United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 1999-05-19 monographic deposited born digital 12 p. GA 1.13:T-RCED-99-152 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152 P0b002ee18037d6fa f:rc99152t DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-24 GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152 T-RCED-99-152 Prices and pricing Gas leases Intergovernmental fiscal relations Petroleum industry Public lands Royalty payments Oil leases California Alaska Colorado Montana North Dakota Utah Wyoming Gulf of Mexico South Dakota Testimony RCED Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the valuation of federal oil, focusing on: (1) the information the Minerals Management Service (MMS) used to justify the need for revising its regulations; (2) how MMS addressed concerns expressed by the oil industry and the states in developing these regulations; and (3) the feasibility of the government's taking its oil and gas royalties in kind, instead of in cash.<p/>GAO noted that: (1) MMS relied heavily on the findings of an interagency task force to revise its oil valuation regulations; (2) this task force concluded that the major oil companies' use of posted prices in California to calculate federal royalities was inappropriate and recommended that the federal oil valuation regulations be revised; (3) MMS also relied on contracted studies of oil markets and on valuation disputes between the states and oil companies that the oil companies agreed to settle for more than $1 billion; (4) to address concerns of the oil industry and the states, MMS solicited public comments on the proposed regulations in seven Federal Register notices, held 17 public meetings, and revised its regulations five times; (5) proposed changes to the regulations are still pending; (6) concerning the government's taking of its royalties in kind, GAO concluded that this would not be feasible except under certain conditions; (7) these conditions include having easy access to pipelines, leases that produce large volumes of oil and gas, competitive arrangements for processing gas, and expertise in marketing oil and gas; and (8) however, these conditions are lacking for the federal government and for most federal leases. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152.pdf GAO/T-RCED-99-152 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-152 Testimony GAO/T-RCED-99-152; Federal Oil Valuation: Efforts to Revise Regulations and an Analysis of Royalties in Kind; Prices and pricing Gas leases Intergovernmental fiscal relations Petroleum industry Public lands Royalty payments Oil leases California Alaska Colorado Montana North Dakota Utah Wyoming Gulf of Mexico South Dakota