<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1c1960b56">
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
        </role>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States</namePart>
         <namePart>United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit</namePart>
         <role>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
        </role>
         <description>Government Organization</description>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
    <language>
         <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <extension>
         <collectionCode>USCOURTS</collectionCode>
         <category>Judicial Publications</category>
         <branch>judicial</branch>
         <dateIngested>2023-10-20</dateIngested>
    </extension>
    <originInfo>
         <publisher>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher>
         <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2023-10-18</dateIssued>
         <issuance>monographic</issuance>
    </originInfo>
    <physicalDescription>
         <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
         <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
    </physicalDescription>
    <classification authority="sudocs">JU 2.11</classification>
    <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621</identifier>
    <identifier type="local">P0b002ee1c1960b56</identifier>
    <recordInfo>
         <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
         <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-10-20</recordCreationDate>
         <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-10-20</recordChangeDate>
         <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621</recordIdentifier>
         <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
         <languageOfCataloging>
              <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
        </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
    <accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
    <extension>
         <docClass>USCOURTS</docClass>
         <accessId>USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621</accessId>
         <courtType>Appellate</courtType>
         <courtCode>ca7</courtCode>
         <courtCircuit>7th</courtCircuit>
         <courtSortOrder>1070</courtSortOrder>
         <caseNumber>22-02621</caseNumber>
         <natureSuitCode>890</natureSuitCode>
         <natureSuit>Other Statutory Actions</natureSuit>
         <party fullName="Chamber of Progress" lastName="Chamber of Progress" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party firstName="G." fullName="G. G." lastName="G." role="Appellant"></party>
         <party fullName="International Franchise Association" lastName="International Franchise Association" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party fullName="NetChoice LLC" lastName="NetChoice LLC" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party firstName="Deanna" fullName="Deanna Rose" lastName="Rose" role="Appellant"></party>
         <party fullName="Salesforce.com, Inc." lastName="Salesforce.com, Inc." role="Appellee"></party>
    </extension>
    <titleInfo>
         <title>G.G., et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc.</title>
         <partNumber>22-02621</partNumber>
    </titleInfo>
    <location>
         <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621</url>
    </location>
    <classification authority="sudocs">JU 2.11</classification>
    <identifier type="preferred citation">22-02621;22-2621</identifier>
    <name type="corporate">
         <namePart>United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit</namePart>
         <namePart>7th Circuit</namePart>
         <namePart></namePart>
         <affiliation>U.S. Courts</affiliation>
         <role>
              <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
              <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>Chamber of Progress</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">Chamber of Progress</namePart>
         <namePart type="given"></namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Amicus Curiae</description>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>G. G.</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">G.</namePart>
         <namePart type="given">G.</namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Appellant</description>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>International Franchise Association</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">International Franchise Association</namePart>
         <namePart type="given"></namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Amicus Curiae</description>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>NetChoice LLC</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">NetChoice LLC</namePart>
         <namePart type="given"></namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Amicus Curiae</description>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>Deanna Rose</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">Rose</namePart>
         <namePart type="given">Deanna</namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Appellant</description>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
         <displayForm>Salesforce.com, Inc.</displayForm>
         <namePart type="family">Salesforce.com, Inc.</namePart>
         <namePart type="given"></namePart>
         <namePart type="termsOfAddress"></namePart>
         <description>Appellee</description>
    </name>
    <extension>
         <docClass>USCOURTS</docClass>
         <accessId>USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621</accessId>
         <courtType>Appellate</courtType>
         <courtCode>ca7</courtCode>
         <courtCircuit>7th</courtCircuit>
         <courtSortOrder>1070</courtSortOrder>
         <caseNumber>22-02621</caseNumber>
         <natureSuitCode>890</natureSuitCode>
         <natureSuit>Other Statutory Actions</natureSuit>
         <party fullName="Chamber of Progress" lastName="Chamber of Progress" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party firstName="G." fullName="G. G." lastName="G." role="Appellant"></party>
         <party fullName="International Franchise Association" lastName="International Franchise Association" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party fullName="NetChoice LLC" lastName="NetChoice LLC" role="Amicus Curiae"></party>
         <party firstName="Deanna" fullName="Deanna Rose" lastName="Rose" role="Appellant"></party>
         <party fullName="Salesforce.com, Inc." lastName="Salesforce.com, Inc." role="Appellee"></party>
    </extension>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>G.G., et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc.</title>
              <subTitle>Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. REVERSED and REMANDED. David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge; Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge, dissenting, and Doris L. Pryor, Circuit Judge. [7327245-1] [7327245] [22-2621]</subTitle>
              <partNumber>0</partNumber>
        </titleInfo>
         <originInfo>
              <dateIssued>2023-08-03</dateIssued>
        </originInfo>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/pdf/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1c198bd0b</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0</identifier>
         <identifier type="former granule identifier">ca7-22-02621_0.pdf</identifier>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/pdf/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0.pdf</url>
        </location>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>USCOURTS 22-02621; G.G., et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc.; </searchTitle>
              <courtName>United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit</courtName>
              <accessId>USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-0</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>0</sequenceNumber>
              <dateIssued>2023-08-03</dateIssued>
              <docketText>Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. REVERSED and REMANDED. David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge; Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge, dissenting, and Doris L. Pryor, Circuit Judge. [7327245-1] [7327245] [22-2621]</docketText>
        </extension>
    </relatedItem>
    <relatedItem type="constituent" ID="id-USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/metadata/granule/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1/mods.xml">
         <titleInfo>
              <title>G.G., et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc.</title>
              <subTitle>Filed PER CURIAM opinion of the court DENYING Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc. Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing Enbanc. A judge in regular active service called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority in active service voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Brennan, Scudder, St. Eve, and Kirsch voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Scudder dissented from the denial of the rehearing and rehearing en banc and filed an opinion which Judge St. Eve joined. [7342382-1] [7342382] [22-2621]</subTitle>
              <partNumber>1</partNumber>
        </titleInfo>
         <originInfo>
              <dateIssued>2023-10-18</dateIssued>
        </originInfo>
         <relatedItem type="otherFormat" xlink:href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/pdf/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1.pdf">
              <identifier type="FDsys Unique ID">D09002ee1c198bd0c</identifier>
        </relatedItem>
         <identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1</identifier>
         <identifier type="former granule identifier">ca7-22-02621_1.pdf</identifier>
         <location>
              <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1</url>
              <url access="raw object" displayLabel="PDF rendition">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621/pdf/USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1.pdf</url>
        </location>
         <extension>
              <searchTitle>USCOURTS 22-02621; G.G., et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc.; </searchTitle>
              <courtName>United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit</courtName>
              <accessId>USCOURTS-ca7-22-02621-1</accessId>
              <sequenceNumber>1</sequenceNumber>
              <dateIssued>2023-10-18</dateIssued>
              <docketText>Filed PER CURIAM opinion of the court DENYING Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc. Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing Enbanc. A judge in regular active service called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority in active service voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Brennan, Scudder, St. Eve, and Kirsch voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Scudder dissented from the denial of the rehearing and rehearing en banc and filed an opinion which Judge St. Eve joined. [7342382-1] [7342382] [22-2621]</docketText>
        </extension>
    </relatedItem>
</mods>