<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037d77b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02-22</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-95-111</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037d77b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:trc95111</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-95-111</reportNumber>
 <subject>Independent regulatory commissions</subject>
 <subject>Motor carrier operations</subject>
 <subject>Railroad transportation operations</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Interstate commerce</subject>
 <subject>Railroad regulation</subject>
 <subject>Transportation industry</subject>
 <subject>Transportation rates</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Interstate Commerce Commission: Budget and Other Impacts of Eliminating or Transferring Functions</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>If Congress were to repeal the Interstate Commerce Act and eliminate the
Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the budget savings would total $39
million.  Virtually all the options GAO reviewed for transferring ICC&apos;s
functions offer opportunities for savings--ranging from $16 million to
$28 million.  Of potentially greater significance, however, is the issue
of how ICC&apos;s remaining regulatory functions would be handled in the
future. If Congress decides that there is still a need for a high degree
of independence and the application of substantial expertise in carrying
out the remaining regulatory processes, a merger with the Federal
Maritime Commission or incorporating the functions into the
Transportation Department under a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission-like model might be preferable.  On the other hand, if
Congress decides that an independent regulatory agency is no longer
necessary, then greater savings might be realized by integrating the
remaining ICC functions into the Transportation Department or by
dividing them among several agencies.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-95-111</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-95-111</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-95-111; Interstate Commerce Commission: Budget and Other Impacts of Eliminating or Transferring Functions;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Independent regulatory commissions</topic>
 <topic>Motor carrier operations</topic>
 <topic>Railroad transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Interstate commerce</topic>
 <topic>Railroad regulation</topic>
 <topic>Transportation industry</topic>
 <topic>Transportation rates</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
</subject>
</mods>