United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States District Court Eastern District of California author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-10-17 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2026-07-21 monographic deposited born digital 130 digital object pages JU 4.15 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699 P0b002ee1e92c0ab4 DGPO 2026-10-17 2026-10-18 USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699 District caed 9th California 2061 2:22-cv-01699 Sacramento civil 445 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act 2:22-cv-01699 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699 JU 4.15 2:22-cv-01699;22-1699 United States District Court Eastern District of California 9th Circuit Sacramento U.S. Courts author aut A.I.M.S. A.I.M.S. Plaintiff Angelique Ashby Ashby Angelique Defendant Tiffany Brown Brown Tiffany Defendant Tanya Cruz Cruz Tanya Defendant Rich Desmond Desmond Rich Defendant La Shelle Dozier Dozier La Shelle Defendant Sue Frost Frost Sue Defendant Eric Guerra Guerra Eric Defendant Jeff Harris Harris Jeff Defendant Ibra Henly Henly Ibra Defendant Tameka Jackson Jackson Tameka Defendant Rick Jennings Jennings Rick Defendant Sean Lolee Lolee Sean Defendant Tory Lynch Lynch Tory Defendant Lisa Macias Macias Lisa Defendant Dan Nottoli Nottoli Dan Defendant MaryLiz Paulson Paulson MaryLiz Defendant Sydney Brooke Roberts Roberts Sydney Plaintiff Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Defendant David Tyrone Samuel Samuel David Plaintiff Phil Serna Serna Phil Defendant Jay Shenirer Shenirer Jay Defendant Darrell Steinberg Steinberg Darrell Defendant Tyler Thao Thao Tyler Defendant Katie Valenzuela Valenzuela Katie Defendant Mai Vang Vang Mai Defendant USCOURTS USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699 District caed 9th California 2061 2:22-cv-01699 Sacramento civil 445 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act California ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/5/22 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Amended Complaint due within 30 days. (Her, S) 0 2022-10-06 D09002ee1e9315ea4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-0 caed-2_22-cv-01699_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-0.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-0 0 2022-10-06 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/5/22 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Amended Complaint due within 30 days. (Her, S) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/25/2022 GRANTING the 4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Plaintiff to complete and return the provided form indicating whether they wish to proceed on the First Amended Complaint or whether they wish to file a Second Amended Complaint. If plaintiffs fail to timely comply with this order, the undersigned may recommend that this action be dismissed. (Spichka, K.) 1 2022-10-26 D09002ee1e9315eb8 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-1 caed-2_22-cv-01699_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-1.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-1 1 2022-10-26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/25/2022 GRANTING the 4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Plaintiff to complete and return the provided form indicating whether they wish to proceed on the First Amended Complaint or whether they wish to file a Second Amended Complaint. If plaintiffs fail to timely comply with this order, the undersigned may recommend that this action be dismissed. (Spichka, K.) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/2022 DENIED as MOOT 7 Motion to Amend the Complaint. because plaintiffs had already been given permission to file an amended complaint, and Plaintiffs are ORDERED within 14 days to complete and return the attached form notifying the court indicating whether they wish to proceed on the Second Amended Complaint against defendant Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency only, dismissing claims against other defendants, or whether they wish to file a third amended complaint.(Reader, L) 2 2022-11-04 D09002ee1e9315ebf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-2 caed-2_22-cv-01699_2.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-2 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-2.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-2 2 2022-11-04 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/2022 DENIED as MOOT 7 Motion to Amend the Complaint. because plaintiffs had already been given permission to file an amended complaint, and Plaintiffs are ORDERED within 14 days to complete and return the attached form notifying the court indicating whether they wish to proceed on the Second Amended Complaint against defendant Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency only, dismissing claims against other defendants, or whether they wish to file a third amended complaint.(Reader, L) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/30/2022 ORDERING that Service of the 11 Third Amended Complaint is appropriate for the defendants. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff: one USM-285, one summons for each defendant, a copy of the complaint for each defendant, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge for each defendant. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process. (Rodriguez, E) 3 2022-12-01 D09002ee1e9315e9b https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-3 caed-2_22-cv-01699_3.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-3 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-3.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-3 3 2022-12-01 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/30/2022 ORDERING that Service of the 11 Third Amended Complaint is appropriate for the defendants. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff: one USM-285, one summons for each defendant, a copy of the complaint for each defendant, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge for each defendant. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process. (Rodriguez, E) FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/03/23 RECOMMENDING that 26 Motion for TRO be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Objections to F&Rs due within 21 days. (Benson, A.) 4 2023-05-03 D09002ee1e9315ea1 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-4 caed-2_22-cv-01699_4.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-4 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-4.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-4 4 2023-05-03 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/03/23 RECOMMENDING that 26 Motion for TRO be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Objections to F&Rs due within 21 days. (Benson, A.) ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/30/2023 GRANTING 23 Motion to Amend the Complaint. STRICKEN 24 as prematurely the Proposed 4th Amended Complaint. RECOMMENDING 21 that Motion to Dismiss be Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta, and Objections due within 21 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L) 5 2023-05-31 D09002ee1e9315eb6 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-5 caed-2_22-cv-01699_5.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-5 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-5.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-5 5 2023-05-31 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/30/2023 GRANTING 23 Motion to Amend the Complaint. STRICKEN 24 as prematurely the Proposed 4th Amended Complaint. RECOMMENDING 21 that Motion to Dismiss be Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta, and Objections due within 21 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/12/2023 DENYING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to refiling at the appropriate time, as premature and procedurally improper. (Perdue, C.) 6 2023-06-12 D09002ee1e9315eb7 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-6 caed-2_22-cv-01699_6.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-6.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-6 6 2023-06-12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/12/2023 DENYING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to refiling at the appropriate time, as premature and procedurally improper. (Perdue, C.) ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/8/23 ADOPTING in full 27 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 26 plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. (Kastilahn, A) 7 2023-11-08 D09002ee1e9315e97 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-7 caed-2_22-cv-01699_7.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-7 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-7.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-7 7 2023-11-08 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/8/23 ADOPTING in full 27 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 26 plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. (Kastilahn, A) ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/17/23 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 21 Motion to Dismiss, as follows. 1. GRANTED as to defendants Darrell Steinberg, Angelique Ashby, Sean Lololee, Jeff Harris, Katie Valenzuela, Jay Schenirer, Eric Guerra, Rick Jennings, Mai Vang, Phil Serna, Rich Desmond, Sue Frost, and Don Nottoli, all of whom are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. GRANTED without leave to amend as to the claim for family composition discrimination (Claim Six), which is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. DENIED as to the remaining individual defendants, all claims against whom should be CONSTRUED as individual capacity claims only; 4. DENIED as to claims for disability discrimination in housing under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Fair Housing Act (Claims One and Five); 5. DENIED as to the ineffective communication claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Claim Tined by the magistrate judge in the findings and recommendations within 30 days of the entry of this order.(Licea Chavez, V)wo); 6. DENIED as to the Fourteenth Amendment due process violation claim (Claim Three); and 7. DENIED as to the accessibility of services claims (Claim Four). In addition, Plaintiffs will be granted leave to amend to include additional facts as outl 8 2023-11-20 D09002ee1e9315e9f https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-8 caed-2_22-cv-01699_8.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-8 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-8.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-8 8 2023-11-20 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/17/23 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 21 Motion to Dismiss, as follows. 1. GRANTED as to defendants Darrell Steinberg, Angelique Ashby, Sean Lololee, Jeff Harris, Katie Valenzuela, Jay Schenirer, Eric Guerra, Rick Jennings, Mai Vang, Phil Serna, Rich Desmond, Sue Frost, and Don Nottoli, all of whom are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. GRANTED without leave to amend as to the claim for family composition discrimination (Claim Six), which is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. DENIED as to the remaining individual defendants, all claims against whom should be CONSTRUED as individual capacity claims only; 4. DENIED as to claims for disability discrimination in housing under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Fair Housing Act (Claims One and Five); 5. DENIED as to the ineffective communication claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Claim Tined by the magistrate judge in the findings and recommendations within 30 days of the entry of this order.(Licea Chavez, V)wo); 6. DENIED as to the Fourteenth Amendment due process violation claim (Claim Three); and 7. DENIED as to the accessibility of services claims (Claim Four). In addition, Plaintiffs will be granted leave to amend to include additional facts as outl ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/6/24 SETTING A Status, (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 4/17/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Not later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference, the parties shall file status reports. The parties are informed that they may elect to participate in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP") by contacting the court's VDRP administrator, Sujean Park. The parties are also informed that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a United States Magistrate Judge while preserving their right to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Consent forms should be returned to the Clerk within 30 days of this order. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of the "Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge". (Kastilahn, A) 9 2024-02-07 D09002ee1e9315ea7 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-9 caed-2_22-cv-01699_9.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-9 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-9.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-9 9 2024-02-07 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/6/24 SETTING A Status, (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 4/17/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Not later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference, the parties shall file status reports. The parties are informed that they may elect to participate in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP") by contacting the court's VDRP administrator, Sujean Park. The parties are also informed that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a United States Magistrate Judge while preserving their right to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Consent forms should be returned to the Clerk within 30 days of this order. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of the "Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge". (Kastilahn, A) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/15/2024 DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Clemente Licea, O) 10 2024-04-15 D09002ee1e9315e96 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-10 caed-2_22-cv-01699_10.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-10 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-10.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-10 10 2024-04-15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/15/2024 DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Clemente Licea, O) ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/17/2024 DIRECTING the plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE why the minor plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS should not be terminated from this case, and why defendant Tyler Thao should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. (Woodson, A) 11 2024-04-18 D09002ee1e9315ebd https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-11 caed-2_22-cv-01699_11.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-11 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-11.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-11 11 2024-04-18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/17/2024 DIRECTING the plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE why the minor plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS should not be terminated from this case, and why defendant Tyler Thao should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. (Woodson, A) FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/20/2024 RECOMMENDING that (1) the minor Plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS be terminated as Plaintiffs this case, and (2) Defendant Tyler Thao be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Nair, C) 12 2024-05-21 D09002ee1e9315ea8 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-12 caed-2_22-cv-01699_12.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-12 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-12.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-12 12 2024-05-21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/20/2024 RECOMMENDING that (1) the minor Plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS be terminated as Plaintiffs this case, and (2) Defendant Tyler Thao be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Nair, C) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 05/30/2024 GRANTING 61 Ex Parte Application for Continuance. The Settlement Conference set for 06/10/2024 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim is VACATED and will be continued to a future date after schedules are confirmed with the parties. (Nair, C) Modified on 5/31/2024 (Nair, C). 13 2024-05-30 D09002ee1e9315ea5 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-13 caed-2_22-cv-01699_13.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-13 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-13.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-13 13 2024-05-30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 05/30/2024 GRANTING 61 Ex Parte Application for Continuance. The Settlement Conference set for 06/10/2024 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim is VACATED and will be continued to a future date after schedules are confirmed with the parties. (Nair, C) Modified on 5/31/2024 (Nair, C). ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 8/14/24; ADOPTING in full 60 Findings and Recommendations. The minor plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS are TERMINATED as plaintiffs in this case and defendant Tyler Thao is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Salmeron, A) 14 2024-08-14 D09002ee1e9315e9d https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-14 caed-2_22-cv-01699_14.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-14 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-14.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-14 14 2024-08-14 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 8/14/24; ADOPTING in full 60 Findings and Recommendations. The minor plaintiffs AIMS and DAYS are TERMINATED as plaintiffs in this case and defendant Tyler Thao is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Salmeron, A) ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 9/29/2024 DENYING 65 Objection to Order dated 8/14/2024 and REFERRING matter back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Kyono, V) 15 2024-09-30 D09002ee1e9315e99 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-15 caed-2_22-cv-01699_15.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-15 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-15.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-15 15 2024-09-30 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 9/29/2024 DENYING 65 Objection to Order dated 8/14/2024 and REFERRING matter back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Kyono, V) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/30/24 DENYING 66 Motion to Compel. (Deputy Clerk AJB) 16 2025-01-02 D09002ee1e9315eba https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-16 caed-2_22-cv-01699_16.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-16 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-16.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-16 16 2025-01-02 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/30/24 DENYING 66 Motion to Compel. (Deputy Clerk AJB) se findings and recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLC)FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/13/25 RECOMMENDING that the 67 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with the 17 2025-01-14 D09002ee1e9315ea6 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-17 caed-2_22-cv-01699_17.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-17 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-17.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-17 17 2025-01-14 se findings and recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLC)FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/13/25 RECOMMENDING that the 67 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with the ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 02/27/25 ADOPTING 76 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 67 Motion for Summary Judgment and REFERRING matter back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk AJB) 18 2025-02-28 D09002ee1e9315e9e https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-18 caed-2_22-cv-01699_18.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-18 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-18.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-18 18 2025-02-28 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 02/27/25 ADOPTING 76 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 67 Motion for Summary Judgment and REFERRING matter back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk AJB) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 GRANTING to the extent that plaintiffs will be served electronically but DENIED without prejudice as to electronic filing. (Deputy Clerk KML) 19 2025-05-19 D09002ee1e9315eb9 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-19 caed-2_22-cv-01699_19.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-19 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-19.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-19 19 2025-05-19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 GRANTING to the extent that plaintiffs will be served electronically but DENIED without prejudice as to electronic filing. (Deputy Clerk KML) PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25. (Deputy Clerk KML) 20 2025-05-19 D09002ee1e9315ec4 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-20 caed-2_22-cv-01699_20.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-20 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-20.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-20 20 2025-05-19 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25. (Deputy Clerk KML) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 DENYING 90 Motion to Compel AS MOOT. (Deputy Clerk KML) 21 2025-05-19 D09002ee1e9315ea2 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-21 caed-2_22-cv-01699_21.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-21 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-21.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-21 21 2025-05-19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 DENYING 90 Motion to Compel AS MOOT. (Deputy Clerk KML) h these findings and recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLC)FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 RECOMMENDING that the 101 Motion for Relief from Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served wit 22 2025-05-19 D09002ee1e9315ea0 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-22 caed-2_22-cv-01699_22.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-22 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-22.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-22 22 2025-05-19 h these findings and recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLC)FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/19/25 RECOMMENDING that the 101 Motion for Relief from Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served wit ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/4/2025 DENYING Plaintiff's 119 Emergency Motion for District Judge review, Stay of Depositions, Sanctions, Extension of Deadlines, and Evidentiary Hearing; and REFERRING this matter back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings with the exception of the 111 Findings and Recommendations which are separately before this Court. (Deputy Clerk RRB) 23 2025-06-05 D09002ee1e9315e9a https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-23 caed-2_22-cv-01699_23.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-23 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-23.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-23 23 2025-06-05 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/4/2025 DENYING Plaintiff's 119 Emergency Motion for District Judge review, Stay of Depositions, Sanctions, Extension of Deadlines, and Evidentiary Hearing; and REFERRING this matter back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings with the exception of the 111 Findings and Recommendations which are separately before this Court. (Deputy Clerk RRB) ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/8/2025 ADOPTING 111 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 101 Plaintiff's Motion for relief from judgment; and This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk LMS) 24 2025-07-09 D09002ee1e9315ebe https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-24 caed-2_22-cv-01699_24.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-24 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-24.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-24 24 2025-07-09 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/8/2025 ADOPTING 111 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 101 Plaintiff's Motion for relief from judgment; and This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk LMS) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/29/2025 DENYING 112 Motion to Compel, DENYING 116 Motion for Ruling. (Deputy Clerk VLK) 25 2025-07-30 D09002ee1e9315ebb https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-25 caed-2_22-cv-01699_25.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-25 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-25.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-25 25 2025-07-30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/29/2025 DENYING 112 Motion to Compel, DENYING 116 Motion for Ruling. (Deputy Clerk VLK) ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/29/2025 ORDERING the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim to set a settlement conference and VACATING all remaining dates in this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the 124 Motion to Enforce Settlement be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLK) 26 2025-07-30 D09002ee1e9315ea3 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-26 caed-2_22-cv-01699_26.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-26 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-26.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-26 26 2025-07-30 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/29/2025 ORDERING the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim to set a settlement conference and VACATING all remaining dates in this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the 124 Motion to Enforce Settlement be denied. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLK) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/15/2026 DENYING 139 Motion for Extension of Time. Initial Expert Disclosures are due by 2/25/2026. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures are due by 3/25/2026. The deadline for law and motion is 4/6/2026. A Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 6/18/2026 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. A Jury Trial set for 9/21/2026 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. (Deputy Clerk LMS) 27 2026-01-16 D09002ee1e9315e9c https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-27 caed-2_22-cv-01699_27.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-27 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-27.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-27 27 2026-01-16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/15/2026 DENYING 139 Motion for Extension of Time. Initial Expert Disclosures are due by 2/25/2026. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures are due by 3/25/2026. The deadline for law and motion is 4/6/2026. A Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 6/18/2026 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. A Jury Trial set for 9/21/2026 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. (Deputy Clerk LMS) ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/20/2026 ADOPTING 132 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 124 Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement; This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pre-trial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk LMS) 28 2026-05-21 D09002ee1e9315e98 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-28 caed-2_22-cv-01699_28.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-28 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-28.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-28 28 2026-05-21 ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/20/2026 ADOPTING 132 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 124 Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement; This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pre-trial proceedings. (Deputy Clerk LMS) FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/10/2026 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 146 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part as follows: GRANTED as to Claim Three (42 U.S.C. § 1983); the equal protection aspects of Claims One, Two, Four, Five and Six; and statutory claims related to housekeeping, soundproofing, and blackout curtains; and DENIED in all other respects. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Objections to these F&R due within twenty-one days. (Deputy Clerk LMS) 29 2026-06-10 D09002ee1e9315ebc https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-29 caed-2_22-cv-01699_29.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-29 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-29.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-29 29 2026-06-10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/10/2026 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 146 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part as follows: GRANTED as to Claim Three (42 U.S.C. § 1983); the equal protection aspects of Claims One, Two, Four, Five and Six; and statutory claims related to housekeeping, soundproofing, and blackout curtains; and DENIED in all other respects. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Objections to these F&R due within twenty-one days. (Deputy Clerk LMS) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/20/26 DENYING 170 Renewed Motion to E-File and DENYING 171 Motion to Depose Defendants' Expert Witness. (Deputy Clerk KML) 30 2026-07-21 D09002ee1e9315ea9 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-30 caed-2_22-cv-01699_30.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-30 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-30.pdf USCOURTS 2:22-cv-01699; (PS) Roberts et al v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency, et al; United States District Court Eastern District of California California USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-30 30 2026-07-21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/20/26 DENYING 170 Renewed Motion to E-File and DENYING 171 Motion to Depose Defendants' Expert Witness. (Deputy Clerk KML)