<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a4544">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-04-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-NSIAD-94-166</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a4544</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:tns94166</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-NSIAD-94-166</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Defense contracts</subject>
 <subject>Claims settlement</subject>
 <subject>Contractor performance</subject>
 <subject>Contract monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Life cycle costs</subject>
 <subject>Expense claims</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <subject>Contract specifications</subject>
 <identifier>C-17 Aircraft</identifier>
 <identifier>C-5B Aircraft</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Airlift: The C-17 Program Update and Proposed Settlement</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The recent settlement between the Pentagon and McDonnell Douglas on the
troubled C-17 transport plane is not a good deal for the government,
which will have to waive all potential financial claims against the
aircraft maker, lower the C-17&apos;s performance standards, and pay more for
fewer aircraft.  To acquire 120 aircraft will now cost an estimated $43
billion--$1.3 billion more than the Pentagon&apos;s last estimate to acquire
210 aircraft.  In an effort to overcome the contentious relationship
between the government and the contractor, the government has agreed to
waive all of its potential claims arising from the contractor&apos;s failure
to meet the original contract specifications and delivery schedule,
without establishing the value of those claims.  The government also
agreed to resolve filed and unfiled contractors&apos; claims by adding $237
million to the contract price.  Department of Defense (DOD) officials
acknowledge that the claims were never subjected to a full legal or
price analysis.  At the same time, McDonnell Douglas&apos; out-of-pocket
expenses are hundreds of millions of dollars less than the agreement
implies. GAO urges DOD to determine immediately the minimum number of
C-17s needed and pursue a strategy to acquire alternative wide-body
aircraft that can meet its needs.  DOD, in deciding whether to continue
the program, also needs to establish specific cost-schedule, and
performance criteria to evaluate improvement in the contract&apos;s
performance.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166/html/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-NSIAD-94-166</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-166</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-NSIAD-94-166; Military Airlift: The C-17 Program Update and Proposed Settlement;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Defense contracts</topic>
 <topic>Claims settlement</topic>
 <topic>Contractor performance</topic>
 <topic>Contract monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Life cycle costs</topic>
 <topic>Expense claims</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>Contract specifications</topic>
 <topic>C-17 Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>C-5B Aircraft</topic>
</subject>
</mods>