<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038648e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>13 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED/AIMD-97-168</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038648e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:r197168t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED/AIMD-97-168</reportNumber>
 <subject>Small business assistance</subject>
 <subject>Research grants</subject>
 <subject>Grant award procedures</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Research and development</subject>
 <subject>Financial statement audits</subject>
 <subject>Accounting procedures</subject>
 <subject>Systems conversions</subject>
 <subject>Research program management</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <identifier>NSF Small Business Innovation Research Program</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Management: Observations on the National Science Foundation</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed a number of management and program issues at the National
Science Foundation (NSF) as recently reported by the NSF Office of
Inspector General (OIG) and GAO, focusing on: (1) duplicate funding in
the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program at NSF and
elsewhere; (2) challenges for NSF in implementing the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA); (3) the status of NSF&apos;s efforts to
prepare and have audited agencywide financial statements as required by
the Chief Financial Officers Act (CFO); and (4) a framework for
assessing NSF&apos;s readiness to meet computer challenges that will arise in
the year 2000.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) among the management issues identified by NSF&apos;s OIG
most in need of reform at NSF is the SBIR program; (2) GAO has reported
that duplicate funding of similar or even identical SBIR proposals
submitted to more than one agency has occurred at NSF, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Department of Defense ; (3)
NSF has revised its certification form to require applicants to certify,
under criminal penalties for perjury, exactly what, if any, applications
for similar research were pending in other agencies; (4) in implementing
the results Act, NSF, like most agencies, is still struggling to develop
the mission based goals and the performance measurement requirements of
the Act; (5) measuring the performance of science-related projects can
be extremely difficult because a wide range of factors determine if and
how a particular research and development (R&amp;D) project will result in a
commercial application or have other benefits, and it can take years for
a research project to realize a successful outcome; (6) GAO recently
reported that there is no single indicator or evaluation method that
captures the results of R&amp;D; (7) as a result, determining the specific
outcomes resulting from federal R&amp;D is a challenge that will not easily
be resolved; (8) as required by the CFO Act, one of NSF&apos;s primary
financial management challenges is to prepare and audit consolidated
agencywide financial statements; (9) NSF received its first-time audit
of its agencywide financial statements for fiscal year 1996; (10) NSF&apos;s
auditor concluded that the reported property, plant, and equipment
account balance is unreliable; (11) in response to its auditor&apos;s
concerns, NSF is in the process of developing a framework for
identifying and developing performance measures in response to the CFO
Act&apos;s and GPRA&apos;s requirements; (12) NSF like other federal agencies that
have system or application programs that use dates to perform
calculations, comparisons, or sorting may generate incorrect results
when working with years after 1999; (13) converting systems to a
four-digit year can be a massive undertaking for agencies such as NSF
because it involves identifying computer systems, developing conversion
strategies and plans, and dedicating sufficient resources to converting
and adequately testing their computer systems and programs before
January 1, 2000; (14) GAO has developed an assessment guide that
provides a structured approach for assessing the readiness of agencies&apos;
year 2000 programs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED/AIMD-97-168</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-AIMD-97-168</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED/AIMD-97-168; Federal Management: Observations on the National Science Foundation;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Small business assistance</topic>
 <topic>Research grants</topic>
 <topic>Grant award procedures</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Research and development</topic>
 <topic>Financial statement audits</topic>
 <topic>Accounting procedures</topic>
 <topic>Systems conversions</topic>
 <topic>Research program management</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>NSF Small Business Innovation Research Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>