<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180379308">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-07-01</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>16 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-99-232</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180379308</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99232t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-99-232</reportNumber>
 <subject>Food inspection</subject>
 <subject>Safety regulation</subject>
 <subject>Contaminated foods</subject>
 <subject>Consumer protection</subject>
 <subject>Health hazards</subject>
 <subject>Quality control</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Poultry industry</subject>
 <subject>Product safety</subject>
 <identifier>APHIS National Poultry Improvement Plan</identifier>
 <identifier>Salmonella Enteritidis Bacteria</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Food Safety: U.S. Needs a Consistent Farm-to-Table</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed its work on the
safety of eggs and egg products, focusing on whether: (1)
prevention-based safety practices have been applied on egg farms and at
processing plants; (2) implementation of a new federal policy on egg
refrigeration will effectively reduce the risks associated with
contaminated eggs; (3) federal and state policies and practices on
serving eggs to vulnerable populations and dating egg cartons are
consistent; and (4) federal egg safety resources are used efficiently
and policies are coordinated effectively.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not
established prevention-based procedures on egg farms or at shell egg
processing plants that would reduce or eliminate Salmonella Enteritidis
contamination by identifying, controlling, and monitoring known safety
risks; (2) 13 states, responsible for about 38 percent of the nation&apos;s
egg production, have established voluntary prevention-based programs for
egg farms; (3) however, these programs do not provide a uniform level of
risk reduction because they take different approaches in critical areas
such as the frequency of testing for the presence of Salmonella
Enteritidis; (4) the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) does not
require a prevention-based approach in processing plants where eggs are
broken to create egg products; (5) the first national requirement to
refrigerate eggs at 45 degrees Fahrenheit or below from the time they
are packed until they reach the consumer may not, for a variety of
reasons, effectively reduce egg safety risks; (6) implementation and
enforcement of the requirements will be split between FSIS and FDA; (7)
FSIS has issued regulations, which take effect in August, requiring that
eggs be refrigerated during storage and transportation; (8) however, FDA
has not yet proposed regulations to require that eggs be refrigerated
after they arrive at retail locations such as restaurants and grocery
stores; (9) many experts believe that greater risk reduction could be
achieved by controlling the internal temperature of the egg, something
that the new regulations will not require; (10) inconsistent policies
and practices in three other areas have weakened the nation&apos;s egg safety
efforts; (11) certain groups are more likely to suffer severe health
consequences from eating contaminated eggs; (12) only about half the
states have followed FDA&apos;s recommendation that they require food service
operators to use pasteurized eggs or egg products when serving these
groups; (13) federal policies allow some eggs to be returned from
grocery stores to processors to be repackaged, redated, and returned to
the retail level for sale; (14) there are inconsistencies in how
expiration dates are used on egg cartons; (15) the inconsistencies in
repackaging and expiration dating can mislead consumers about the eggs&apos;
freshness and may pose a food safety risk; and (16) the involvement of
four federal agencies enforcing a variety of laws makes it difficult to
direct resources to the areas of highest safety risk and to effectively
coordinate egg safety policies.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-99-232</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-232</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-99-232; Food Safety: U.S. Needs a Consistent Farm-to-Table;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Food inspection</topic>
 <topic>Safety regulation</topic>
 <topic>Contaminated foods</topic>
 <topic>Consumer protection</topic>
 <topic>Health hazards</topic>
 <topic>Quality control</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Poultry industry</topic>
 <topic>Product safety</topic>
 <topic>APHIS National Poultry Improvement Plan</topic>
 <topic>Salmonella Enteritidis Bacteria</topic>
</subject>
</mods>