<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038e885">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-03-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>14 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-RCED-00-125</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038e885</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00125t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-RCED-00-125</reportNumber>
 <subject>Commercial aviation</subject>
 <subject>Facility security</subject>
 <subject>Airline industry</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Accident prevention</subject>
 <subject>Terrorism</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Transportation safety</subject>
 <subject>Airports</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <identifier>FAA Threat Image Projection System</identifier>
 <identifier>Belgium</identifier>
 <identifier>Canada</identifier>
 <identifier>France</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <identifier>Netherlands</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Aviation Security: Slow Progress in Addressing</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed airport screeners&apos;
role in enforcing aviation security, focusing on: (1) the causes of
screener performance problems in detecting threat objects; (2) the
status of efforts being made by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) to address these causes; and (3) the screening practices in five
other countries as compared with the United States.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) two important causes for the screeners&apos; performance
problems are the rapid turnover among screeners and human factors issues
involved in their work; (2) turnover exceeds 100 percent a year at most
large airports and at one airport has topped 400 percent, leaving few
screeners with much experience at the checkpoints; (3) the main reason
for this turnover is the low wages and few benefits screeners receive;
(4) the human factors issues have not been addressed sufficiently; (5)
FAA has several interrelated initiatives underway to address the causes
of the screeners&apos; performance problems, including establishing a
screening company certification program and a system for the automated
monitoring of screeners&apos; performance, and has established goals for
improving performance; (6) however, these initiatives have not been
fully implemented and are behind schedule; (7) other countries GAO
visited conduct their checkpoint screening differently; (8) these
operations include: (a) conducting routine pat-downs of some passengers;
(b) requiring screeners to have more extensive qualifications and to
meet higher standards; and (c) paying screeners more and providing
benefits; and (d) placing the responsibility for screening with airports
or the government instead of with air carriers; (9) the five countries
GAO visited had significantly lower screener turnover and may have
better screener performance--one country&apos;s screeners detected over twice
as many objects in a joint screener testing program it conducted with
the FAA; (10) it must be recognized that the screeners&apos; performance
problems do not fall solely on FAA&apos;s shoulders; (11) the responsibility
for certain conditions more appropriately rests with the air carriers
and screening companies; (12) nevertheless, FAA does have leadership
responsibility for aviation security, and it will be up to the agency to
provide the guidance and motivation for improving the performance of
screeners; (13) the actions FAA has underway are strong steps in the
right direction and, when fully implemented, may provide the needed
improvement; (14) it is critical that Congress maintain vigilant
oversight of FAA&apos;s efforts to ensure that it implements these actions in
a timely manner and achieves its performance improvement goals; and (15)
if performance improvements are not achieved, FAA and Congress may need
to consider other alternatives--such as some of the practices being used
by other countries--to improve the screeners&apos; performance.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125/html/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-RCED-00-125</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-RCED-00-125</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-RCED-00-125; Aviation Security: Slow Progress in Addressing;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Commercial aviation</topic>
 <topic>Facility security</topic>
 <topic>Airline industry</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Accident prevention</topic>
 <topic>Terrorism</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Transportation safety</topic>
 <topic>Airports</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>FAA Threat Image Projection System</topic>
 <topic>Belgium</topic>
 <topic>Canada</topic>
 <topic>France</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
 <topic>Netherlands</topic>
</subject>
</mods>