<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a1f28">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>16 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-00-233</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a1f28</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00233t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-00-233</reportNumber>
 <subject>Water pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Pollution monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Water quality</subject>
 <subject>Environmental legislation</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Agency proceedings</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <identifier>EPA Total Maximum Daily Loads Program</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Water Quality Inventory</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed proposed revisions to
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to clean up polluted
waters, focusing on: (1) the reasonableness of EPA&apos;s economic analyses
for the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act; and (2) whether EPA&apos;s determinations under the two
proposed regulations were adequately supported.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) limitations with EPA&apos;s economic analyses of the
proposed regulations for the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs raise
questions about their reasonableness and about the determinations that
EPA has based on them; (2) of particular consequence, the outcomes of
the analyses were heavily influenced by a number of key assumptions; (3)
among the most important of these assumptions was that states are
essentially in full compliance with current regulations, or will be as a
result of existing statutory and regulatory requirements; (4) therefore,
EPA included in its estimate only the costs that would result from the
new requirements in the proposed regulations and not the costs of doing
TMDLs generally; (5) however, compliance with existing TMDL regulations
has been problematic, and future compliance in the absence of the
proposed regulation is uncertain; (6) GAO found similar uncertainties
with key baseline assumptions that affect the cost estimates associated
with the proposed NPDES regulation; (7) another key limitation of the
analyses was that they did not sufficiently recognize that the key water
quality data available to EPA to identify the number of waters not
meeting standards (and, hence, the number of TMDLs that will be needed)
are incomplete, inconsistently collected by states, and sometimes based
on outdated and unconfirmed sources; (8) as a result of these
limitations, EPA&apos;s cost estimates are subject to substantial
uncertainty; (9) under these circumstances, it would have been
appropriate for EPA to assess the effect of different assumptions on the
agency&apos;s cost estimates; (10) had it done so, the agency would likely
have produced a range of possible costs exceeding those included in its
analyses; (11) given the uncertainties surrounding EPA&apos;s cost estimates,
GAO disagrees with EPA that the agency&apos;s analyses adequately supported
its determinations under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 that
more detailed analyses of costs, benefits, and alternatives were not
needed for either of the proposed regulations; and (12) in the case of
the requirements for additional analyses under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, case law supports EPA&apos;s determination that because its
proposed revisions to both regulations do not directly regulate small
entities, additional analyses were not required.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-00-233</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-233</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-00-233; Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Water pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Pollution monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Water quality</topic>
 <topic>Environmental legislation</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Agency proceedings</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>EPA Total Maximum Daily Loads Program</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Water Quality Inventory</topic>
</subject>
</mods>