United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States Court of International Trade author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2021-04-06 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2020-04-06 monographic deposited born digital JU 9.5: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246 P0b002ee1ac75fc04 DGPO 2021-04-06 2021-04-09 USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246 National cit Federal 4004 1:13-cv-00246 New York civil 1581c 28USC1581(c) Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Determination(s) 1:13-cv-00246 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246 JU 9.5: 1:13-cv-00246;1:13-cv-00246 United States Court of International Trade Federal Circuit New York U.S. Courts author aut Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee Intervenor Defendant Meridian Products LLC Meridian Products LLC Plaintiff United States United States Defendant Whirlpool Corporation Whirlpool Corporation Intervenor Plaintiff USCOURTS USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246 National cit Federal 4004 1:13-cv-00246 New York civil 1581c 28USC1581(c) Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Determination(s) Order entered on 2/19/2014,Slip opinion: 14-20. ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for remand be, and hereby is, denied without prejudice to plaintiffs opportunity to seek a remedy at a later time; and it is further ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff shall consult with counsel for the other parties and, by March 7, 2014, submit an agreed-upon schedule for briefing that follows generally the procedures of USCIT Rule 56.2 or, in the event that the parties cannot reach an agreement on a schedule, a request for a scheduling conference. (related document(s)29).(Love, Cynthia) 0 2014-02-19 D09002ee1acaf445d https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-0 cit-1_13-cv-00246_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-0.pdf USCOURTS 1:13-cv-00246; Meridian Products LLC v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-0 0 2014-02-19 Order entered on 2/19/2014,Slip opinion: 14-20. ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for remand be, and hereby is, denied without prejudice to plaintiffs opportunity to seek a remedy at a later time; and it is further ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff shall consult with counsel for the other parties and, by March 7, 2014, submit an agreed-upon schedule for briefing that follows generally the procedures of USCIT Rule 56.2 or, in the event that the parties cannot reach an agreement on a schedule, a request for a scheduling conference. (related document(s)29).(Love, Cynthia) Order entered on 12/7/2015, Slip opinion: 15-135. ORDERED that the Final Scope Ruling is affirmed in its determination that the Type A and Type C appliance door handles are within the scope of the Orders; it is further ORDERED that the Final Scope Ruling be, and hereby is, remanded for reconsideration, in accordance with this Opinion and Order, of the Departments determination that the Type B appliance door handles are within the scope of the Orders; it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this Opinion and Order to file a remand redetermination comprising a new scope ruling addressing the Type B handles that complies with this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor, and defendant-intervenor shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the Departments filing of the remand redetermination in which to file comments on the remand redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that defendant shall have fifteen (15) days after the filing of the last comment by plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor, or defendant-intervenor in which to file a reply to the comments of the other parties. (related document(s)38) (Attachments: # (1) Web Pages Cited).(Love, Cynthia) 1 2015-12-07 D09002ee1acaf445e https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-1 cit-1_13-cv-00246_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-1.pdf USCOURTS 1:13-cv-00246; Meridian Products LLC v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-1 1 2015-12-07 Order entered on 12/7/2015, Slip opinion: 15-135. ORDERED that the Final Scope Ruling is affirmed in its determination that the Type A and Type C appliance door handles are within the scope of the Orders; it is further ORDERED that the Final Scope Ruling be, and hereby is, remanded for reconsideration, in accordance with this Opinion and Order, of the Departments determination that the Type B appliance door handles are within the scope of the Orders; it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this Opinion and Order to file a remand redetermination comprising a new scope ruling addressing the Type B handles that complies with this Opinion and Order; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor, and defendant-intervenor shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the Departments filing of the remand redetermination in which to file comments on the remand redetermination; and it is further ORDERED that defendant shall have fifteen (15) days after the filing of the last comment by plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor, or defendant-intervenor in which to file a reply to the comments of the other parties. (related document(s)38) (Attachments: # (1) Web Pages Cited).(Love, Cynthia) Order entered on 7/18/2016, Slip opinion: 16-71. The court affirms the Departments decision that the Type B handles are not within the scope of the Orders but does not agree with all of the statements in the Remand Redetermination that Commerce offers as an explanation for why it has chosen to reach that decision under protest. Judgment will enter accordingly. (related document(s)38, 67) (Attachments: # (1) Cited Web Page).(Love, Cynthia) 2 2016-07-18 D09002ee1acaf4949 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-2 cit-1_13-cv-00246_2.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-2.pdf USCOURTS 1:13-cv-00246; Meridian Products LLC v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-2 2 2016-07-18 Order entered on 7/18/2016, Slip opinion: 16-71. The court affirms the Departments decision that the Type B handles are not within the scope of the Orders but does not agree with all of the statements in the Remand Redetermination that Commerce offers as an explanation for why it has chosen to reach that decision under protest. Judgment will enter accordingly. (related document(s)38, 67) (Attachments: # (1) Cited Web Page).(Love, Cynthia) Order entered on 1/14/2019 Slip opinion: 19-5; Ordering further agency proceedings in compliance with a mandate of the United States Courtof Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (related document(s)82) Remand Results due by 4/15/2019..(Demb, Rebecca) 3 2019-01-14 D09002ee1acaf445c https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-3 cit-1_13-cv-00246_3.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-3.pdf USCOURTS 1:13-cv-00246; Meridian Products LLC v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-3 3 2019-01-14 Order entered on 1/14/2019 Slip opinion: 19-5; Ordering further agency proceedings in compliance with a mandate of the United States Courtof Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (related document(s)82) Remand Results due by 4/15/2019..(Demb, Rebecca) Order entered on 4/6/2020, Slip opinion: 20-43. The court sustains the Second Remand Redeterminationand will enter judgment accordingly. (related document(s)88).(Love, Cynthia) 4 2020-04-06 D09002ee1acaf445b https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-4 cit-1_13-cv-00246_4.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246/pdf/USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-4.pdf USCOURTS 1:13-cv-00246; Meridian Products LLC v. United States; United States Court of International Trade USCOURTS-cit-1_13-cv-00246-4 4 2020-04-06 Order entered on 4/6/2020, Slip opinion: 20-43. The court sustains the Second Remand Redeterminationand will enter judgment accordingly. (related document(s)88).(Love, Cynthia)