<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180393342">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-04</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-98-215</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180393342</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98215t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-98-215</reportNumber>
 <subject>Airline regulation</subject>
 <subject>Competition</subject>
 <subject>Airline industry</subject>
 <subject>Antitrust law</subject>
 <subject>Marketing</subject>
 <subject>Airports</subject>
 <subject>Commercial aviation</subject>
 <subject>Air transportation operations</subject>
 <identifier>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DC)</identifier>
 <identifier>LaGuardia International Airport (New York, NY)</identifier>
 <identifier>Newark International Airport (NJ)</identifier>
 <identifier>Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (Detroit, MI)</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Aviation Competition: Proposed Domestic Airline Alliances Raise Serious Issues</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the potential impact of the alliances proposed by the
nation&apos;s six largest airlines, focusing on the competitive implications
of the proposed alliances, including: (1) their potential benefits to
consumers; (2) their potential harm to consumers; and (3) the issues
that policymakers need to consider in evaluating the net effects of the
proposed alliances.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the primary potential benefits of the proposed
alliances for consumers, according to airline officials, are the
additional destinations and frequencies that occur when alliance
partners join route networks by code-sharing; (2) with code-sharing, an
airline can market its alliance partner&apos;s flights as its own and,
without adding any planes, increase the number of destinations and the
frequency of the flights it can offer; (3) airline officials also
predict that increased frequencies and connection opportunities will
spur additional demand, allowing for even more frequent flights and
additional destinations; (4) the primary source of potential harm to
consumers from the proposed alliances is the possibility that they will
reduce competition on hundreds of domestic routes if the alliance
partners do not compete with each other or compete less vigorously than
they did when they were unaffiliated; (5) GAO analyzed 1997 data on the
5,000 busiest domestic airport-pair origin and destination
markets--markets for air travel between two airports--to determine how
these markets could be affected by the proposed alliances; (6) if all
three alliances occur, GAO found that the number of independent airlines
could decline on 1,836 of the 5,000 most frequently traveled domestic
airline routes and potentially reduce competition for about 100 million
of the 396 million domestic passengers per year; (7) in weighing the net
effects of the proposed alliances, policymakers in the Department of
Justice and the Department of Transportation have a difficult task
because each alliance varies in its level of integration and in the
scope and breadth of the combined networks; (8) however, GAO believes
that if several key issues are addressed, policymakers will be better
able to determine whether an alliance benefits consumers overall; (9)
the first issue is whether airline partners&apos; assumptions concerning the
additional traffic and other benefits generated by the alliance are
realistic; (10) second, it will be critical to determine if an alliance
retains or reduces incentives for alliance partners to compete on price;
and (11) if an alliance agreement reduces the incentives for partners to
compete with fares in markets they both serve, then policymakers may
want to examine the overlap in the alliance partners&apos; route structures
to determine whether that alliance would lead to a significant number of
routes with fewer independent airlines.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-98-215</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-98-215</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-98-215; Aviation Competition: Proposed Domestic Airline Alliances Raise Serious Issues;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Airline regulation</topic>
 <topic>Competition</topic>
 <topic>Airline industry</topic>
 <topic>Antitrust law</topic>
 <topic>Marketing</topic>
 <topic>Airports</topic>
 <topic>Commercial aviation</topic>
 <topic>Air transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DC)</topic>
 <topic>LaGuardia International Airport (New York, NY)</topic>
 <topic>Newark International Airport (NJ)</topic>
 <topic>Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (Detroit, MI)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>