United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States United States District Court District of Arizona author aut Government Organization text government publication eng USCOURTS Judicial Publications judicial 2026-07-16 Administrative Office of the United States Courts 2025-10-28 monographic deposited born digital 14 digital object pages JU 4.15 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413 P0b002ee1e5193b22 DGPO 2026-07-16 2026-07-17 USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413 machine generated eng fdlp USCOURTS USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413 District azd 9th Arizona 2040 2:25-cv-02413 Phoenix Division civil 890 Other Statutory Actions 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus 2:25-cv-02413 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413 JU 4.15 2:25-cv-02413;25-2413 United States District Court District of Arizona 9th Circuit Phoenix Division U.S. Courts author aut John M Allen Allen John M Defendant Andrew the Homebuyer LLC Andrew the Homebuyer LLC Defendant Andrew Brent Brent Andrew Defendant Clear Title Agency of Arizona Clear Title Agency of Arizona Defendant Copper State Properties LLC Copper State Properties LLC Defendant Fidelity National Title Agency Incorporated Fidelity National Title Agency Incorporated Defendant Keith Anthony Hartl Hartl Keith Anthony Plaintiff Paul Anthony Hartl Hartl Paul Anthony Plaintiff JAX Advisory JAX Advisory Defendant Mark Manoil Manoil Mark Defendant Manoil Kime PLC Manoil Kime PLC Defendant Maricopa County Correctional Health Services Maricopa County Correctional Health Services Defendant Maricopa, County of Maricopa, County of Defendant Mohave, County of Mohave, County of Defendant Alysia Moore Moore Alysia Defendant Phoenix, City of Phoenix, City of Defendant Keith Thorstenson Thorstenson Keith Plaintiff Unknown Parties Unknown Parties Defendant Javier Vargas Vargas Javier Defendant West Coast Tax Auction LLC West Coast Tax Auction LLC Defendant James B Wittman Wittman James B Defendant USCOURTS USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413 District azd 9th Arizona 2040 2:25-cv-02413 Phoenix Division civil 890 Other Statutory Actions 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Arizona ORDER that (1) the Petition (Doc. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the motion for leave to file a FAC (Doc. 4) is denied; (3) the emergency motions for TRO and PI (Docs. 6, 7, 14) are denied as moot; (4) the motion for evidence preservation (Doc. 8) is denied as moot; (5) the IFP applications (Docs. 15, 30, 31) are denied as moot; (6) the motion for asset forfeiture and business dissolution (Doc. 16) is denied as moot; (7) the motion for an FBI civil rights investigation (Doc. 17) is denied as moot; (8) the motion for consolidation (Doc. 29) is denied as moot; and (9) the motion for service of process (Doc. 34) is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Sharad H Desai on 8/15/25. (EJA) 0 2025-08-15 D09002ee1e520a061 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-0 azd-2_25-cv-02413_0.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-0 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/pdf/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-0.pdf USCOURTS 2:25-cv-02413; Thorstenson v. Unknown Parties; United States District Court District of Arizona Arizona USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-0 0 2025-08-15 ORDER that (1) the Petition (Doc. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the motion for leave to file a FAC (Doc. 4) is denied; (3) the emergency motions for TRO and PI (Docs. 6, 7, 14) are denied as moot; (4) the motion for evidence preservation (Doc. 8) is denied as moot; (5) the IFP applications (Docs. 15, 30, 31) are denied as moot; (6) the motion for asset forfeiture and business dissolution (Doc. 16) is denied as moot; (7) the motion for an FBI civil rights investigation (Doc. 17) is denied as moot; (8) the motion for consolidation (Doc. 29) is denied as moot; and (9) the motion for service of process (Doc. 34) is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Sharad H Desai on 8/15/25. (EJA) ORDER that Plaintiffs' motions to vacate (Docs. 40, 66) are denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (Doc. 41) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Docs. 38, 42, 46, 47, 48, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 61, 68, 74, 78, 79, 83, 84, 85, and 90 are denied without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' filings purporting to be orders of this Court (Docs. 88, 91, 92, 93, 94) are stricken, and the Clerk of Court is directed to seal the documents. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall accept no further filings in this matter except in the furtherance of the appeal. FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain closed. See attached pdf for additional information. Signed by Judge Sharad H. Desai on 10/28/2025. (RMW) 1 2025-10-28 D09002ee1e520a064 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-1 azd-2_25-cv-02413_1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413/pdf/USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-1.pdf USCOURTS 2:25-cv-02413; Thorstenson v. Unknown Parties; United States District Court District of Arizona Arizona USCOURTS-azd-2_25-cv-02413-1 1 2025-10-28 ORDER that Plaintiffs' motions to vacate (Docs. 40, 66) are denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (Doc. 41) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Docs. 38, 42, 46, 47, 48, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 61, 68, 74, 78, 79, 83, 84, 85, and 90 are denied without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' filings purporting to be orders of this Court (Docs. 88, 91, 92, 93, 94) are stricken, and the Clerk of Court is directed to seal the documents. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall accept no further filings in this matter except in the furtherance of the appeal. FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain closed. See attached pdf for additional information. Signed by Judge Sharad H. Desai on 10/28/2025. (RMW)