<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039e64c">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-05-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-NSIAD-95-162</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039e64c</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:tns95162</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-NSIAD-95-162</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear powered submarines</subject>
 <subject>Shipyards</subject>
 <subject>Shipbuilding industry</subject>
 <subject>Navy procurement</subject>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Antisubmarine warfare</subject>
 <subject>Combat readiness</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Naval warfare</subject>
 <identifier>SSN-23 Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>SSN-688 Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>SSN-688I Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>Seawolf Attack Submarine</identifier>
 <identifier>Russia</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Bottom-Up Review</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Navy Shipbuilding Programs: Nuclear Attack Submarine Issues</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>This testimony on production of the Navy&apos;s nuclear attack submarines
makes three main points.  First, alternatives to the Navy&apos;s approach to
maintain the required SSN force structure could save billions of dollars
and meet the Navy&apos;s force structure and threat requirements.  Second,
there is agreement within the intelligence community that Russia&apos;s
frontline submarines are for the first time as quiet as or quieter than
the SSN-688I and that Russia plans to continue reducing radiated noise
levels on its submarines.  Third, although the Navy argues that
maintaining two nuclear shipbuilders preserves competition and hedges
against future uncertainties, GAO concludes that consolidating
production at a single shipyard would cut costs dramatically.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162/html/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-NSIAD-95-162</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-95-162</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-NSIAD-95-162; Navy Shipbuilding Programs: Nuclear Attack Submarine Issues;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear powered submarines</topic>
 <topic>Shipyards</topic>
 <topic>Shipbuilding industry</topic>
 <topic>Navy procurement</topic>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Antisubmarine warfare</topic>
 <topic>Combat readiness</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Naval warfare</topic>
 <topic>SSN-23 Submarine</topic>
 <topic>SSN-688 Submarine</topic>
 <topic>SSN-688I Submarine</topic>
 <topic>Seawolf Attack Submarine</topic>
 <topic>Russia</topic>
 <topic>DOD Bottom-Up Review</topic>
</subject>
</mods>