United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States District Court Northern District of California author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2018-03-08 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2017-08-01 monographic deposited born digital JU 4.15 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266 P0b002ee198c14fd2 DGPO 2018-03-08 2018-03-08 USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266 District cand 9th California 2062 3:13-cv-01266 San Francisco civil 899 Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision 05:0701 Maritime Subsidy Board 3:13-cv-01266 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266 JU 4.15 3:13-cv-01266;13-1266 United States District Court Northern District of California 9th Circuit San Francisco U.S. Courts author aut Bayer CropScience LP Bayer CropScience LP Intervenor Dft Beyond Pesticides Beyond Pesticides Plaintiff Steven P. Bradbury Bradbury Steven Defendant Center for Environmental Health Center for Environmental Health Plaintiff Center for Food Safety Center for Food Safety Plaintiff CropLife America CropLife America Intervenor Dft Jim Doan Doan Jim Plaintiff Steve Ellis Ellis Steve Plaintiff Bob Perciasepe Perciasepe Bob Defendant Pesticide Action Network North America Pesticide Action Network North America Plaintiff Pollinator Stewardship Council Pollinator Stewardship Council Amicus RISE (Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment) RISE (Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment) Intervenor Dft Bill Rhodes Rhodes Bill Plaintiff Sierra Club Sierra Club Plaintiff Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC Intervenor Dft Tom Theobald Theobald Tom Plaintiff Valent U.S.A. Corporation Valent U.S.A. Corporation Intervenor Dft USCOURTS USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266 District cand 9th California 2062 3:13-cv-01266 San Francisco civil 899 Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision 05:0701 Maritime Subsidy Board California ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 12, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013) 0 2013-07-12 D09002ee198c81866 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-0 cand-3_13-cv-01266_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-0.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-0 0 2013-07-12 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 12, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION IN PART AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties' stipulation, filed July 18, 2013, is approved, with the exception that the motion and opposition, respectively, shall be no more than 35 pages in length, the reply shall be no more than 20 pages in length, and the Case Management Conference is continued to December 13, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 22, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013) 1 2013-07-22 D09002ee198c81892 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-1 cand-3_13-cv-01266_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-1.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-1 1 2013-07-22 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION IN PART AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties' stipulation, filed July 18, 2013, is approved, with the exception that the motion and opposition, respectively, shall be no more than 35 pages in length, the reply shall be no more than 20 pages in length, and the Case Management Conference is continued to December 13, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 22, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013) ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION ON AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to December 6, 2013. Proposed defendants/intervenors' motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than September 16, 2013, and noticed for hearing on December 6, 2013. Plaintiffs' opposition to the respective motions to dismiss shall be filed no later than October 14, 2013; the Court declines to adopt defendants' proposal as to the manner in which plaintiffs may file their opposition to the respective motions to dismiss. The replies shall be filed no later than November 1, 2013. The parties' stipulation with respect to page limits as to the defendants/intervenors' motion is not approved. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013) 2 2013-08-06 D09002ee198c81897 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-2 cand-3_13-cv-01266_2.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-2.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-2 2 2013-08-06 ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION ON AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to December 6, 2013. Proposed defendants/intervenors' motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than September 16, 2013, and noticed for hearing on December 6, 2013. Plaintiffs' opposition to the respective motions to dismiss shall be filed no later than October 14, 2013; the Court declines to adopt defendants' proposal as to the manner in which plaintiffs may file their opposition to the respective motions to dismiss. The replies shall be filed no later than November 1, 2013. The parties' stipulation with respect to page limits as to the defendants/intervenors' motion is not approved. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE OF BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, AND VALENT U.S.A. CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013) 3 2013-08-06 D09002ee198c8186a https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-3 cand-3_13-cv-01266_3.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-3.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-3 3 2013-08-06 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE OF BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, AND VALENT U.S.A. CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON CROPLIFE AMERICA AND RISE'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 3, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013) 4 2013-09-03 D09002ee198c81899 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-4 cand-3_13-cv-01266_4.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-4.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-4 4 2013-09-03 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON CROPLIFE AMERICA AND RISE'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 3, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROPLIFE AMERICA AND RISE'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; DIRECTIONS TO INTERVENING DEFENDANTS. To the extent the motion seeks an order allowing CropLife America to intervene as a defendant, the motion is granted. To the extent the motion seeks an order allowing RISE to intervene as a defendant, the motion is denied. All intervening defendants are directed to file a joint motion to dismiss and a joint reply. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2013) 5 2013-09-06 D09002ee198c8186b https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-5 cand-3_13-cv-01266_5.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-5.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-5 5 2013-09-06 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROPLIFE AMERICA AND RISE'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; DIRECTIONS TO INTERVENING DEFENDANTS. To the extent the motion seeks an order allowing CropLife America to intervene as a defendant, the motion is granted. To the extent the motion seeks an order allowing RISE to intervene as a defendant, the motion is denied. All intervening defendants are directed to file a joint motion to dismiss and a joint reply. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2013) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME; GRANTING LIMITED INTERIM EXTENSION TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS. The Court, pending ruling on the motion to enlarge time, grants plaintiffs a limited interim extension to October 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013) 6 2013-10-11 D09002ee198c81864 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-6 cand-3_13-cv-01266_6.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-6.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-6 6 2013-10-11 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME; GRANTING LIMITED INTERIM EXTENSION TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS. The Court, pending ruling on the motion to enlarge time, grants plaintiffs a limited interim extension to October 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS. All proceedings are stayed. Federal Defendants shall promptly notify the Court and parties as soon as Congress has appropriated funds for EPA and the Department of Justice. The parties shall file a joint status report within seven days of Federal Defendants' notice stating the parties' proposal(s) for a new litigation schedule. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013) 7 2013-10-11 D09002ee198c818af https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-7 cand-3_13-cv-01266_7.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-7.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-7 7 2013-10-11 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS. All proceedings are stayed. Federal Defendants shall promptly notify the Court and parties as soon as Congress has appropriated funds for EPA and the Department of Justice. The parties shall file a joint status report within seven days of Federal Defendants' notice stating the parties' proposal(s) for a new litigation schedule. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 17, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014) 8 2014-01-17 D09002ee198c81893 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-8 cand-3_13-cv-01266_8.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-8.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-8 8 2014-01-17 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 17, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014) 9 2014-03-24 D09002ee198c81898 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-9 cand-3_13-cv-01266_9.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-9 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-9.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-9 9 2014-03-24 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART EPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART INTERVENORS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Third and Fourth Claims, the motions are granted, and said Claims are dismissed with leave to amend. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Claims, the motions are granted, and said Claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Claims, the motions are granted in part. In all other respects, the motions are denied. Any Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than May 9, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 18, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2014) 10 2014-04-18 D09002ee198c81863 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-10 cand-3_13-cv-01266_10.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-10 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-10.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-10 10 2014-04-18 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART EPA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART INTERVENORS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Third and Fourth Claims, the motions are granted, and said Claims are dismissed with leave to amend. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Claims, the motions are granted, and said Claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend. To the extent the motions seek dismissal of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Claims, the motions are granted in part. In all other respects, the motions are denied. Any Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than May 9, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 18, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2014) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 20, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014) 11 2014-10-20 D09002ee198c81896 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-11 cand-3_13-cv-01266_11.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-11 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-11.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-11 11 2014-10-20 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 20, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO LODGE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. The deadline to file the administrative record is extended to January 12, 2015. The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine a plan for defendants' producing the record on a rolling basis. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2014) 12 2014-11-03 D09002ee198c81895 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-12 cand-3_13-cv-01266_12.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-12 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-12.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-12 12 2014-11-03 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO LODGE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. The deadline to file the administrative record is extended to January 12, 2015. The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine a plan for defendants' producing the record on a rolling basis. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2014) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED OVERSIZED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION Plaintiffs may file a single brief of no more than thirty pages in opposition to the two motions to preclude submission of expert declarations and extra-record materials. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 14, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2015) 13 2015-04-14 D09002ee198c81894 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-13 cand-3_13-cv-01266_13.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-13 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-13.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-13 13 2015-04-14 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED OVERSIZED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION Plaintiffs may file a single brief of no more than thirty pages in opposition to the two motions to preclude submission of expert declarations and extra-record materials. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 14, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2015) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON EPA'S MOTION TO LIMIT REVIEW TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; VACATING HEARING ON INTERVENORS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-RECORD MATERIAL; DENYING AS MOOT JOINT REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE TELEPHONICALLY IN HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015) 14 2015-05-20 D09002ee198c81868 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-14 cand-3_13-cv-01266_14.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-14 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-14.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-14 14 2015-05-20 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON EPA'S MOTION TO LIMIT REVIEW TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; VACATING HEARING ON INTERVENORS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-RECORD MATERIAL; DENYING AS MOOT JOINT REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE TELEPHONICALLY IN HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015) ORDER DENYING EPA'S MOTION TO LIMIT REVIEW TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; DENYING INTERVENORS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-RECORD MATERIAL; GRANTING EPA'S REQUEST FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 12, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2015) 15 2015-06-12 D09002ee198c81891 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-15 cand-3_13-cv-01266_15.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-15 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-15.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-15 15 2015-06-12 ORDER DENYING EPA'S MOTION TO LIMIT REVIEW TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; DENYING INTERVENORS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXTRA-RECORD MATERIAL; GRANTING EPA'S REQUEST FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 12, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2015) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' PROFERRED EXPERT TESTIMONY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 8, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016) 16 2016-03-08 D09002ee198c81867 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-16 cand-3_13-cv-01266_16.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-16 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-16.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-16 16 2016-03-08 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' PROFERRED EXPERT TESTIMONY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 8, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 10, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2016) 17 2016-03-10 D09002ee198c8189a https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-17 cand-3_13-cv-01266_17.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-17 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-17.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-17 17 2016-03-10 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 10, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2016) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 29, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2016) 18 2016-04-29 D09002ee198c81869 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-18 cand-3_13-cv-01266_18.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-18 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-18.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-18 18 2016-04-29 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 29, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2016) ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim is dismissed with prejudice to the extent it is based on EPA approvals for Titan FL, Three-Way VAP, Proceed Plus, and AE 1283742. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 8, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016) 19 2016-06-08 D09002ee198c818b0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-19 cand-3_13-cv-01266_19.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-19 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-19.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-19 19 2016-06-08 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim is dismissed with prejudice to the extent it is based on EPA approvals for Titan FL, Three-Way VAP, Proceed Plus, and AE 1283742. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 8, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. As to the Fifth and Sixth Claims, to the extent plaintiffs have established the EPA's liability, the parties are directed to meet and confer, and to thereafter file, no later than May 26, 2017, a jointly proposed briefing schedule and hearing date, or, if the parties are unable to agree on a schedule, a joint filing in which they set forth their respective proposals. The parties are referred back to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley and are directed to contact her chambers forthwith to schedule a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017) 20 2017-05-08 D09002ee198c818b1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-20 cand-3_13-cv-01266_20.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-20 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-20.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-20 20 2017-05-08 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. As to the Fifth and Sixth Claims, to the extent plaintiffs have established the EPA's liability, the parties are directed to meet and confer, and to thereafter file, no later than May 26, 2017, a jointly proposed briefing schedule and hearing date, or, if the parties are unable to agree on a schedule, a joint filing in which they set forth their respective proposals. The parties are referred back to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley and are directed to contact her chambers forthwith to schedule a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017) sney on August 1, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2017)ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY REMEDY PHASE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The remedies briefing schedule and hearing date set forth in the Court's order dated June 6, 2017, are stayed. The parties shall confer and by September 8, 2017, either jointly request a stay or commence remedies briefing under the following schedule: Opening Remedies Brief - September 11, 2017; Oppositions - November 9, 2017; Reply - December 15, 2017; Hearing - January 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Che 21 2017-08-01 D09002ee198c81865 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-21 cand-3_13-cv-01266_21.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-21 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-21.pdf USCOURTS 3:13-cv-01266; Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al; United States District Court Northern District of California California USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01266-21 21 2017-08-01 sney on August 1, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2017)ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY REMEDY PHASE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The remedies briefing schedule and hearing date set forth in the Court's order dated June 6, 2017, are stayed. The parties shall confer and by September 8, 2017, either jointly request a stay or commence remedies briefing under the following schedule: Opening Remedies Brief - September 11, 2017; Oppositions - November 9, 2017; Reply - December 15, 2017; Hearing - January 12, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Che