<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039ecc7">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-11-04</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>17 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-98-38</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039ecc7</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98038t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-98-38</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal aid for highways</subject>
 <subject>Unobligated budget balances</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</subject>
 <subject>State-administered programs</subject>
 <subject>Highway planning</subject>
 <subject>Financial management</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Highway Programs: Status of Federal Highway Programs in the Absence of Reauthorization</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the status of federal surface transportation programs in
the absence of funding from a new federal highway reauthorization act,
focusing on a comparison of unobligated federal highway fund balances at
the beginning of fiscal year (FY) 1998 with the highway funds that the
states obligated during the first part of FY 1997.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the total unobligated highway fund balance available
at the beginning of FY 1998 equals $12.1 billion and exceeds the total
actual obligations of $8.1 billion, made by the states during the first
6 months of FY 1997; (2) a comparison of the unobligated balances of
individual states with their actual FY 1997 obligations reveals that
some state highway programs may experience financial difficulties by the
middle of FY 1998 if their obligation rates for this year are comparable
to those for FY 1997; (3) while most states have unobligated balances
that are greater than their actual federal highway obligations in the
first 6 months of FY 1997, 14 states have an unobligated balance that is
lower than their actual obligations during the same period; (4) the nine
states that GAO contacted identified various strategies that they would
use to try to continue their highway operations, such as relying more
extensively on state funds; (5) some of these states also noted that
they would soon be postponing highway projects if new federal funds are
not available within the next few months; (6) the rates at which states
obligated funds in FY 1997 may not correspond to their plans for
obligating federal highway funds in FY 1998; (7) some states may be
limited in their ability to use available unobligated balances because
of restrictions on the specific types of highway programs that the funds
can be used for; (8) the comparisons indicate that while many states may
be able to continue financing highway projects for some time, some
states may have difficulty dealing even in the short term with the
absence of new federal highway funds; (9) a number of strategies could
help the states respond to the absence of new federal funds in the short
term; (10) for example, Congress could provide the states with the
flexibility to use their unobligated balances across the range of
federal highway programs, rather than keeping the balances tied to
specific highway funding categories and demonstration projects; (11)
Congress could then reimburse appropriate funding categories after
reauthorization; (12) individual states could also consider a number of
strategies, such as temporarily substituting state funds for federal
highway funds; (13) states could also begin highway projects by using
advance construction, which enables a state to access capital from a
variety of sources and later receive reimbursements through federal
highway obligations; (14) such strategies, however, may delay other
planned projects within individual states; and (15) these strategies may
not be feasible for some states or for an extended period of time.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-98-38</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-38</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-98-38; Federal Highway Programs: Status of Federal Highway Programs in the Absence of Reauthorization;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal aid for highways</topic>
 <topic>Unobligated budget balances</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</topic>
 <topic>State-administered programs</topic>
 <topic>Highway planning</topic>
 <topic>Financial management</topic>
</subject>
</mods>