<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a0232">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>18 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-98-229</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a0232</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98229t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-98-229</reportNumber>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Economic development</subject>
 <subject>Economically depressed areas</subject>
 <subject>Community development</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Lending institutions</subject>
 <identifier>Community Development Financial Institutions Fund</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="325"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Community Development: Early Results of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund&apos;s Programs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the preliminary results of its ongoing review of the
administration of the Community Development Financial Institutions
(CDFI) Fund, focusing on: (1) the first year&apos;s performance of the CDFI
and Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) programs and opportunities for improving
their effectiveness; (2) the Fund&apos;s progress in developing performance
measures for awardees and systems to monitor and evaluate their
progress; (3) the impact of the BEA program on banks&apos; investments in
CDFIs and distressed communities; and (4) CDFI&apos;s progress in meeting the
strategic planning requirements of the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) as of January 1998, the Fund had entered into
assistance agreements with 26 of the 31 CDFIs that received awards in
1996; (2) these agreements include performance goals and measures that
were based on the business plans submitted by awardees in their
application packages and negotiated between the Fund and the awardees,
as the CDFI Act requires; (3) these agreements are consistent with the
program&apos;s objectives; (4) using the Results Act for guidance, GAO found
that the performance measures in the assistance agreements generally
assess activities rather than accomplishments reflecting the results of
activities; (5) GAO further found that although the performance measures
in the assistance agreements are generally related to specific goals,
they do not always address all key aspects of the goals, and most
assistance agreements lack baseline data that would facilitate tracking
progress over time; (6) the Fund has developed reporting requirements
for awardees to collect information for monitoring their performance and
is developing post-award monitoring procedures for assessing their
compliance with their assistance agreements; (7) the Fund currently does
not have a system for evaluating the impact of awardees&apos; activities; (8)
although the Fund has disbursed about 80 percent of the fiscal year 1996
BEA awards funds, it is difficult to determine the extent to which the
program has encouraged the 38 awardees to increase their investments in
distressed communities; (9) in addition, some banks do not collect all
of the data on their activities needed to guarantee that increases in
investments under the BEA program are not being offset by decreases in
other investments in these distressed areas; (10) furthermore, the Fund
cannot be assured that banks&apos; increased investments remain in place
because it does not require banks to report any material changes in the
status of these investments; (11) the CDFI Fund&apos;s strategic plan
contains all of the elements required by the Results Act and the Office
of Management and Budget&apos;s associated guidance, but these elements
generally lack the clarity, specificity, and linkage with one another
that the act envisioned; (12) although the plan identifies key external
factors that could affect the Fund&apos;s mission, it does not relate these
factors to the Fund&apos;s strategic goals and objectives and does not
indicate how the Fund will take the factors into account when assessing
awardees&apos; progress toward goals; and (13) in addition, the plan does not
describe the relationship of its activities to similar activities in
other government agencies.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-98-229</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-229</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-98-229; Community Development: Early Results of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund&apos;s Programs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Economic development</topic>
 <topic>Economically depressed areas</topic>
 <topic>Community development</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Lending institutions</topic>
 <topic>Community Development Financial Institutions Fund</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 325 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-325</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>