned to all other qualifying separate rate respondents that are plaintiffs in this action; it is further ORDERED that Commerce will submit its Remand Redetermination within 90 days of the date of this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that comments of plaintiffs on the Remand Redetermination must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the filing of the Remand Redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that the response of defendant to the aforementioned comments must befiled no later than 15 days from the date on which the last comment is filed.(related document(s)55, 53, 48, 51, 54, 49, 52, 50, 56) (Attachments: # (1) Cited Webpage 1, # (2) Cited Webpage 2).(Love, Cynthia) 0 2019-05-24 D09002ee1be437365 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-0 cit-1_17-cv-00100_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-0.pdf USCOURTS 1:17-cv-00100; Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. et al v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-0 0 2019-05-24 Order entered on 5/24/2019, Slip opinion: 19-64. ORDERED that Commerce shall submit a new determination upon remand (Remand Redetermination) in which it reconsiders its decisions not to assign separate rates to GTC and Aeolus and redetermines the dumping margins for those respondents as required by its reconsideration of those decisions; it is further ORDERED that Commerce, in the Remand Redetermination, shall recalculate export price and constructed export price for Xugong without making deductions for Chinese value added tax; it is further ORDERED that Commerce will redetermine the weighted average dumping margin for Xugong and also the rates to be assigned to all other qualifying separate rate respondents that are plaintiffs in this action; it is further ORDERED that Commerce will submit its Remand Redetermination within 90 days of the date of this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that comments of plaintiffs on the Remand Redetermination must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the filing of the Remand Redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that the response of defendant to the aforementioned comments must befiled no later than 15 days from the date on which the last comment is filed.(related document(s)55, 53, 48, 51, 54, 49, 52, 50, 56) (Attachments: # (1) Cited Webpage 1, # (2) Cited Webpage 2).(Love, Cynthia) Order entered on 5/14/2021, Slip opinion: 21-60. ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained with respect to the assignment of a redetermined weighted average dumping margin of 16.78% to mandatory respondent Xugong and the assignment of a rate of 16.78% to separate rate respondents Full World, Qingdao Qihang, Trelleborg, and Zhongwei; it is further ORDERED that Commerce submit a second determination upon remand (Second Remand Redetermination) in which it reconsiders its decisions not to accord separate rate status to Aeolus and GTC and revises the antidumping duty rates applied to these respondents as may be required by its reconsideration of those decisions; it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall submit its Second Remand Redetermination within 90 days of the date of this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that comments of plaintiffs on the Second Remand Redetermination must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the filing of the Second Remand Redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that the response of defendant to the aforementioned comments must be filed no later than 15 days from the date on which the last comment is filed. (related document(s)53, 74, 48, 54, 49, 50, 81).(Love, Cynthia) 1 2021-05-14 D09002ee1be437366 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-1 cit-1_17-cv-00100_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-1.pdf USCOURTS 1:17-cv-00100; Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. et al v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-1 1 2021-05-14 Order entered on 5/14/2021, Slip opinion: 21-60. ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained with respect to the assignment of a redetermined weighted average dumping margin of 16.78% to mandatory respondent Xugong and the assignment of a rate of 16.78% to separate rate respondents Full World, Qingdao Qihang, Trelleborg, and Zhongwei; it is further ORDERED that Commerce submit a second determination upon remand (Second Remand Redetermination) in which it reconsiders its decisions not to accord separate rate status to Aeolus and GTC and revises the antidumping duty rates applied to these respondents as may be required by its reconsideration of those decisions; it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall submit its Second Remand Redetermination within 90 days of the date of this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that comments of plaintiffs on the Second Remand Redetermination must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the filing of the Second Remand Redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that the response of defendant to the aforementioned comments must be filed no later than 15 days from the date on which the last comment is filed. (related document(s)53, 74, 48, 54, 49, 50, 81).(Love, Cynthia) Order entered on 5/18/2023 Slip-Op. 23-79: Sustaining an agency decision issued in response to court order in litigation contesting results of an administrative review of an antidumping duty order on off-the-road tires from the People's Republic of China. Commerce applied a permissible methodology and reached findings supported by substantial evidence in determining that Aeolus and GTC did not qualify for separate rate status. Therefore, the court will enter judgment sustaining the Second Remand Redetermination. (related document(s)110, 109, 126, 103).(Hugh, Lewis) 2 2023-05-18 D09002ee1be437367 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-2 cit-1_17-cv-00100_2.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-2.pdf USCOURTS 1:17-cv-00100; Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. et al v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_17-cv-00100-2 2 2023-05-18 Order entered on 5/18/2023 Slip-Op. 23-79: Sustaining an agency decision issued in response to court order in litigation contesting results of an administrative review of an antidumping duty order on off-the-road tires from the People's Republic of China. Commerce applied a permissible methodology and reached findings supported by substantial evidence in determining that Aeolus and GTC did not qualify for separate rate status. Therefore, the court will enter judgment sustaining the Second Remand Redetermination. (related document(s)110, 109, 126, 103).(Hugh, Lewis)