<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a0136">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-03-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>15 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-99-116</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a0136</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99116t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-99-116</reportNumber>
 <subject>Aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Ships</subject>
 <subject>Military procurement</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Mission budgeting</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <identifier>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability Replacement Project</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Coast Guard: Strategies for Procuring New Ships, Aircraft, and Other Assets</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the Coast Guard&apos;s
plans for modernizing its ships, aircraft, and other capital assets
needed to carry out its missions, as well as the agency&apos;s plans and
strategies to fund these needs, focusing on the Coast Guard&apos;s progress
in: (1) justifying the Deepwater Capability Replacement Project and
addressing GAO&apos;s concerns about its affordability; and (2) developing
strategies and plans for funding its capital needs within a constrained
fiscal environment.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Coast Guard has not yet sufficiently justified
the Deepwater Project, in that accurate and complete information is
lacking on the performance shortcomings of its ships and aircraft and
the resource hours needed to fulfill its missions; (2) proceeding
without these key data increases the risk that contractors will develop
alternatives that are not the most cost-effective to meet the needs of
the project; (3) the Coast Guard and its contractors are developing this
information, but some of it will not be available until later this year;
(4) GAO also reported that if the cost of the Deepwater Project
approaches the agency&apos;s initial estimate of $500 million annually, it
would consume more than the agency now spends for all capital projects
and leave little funding for other critical needs; (5) Coast Guard
officials believe that competition among contractors will reduce the
cost of the Deepwater Project and more closely align its potential cost
with probable funding levels; (6) however, until the Coast Guard
develops its new justification for the project in early 2000 and
contractors provide their cost estimates for various alternatives, the
Coast Guard will not know whether the affordability issue has been
adequately addressed; (7) the costs of the Deepwater Project, together
with funds needed to complete all other ongoing capital projects, may
outstrip the Coast Guard&apos;s ability to pay for them; (8) the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) proposes freezing the Coast Guard&apos;s budget
for capital spending at $485 million annually through fiscal year 2004;
(9) if the Deepwater Project requires annual funding levels of $500
million, this cost, coupled with the costs of ongoing capital projects,
would exceed the OMB target by about $300 million in 2002; (10) with
good planning, renewed efforts to reduce costs, and better information
on the useful life of its ships and aircraft, the Coast Guard may be
able to prioritize its needs and minimize future capital needs; and (11)
the Coast Guard is now developing a new plan and budget strategies for
dealing with its capital funding needs in an environment of fiscal
constraint, but putting these approaches in place may take several years
and their effectiveness is uncertain.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-99-116</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-99-116</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-99-116; Coast Guard: Strategies for Procuring New Ships, Aircraft, and Other Assets;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Ships</topic>
 <topic>Military procurement</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Mission budgeting</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability Replacement Project</topic>
</subject>
</mods>