<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038e5b6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Program Evaluation and Methodology Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-05-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>17 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-PEMD-96-9</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038e5b6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:pe96009t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-PEMD-96-9</reportNumber>
 <subject>Drugs</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Pharmacological research</subject>
 <subject>Product safety</subject>
 <subject>Consumer protection</subject>
 <subject>Regulatory agencies</subject>
 <subject>Food and drug law</subject>
 <subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject>
 <subject>Safety regulation</subject>
 <subject>Product performance evaluation</subject>
 <identifier>European Union</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>PEMD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="102" isPrivate="false" number="571"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>FDA Review Times</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO examined the Food and Drug Administration&apos;s (FDA) drug review and
approval times, focusing on: (1) whether the timeliness of new drug
reviews and approvals has changed; and (2) how approval times in the
United States compare with those in the United Kingdom (UK). GAO found
that: (1) new drug applications (NDA) are moving more quickly through
the review and approval process; (2) the time taken for NDA approvals
has decreased from 33 months in 1987 to 19 months in 1992; (3) the
priority FDA assigns to NDA and the experience of application sponsors
affect the timeliness of NDA decisions; (4) FDA assigns priority status
to those applications expected to provide greater therapeutic relief;
(5) NDA are approved 10 months faster than standard applications; (6)
FDA made timely decisions on 67 percent of NDA between 1987 and 1993;
(7) the on-time percentage for NDA is relatively stable and varies
between a low of 62 percent to a high of 72 percent; (8) there is little
relationship between the time FDA takes to reach a final decision and
whether or not it meets a specific action deadline; (9) sponsors account
for 20 percent of the time in NDA approval; (10) UK approval times are
similar to the United States&apos; and average 56 working days; (11) UK
granted licenses for applications representing 32 new active substances
during the 12-month period examined; and (13) it is too early to
determine whether the European Union&apos;s new method of drug approval will
ensure more efficient review while ensuring product safety.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9/html/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-PEMD-96-9</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-PEMD-96-9</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-PEMD-96-9; FDA Review Times;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Drugs</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Pharmacological research</topic>
 <topic>Product safety</topic>
 <topic>Consumer protection</topic>
 <topic>Regulatory agencies</topic>
 <topic>Food and drug law</topic>
 <topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic>
 <topic>Safety regulation</topic>
 <topic>Product performance evaluation</topic>
 <topic>European Union</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 571 (102nd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 102-571</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>