<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180376933">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-08-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>19 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-98-253</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180376933</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98253t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-98-253</reportNumber>
 <subject>Air transportation operations</subject>
 <subject>Airline industry</subject>
 <subject>Airline regulation</subject>
 <subject>Pilots</subject>
 <subject>Administrative remedies</subject>
 <subject>Safety regulation</subject>
 <subject>Transportation safety</subject>
 <subject>Commercial aviation</subject>
 <subject>Licenses</subject>
 <subject>Aircraft maintenance</subject>
 <identifier>Valujet Flight 592</identifier>
 <identifier>TWA Flight 800</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="49">
                      <section number="46110"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Aviation Safety: FAA&apos;s Use of Emergency Orders to Revoke or Suspend Operating Certificates</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the Federal Aviation
Administration&apos;s (FAA) use of emergency orders to suspend or revoke
aviation operating certificates, focusing on the: (1) extent to which
FAA used emergency orders; (2) ways in which changes in FAA&apos;s policies
might have affected the agency&apos;s use of emergency orders; and (3) time
needed for FAA to investigate alleged violations and issue emergency
orders.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) of the 137,506 enforcement cases closed in fiscal
years (FY) 1990 through 1997, FAA initiated 3 percent using emergency
orders; (2) FAA&apos;s nine regions differed in how frequently they issued
emergency orders partly as a result of their different enforcement
practices; (3) most of the emergency orders were issued to pilots for
either their operating certificates or their certificates of their
medical fitness to fly; (4) seventy-seven percent of the enforcement
cases initiated as emergency actions resulted ultimately in the
suspension or revocation of the certificate holder&apos;s operating
certificate; (5) five percent resulted in FAA&apos;s dropping the case
because it determined that no violation was committed or that it had
insufficient evidence to prove a violation; (6) the outcomes were not
specified for six percent of the cases, and the remainder involved a
variety of other outcomes; (7) in 1990, FAA decided that, for those
cases in which revocation are based on a demonstrated lack of
qualification to hold the relevant certificate, the certificate
generally should be revoked immediately and not after the lengthy appeal
process that nonemergency certificate actions can be subject to; (8) FAA
informally implemented this policy change in 1990 and 1991 before
formally incorporating it into its compliance and enforcement guidance
in 1992; (9) this shift in policy is reflected in the increase in the
numbers of emergency actions GAO observed: FAA initiated 184 revocations
using emergency orders in FY 1990; (10) in subsequent years, over 320
emergency revocations were issued, on average, each year; (11) although
the use of emergency orders is intended to expedite the handling of
serious enforcement cases, the time needed for FAA to investigate
violations and issue emergency orders varied widely, frequently taking
several months or longer; (12) for half of the enforcement cases in FY
1990 through FY 1997, FAA issued the emergency order within about 4
months after learning of the violation; (13) for the remainder, the time
needed to investigate and issue the order ranged from just over 4 months
to over 2 years; (14) during this time, the certificate holder could
continue to operate, that is, to fly or repair aircraft and possibly
pose a safety risk; and (15) while it is necessary for FAA to act
swiftly in cases that present an immediate threat to safety or a
demonstrated lack of qualifications, some aviation attorneys in the
private-sector have questioned whether it is appropriate or necessary
for FAA to handle some cases as emergencies, especially if the
violations occurred years before.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-98-253</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-253</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-98-253; Aviation Safety: FAA&apos;s Use of Emergency Orders to Revoke or Suspend Operating Certificates;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Air transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Airline industry</topic>
 <topic>Airline regulation</topic>
 <topic>Pilots</topic>
 <topic>Administrative remedies</topic>
 <topic>Safety regulation</topic>
 <topic>Transportation safety</topic>
 <topic>Commercial aviation</topic>
 <topic>Licenses</topic>
 <topic>Aircraft maintenance</topic>
 <topic>Valujet Flight 592</topic>
 <topic>TWA Flight 800</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 49 Section 46110</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">49 U.S.C. 46110</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>